History log of /freebsd/stand/efi/loader/arch/riscv/start.S (Results 1 – 3 of 3)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/14.0.0
# b3e76948 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

Remove $FreeBSD$: two-line .h pattern

Remove /^\s*\*\n \*\s+\$FreeBSD\$$\n/


# 4d846d26 10-May-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.

Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix

show more ...


Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0
# 2192efc0 06-Jul-2020 Mitchell Horne <mhorne@FreeBSD.org>

RISC-V boot1.efi and loader.efi support

This implementation doesn't have any major deviations from the other EFI
ports. I've copied the boilerplate from arm and arm64.

I've tested this with the fol

RISC-V boot1.efi and loader.efi support

This implementation doesn't have any major deviations from the other EFI
ports. I've copied the boilerplate from arm and arm64.

I've tested this with the following boot flows:
OpenSBI (M-mode) -> u-boot (S-mode) -> loader.efi -> FreeBSD
OpenSBI (M-mode) -> u-boot (S-mode) -> boot1.efi -> loader.efi -> FreeBSD

Due to the way that u-boot handles secondary CPUs, OpenSBI >= v0.7 is required,
as the HSM extension is needed to bring them up explicitly. Because of this,
using BBL as the SBI implementation will not be possible. Additionally, there
are a few recent u-boot changes that are required as well, all of which will be
present in the upcoming v2020.07 release.

Looks good: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25135

show more ...