#
25768de5 |
| 21-Jan-2025 |
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
Merge branch 'next' into for-linus
Prepare input updates for 6.14 merge window.
|
Revision tags: v6.13, v6.13-rc7, v6.13-rc6, v6.13-rc5, v6.13-rc4 |
|
#
6d4a0f4e |
| 17-Dec-2024 |
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
Merge tag 'v6.13-rc3' into next
Sync up with the mainline.
|
#
c5fb51b7 |
| 03-Jan-2025 |
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'pm/opp/linux-next' into HEAD
Merge pm/opp tree to get dev_pm_opp_get_bw()
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
|
Revision tags: v6.13-rc3 |
|
#
e7f0a3a6 |
| 11-Dec-2024 |
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next
Catching up with 6.13-rc2.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
Revision tags: v6.13-rc2 |
|
#
8f109f28 |
| 02-Dec-2024 |
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-xe-next
A backmerge to get the PMT preparation work for merging the BMG PMT support.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
#
3aba2eba |
| 02-Dec-2024 |
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next
Kickstart 6.14 cycle.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
|
#
bcfd5f64 |
| 02-Dec-2024 |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
Merge tag 'v6.13-rc1' into perf/core, to refresh the branch
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
#
c34e9ab9 |
| 05-Dec-2024 |
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> |
Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v6.13-rc1' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus
ASoC: Fixes for v6.13
A few small fixes for v6.13, all system specific - the biggest t
Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v6.13-rc1' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus
ASoC: Fixes for v6.13
A few small fixes for v6.13, all system specific - the biggest thing is the fix for jack handling over suspend on some Intel laptops.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.13-rc1 |
|
#
cf87766d |
| 26-Nov-2024 |
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> |
Merge branch 'ovl.fixes'
Bring in an overlayfs fix for v6.13-rc1 that fixes a bug introduced by the overlayfs changes merged for v6.13.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
#
6e95ef02 |
| 21-Nov-2024 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:
- Add BPF uprobe session support (Jiri Olsa)
- Optimize uprobe p
Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:
- Add BPF uprobe session support (Jiri Olsa)
- Optimize uprobe performance (Andrii Nakryiko)
- Add bpf_fastcall support to helpers and kfuncs (Eduard Zingerman)
- Avoid calling free_htab_elem() under hash map bucket lock (Hou Tao)
- Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace (Leon Hwang)
- Mark raw_tracepoint arguments as nullable (Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi)
- Introduce uptr support in the task local storage map (Martin KaFai Lau)
- Stringify errno log messages in libbpf (Mykyta Yatsenko)
- Add kmem_cache BPF iterator for perf's lock profiling (Namhyung Kim)
- Support BPF objects of either endianness in libbpf (Tony Ambardar)
- Add ksym to struct_ops trampoline to fix stack trace (Xu Kuohai)
- Introduce private stack for eligible BPF programs (Yonghong Song)
- Migrate samples/bpf tests to selftests/bpf test_progs (Daniel T. Lee)
- Migrate test_sock to selftests/bpf test_progs (Jordan Rife)
* tag 'bpf-next-6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (152 commits) libbpf: Change hash_combine parameters from long to unsigned long selftests/bpf: Fix build error with llvm 19 libbpf: Fix memory leak in bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi bpf: use common instruction history across all states bpf: Add necessary migrate_disable to range_tree. bpf: Do not alloc arena on unsupported arches selftests/bpf: Set test path for token/obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar selftests/bpf: Add a test for arena range tree algorithm bpf: Introduce range_tree data structure and use it in bpf arena samples/bpf: Remove unused variable in xdp2skb_meta_kern.c samples/bpf: Remove unused variables in tc_l2_redirect_kern.c bpftool: Cast variable `var` to long long bpf, x86: Propagate tailcall info only for subprogs bpf: Add kernel symbol for struct_ops trampoline bpf: Use function pointers count as struct_ops links count bpf: Remove unused member rcu from bpf_struct_ops_map selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops prog private stack tests bpf: Support private stack for struct_ops progs selftests/bpf: Add tracing prog private stack tests bpf, x86: Support private stack in jit ...
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.12 |
|
#
c1bc51f8 |
| 13-Nov-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
Merge branch 'bpf-support-private-stack-for-bpf-progs'
Yonghong Song says:
==================== bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs
The main motivation for private stack comes from nested sch
Merge branch 'bpf-support-private-stack-for-bpf-progs'
Yonghong Song says:
==================== bpf: Support private stack for bpf progs
The main motivation for private stack comes from nested scheduler in sched-ext from Tejun. The basic idea is that - each cgroup will its own associated bpf program, - bpf program with parent cgroup will call bpf programs in immediate child cgroups.
