| cf72bc48 | 08-Dec-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/virt/tdx: Get module global metadata for module initialization
The TDX module global metadata provides system-wide information about
the module.
TL;DR:
Use the TDH.SYS.RD SEAMCALL to tell if t
x86/virt/tdx: Get module global metadata for module initialization
The TDX module global metadata provides system-wide information about
the module.
TL;DR:
Use the TDH.SYS.RD SEAMCALL to tell if the module is good or not.
Long Version:
1) Only initialize TDX module with version 1.5 and later
TDX module 1.0 has some compatibility issues with the later versions of
module, as documented in the "Intel TDX module ABI incompatibilities
between TDX1.0 and TDX1.5" spec. Don't bother with module versions that
do not have a stable ABI.
2) Get the essential global metadata for module initialization
TDX reports a list of "Convertible Memory Region" (CMR) to tell the
kernel which memory is TDX compatible. The kernel needs to build a list
of memory regions (out of CMRs) as "TDX-usable" memory and pass them to
the TDX module. The kernel does this by constructing a list of "TD
Memory Regions" (TDMRs) to cover all these memory regions and passing
them to the TDX module.
Each TDMR is a TDX architectural data structure containing the memory
region that the TDMR covers, plus the information to track (within this
TDMR):
a) the "Physical Address Metadata Table" (PAMT) to track each TDX
memory page's status (such as which TDX guest "owns" a given page,
and
b) the "reserved areas" to tell memory holes that cannot be used as
TDX memory.
The kernel needs to get below metadata from the TDX module to build the
list of TDMRs:
a) the maximum number of supported TDMRs
b) the maximum number of supported reserved areas per TDMR and,
c) the PAMT entry size for each TDX-supported page size.
== Implementation ==
The TDX module has two modes of fetching the metadata: a one field at
a time, or all in one blob. Use the field at a time for now. It is
slower, but there just are not enough fields now to justify the
complexity of extra unpacking.
The err_free_tdxmem=>out_put_tdxmem goto looks wonky by itself. But
it is the first of a bunch of error handling that will get stuck at
its site.
[ dhansen: clean up changelog and add a struct to map between
the TDX module fields and 'struct tdx_tdmr_sysinfo' ]
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231208170740.53979-8-dave.hansen%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 518755a7 | 18-Sep-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Fix __noreturn build warning around __tdx_hypercall_failed()
LKP reported below build warning:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x128: __tdx_hypercall_failed() is missing a _
x86/tdx: Fix __noreturn build warning around __tdx_hypercall_failed()
LKP reported below build warning:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x128: __tdx_hypercall_failed() is missing a __noreturn annotation
The __tdx_hypercall_failed() function definition already has __noreturn
annotation, but it turns out the __noreturn must be annotated to the
function declaration.
PeterZ explains:
"FWIW, the reason being that...
The point of noreturn is that the caller should know to stop generating
code. For that the declaration needs the attribute, because call sites
typically do not have access to the function definition in C."
Add __noreturn annotation to the declaration of __tdx_hypercall_failed()
to fix. It's not a bad idea to document the __noreturn nature at the
definition site either, so keep the annotation at the definition.
Note <asm/shared/tdx.h> is also included by TDX related assembly files.
Include <linux/compiler_attributes.h> only in case of !__ASSEMBLY__
otherwise compiling assembly file would trigger build error.
Also, following the objtool documentation, add __tdx_hypercall_failed()
to "tools/objtool/noreturns.h".
Fixes: c641cfb5c157 ("x86/tdx: Make TDX_HYPERCALL asm similar to TDX_MODULE_CALL")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918041858.331234-1-kai.huang@intel.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309140828.9RdmlH2Z-lkp@intel.com/
show more ...
|
| 8a8544bd | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Remove 'struct tdx_hypercall_args'
Now 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' is basically 'struct tdx_module_args'
minus RCX. Although from __tdx_hypercall()'s perspective RCX isn't
used as shared r
x86/tdx: Remove 'struct tdx_hypercall_args'
Now 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' is basically 'struct tdx_module_args'
minus RCX. Although from __tdx_hypercall()'s perspective RCX isn't
used as shared register thus not part of input/output registers, it's
not worth to have a separate structure just due to one register.
