Name Date Size #Lines LOC

..--

asm/H--5045

asm-generic/H--1,7321,378

drm/H--5,3341,701

linux/H--19,1698,825

READMEH A D05-Sep-20242.7 KiB7457

README

1Why we want a copy of kernel headers in tools?
2==============================================
3
4There used to be no copies, with tools/ code using kernel headers
5directly. From time to time tools/perf/ broke due to legitimate kernel
6hacking. At some point Linus complained about such direct usage. Then we
7adopted the current model.
8
9The way these headers are used in perf are not restricted to just
10including them to compile something.
11
12There are sometimes used in scripts that convert defines into string
13tables, etc, so some change may break one of these scripts, or new MSRs
14may use some different #define pattern, etc.
15
16E.g.:
17
18  $ ls -1 tools/perf/trace/beauty/*.sh | head -5
19  tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch_errno_names.sh
20  tools/perf/trace/beauty/drm_ioctl.sh
21  tools/perf/trace/beauty/fadvise.sh
22  tools/perf/trace/beauty/fsconfig.sh
23  tools/perf/trace/beauty/fsmount.sh
24  $
25  $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/fadvise.sh
26  static const char *fadvise_advices[] = {
27        [0] = "NORMAL",
28        [1] = "RANDOM",
29        [2] = "SEQUENTIAL",
30        [3] = "WILLNEED",
31        [4] = "DONTNEED",
32        [5] = "NOREUSE",
33  };
34  $
35
36The tools/perf/check-headers.sh script, part of the tools/ build
37process, points out changes in the original files.
38
39So its important not to touch the copies in tools/ when doing changes in
40the original kernel headers, that will be done later, when
41check-headers.sh inform about the change to the perf tools hackers.
42
43Another explanation from Ingo Molnar:
44It's better than all the alternatives we tried so far:
45
46 - Symbolic links and direct #includes: this was the original approach but
47   was pushed back on from the kernel side, when tooling modified the
48   headers and broke them accidentally for kernel builds.
49
50 - Duplicate self-defined ABI headers like glibc: double the maintenance
51   burden, double the chance for mistakes, plus there's no tech-driven
52   notification mechanism to look at new kernel side changes.
53
54What we are doing now is a third option:
55
56 - A software-enforced copy-on-write mechanism of kernel headers to
57   tooling, driven by non-fatal warnings on the tooling side build when
58   kernel headers get modified:
59
60    Warning: Kernel ABI header differences:
61      diff -u tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
62      diff -u tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h include/uapi/linux/fs.h
63      diff -u tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
64      ...
65
66   The tooling policy is to always pick up the kernel side headers as-is,
67   and integate them into the tooling build. The warnings above serve as a
68   notification to tooling maintainers that there's changes on the kernel
69   side.
70
71We've been using this for many years now, and it might seem hacky, but
72works surprisingly well.
73
74