Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.11 merge window.

Merge tag 'v6.9' into next

Sync up with the mainline to bring in the new cleanup API.

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Some display refactoring patches are needed in order to allow conflict-
less merging.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>

Merge topic branches 'clkdev' and 'fixes' into for-linus

Merge branch 'master' into mm-stable

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-xe-next

Backmerging drm-next in order to get up-to-date and in particular
to access commit 9ca5facd0400f610f3f7f71aeb7fc0b949a48c67.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <tho

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-xe-next

Backmerging drm-next in order to get up-to-date and in particular
to access commit 9ca5facd0400f610f3f7f71aeb7fc0b949a48c67.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

Merge tag 'phy_dp_modes_6.10' into msm-next-lumag

Merge DisplayPort subnode API in order to allow DisplayPort driver to
configure the PHYs either to the DP or eDP mode, depending on hardware
configu

Merge tag 'phy_dp_modes_6.10' into msm-next-lumag

Merge DisplayPort subnode API in order to allow DisplayPort driver to
configure the PHYs either to the DP or eDP mode, depending on hardware
configuration.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching up on 6.9-rc2

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.9-rc2 changes into drm-misc-next.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge branch 'topic/sound-devel-6.10' into for-next

Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v6.9-rc2' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus

ASoC: Fixes for v6.9

A relatively large set of fixes here, the biggest piece of it is a

Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v6.9-rc2' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus

ASoC: Fixes for v6.9

A relatively large set of fixes here, the biggest piece of it is a
series correcting some problems with the delay reporting for Intel SOF
cards but there's a bunch of other things. Everything here is driver
specific except for a fix in the core for an issue with sign extension
handling volume controls.

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Backmerging to get drm-misc-fixes to the state of v6.9-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict

There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:

38b334fc767e Merge t

Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict

There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:

38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:

1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code

... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:

2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree

But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.

So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.

Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

Merge tag 'locking-core-2024-03-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

- Micro-optimize local_xchg() and the rtmutex code on x86

- Fi

Merge tag 'locking-core-2024-03-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

- Micro-optimize local_xchg() and the rtmutex code on x86

- Fix percpu-rwsem contention tracepoints

- Simplify debugging Kconfig dependencies

- Update/clarify the documentation of atomic primitives

- Misc cleanups

* tag 'locking-core-2024-03-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
locking/rtmutex: Use try_cmpxchg_relaxed() in mark_rt_mutex_waiters()
locking/x86: Implement local_xchg() using CMPXCHG without the LOCK prefix
locking/percpu-rwsem: Trigger contention tracepoints only if contended
locking/rwsem: Make DEBUG_RWSEMS and PREEMPT_RT mutually exclusive
locking/rwsem: Clarify that RWSEM_READER_OWNED is just a hint
locking/mutex: Simplify <linux/mutex.h>
locking/qspinlock: Fix 'wait_early' set but not used warning
locking/atomic: scripts: Clarify ordering of conditional atomics

show more ...

locking/atomic: scripts: Clarify ordering of conditional atomics

Conditional atomic operations (e.g. cmpxchg()) only provide ordering
when the condition holds; when the condition does not hold, the

locking/atomic: scripts: Clarify ordering of conditional atomics

Conditional atomic operations (e.g. cmpxchg()) only provide ordering
when the condition holds; when the condition does not hold, the location
is not modified and relaxed ordering is provided. Where ordering is
needed for failed conditional atomics, it is necessary to use
smp_mb__before_atomic() and/or smp_mb__after_atomic().

This is explained tersely in memory-barriers.txt, and is implied but not
explicitly stated in the kerneldoc comments for the conditional
operations. The lack of an explicit statement has lead to some off-list
queries about the ordering semantics of failing conditional operations,
so evidently this is confusing.

Update the kerneldoc comments to explicitly describe the lack of ordering
for failed conditional atomic operations.

For most conditional atomic operations, this is written as:

| If (${condition}), atomically updates @v to (${new}) with ${desc_order} ordering.
| Otherwise, @v is not modified and relaxed ordering is provided.

For the try_cmpxchg() operations, this is written as:

| If (${condition}), atomically updates @v to @new with ${desc_order} ordering.
| Otherwise, @v is not modified, @old is updated to the current value of @v,
| and relaxed ordering is provided.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209124010.2096198-1-mark.rutland@arm.com

show more ...

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.7 merge window.

Merge tag 'v6.5' into next

Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to the shared infrastructure.

