xref: /linux/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus (revision fd7d598270724cc787982ea48bbe17ad383a8b7f)
1C S+poonceonces
2
3(*
4 * Result: Sometimes
5 *
6 * Starting with a two-process release-acquire chain ordering P0()'s
7 * first store against P1()'s final load, if the smp_store_release()
8 * is replaced by WRITE_ONCE() and the smp_load_acquire() replaced by
9 * READ_ONCE(), is ordering preserved?
10 *)
11
12{}
13
14P0(int *x, int *y)
15{
16	WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
17	WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
18}
19
20P1(int *x, int *y)
21{
22	int r0;
23
24	r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
25	WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
26}
27
28exists (x=2 /\ 1:r0=1)
29