| c2c6b27b | 17-Oct-2024 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries
When arm64's stack unwinder encounters an exception boundary, it uses
the pt_regs::stackframe created by the entry code, which has a copy of
the PC and
arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries
When arm64's stack unwinder encounters an exception boundary, it uses
the pt_regs::stackframe created by the entry code, which has a copy of
the PC and FP at the time the exception was taken. The unwinder doesn't
know anything about pt_regs, and reports the PC from the stackframe, but
does not report the LR.
The LR is only guaranteed to contain the return address at function call
boundaries, and can be used as a scratch register at other times, so the
LR at an exception boundary may or may not be a legitimate return
address. It would be useful to report the LR value regardless, as it can
be helpful when debugging, and in future it will be helpful for reliable
stacktrace support.
This patch changes the way we unwind across exception boundaries,
allowing both the PC and LR to be reported. The entry code creates a
frame_record_meta structure embedded within pt_regs, which the unwinder
uses to find the pt_regs. The unwinder can then extract pt_regs::pc and
pt_regs::lr as two separate unwind steps before continuing with a
regular walk of frame records.
When a PC is unwound from pt_regs::lr, dump_backtrace() will log this
with an "L" marker so that it can be identified easily. For example,
an unwind across an exception boundary will appear as follows:
| el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
| _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x10/0x60 (P)
| __aarch64_insn_write+0x6c/0x90 (L)
| aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync+0x28/0x80
... with a (P) entry for pt_regs::pc, and an (L) entry for pt_regs:lr.
Note that the LR may be stale at the point of the exception, for example,
shortly after a return:
| el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
| default_idle_call+0x34/0x180 (P)
| default_idle_call+0x28/0x180 (L)
| do_idle+0x204/0x268
... where the LR points a few instructions before the current PC.
This plays nicely with all the other unwind metadata tracking. With the
ftrace_graph profiler enabled globally, and kretprobes installed on
generic_handle_domain_irq() and do_interrupt_handler(), a backtrace triggered
by magic-sysrq + L reports:
| Call trace:
| show_stack+0x20/0x40 (CF)
| dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 (F)
| dump_stack+0x18/0x28
| nmi_cpu_backtrace+0xfc/0x140
| nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1c8/0x200
| arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x20/0x40
| sysrq_handle_showallcpus+0x24/0x38 (F)
| __handle_sysrq+0xa8/0x1b0 (F)
| handle_sysrq+0x38/0x50 (F)
| pl011_int+0x460/0x5a8 (F)
| __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x60/0x220 (F)
| handle_irq_event+0x54/0xc0 (F)
| handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa8/0x1d0 (F)
| generic_handle_domain_irq+0x34/0x58 (F)
| gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x140 (FK)
| call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x58 (F)
| do_interrupt_handler+0x88/0xa0
| el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68 (FK)
| el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28
| el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
| default_idle_call+0x34/0x180 (P)
| default_idle_call+0x28/0x180 (L)
| do_idle+0x204/0x268
| cpu_startup_entry+0x3c/0x50 (F)
| rest_init+0xe4/0xf0
| start_kernel+0x744/0x750
| __primary_switched+0x88/0x98
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-11-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| f05a4a42 | 17-Oct-2024 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack()
When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find
whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and*
to update th
arm64: stacktrace: split unwind_consume_stack()
When unwinding stacks, we use unwind_consume_stack() to both find
whether an object (e.g. a frame record) is on an accessible stack *and*
to update the stack boundaries. This works fine today since we only care
about one type of object which does not overlap other objects.
In subsequent patches we'll want to check whether an object (e.g a frame
record) is on the stack and follow this up by accessing a larger object
containing the first (e.g. a pt_regs with an embedded frame record).
To make that pattern easier to implement, this patch reworks
unwind_find_next_stack() and unwind_consume_stack() so that the former
can be used to check if an object is on any accessible stack, and the
latter is purely used to update the stack boundaries.
As unwind_find_next_stack() is modified to also check the stack
currently being unwound, it is renamed to unwind_find_stack().
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017092538.1859841-10-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| 4b5e694e | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: track hyp stacks in unwinder's address space
Currently unwind_next_frame_record() has an optional callback to convert
the address space of the FP. This is necessary for the NVHE u
arm64: stacktrace: track hyp stacks in unwinder's address space
Currently unwind_next_frame_record() has an optional callback to convert
the address space of the FP. This is necessary for the NVHE unwinder,
which tracks the stacks in the hyp VA space, but accesses the frame
records in the kernel VA space.
This is a bit unfortunate since it clutters unwind_next_frame_record(),
which will get in the way of future rework.
Instead, this patch changes the NVHE unwinder to track the stacks in the
kernel's VA space and translate to FP prior to calling
unwind_next_frame_record(). This removes the need for the translate_fp()
callback, as all unwinders consistently track stacks in the native
address space of the unwinder.
