930a7c2a | 16-Jan-2022 |
Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> |
compiler-rt: re-exec with ASLR disabled when necessary
Some sanitizers (at least msan) currently require ASLR to be disabled. When we detect that ASLR is enabled, re-exec with it disabled rather tha
compiler-rt: re-exec with ASLR disabled when necessary
Some sanitizers (at least msan) currently require ASLR to be disabled. When we detect that ASLR is enabled, re-exec with it disabled rather than exiting with an error. See LLVM GitHub issue 53256 for more detail: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53256
No objection: dim MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33934
show more ...
|
0faeaeed | 06-Aug-2020 |
Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> |
r356104 | jhibbits | 2019-12-27 00:06:28 +0100 (Fri, 27 Dec 2019) | 25 lines
[PowerPC] enable atomic.c in compiler_rt and do not check and forces lock/lock_free decisions in compiled time
Summary:
r356104 | jhibbits | 2019-12-27 00:06:28 +0100 (Fri, 27 Dec 2019) | 25 lines
[PowerPC] enable atomic.c in compiler_rt and do not check and forces lock/lock_free decisions in compiled time
Summary: Enables atomic.c in compiler_rt and forces clang to not emit a call for runtime decision about lock/lock_free. At compiling time, if clang can't decide if atomic operation can be lock free, it emits calls to external functions like `__atomic_is_lock_free`, `__c11_atomic_is_lock_free` and `__atomic_always_lock_free`, postponing decision to a runtime check. According to LLVM code documentation, the mechanism exists due to differences between x86_64 processors that can't be decided at runtime.
On PowerPC and PowerPCSPE (32 bits), we already know in advance it can't be lock free, so we force the decision at compile time and avoid having to implement it in an external library.
This patch was made after 32 bit users testing the PowePC32 bit ISO reported llvm could not be compiled with in-base llvm due to `__atomic_load8` not implemented.
Submitted by: alfredo.junior_eldorado.org.br Reviewed by: jhibbits, dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22549
show more ...
|
998a72c5 | 06-Aug-2020 |
Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> |
Reapply r354347 (by cem):
Fix llvm-libunwind userspace build on ARM
GCC's libgcc exports a few ARM-specific symbols for ARM EABI, AEABI, or EHABI or whatever it's called. Export the same ones from
Reapply r354347 (by cem):
Fix llvm-libunwind userspace build on ARM
GCC's libgcc exports a few ARM-specific symbols for ARM EABI, AEABI, or EHABI or whatever it's called. Export the same ones from LLVM-libunwind's libgcc_s, on ARM. As part of this, convert libgcc_s from a direct Version.map to one constructed from component Symbol.map files. This allows the ARM-specific Symbol.map to be included only on ARM.
Fix ARM-only oddities in struct name/aliases in LLVM-libunwind to match non-ARM definitions and ARM-specific expectations in libcxxrt / libcompiler_rt.
No functional change intended for non-ARM architectures.
This commit does not actually flip the switch for ARM defaults from libgcc to llvm-libunwind, but makes it possible (to compile, anyway).
show more ...
|