Let us say we have the following cgroup hierarchy: root_cg (prog0): cg1 (prog1): cg11 (prog11): cg111 (prog111) cg112 (prog112) cg12 (prog12): cg121 (prog121) cg122 (prog122) cg2 (prog2): cg21 (prog21) cg22 (prog22) cg23 (prog23)
In the above example, prog0 will call a kfunc which will call prog1 and prog2 to get sched info for cg1 and cg2 and then the information is summarized and sent back to prog0. Similarly, prog11 and prog12 will be invoked in the kfunc and the result will be summarized and sent back to prog1, etc. The following illustrates a possible call sequence: ... -> bpf prog A -> kfunc -> ops.<callback_fn> (bpf prog B) ...
Currently, for each thread, the x86 kernel allocate 16KB stack. Each bpf program (including its subprograms) has maximum 512B stack size to avoid potential stack overflow. Nested bpf programs further increase the risk of stack overflow. To avoid potential stack overflow caused by bpf programs, this patch set supported private stack and bpf program stack space is allocated during jit time. Using private stack for bpf progs can reduce or avoid potential kernel stack overflow.
Currently private stack is applied to tracing programs like kprobe/uprobe, perf_event, tracepoint, raw tracepoint and struct_ops progs. Tracing progs enable private stack if any subprog stack size is more than a threshold (i.e. 64B). Struct-ops progs enable private stack based on particular struct op implementation which can enable private stack before verification at per-insn level. Struct-ops progs have the same treatment as tracing progs w.r.t when to enable private stack.
For all these progs, the kernel will do recursion check (no nesting for per prog per cpu) to ensure that private stack won't be overwritten. The bpf_prog_aux struct has a callback func recursion_detected() which can be implemented by kernel subsystem to synchronously detect recursion, report error, etc.
Only x86_64 arch supports private stack now. It can be extended to other archs later. Please see each individual patch for details.
Change logs: v11 -> v12: - v11 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241109025312.148539-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Fix a bug where allocated percpu space is less than actual private stack. - Add guard memory (before and after actual prog stack) to detect potential underflow/overflow. v10 -> v11: - v10 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241107024138.3355687-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Use two bool variables, priv_stack_requested (used by struct-ops only) and jits_use_priv_stack, in order to make code cleaner. - Set env->prog->aux->jits_use_priv_stack to true if any subprog uses private stack. This is for struct-ops use case to kick in recursion protection. v9 -> v10: - v9 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241104193455.3241859-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Simplify handling async cbs by making those async cb related progs using normal kernel stack. - Do percpu allocation in jit instead of verifier. v8 -> v9: - v8 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241101030950.2677215-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Use enum to express priv stack mode. - Use bits in bpf_subprog_info struct to do subprog recursion check between main/async and async subprogs. - Fix potential memory leak. - Rename recursion detection func from recursion_skipped() to recursion_detected(). v7 -> v8: - v7 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241029221637.264348-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Add recursion_skipped() callback func to bpf_prog->aux structure such that if a recursion miss happened and bpf_prog->aux->recursion_skipped is not NULL, the callback fn will be called so the subsystem can do proper action based on their respective design. v6 -> v7: - v6 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241020191341.2104841-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Going back to do private stack allocation per prog instead per subtree. This can simplify implementation and avoid verifier complexity. - Handle potential nested subprog run if async callback exists. - Use struct_ops->check_member() callback to set whether a particular struct-ops prog wants private stack or not. v5 -> v6: - v5 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241017223138.3175885-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Instead of using (or not using) private stack at struct_ops level, each prog in struct_ops can decide whether to use private stack or not. v4 -> v5: - v4 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241010175552.1895980-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ - Remove bpf_prog_call() related implementation. - Allow (opt-in) private stack for sched-ext progs. v3 -> v4: - v3 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240926234506.1769256-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ There is a long discussion in the above v3 link trying to allow private stack to be used by kernel functions in order to simplify implementation. But unfortunately we didn't find a workable solution yet, so we return to the approach where private stack is only used by bpf programs. - Add bpf_prog_call() kfunc. v2 -> v3: - Instead of per-subprog private stack allocation, allocate private stacks at main prog or callback entry prog. Subprogs not main or callback progs will increment the inherited stack pointer to be their frame pointer. - Private stack allows each prog max stack size to be 512 bytes, intead of the whole prog hierarchy to be 512 bytes. - Add some tests. ====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112163902.2223011-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
becfe32b |
| 12-Nov-2024 |
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> |
selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops prog private stack tests
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stac
selftests/bpf: Add struct_ops prog private stack tests
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK #336/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK #336/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK #336 struct_ops_private_stack:OK
The following is a snippet of a struct_ops check_member() implementation:
u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8; switch (moff) { case offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, test_1): prog->aux->priv_stack_requested = true; prog->aux->recursion_detected = test_1_recursion_detected; fallthrough; default: break; } return 0;
The first test is with nested two different callback functions where the first prog has more than 512 byte stack size (including subprogs) with private stack enabled.
The second test is a negative test where the second prog has more than 512 byte stack size without private stack enabled.
The third test is the same callback function recursing itself. At run time, the jit trampoline recursion check kicks in to prevent the recursion. The recursion_detected() callback function is implemented by the bpf_testmod, the following message in dmesg bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1 demonstrates the callback function is indeed triggered when recursion miss happens.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112163938.2225528-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|