1.. _sched_design_CFS: 2 3============= 4CFS Scheduler 5============= 6 7 81. OVERVIEW 9============ 10 11CFS stands for "Completely Fair Scheduler," and is the "desktop" process 12scheduler implemented by Ingo Molnar and merged in Linux 2.6.23. When 13originally merged, it was the replacement for the previous vanilla 14scheduler's SCHED_OTHER interactivity code. Nowadays, CFS is making room 15for EEVDF, for which documentation can be found in 16Documentation/scheduler/sched-eevdf.rst. 17 1880% of CFS's design can be summed up in a single sentence: CFS basically models 19an "ideal, precise multi-tasking CPU" on real hardware. 20 21"Ideal multi-tasking CPU" is a (non-existent :-)) CPU that has 100% physical 22power and which can run each task at precise equal speed, in parallel, each at 231/nr_running speed. For example: if there are 2 tasks running, then it runs 24each at 50% physical power --- i.e., actually in parallel. 25 26On real hardware, we can run only a single task at once, so we have to 27introduce the concept of "virtual runtime." The virtual runtime of a task 28specifies when its next timeslice would start execution on the ideal 29multi-tasking CPU described above. In practice, the virtual runtime of a task 30is its actual runtime normalized to the total number of running tasks. 31 32 33 342. FEW IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS 35============================== 36 37In CFS the virtual runtime is expressed and tracked via the per-task 38p->se.vruntime (nanosec-unit) value. This way, it's possible to accurately 39timestamp and measure the "expected CPU time" a task should have gotten. 40 41 Small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same 42 p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task 43 would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time. 44 45CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->se.vruntime value and it is thus 46very simple: it always tries to run the task with the smallest p->se.vruntime 47value (i.e., the task which executed least so far). CFS always tries to split 48up CPU time between runnable tasks as close to "ideal multitasking hardware" as 49possible. 50 51Most of the rest of CFS's design just falls out of this really simple concept, 52with a few add-on embellishments like nice levels, multiprocessing and various 53algorithm variants to recognize sleepers. 54 55 56 573. THE RBTREE 58============== 59 60CFS's design is quite radical: it does not use the old data structures for the 61runqueues, but it uses a time-ordered rbtree to build a "timeline" of future 62task execution, and thus has no "array switch" artifacts (by which both the 63previous vanilla scheduler and RSDL/SD are affected). 64 65CFS also maintains the rq->cfs.min_vruntime value, which is a monotonic 66increasing value tracking the smallest vruntime among all tasks in the 67runqueue. The total amount of work done by the system is tracked using 68min_vruntime; that value is used to place newly activated entities on the left 69side of the tree as much as possible. 70 71The total number of running tasks in the runqueue is accounted through the 72rq->cfs.load value, which is the sum of the weights of the tasks queued on the 73runqueue. 74 75CFS maintains a time-ordered rbtree, where all runnable tasks are sorted by the 76p->se.vruntime key. CFS picks the "leftmost" task from this tree and sticks to it. 77As the system progresses forwards, the executed tasks are put into the tree 78more and more to the right --- slowly but surely giving a chance for every task 79to become the "leftmost task" and thus get on the CPU within a deterministic 80amount of time. 81 82Summing up, CFS works like this: it runs a task a bit, and when the task 83schedules (or a scheduler tick happens) the task's CPU usage is "accounted 84for": the (small) time it just spent using the physical CPU is added to 85p->se.vruntime. Once p->se.vruntime gets high enough so that another task 86becomes the "leftmost task" of the time-ordered rbtree it maintains (plus a 87small amount of "granularity" distance relative to the leftmost task so that we 88do not over-schedule tasks and trash the cache), then the new leftmost task is 89picked and the current task is preempted. 90 91 92 934. SOME FEATURES OF CFS 94======================== 95 96CFS uses nanosecond granularity accounting and does not rely on any jiffies or 97other HZ detail. Thus the CFS scheduler has no notion of "timeslices" in the 98way the previous scheduler had, and has no heuristics whatsoever. There is 99only one central tunable (you have to switch on CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG): 100 101 /sys/kernel/debug/sched/base_slice_ns 102 103which can be used to tune the scheduler from "desktop" (i.e., low latencies) to 104"server" (i.e., good batching) workloads. It defaults to a setting suitable 105for desktop workloads. SCHED_BATCH is handled by the CFS scheduler module too. 106 107In case CONFIG_HZ results in base_slice_ns < TICK_NSEC, the value of 108base_slice_ns will have little to no impact on the workloads. 109 110Due to its design, the CFS scheduler is not prone to any of the "attacks" that 111exist today against the heuristics of the stock scheduler: fiftyp.c, thud.c, 112chew.c, ring-test.c, massive_intr.c all work fine and do not impact 113interactivity and produce the expected behavior. 114 115The CFS scheduler has a much stronger handling of nice levels and SCHED_BATCH 116than the previous vanilla scheduler: both types of workloads are isolated much 117more aggressively. 