At the same time, this patch consolidates the generation of the stack
addresses behind the stackinfo_get_*() helpers.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-10-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| 8df13730 | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly
Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the
unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of th
arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly
Currently we call an on_accessible_stack() callback for each step of the
unwinder, requiring redundant work to be performed in the core of the
unwind loop (e.g. disabling preemption around accesses to per-cpu
variables containing stack boundaries). To prevent unwind loops which go
through a stack multiple times, we have to track the set of unwound
stacks, requiring a stack_type enum which needs to cater for all the
stacks of all possible callees. To prevent loops within a stack, we must
track the prior FP values.
This patch reworks the unwinder to minimize the work in the core of the
unwinder, and to remove the need for the stack_type enum. The set of
accessible stacks (and their boundaries) are determined at the start of
the unwind, and the current stack is tracked during the unwind, with
completed stacks removed from the set of accessible stacks. This makes
the boundary checks more accurate (e.g. detecting overlapped frame
records), and removes the need for separate tracking of the prior FP and
visited stacks.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-9-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| bd8abd68 | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: remove stack type from fp translator
In subsequent patches we'll remove the stack_type enum, and move the FP
translation logic out of the raw FP unwind code.
In preparation for d
arm64: stacktrace: remove stack type from fp translator
In subsequent patches we'll remove the stack_type enum, and move the FP
translation logic out of the raw FP unwind code.
In preparation for doing so, this patch removes the type parameter from
the FP translation callback, and modifies kvm_nvhe_stack_kern_va() to
determine the relevant stack directly.
So that kvm_nvhe_stack_kern_va() can use the stackinfo_*() helpers,
these are moved earlier in the file, but are not modified in any way.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-8-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| d1f684e4 | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: rework stack boundary discovery
In subsequent patches we'll want to acquire the stack boundaries
ahead-of-time, and we'll need to be able to acquire the relevant
stack_info regard
arm64: stacktrace: rework stack boundary discovery
In subsequent patches we'll want to acquire the stack boundaries
ahead-of-time, and we'll need to be able to acquire the relevant
stack_info regardless of whether we have an object the happens to be on
the stack.
This patch replaces the on_XXX_stack() helpers with stackinfo_get_XXX()
helpers, with the caller being responsible for the checking whether an
object is on a relevant stack. For the moment this is moved into the
on_accessible_stack() functions, making these slightly larger;
subsequent patches will remove the on_accessible_stack() functions and
simplify the logic.
The on_irq_stack() and on_task_stack() helpers are kept as these are
used by IRQ entry sequences and stackleak respectively. As they're only
used as predicates, the stack_info pointer parameter is removed in both
cases.
As the on_accessible_stack() functions are always passed a non-NULL info
pointer, these now update info unconditionally. When updating the type
to STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN, the low/high bounds are also modified, but as
these will not be consumed this should have no adverse affect.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-7-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| b532ab5f | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: rename unwind_next_common() -> unwind_next_frame_record()
The unwind_next_common() function unwinds a single frame record. There
are other unwind steps (e.g. unwinding through tra
arm64: stacktrace: rename unwind_next_common() -> unwind_next_frame_record()
The unwind_next_common() function unwinds a single frame record. There
are other unwind steps (e.g. unwinding through trampolines) which are
handled in the regular kernel unwinder, and in future there may be other
common unwind helpers.
Clarify the purpose of unwind_next_common() by renaming it to
unwind_next_frame_record(). At the same time, add commentary, and delete
the redundant comment at the top of asm/stacktrace/common.h.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| bc8d7521 | 01-Sep-2022 |
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: simplify unwind_next_common()
Currently unwind_next_common() takes a pointer to a stack_info which is
only ever used within unwind_next_common().
Make it a local variable and sim
arm64: stacktrace: simplify unwind_next_common()
Currently unwind_next_common() takes a pointer to a stack_info which is
only ever used within unwind_next_common().
Make it a local variable and simplify callers.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130646.1316937-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| a4c750e2 | 27-Jul-2022 |
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> |
arm64: Update 'unwinder howto'
Implementing a new unwinder is a bit more involved than writing
a couple of helpers, so let's not lure the reader into a false
sense of comfort. Instead, let's point o
arm64: Update 'unwinder howto'
Implementing a new unwinder is a bit more involved than writing
a couple of helpers, so let's not lure the reader into a false
sense of comfort. Instead, let's point out what they should
call into, and what sort of parameter they need to provide.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-7-maz@kernel.org
show more ...
|
| 0e773da1 | 27-Jul-2022 |
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> |
KVM: arm64: Move nVHE-only helpers into kvm/stacktrace.c
kvm_nvhe_stack_kern_va() only makes sense as part of the nVHE
unwinder, so simply move it there.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org
KVM: arm64: Move nVHE-only helpers into kvm/stacktrace.c
kvm_nvhe_stack_kern_va() only makes sense as part of the nVHE
unwinder, so simply move it there.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-5-maz@kernel.org
show more ...
|
| 4e00532f | 27-Jul-2022 |
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> |
KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions
Having multiple versions of on_accessible_stack() (one per unwinder)
makes it very hard to reason about what is used where due
KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions
Having multiple versions of on_accessible_stack() (one per unwinder)
makes it very hard to reason about what is used where due to the
complexity of the various includes, the forward declarations, and
the reliance on everything being 'inline'.
