| edbd489d | 06-Jun-2024 |
Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> |
ctladm: don't require the use of "-p" with "port -r"
When removing a port, the ioctl frontend requires the "-p" argument.
But other frontends, like cfiscsi, do not. So don't require that
argument i
ctladm: don't require the use of "-p" with "port -r"
When removing a port, the ioctl frontend requires the "-p" argument.
But other frontends, like cfiscsi, do not. So don't require that
argument in the ctladm command. The frontend driver will report an
error if any required argument is missing.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: mav
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1279
show more ...
|
| 591de753 | 06-Jun-2024 |
Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> |
ctladm: print port number with a succesful "port -c" command
Make "ctladm port -c" print the port number of the newly successful
port. This way it won't have to be guessed by a subsequent "ctladm
p
ctladm: print port number with a succesful "port -c" command
Make "ctladm port -c" print the port number of the newly successful
port. This way it won't have to be guessed by a subsequent "ctladm
portlist" command. That means it's safe to use it concurrently with
other ctladm processes. In particular, this allows the tests to be run
in parallel.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: mav
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1279
show more ...
|