118 119SMP load-balancing has been reworked/sanitized: the runqueue-walking 120assumptions are gone from the load-balancing code now, and iterators of the 121scheduling modules are used. The balancing code got quite a bit simpler as a 122result. 123 124 125 1265. Scheduling policies 127====================== 128 129CFS implements three scheduling policies: 130 131 - SCHED_NORMAL (traditionally called SCHED_OTHER): The scheduling 132 policy that is used for regular tasks. 133 134 - SCHED_BATCH: Does not preempt nearly as often as regular tasks 135 would, thereby allowing tasks to run longer and make better use of 136 caches but at the cost of interactivity. This is well suited for 137 batch jobs. 138 139 - SCHED_IDLE: This is even weaker than nice 19, but its not a true 140 idle timer scheduler in order to avoid to get into priority 141 inversion problems which would deadlock the machine. 142 143SCHED_FIFO/_RR are implemented in sched/rt.c and are as specified by 144POSIX. 145 146The command chrt from util-linux-ng 2.13.1.1 can set all of these except 147SCHED_IDLE. 148 149 150 1516. SCHEDULING CLASSES 152====================== 153 154The new CFS scheduler has been designed in such a way to introduce "Scheduling 155Classes," an extensible hierarchy of scheduler modules. These modules 156encapsulate scheduling policy details and are handled by the scheduler core 157without the core code assuming too much about them. 158 159sched/fair.c implements the CFS scheduler described above. 160 161sched/rt.c implements SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR semantics, in a simpler way than 162the previous vanilla scheduler did. It uses 100 runqueues (for all 100 RT 163priority levels, instead of 140 in the previous scheduler) and it needs no 164expired array. 165 166Scheduling classes are implemented through the sched_class structure, which 167contains hooks to functions that must be called whenever an interesting event 168occurs. 169 170This is the (partial) list of the hooks: 171 172 - enqueue_task(...) 173 174 Called when a task enters a runnable state. 175 It puts the scheduling entity (task) into the red-black tree and 176 increments the nr_running variable. 177 178 - dequeue_task(...) 179 180 When a task is no longer runnable, this function is called to keep the 181 corresponding scheduling entity out of the red-black tree. It decrements 182 the nr_running variable. 183 184 - yield_task(...) 185 186 This function is basically just a dequeue followed by an enqueue, unless the 187 compat_yield sysctl is turned on; in that case, it places the scheduling 188 entity at the right-most end of the red-black tree. 189 190 - wakeup_preempt(...) 191 192 This function checks if a task that entered the runnable state should 193 preempt the currently running task. 194 195 - pick_next_task(...) 196 197 This function chooses the most appropriate task eligible to run next. 198 199 - set_next_task(...) 200 201 This function is called when a task changes its scheduling class, changes 202 its task group or is scheduled. 203 204 - task_tick(...) 205 206 This function is mostly called from time tick functions; it might lead to 207 process switch. This drives the running preemption. 208 209 210 211 2127. GROUP SCHEDULER EXTENSIONS TO CFS 213===================================== 214 215Normally, the scheduler operates on individual tasks and strives to provide 216fair CPU time to each task. Sometimes, it may be desirable to group tasks and 217provide fair CPU time to each such task group. For example, it may be 218desirable to first provide fair CPU time to each user on the system and then to 219each task belonging to a user. 220 221CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED strives to achieve exactly that. It lets tasks to be 222grouped and divides CPU time fairly among such groups. 223 224CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED permits to group real-time (i.e., SCHED_FIFO and 225SCHED_RR) tasks. 226 227CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED permits to group CFS (i.e., SCHED_NORMAL and 228SCHED_BATCH) tasks. 229 230 These options need CONFIG_CGROUPS to be defined, and let the administrator 231 create arbitrary groups of tasks, using the "cgroup" pseudo filesystem. See 232 Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cgroups.rst for more information about this filesystem. 233 234When CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is defined, a "cpu.shares" file is created for each 235group created using the pseudo filesystem. See example steps below to create 236task groups and modify their CPU share using the "cgroups" pseudo filesystem:: 237 238 # mount -t tmpfs cgroup_root /sys/fs/cgroup 239 # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu 240 # mount -t cgroup -ocpu none /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu 241 # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu 242 243 # mkdir multimedia # create "multimedia" group of tasks 244 # mkdir browser # create "browser" group of tasks 245 246 # #Configure the multimedia group to receive twice the CPU bandwidth 247 # #that of browser group 248 249 # echo 2048 > multimedia/cpu.shares 250 # echo 1024 > browser/cpu.shares 251 252 # firefox & # Launch firefox and move it to "browser" group 253 # echo <firefox_pid> > browser/tasks 254 255 # #Launch gmplayer (or your favourite movie player) 256 # echo <movie_player_pid> > multimedia/tasks 257