#
4d846d26 |
| 10-May-2023 |
Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> |
spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD
The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of
spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD
The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.
Discussed with: pfg MFC After: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix
show more ...
|
#
2192efc0 |
| 06-Jul-2020 |
Mitchell Horne <mhorne@FreeBSD.org> |
RISC-V boot1.efi and loader.efi support
This implementation doesn't have any major deviations from the other EFI ports. I've copied the boilerplate from arm and arm64.
I've tested this with the fol
RISC-V boot1.efi and loader.efi support
This implementation doesn't have any major deviations from the other EFI ports. I've copied the boilerplate from arm and arm64.
I've tested this with the following boot flows: OpenSBI (M-mode) -> u-boot (S-mode) -> loader.efi -> FreeBSD OpenSBI (M-mode) -> u-boot (S-mode) -> boot1.efi -> loader.efi -> FreeBSD
Due to the way that u-boot handles secondary CPUs, OpenSBI >= v0.7 is required, as the HSM extension is needed to bring them up explicitly. Because of this, using BBL as the SBI implementation will not be possible. Additionally, there are a few recent u-boot changes that are required as well, all of which will be present in the upcoming v2020.07 release.
Looks good: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25135
show more ...
|