Instead, move the code back where it should be. Each unwinder
implements:
- on_accessible_stack() as well as the helpers it depends on,
- unwind()/unwind_next(), as they pass on_accessible_stack as
a parameter to unwind_next_common() (which is the only common
code here)
This hardly results in any duplication, and makes it much
easier to reason about the code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-4-maz@kernel.org
show more ...
|
| 9f5fee05 | 27-Jul-2022 |
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> |
KVM: arm64: Move nVHE stacktrace unwinding into its own compilation unit
The unwinding code doesn't really belong to the exit handling
code. Instead, move it to a file (conveniently named stacktrace
KVM: arm64: Move nVHE stacktrace unwinding into its own compilation unit
The unwinding code doesn't really belong to the exit handling
code. Instead, move it to a file (conveniently named stacktrace.c
to confuse the reviewer), and move all the stacktrace-related
stuff there.
It will be joined by more code very soon.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Tested-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727142906.1856759-3-maz@kernel.org
show more ...
|
| 75e9459e | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder
Implements the common framework necessary for unwind() to work in
the protected nVHE context:
- on_accessible_stack()
- on_overflow_stac
KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder
Implements the common framework necessary for unwind() to work in
the protected nVHE context:
- on_accessible_stack()
- on_overflow_stack()
- unwind_next()
Protected nVHE unwind() is used to unwind and save the hyp stack
addresses to the shared stacktrace buffer. The host reads the
entries in this buffer, symbolizes and dumps the stacktrace (later
patch in the series).
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-17-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| 25aa73b6 | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder
Add some stub implementations of protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
building. These are implemented later in this series.
Signed-off-by: K
KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder
Add some stub implementations of protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
building. These are implemented later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-15-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| 314a61dc | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace()
In non-protected nVHE mode, unwinds and dumps the hypervisor backtrace
from EL1. This is possible beacause the host can directly access the
hypervisor stac
KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace()
In non-protected nVHE mode, unwinds and dumps the hypervisor backtrace
from EL1. This is possible beacause the host can directly access the
hypervisor stack pages in non-protected mode.
The nVHE backtrace is dumped on hyp_panic(), before panicking the host.
[ 101.498183] kvm [377]: nVHE call trace:
[ 101.498363] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a6570>] __kvm_nvhe_hyp_panic+0xac/0xf8
[ 101.499045] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a65cc>] __kvm_nvhe_hyp_panic_bad_stack+0x10/0x10
[ 101.499498] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a61e4>] __kvm_nvhe_recursive_death+0x24/0x34
. . .
[ 101.524929] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a61e4>] __kvm_nvhe_recursive_death+0x24/0x34
[ 101.525062] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a61e4>] __kvm_nvhe_recursive_death+0x24/0x34
[ 101.525195] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a5de4>] __kvm_nvhe___kvm_vcpu_run+0x30/0x40c
[ 101.525333] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a8b64>] __kvm_nvhe_handle___kvm_vcpu_run+0x30/0x48
[ 101.525468] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a88b8>] __kvm_nvhe_handle_trap+0xc4/0x128
[ 101.525602] kvm [377]: [<ffff8000090a7864>] __kvm_nvhe___host_exit+0x64/0x64
[ 101.525745] kvm [377]: ---[ end nVHE call trace ]---
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-12-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| 573e1e82 | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
building. These are implemented later in this series.
Sig
KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
building. These are implemented later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-9-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| 051ece67 | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h
Add brief description on how to use stacktrace/common.h to implement
a stack unwinder.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h
Add brief description on how to use stacktrace/common.h to implement
a stack unwinder.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-7-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| f51e7146 | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind()
Move unwind() to stacktrace/common.h, and as a result
the kernel unwind_next() to asm/stacktrace.h. This allow
reusing unwind() in the implementation of
arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind()
Move unwind() to stacktrace/common.h, and as a result
the kernel unwind_next() to asm/stacktrace.h. This allow
reusing unwind() in the implementation of the nVHE HYP
stack unwinder, later in the series.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-6-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|
| 5b1b0861 | 26-Jul-2022 |
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> |
arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces
The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
nVHE h
arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces
The unwinder code is made reusable so that it can be used to
unwind various types of stacks. One usecase is unwinding the
nVHE hyp stack from the host (EL1) in non-protected mode. This
means that the unwinder must be able to translate HYP stack
addresses to kernel addresses.
Add a callback (stack_trace_translate_fp_fn) to allow specifying
the translation function.
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726073750.3219117-5-kaleshsingh@google.com
show more ...
|