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable

Merge tag 'locking-core-2023-06-27' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

- Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double()

Merge tag 'locking-core-2023-06-27' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

- Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double()

The cmpxchg128() family of functions is basically & functionally the
same as cmpxchg_double(), but with a saner interface.

Instead of a 6-parameter horror that forced u128 - u64/u64-halves
layout details on the interface and exposed users to complexity,
fragility & bugs, use a natural 3-parameter interface with u128
types.

- Restructure the generated atomic headers, and add kerneldoc comments
for all of the generic atomic{,64,_long}_t operations.

The generated definitions are much cleaner now, and come with
documentation.

- Implement lock_set_cmp_fn() on lockdep, for defining an ordering when
taking multiple locks of the same type.

This gets rid of one use of lockdep_set_novalidate_class() in the
bcache code.

- Fix raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg() bug due to an unintended variable
shadowing generating garbage code on Clang on certain ARM builds.

* tag 'locking-core-2023-06-27' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (43 commits)
locking/atomic: scripts: fix ${atomic}_dec_if_positive() kerneldoc
percpu: Fix self-assignment of __old in raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg()
locking/atomic: treewide: delete arch_atomic_*() kerneldoc
locking/atomic: docs: Add atomic operations to the driver basic API documentation
locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments
docs: scripts: kernel-doc: accept bitwise negation like ~@var
locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic*() definitions
locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic_long*() definitions
locking/atomic: scripts: split pfx/name/sfx/order
locking/atomic: scripts: restructure fallback ifdeffery
locking/atomic: scripts: build raw_atomic_long*() directly
locking/atomic: treewide: use raw_atomic*_<op>()
locking/atomic: scripts: add trivial raw_atomic*_<op>()
locking/atomic: scripts: factor out order template generation
locking/atomic: scripts: remove leftover "${mult}"
locking/atomic: scripts: remove bogus order parameter
locking/atomic: xtensa: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: x86: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: sparc: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: sh: add preprocessor symbols
...

show more ...

locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments

Currently the atomics are documented in Documentation/atomic_t.txt, and
have no kerneldoc comments. There are a sufficient number of gotchas
(e.g

locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments

Currently the atomics are documented in Documentation/atomic_t.txt, and
have no kerneldoc comments. There are a sufficient number of gotchas
(e.g. semantics, noinstr-safety) that it would be nice to have comments
to call these out, and it would be nice to have kerneldoc comments such
that these can be collated.

While it's possible to derive the semantics from the code, this can be
painful given the amount of indirection we currently have (e.g. fallback
paths), and it's easy to be mislead by naming, e.g.

* The unconditional void-returning ops *only* have relaxed variants
without a _relaxed suffix, and can easily be mistaken for being fully
ordered.

It would be nice to give these a _relaxed() suffix, but this would
result in significant churn throughout the kernel.

* Our naming of conditional and unconditional+test ops is rather
inconsistent, and it can be difficult to derive the name of an
operation, or to identify where an op is conditional or
unconditional+test.

Some ops are clearly conditional:
- dec_if_positive
- add_unless
- dec_unless_positive
- inc_unless_negative

Some ops are clearly unconditional+test:
- sub_and_test
- dec_and_test
- inc_and_test

However, what exactly those test is not obvious. A _test_zero suffix
might be clearer.

Others could be read ambiguously:
- inc_not_zero // conditional
- add_negative // unconditional+test

It would probably be worth renaming these, e.g. to inc_unless_zero and
add_test_negative.

As a step towards making this more consistent and easier to understand,
this patch adds kerneldoc comments for all generated *atomic*_*()
functions. These are generated from templates, with some common text
shared, making it easy to extend these in future if necessary.

I've tried to make these as consistent and clear as possible, and I've
deliberately ensured:

* All ops have their ordering explicitly mentioned in the short and long
description.

* All test ops have "test" in their short description.

* All ops are described as an expression using their usual C operator.
For example:

andnot: "Atomically updates @v to (@v & ~@i)"
inc: "Atomically updates @v to (@v + 1)"

Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
the operations to be described in the same style.

* All conditional ops have their condition described as an expression
using the usual C operators. For example:

add_unless: "If (@v != @u), atomically updates @v to (@v + @i)"
cmpxchg: "If (@v == @old), atomically updates @v to @new"

Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
the operations to be described in the same style.

* All bitwise ops (and,andnot,or,xor) explicitly mention that they are
bitwise in their short description, so that they are not mistaken for
performing their logical equivalents.

* The noinstr safety of each op is explicitly described, with a
description of whether or not to use the raw_ form of the op.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-26-mark.rutland@arm.com

show more ...