Remove the 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' and use 'struct tdx_module_args'
instead in __tdx_hypercall() related code. This also saves the memory
copy between the two structures within __tdx_hypercall().
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/798dad5ce24e9d745cf0e16825b75ccc433ad065.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 90f5ecd3 | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Reimplement __tdx_hypercall() using TDX_MODULE_CALL asm
Now the TDX_HYPERCALL asm is basically identical to the TDX_MODULE_CALL
with both '\saved' and '\ret' enabled, with two minor things
x86/tdx: Reimplement __tdx_hypercall() using TDX_MODULE_CALL asm
Now the TDX_HYPERCALL asm is basically identical to the TDX_MODULE_CALL
with both '\saved' and '\ret' enabled, with two minor things though:
1) The way to restore the structure pointer is different
The TDX_HYPERCALL uses RCX as spare to restore the structure pointer,
but the TDX_MODULE_CALL assumes no spare register can be used. In other
words, TDX_MODULE_CALL already covers what TDX_HYPERCALL does.
2) TDX_MODULE_CALL only clears shared registers for TDH.VP.ENTER
For this just need to make that code available for the non-host case.
Thus, remove the TDX_HYPERCALL and reimplement the __tdx_hypercall()
using the TDX_MODULE_CALL.
Extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL to cover "clear shared registers" for
TDG.VP.VMCALL. Introduce a new __tdcall_saved_ret() to replace the
temporary __tdcall_hypercall().
The __tdcall_saved_ret() can also be used for those new TDCALLs which
require more input/output registers than the basic TDCALLs do.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e68a2473fb6f5bcd78b078cae7510e9d0753b3df.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| c641cfb5 | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Make TDX_HYPERCALL asm similar to TDX_MODULE_CALL
Now the 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' and 'struct tdx_module_args' are
almost the same, and the TDX_HYPERCALL and TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro
s
x86/tdx: Make TDX_HYPERCALL asm similar to TDX_MODULE_CALL
Now the 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' and 'struct tdx_module_args' are
almost the same, and the TDX_HYPERCALL and TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro
share similar code pattern too. The __tdx_hypercall() and __tdcall()
should be unified to use the same assembly code.
As a preparation to unify them, simplify the TDX_HYPERCALL to make it
more like the TDX_MODULE_CALL.
The TDX_HYPERCALL takes the pointer of 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' as
function call argument, and does below extra things comparing to the
TDX_MODULE_CALL:
1) It sets RAX to 0 (TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf) internally;
2) It sets RCX to the (fixed) bitmap of shared registers internally;
3) It calls __tdx_hypercall_failed() internally (and panics) when the
TDCALL instruction itself fails;
4) After TDCALL, it moves R10 to RAX to return the return code of the
VMCALL leaf, regardless the '\ret' asm macro argument;
Firstly, change the TDX_HYPERCALL to take the same function call
arguments as the TDX_MODULE_CALL does: TDCALL leaf ID, and the pointer
to 'struct tdx_module_args'. Then 1) and 2) can be moved to the
caller:
- TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf ID can be passed via the function call argument;
- 'struct tdx_module_args' is 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' + RCX, thus
the bitmap of shared registers can be passed via RCX in the
structure.
Secondly, to move 3) and 4) out of assembly, make the TDX_HYPERCALL
always save output registers to the structure. The caller then can:
- Call __tdx_hypercall_failed() when TDX_HYPERCALL returns error;
- Return R10 in the structure as the return code of the VMCALL leaf;
With above changes, change the asm function from __tdx_hypercall() to
__tdcall_hypercall(), and reimplement __tdx_hypercall() as the C wrapper
of it. This avoids having to add another wrapper of __tdx_hypercall()
(_tdx_hypercall() is already taken).
