Reduce Coccinelle choices in string_choices.cocci

The isomorphism neg_if_exp negates the test of a ?: conditional,
making it unnecessary to have an explicit case for a negated test
with the branches

Reduce Coccinelle choices in string_choices.cocci

The isomorphism neg_if_exp negates the test of a ?: conditional,
making it unnecessary to have an explicit case for a negated test
with the branches inverted.

At the same time, we can disable neg_if_exp in cases where a
different API function may be more suitable for a negated test.

Finally, in the non-patch cases, E matches an expression with
parentheses around it, so there is no need to mention ()
explicitly in the pattern. The () are still needed in the patch
cases, because we want to drop them, if they are present.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Remove unnecessary parentheses for only one possible change.

The parentheses are only needed if there is a disjunction, ie a
set of possible changes. If there is only one pattern, we can

coccinelle: Remove unnecessary parentheses for only one possible change.

The parentheses are only needed if there is a disjunction, ie a
set of possible changes. If there is only one pattern, we can
remove these parentheses. Just like the format:

- x
+ y

not:

(
- x
+ y
)

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_yes_no() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_yes_no()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Sign

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_yes_no() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_yes_no()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_on_off() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_on_off()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Sign

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_on_off() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_on_off()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_write_read() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_write_read()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.c

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_write_read() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_write_read()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_read_write() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_read_write()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.c

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_read_write() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_read_write()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_enable{d}_disable{d}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_enable{d}_
disable{d}() to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_enable{d}_disable{d}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_enable{d}_
disable{d}() to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_lo{w}_hi{gh}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_lo{w}_hi{gh}()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huaw

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_lo{w}_hi{gh}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_lo{w}_hi{gh}()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_hi{gh}_lo{w}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_hi{gh}_lo{w}()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huaw

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_hi{gh}_lo{w}() replacements

As other rules done, we add rules for str_hi{gh}_lo{w}()
to check the relative opportunities.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_false_true() replacements

As done with str_true_false(), add checks for str_false_true()
opportunities. A simple test can find over 9 cases currently
exist in the t

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_false_true() replacements

As done with str_true_false(), add checks for str_false_true()
opportunities. A simple test can find over 9 cases currently
exist in the tree.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_true_false() replacements

After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree,
we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false()
can be used. A simple t

coccinelle: Add rules to find str_true_false() replacements

After str_true_false() has been introduced in the tree,
we can add rules for finding places where str_true_false()
can be used. A simple test can find over 10 locations.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

show more ...

[tree-wide] finally take no_llseek out

no_llseek had been defined to NULL two years ago, in commit 868941b14441
("fs: remove no_llseek")

To quote that commit,

At -rc1 we'll need do a mechanical

[tree-wide] finally take no_llseek out

no_llseek had been defined to NULL two years ago, in commit 868941b14441
("fs: remove no_llseek")

To quote that commit,

At -rc1 we'll need do a mechanical removal of no_llseek -

git grep -l -w no_llseek | grep -v porting.rst | while read i; do
sed -i '/\<no_llseek\>/d' $i
done

would do it.

Unfortunately, that hadn't been done. Linus, could you do that now, so
that we could finally put that thing to rest? All instances are of the
form
.llseek = no_llseek,
so it's obviously safe.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...