1Notes on Filesystem Layout 2-------------------------- 3 4These notes describe what mkcramfs generates. Kernel requirements are 5a bit looser, e.g. it doesn't care if the <file_data> items are 6swapped around (though it does care that directory entries (inodes) in 7a given directory are contiguous, as this is used by readdir). 8 9All data is currently in host-endian format; neither mkcramfs nor the 10kernel ever do swabbing. (See section `Block Size' below.) 11 12<filesystem>: 13 <superblock> 14 <directory_structure> 15 <data> 16 17<superblock>: struct cramfs_super (see cramfs_fs.h). 18 19<directory_structure>: 20 For each file: 21 struct cramfs_inode (see cramfs_fs.h). 22 Filename. Not generally null-terminated, but it is 23 null-padded to a multiple of 4 bytes. 24 25The order of inode traversal is described as "width-first" (not to be 26confused with breadth-first); i.e. like depth-first but listing all of 27a directory's entries before recursing down its subdirectories: the 28same order as `ls -AUR' (but without the /^\..*:$/ directory header 29lines); put another way, the same order as `find -type d -exec 30ls -AU1 {} \;'. 31 32Beginning in 2.4.7, directory entries are sorted. This optimization 33allows cramfs_lookup to return more quickly when a filename does not 34exist, speeds up user-space directory sorts, etc. 35 36<data>: 37 One <file_data> for each file that's either a symlink or a 38 regular file of non-zero st_size. 39 40<file_data>: 41 nblocks * <block_pointer> 42 (where nblocks = (st_size - 1) / blksize + 1) 43 nblocks * <block> 44 padding to multiple of 4 bytes 45 46The i'th <block_pointer> for a file stores the byte offset of the 47*end* of the i'th <block> (i.e. one past the last byte, which is the 48same as the start of the (i+1)'th <block> if there is one). The first 49<block> immediately follows the last <block_pointer> for the file. 50<block_pointer>s are each 32 bits long. 51 52The order of <file_data>'s is a depth-first descent of the directory 53tree, i.e. the same order as `find -size +0 \( -type f -o -type l \) 54-print'. 55 56 57<block>: The i'th <block> is the output of zlib's compress function 58applied to the i'th blksize-sized chunk of the input data. 59(For the last <block> of the file, the input may of course be smaller.) 60Each <block> may be a different size. (See <block_pointer> above.) 61<block>s are merely byte-aligned, not generally u32-aligned. 62 63 64Holes 65----- 66 67This kernel supports cramfs holes (i.e. [efficient representation of] 68blocks in uncompressed data consisting entirely of NUL bytes), but by 69default mkcramfs doesn't test for & create holes, since cramfs in 70kernels up to at least 2.3.39 didn't support holes. Run mkcramfs 71with -z if you want it to create files that can have holes in them. 72 73 74Tools 75----- 76 77The cramfs user-space tools, including mkcramfs and cramfsck, are 78located at <http://sourceforge.net/projects/cramfs/>. 79 80 81Future Development 82================== 83 84Block Size 85---------- 86 87(Block size in cramfs refers to the size of input data that is 88compressed at a time. It's intended to be somewhere around 89PAGE_SIZE for cramfs_readpage's convenience.) 90 91The superblock ought to indicate the block size that the fs was 92written for, since comments in <linux/pagemap.h> indicate that 93PAGE_SIZE may grow in future (if I interpret the comment 94correctly). 95 96Currently, mkcramfs #define's PAGE_SIZE as 4096 and uses that 97for blksize, whereas Linux-2.3.39 uses its PAGE_SIZE, which in 98turn is defined as PAGE_SIZE (which can be as large as 32KB on arm). 99This discrepancy is a bug, though it's not clear which should be 100changed. 101 102One option is to change mkcramfs to take its PAGE_SIZE from 103<asm/page.h>. Personally I don't like this option, but it does 104require the least amount of change: just change `#define 105PAGE_SIZE (4096)' to `#include <asm/page.h>'. The disadvantage 106is that the generated cramfs cannot always be shared between different 107kernels, not even necessarily kernels of the same architecture if 108PAGE_SIZE is subject to change between kernel versions 109(currently possible with arm and ia64). 110 111The remaining options try to make cramfs more sharable. 112 113One part of that is addressing endianness. The two options here are 114`always use little-endian' (like ext2fs) or `writer chooses 115endianness; kernel adapts at runtime'. Little-endian wins because of 116code simplicity and little CPU overhead even on big-endian machines. 117 118The cost of swabbing is changing the code to use the le32_to_cpu 119etc. macros as used by ext2fs. We don't need to swab the compressed 120data, only the superblock, inodes and block pointers. 121 122 123The other part of making cramfs more sharable is choosing a block 124size. The options are: 125 126 1. Always 4096 bytes. 127 128 2. Writer chooses blocksize; kernel adapts but rejects blocksize > 129 PAGE_SIZE. 130 131 3. Writer chooses blocksize; kernel adapts even to blocksize > 132 PAGE_SIZE. 133 134It's easy enough to change the kernel to use a smaller value than 135PAGE_SIZE: just make cramfs_readpage read multiple blocks. 136 137The cost of option 1 is that kernels with a larger PAGE_SIZE 138value don't get as good compression as they can. 139 140The cost of option 2 relative to option 1 is that the code uses 141variables instead of #define'd constants. The gain is that people 142with kernels having larger PAGE_SIZE can make use of that if 143they don't mind their cramfs being inaccessible to kernels with 144smaller PAGE_SIZE values. 145 146Option 3 is easy to implement if we don't mind being CPU-inefficient: 147e.g. get readpage to decompress to a buffer of size MAX_BLKSIZE (which 148must be no larger than 32KB) and discard what it doesn't need. 149Getting readpage to read into all the covered pages is harder. 150 151The main advantage of option 3 over 1, 2, is better compression. The 152cost is greater complexity. Probably not worth it, but I hope someone 153will disagree. (If it is implemented, then I'll re-use that code in 154e2compr.) 155 156 157Another cost of 2 and 3 over 1 is making mkcramfs use a different 158block size, but that just means adding and parsing a -b option. 159 160 161Inode Size 162---------- 163 164Given that cramfs will probably be used for CDs etc. as well as just 165silicon ROMs, it might make sense to expand the inode a little from 166its current 12 bytes. Inodes other than the root inode are followed 167by filename, so the expansion doesn't even have to be a multiple of 4 168bytes. 169