The __tdcall_hypercall() will be replaced with a __tdcall() variant
using TDX_MODULE_CALL in a later commit as the final goal is to have one
assembly to handle both TDCALL and TDVMCALL.
Currently, the __tdx_hypercall() asm is in '.noinstr.text'. To keep
this unchanged, annotate __tdx_hypercall(), which is a C function now,
as 'noinstr'.
Remove the __tdx_hypercall_ret() as __tdx_hypercall() already does so.
Implement __tdx_hypercall() in tdx-shared.c so it can be shared with the
compressed code.
Opportunistically fix a checkpatch error complaining using space around
parenthesis '(' and ')' while moving the bitmap of shared registers to
<asm/shared/tdx.h>.
[ dhansen: quash new calls of __tdx_hypercall_ret() that showed up ]
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0cbf25e7aee3256288045023a31f65f0cef90af4.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 12f34ed8 | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Extend TDX_MODULE_CALL to support more TDCALL/SEAMCALL leafs
The TDX guest live migration support (TDX 1.5) adds new TDCALL/SEAMCALL
leaf functions. Those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs take additi
x86/tdx: Extend TDX_MODULE_CALL to support more TDCALL/SEAMCALL leafs
The TDX guest live migration support (TDX 1.5) adds new TDCALL/SEAMCALL
leaf functions. Those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs take additional registers
for input (R10-R13) and output (R12-R13). TDG.SERVTD.RD is an example.
Also, the current TDX_MODULE_CALL doesn't aim to handle TDH.VP.ENTER
SEAMCALL, which monitors the TDG.VP.VMCALL in input/output registers
when it returns in case of VMCALL from TDX guest.
With those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and the TDH.VP.ENTER covered, the
TDX_MODULE_CALL macro basically needs to handle the same input/output
registers as the TDX_HYPERCALL does. And as a result, they also share
similar logic in the assembly, thus should be unified to use one common
assembly.
Extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm to support the new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and
also the TDH.VP.ENTER SEAMCALL. Eventually it will be unified with the
TDX_HYPERCALL.
The new input/output registers fit with the "callee-saved" registers in
the x86 calling convention. Add a new "saved" parameter to support
those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and TDH.VP.ENTER and keep the existing
TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs minimally impacted.
For TDH.VP.ENTER, after it returns the registers shared by the guest
contain guest's values. Explicitly clear them to prevent speculative
use of guest's values.
Note most TDX live migration related SEAMCALLs may also clobber AVX*
state ("AVX, AVX2 and AVX512 state: may be reset to the architectural
INIT state" -- see TDH.EXPORT.MEM for example). And TDH.VP.ENTER also
clobbers XMM0-XMM15 when the corresponding bit is set in RCX. Don't
handle them in the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro but let the caller save and
restore when needed.
This is basically based on Peter's code.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d4785de7c392f7c5684407f6c24a73b92148ec49.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 57a420bb | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Pass TDCALL/SEAMCALL input/output registers via a structure
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro, which handles both TDCALL and
SEAMCALL, takes one parameter for each input register and
x86/tdx: Pass TDCALL/SEAMCALL input/output registers via a structure
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro, which handles both TDCALL and
SEAMCALL, takes one parameter for each input register and an optional
'struct tdx_module_output' (a collection of output registers) as output.
This is different from the TDX_HYPERCALL macro which uses a single
'struct tdx_hypercall_args' to carry all input/output registers.
The newer TDX versions introduce more TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs which use more
input/output registers. Also, the TDH.VP.ENTER (which isn't covered
by the current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro) basically can use all registers
that the TDX_HYPERCALL does. The current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro isn't
extendible to cover those cases.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, simplify the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro
to use a single structure 'struct tdx_module_args' to carry all the
input/output registers. Currently, R10/R11 are only used as output
register but not as input by any TDCALL/SEAMCALL. Change to also use
R10/R11 as input register to make input/output registers symmetric.
