| fbd7a5a0 | 25-Nov-2024 |
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> |
rust: sync: Add lock::Backend::assert_is_held()
Since we've exposed Lock::from_raw() and Guard::new() publically, we
want to be able to make sure that we assert that a lock is actually held
when con
rust: sync: Add lock::Backend::assert_is_held()
Since we've exposed Lock::from_raw() and Guard::new() publically, we
want to be able to make sure that we assert that a lock is actually held
when constructing a Guard for it to handle instances of unsafe
Guard::new() calls outside of our lock module.
Hence add a new method assert_is_held() to Backend, which uses lockdep
to check whether or not a lock has been acquired. When lockdep is
disabled, this has no overhead.
[Boqun: Resolve the conflicts with exposing Guard::new(), reword the
commit log a bit and format "unsafe { <statement>; }" into "unsafe {
<statement> }" for the consistency. ]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241125204139.656801-1-lyude@redhat.com
show more ...
|
| eb5ccb03 | 20-Nov-2024 |
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> |
rust: sync: Add SpinLockGuard type alias
A simple helper alias for code that needs to deal with Guard types returned
from SpinLocks.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice
rust: sync: Add SpinLockGuard type alias
A simple helper alias for code that needs to deal with Guard types returned
from SpinLocks.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241120222742.2490495-3-lyude@redhat.com
show more ...
|
| 00280272 | 01-Apr-2024 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: kernel: remove redundant imports
Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
In the upcoming 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports
[1], e.g.:
rust: kernel: remove redundant imports
Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
In the upcoming 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports
[1], e.g.:
error: the item `bindings` is imported redundantly
--> rust/kernel/print.rs:38:9
|
38 | use crate::bindings;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the item `bindings` is already defined by prelude
Most cases are `use crate::bindings`, plus a few other items like `Box`.
Thus clean them up.
Note that, in the `bindings` case, the message "defined by prelude"
above means the extern prelude, i.e. the `--extern` flags we pass.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772 [1]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401212303.537355-3-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| e283ee23 | 29-Jan-2024 |
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> |
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros
Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which
means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import
it from the path
rust: kernel: add reexports for macros
Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which
means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import
it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the
workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding
reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from
the correct modules.
It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't
think we can do anything about that.
There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness
improvement.
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129145837.1419880-1-aliceryhl@google.com
[ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| e32cca32 | 27-Mar-2023 |
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> |
rust: lock: add `Guard::do_unlocked`
It releases the lock, executes some function provided by the caller,
then reacquires the lock. This is preparation for the implementation of
condvars, which will
rust: lock: add `Guard::do_unlocked`
It releases the lock, executes some function provided by the caller,
then reacquires the lock. This is preparation for the implementation of
condvars, which will sleep after between unlocking and relocking.
We need an explicit `relock` method for primitives like `SpinLock` that
have an irqsave variant: we use the guard state to determine if the lock
was originally acquired with the regular `lock` function or
`lock_irqsave`.
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20230412121431.41627-1-wedsonaf@gmail.com/
[ Removed the irqsave bits as discussed. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| c6d917a4 | 19-Apr-2023 |
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> |
rust: lock: introduce `SpinLock`
This is the `spinlock_t` lock backend and allows Rust code to use the
kernel spinlock idiomatically.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <ming
rust: lock: introduce `SpinLock`
This is the `spinlock_t` lock backend and allows Rust code to use the
kernel spinlock idiomatically.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419174426.132207-1-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|