| d45224d6 | 27-Feb-2019 |
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> |
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification
Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field
from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notificat
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification
Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field
from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in
the previous patches.
Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev
notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process)
notifier chain.
We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that
requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one
specifically.
Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set()
likewise.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
| 479c86dc | 12-Dec-2018 |
Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> |
net: switchdev: Add extack to struct switchdev_notifier_info
In order to pass extack to the drivers that need it, add an extack field
to struct switchdev_notifier_info, and an extack argument to the
net: switchdev: Add extack to struct switchdev_notifier_info
In order to pass extack to the drivers that need it, add an extack field
to struct switchdev_notifier_info, and an extack argument to the
function call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(). Also add a helper function
switchdev_notifier_info_to_extack().
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
| d17d9f5e | 23-Nov-2018 |
Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> |
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification
Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of
this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev
not
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification
Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of
this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev
notification in the previous patches.
Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev
notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL.
Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function.
Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add()
likewise.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
| f30f0601 | 23-Nov-2018 |
Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> |
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices
After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which
will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices
After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which
will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find
its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers.
The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its
own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it
finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences
lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call.
Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers,
switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If
a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will
simply avoid this layer of indirection.
One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior
is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some
of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP.
The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate
doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports
from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario
that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and
all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver
or not.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
| 29ab586c | 06-Aug-2017 |
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> |
net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from switchdev
Currently the bridge port flags, vlans, FDBs and MDBs can be offloaded
through the bridge code, making the switchdev's SELF bridge bypass
net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from switchdev
Currently the bridge port flags, vlans, FDBs and MDBs can be offloaded
through the bridge code, making the switchdev's SELF bridge bypass
implementation to be redundant. This implies several changes:
- No need for dump infra in switchdev, DSA's special case is handled
privately.
- Remove obj_dump from switchdev_ops.
- FDBs are removed from obj_add/del routines, due to the fact that they
are offloaded through the bridge notification chain.
- The switchdev_port_bridge_xx() and switchdev_port_fdb_xx() functions
can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|