| b213eb34 | 14-Jul-2025 |
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com> |
drm/tidss: oldi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
DRM bridges now use "devm_drm_bridge_alloc()" for allocation and
initialization. "devm_kzalloc()" is not allowed anymore and it results
in WAR
drm/tidss: oldi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
DRM bridges now use "devm_drm_bridge_alloc()" for allocation and
initialization. "devm_kzalloc()" is not allowed anymore and it results
in WARNING. So convert it.
Fixes: 7246e0929945 ("drm/tidss: Add OLDI bridge support")
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250714104554.13441-1-j-choudhary@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
show more ...
|
| 7246e092 | 28-May-2025 |
Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com> |
drm/tidss: Add OLDI bridge support
The AM62x and AM62Px SoCs feature 2 OLDI TXes each, which makes it
possible to connect them in dual-link or cloned single-link OLDI display
modes. The current OLDI
drm/tidss: Add OLDI bridge support
The AM62x and AM62Px SoCs feature 2 OLDI TXes each, which makes it
possible to connect them in dual-link or cloned single-link OLDI display
modes. The current OLDI support in tidss_dispc.c can only support for
a single OLDI TX, connected to a VP and doesn't really support
configuration of OLDIs in the other modes. The current OLDI support in
tidss_dispc.c also works on the principle that the OLDI output can only
be served by one, and only one, DSS video-port. This isn't the case in
the AM62Px SoC, where there are 2 DSS controllers present that share the
OLDI TXes.
Having their own devicetree and their own bridge entity will help
support the various display modes and sharing possiblilities of the OLDI
hardware.
For all these reasons, add support for the OLDI TXes as DRM bridges.
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org> # on am67a
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250528122544.817829-5-aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
show more ...
|
| 46a7c081 | 07-May-2025 |
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com> |
drm/tidss: Add support for AM62L display subsystem
Enable display for AM62L DSS [1] which supports only a single display
pipeline using a single overlay manager, single video port and a single
video
drm/tidss: Add support for AM62L display subsystem
Enable display for AM62L DSS [1] which supports only a single display
pipeline using a single overlay manager, single video port and a single
video lite pipeline which does not support scaling.
The output of video port is routed to SoC boundary via DPI interface and
the DPI signals from the video port are also routed to DSI Tx controller
present within the SoC.
[1]: Section 11.7 (Display Subsystem and Peripherals)
Link : https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprujb4
Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250507180631.874930-4-devarsht@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
show more ...
|
| 78f5685f | 21-Oct-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Rename 'wait_lock' to 'irq_lock'
The 'wait_lock' name seems to be a copy-paste from omapdrm, and makes no
sense here. Rename it to 'irq_lock'. Also clarify the related comment to
make it
drm/tidss: Rename 'wait_lock' to 'irq_lock'
The 'wait_lock' name seems to be a copy-paste from omapdrm, and makes no
sense here. Rename it to 'irq_lock'. Also clarify the related comment to
make it clear what it protects, and drop any comments related to
'wait_list' which doesn't exist in tidss.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-7-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| a9a73f26 | 21-Oct-2024 |
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com> |
drm/tidss: Fix race condition while handling interrupt registers
The driver has a spinlock for protecting the irq_masks field and irq
enable registers. However, the driver misses protecting the irq
drm/tidss: Fix race condition while handling interrupt registers
The driver has a spinlock for protecting the irq_masks field and irq
enable registers. However, the driver misses protecting the irq status
registers which can lead to races.
Take the spinlock when accessing irqstatus too.
Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
[Tomi: updated the desc]
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-6-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| 361a2ebb | 21-Oct-2024 |
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com> |
drm/tidss: Clear the interrupt status for interrupts being disabled
The driver does not touch the irqstatus register when it is disabling
interrupts. This might cause an interrupt to trigger for an
drm/tidss: Clear the interrupt status for interrupts being disabled
The driver does not touch the irqstatus register when it is disabling
interrupts. This might cause an interrupt to trigger for an interrupt
that was just disabled.
To fix the issue, clear the irqstatus registers right after disabling
the interrupts.
Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Closes: https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors-group/processors/f/processors-forum/1394222/am625-issue-about-tidss-rcu_preempt-self-detected-stall-on-cpu/5424479#5424479
Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
[Tomi: mostly rewrote the patch]
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-5-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| 76bae5b9 | 21-Oct-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Add printing of underflows
Add printing of underflows the same way as we handle sync losts.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@lin
drm/tidss: Add printing of underflows
Add printing of underflows the same way as we handle sync losts.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-4-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| f8e59e62 | 21-Oct-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Remove extra K2G check
We check if the platform is K2G in dispc_k3_clear_irqstatus(), and
return early if so. This cannot happen, as the _k3_ functions are never
called on K2G in the firs
drm/tidss: Remove extra K2G check
We check if the platform is K2G in dispc_k3_clear_irqstatus(), and
return early if so. This cannot happen, as the _k3_ functions are never
called on K2G in the first place. So remove the check.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-3-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| 18f430ac | 21-Oct-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Remove unused OCP error flag
We never use the DSS_IRQ_DEVICE_OCP_ERR flag, and the HW doesn't even
have such a bit... So remove it.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewe
drm/tidss: Remove unused OCP error flag
We never use the DSS_IRQ_DEVICE_OCP_ERR flag, and the HW doesn't even
have such a bit... So remove it.
Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-2-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| 44b6730a | 21-Oct-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Fix issue in irq handling causing irq-flood issue
It has been observed that sometimes DSS will trigger an interrupt and
the top level interrupt (DISPC_IRQSTATUS) is not zero, but the VP a
drm/tidss: Fix issue in irq handling causing irq-flood issue
It has been observed that sometimes DSS will trigger an interrupt and
the top level interrupt (DISPC_IRQSTATUS) is not zero, but the VP and
VID level interrupt-statuses are zero.
As the top level irqstatus is supposed to tell whether we have VP/VID
interrupts, the thinking of the driver authors was that this particular
case could never happen. Thus the driver only clears the DISPC_IRQSTATUS
bits which has corresponding interrupts in VP/VID status. So when this
issue happens, the driver will not clear DISPC_IRQSTATUS, and we get an
interrupt flood.
It is unclear why the issue happens. It could be a race issue in the
driver, but no such race has been found. It could also be an issue with
the HW. However a similar case can be easily triggered by manually
writing to DISPC_IRQSTATUS_RAW. This will forcibly set a bit in the
DISPC_IRQSTATUS and trigger an interrupt, and as the driver never clears
the bit, we get an interrupt flood.
To fix the issue, always clear DISPC_IRQSTATUS. The concern with this
solution is that if the top level irqstatus is the one that triggers the
interrupt, always clearing DISPC_IRQSTATUS might leave some interrupts
unhandled if VP/VID interrupt statuses have bits set. However, testing
shows that if any of the irqstatuses is set (i.e. even if
DISPC_IRQSTATUS == 0, but a VID irqstatus has a bit set), we will get an
interrupt.
Co-developed-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Co-developed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@criticallink.com>
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241021-tidss-irq-fix-v1-1-82ddaec94e4a@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|
| c079e2e1 | 13-Feb-2024 |
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> |
drm/tidss: Fix sync-lost issue with two displays
A sync lost issue can be observed with two displays, when moving a plane
from one disabled display to an another disabled display, and then
enabling
drm/tidss: Fix sync-lost issue with two displays
A sync lost issue can be observed with two displays, when moving a plane
from one disabled display to an another disabled display, and then
enabling the display to which the plane was moved to. The exact
requirements for this to trigger are not clear.
It looks like the issue is that the layers are left enabled in the first
display's OVR registers. Even if the corresponding VP is disabled, it
still causes an issue, as if the disabled VP and its OVR would still be
in use, leading to the same VID being used by two OVRs. However, this is
just speculation based on testing the DSS behavior.
Experimentation shows that as a workaround, we can disable all the
layers in the OVR when disabling a VP. There should be no downside to
this, as the OVR is anyway effectively disabled if its VP is disabled,
and it seems to solve the sync lost issue.
However, there may be a bigger issue in play here, related to J721e
erratum i2097 ("DSS: Disabling a Layer Connected to Overlay May Result
in Synclost During the Next Frame"). Experimentation also shows that the
OVR's CHANNELIN field has similar issue. So we may need to revisit this
when we find out more about the core issue.
Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240213-tidss-fixes-v1-2-d709e8dfa505@ideasonboard.com
show more ...
|