Revision tags: v6.7-rc5, v6.7-rc4, v6.7-rc3, v6.7-rc2, v6.7-rc1, v6.6, v6.6-rc7, v6.6-rc6, v6.6-rc5, v6.6-rc4, v6.6-rc3, v6.6-rc2, v6.6-rc1 |
|
#
1ac731c5 |
| 31-Aug-2023 |
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
Merge branch 'next' into for-linus
Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.
|
Revision tags: v6.5, v6.5-rc7, v6.5-rc6, v6.5-rc5, v6.5-rc4, v6.5-rc3 |
|
#
50501936 |
| 17-Jul-2023 |
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
Merge tag 'v6.4' into next
Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to shared infrastructure.
|
Revision tags: v6.5-rc2, v6.5-rc1, v6.4, v6.4-rc7 |
|
#
db6da59c |
| 15-Jun-2023 |
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next-fixes
Backmerging to sync drm-misc-next-fixes with drm-misc-next.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
|
#
03c60192 |
| 12-Jun-2023 |
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> |
Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base
Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patche
Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base
Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patches depend on these helpers.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.4-rc6 |
|
#
5c680050 |
| 06-Jun-2023 |
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> |
Merge tag 'v6.4-rc4' into wpan-next/staging
Linux 6.4-rc4
|
#
9ff17e6b |
| 05-Jun-2023 |
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next
For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:
c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next
For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:
c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.4-rc5, v6.4-rc4, v6.4-rc3 |
|
#
9c3a985f |
| 17-May-2023 |
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next
Backmerge to get some hwmon dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
Revision tags: v6.4-rc2 |
|
#
50282fd5 |
| 12-May-2023 |
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> |
Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes
Let's bring 6.4-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to start the new fix cycle.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
|
#
ff32fcca |
| 09-May-2023 |
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> |
Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next
Start the 6.5 release cycle.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
|
Revision tags: v6.4-rc1 |
|
#
72eaa096 |
| 24-Apr-2023 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20230420' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux
Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore:
- Stop passing the 'selinux_state' pointers as function argum
Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20230420' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux
Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore:
- Stop passing the 'selinux_state' pointers as function arguments
As discussed during the end of the last development cycle, passing a selinux_state pointer through the SELinux code has a noticeable impact on performance, and with the current code it is not strictly necessary.
This simplifies things by referring directly to the single selinux_state global variable which should help improve SELinux performance.
- Uninline the unlikely portions of avc_has_perm_noaudit()
This change was also based on a discussion from the last development cycle, and is heavily based on an initial proof of concept patch from you. The core issue was that avc_has_perm_noaudit() was not able to be inlined, as intended, due to its size. We solved this issue by extracting the less frequently hit portions of avc_has_perm_noaudit() into a separate function, reducing the size of avc_has_perm_noaudit() to the point where the compiler began inlining the function. We also took the opportunity to clean up some ugly RCU locking in the code that became uglier with the change.
- Remove the runtime disable functionality
After several years of work by the userspace and distro folks, we are finally in a place where we feel comfortable removing the runtime disable functionality which we initially deprecated at the start of 2020.
There is plenty of information in the kernel's deprecation (now removal) notice, but the main motivation was to be able to safely mark the LSM hook structures as '__ro_after_init'.
LWN also wrote a good summary of the deprecation this morning which offers a more detailed history:
https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/927463/dcfa0d4ed2872f03
- Remove the checkreqprot functionality
The original checkreqprot deprecation notice stated that the removal would happen no sooner than June 2021, which means this falls hard into the "better late than never" bucket.
The Kconfig and deprecation notice has more detail on this setting, but the basic idea is that we want to ensure that the SELinux policy allows for the memory protections actually applied by the kernel, and not those requested by the process.
While we haven't found anyone running a supported distro that is affected by this deprecation/removal, anyone who is affected would only need to update their policy to reflect the reality of their applications' mapping protections.
- Minor Makefile improvements
Some minor Makefile improvements to correct some dependency issues likely only ever seen by SELinux developers. I expect we will have at least one more tweak to the Makefile during the next merge window, but it didn't quite make the cutoff this time around.
* tag 'selinux-pr-20230420' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux: selinux: ensure av_permissions.h is built when needed selinux: fix Makefile dependencies of flask.h selinux: stop returning node from avc_insert() selinux: clean up dead code after removing runtime disable selinux: update the file list in MAINTAINERS selinux: remove the runtime disable functionality selinux: remove the 'checkreqprot' functionality selinux: stop passing selinux_state pointers and their offspring selinux: uninline unlikely parts of avc_has_perm_noaudit()
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.3, v6.3-rc7, v6.3-rc6, v6.3-rc5, v6.3-rc4, v6.3-rc3 |
|
#
f22f9aaf |
| 17-Mar-2023 |
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> |
selinux: remove the runtime disable functionality
After working with the larger SELinux-based distros for several years, we're finally at a place where we can disable the SELinux runtime disable fun
selinux: remove the runtime disable functionality
After working with the larger SELinux-based distros for several years, we're finally at a place where we can disable the SELinux runtime disable functionality. The existing kernel deprecation notice explains the functionality and why we want to remove it:
The selinuxfs "disable" node allows SELinux to be disabled at runtime prior to a policy being loaded into the kernel. If disabled via this mechanism, SELinux will remain disabled until the system is rebooted.
The preferred method of disabling SELinux is via the "selinux=0" boot parameter, but the selinuxfs "disable" node was created to make it easier for systems with primitive bootloaders that did not allow for easy modification of the kernel command line. Unfortunately, allowing for SELinux to be disabled at runtime makes it difficult to secure the kernel's LSM hooks using the "__ro_after_init" feature.
It is that last sentence, mentioning the '__ro_after_init' hardening, which is the real motivation for this change, and if you look at the diffstat you'll see that the impact of this patch reaches across all the different LSMs, helping prevent tampering at the LSM hook level.
From a SELinux perspective, it is important to note that if you continue to disable SELinux via "/etc/selinux/config" it may appear that SELinux is disabled, but it is simply in an uninitialized state. If you load a policy with `load_policy -i`, you will see SELinux come alive just as if you had loaded the policy during early-boot.
It is also worth noting that the "/sys/fs/selinux/disable" file is always writable now, regardless of the Kconfig settings, but writing to the file has no effect on the system, other than to display an error on the console if a non-zero/true value is written.
Finally, in the several years where we have been working on deprecating this functionality, there has only been one instance of someone mentioning any user visible breakage. In this particular case it was an individual's kernel test system, and the workaround documented in the deprecation notice ("selinux=0" on the kernel command line) resolved the issue without problem.
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
show more ...
|