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro depends on the caller to pass a
non-NULL 'struct tdx_module_output' to get additional output registers.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, change the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro to
take a new 'ret' macro argument to indicate whether to save the output
registers to the 'struct tdx_module_args'. Also introduce a new
__tdcall_ret() for that purpose, similar to the __tdx_hypercall_ret().
Note the tdcall(), which is a wrapper of __tdcall(), is called by three
callers: tdx_parse_tdinfo(), tdx_get_ve_info() and tdx_early_init().
The former two need the additional output but the last one doesn't. For
simplicity, make tdcall() always call __tdcall_ret() to avoid another
"_ret()" wrapper. The last caller tdx_early_init() isn't performance
critical anyway.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/483616c1762d85eb3a3c3035a7de061cfacf2f14.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 5efb9628 | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Rename __tdx_module_call() to __tdcall()
__tdx_module_call() is only used by the TDX guest to issue TDCALL to the
TDX module. Rename it to __tdcall() to match its behaviour, e.g., it
canno
x86/tdx: Rename __tdx_module_call() to __tdcall()
__tdx_module_call() is only used by the TDX guest to issue TDCALL to the
TDX module. Rename it to __tdcall() to match its behaviour, e.g., it
cannot be used to make host-side SEAMCALL.
Also rename tdx_module_call() which is a wrapper of __tdx_module_call()
to tdcall().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/785d20d99fbcd0db8262c94da6423375422d8c75.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| f0024dbf | 15-Aug-2023 |
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> |
x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec
The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel
doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but u
x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec
The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel
doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
prefix "TDX_" for all of them. Although it's arguable whether the TDX
spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
the spec when naming those macros.
Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec. As
a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
which all have prefix "TDH".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/516dccd0bd8fb9a0b6af30d25bb2d971aa03d598.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
show more ...
|
| 6a123d6a | 12-Jan-2023 |
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
cpuidle, ACPI: Make noinstr clean
objtool found cases where ACPI methods called out into instrumentation code:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: io_idle+0xc: call to __inb.isra.0() leaves .noinstr.tex
cpuidle, ACPI: Make noinstr clean
objtool found cases where ACPI methods called out into instrumentation code:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: io_idle+0xc: call to __inb.isra.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: acpi_idle_enter+0xfe: call to num_online_cpus() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: acpi_idle_enter+0x115: call to acpi_idle_fallback_to_c1.isra.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fix this by: marking the IO in/out, acpi_idle_fallback_to_c1() and
num_online_cpus() methods as __always_inline.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.294846301@infradead.org
show more ...
|
| 4c5b9aac | 06-Apr-2022 |
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
x86/boot: Port I/O: Add decompression-time support for TDX
Port I/O instructions trigger #VE in the TDX environment. In response to
the exception, kernel emulates these instructions using hypercalls
x86/boot: Port I/O: Add decompression-time support for TDX
Port I/O instructions trigger #VE in the TDX environment. In response to
the exception, kernel emulates these instructions using hypercalls.
But during early boot, on the decompression stage, it is cumbersome to
deal with #VE. It is cleaner to go to hypercalls directly, bypassing #VE
handling.
Hook up TDX-specific port I/O helpers if booting in TDX environment.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-17-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
show more ...
|
| 1e8f93e1 | 06-Apr-2022 |
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
x86: Consolidate port I/O helpers
There are two implementations of port I/O helpers: one in the kernel and
one in the boot stub.
Move the helpers required for both to <asm/shared/io.h> and use the
x86: Consolidate port I/O helpers
There are two implementations of port I/O helpers: one in the kernel and
one in the boot stub.
Move the helpers required for both to <asm/shared/io.h> and use the one
implementation everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-15-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
show more ...
|