1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) 2 3.. _napi: 4 5==== 6NAPI 7==== 8 9NAPI is the event handling mechanism used by the Linux networking stack. 10The name NAPI no longer stands for anything in particular [#]_. 11 12In basic operation the device notifies the host about new events 13via an interrupt. 14The host then schedules a NAPI instance to process the events. 15The device may also be polled for events via NAPI without receiving 16interrupts first (:ref:`busy polling<poll>`). 17 18NAPI processing usually happens in the software interrupt context, 19but there is an option to use :ref:`separate kernel threads<threaded>` 20for NAPI processing. 21 22All in all NAPI abstracts away from the drivers the context and configuration 23of event (packet Rx and Tx) processing. 24 25Driver API 26========== 27 28The two most important elements of NAPI are the struct napi_struct 29and the associated poll method. struct napi_struct holds the state 30of the NAPI instance while the method is the driver-specific event 31handler. The method will typically free Tx packets that have been 32transmitted and process newly received packets. 33 34.. _drv_ctrl: 35 36Control API 37----------- 38 39netif_napi_add() and netif_napi_del() add/remove a NAPI instance 40from the system. The instances are attached to the netdevice passed 41as argument (and will be deleted automatically when netdevice is 42unregistered). Instances are added in a disabled state. 43 44napi_enable() and napi_disable() manage the disabled state. 45A disabled NAPI can't be scheduled and its poll method is guaranteed 46to not be invoked. napi_disable() waits for ownership of the NAPI 47instance to be released. 48 49The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe against 50concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of control API 51calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race conditions. For example, 52calling napi_disable() multiple times in a row will hang waiting for 53ownership of the NAPI instance to be released. 54 55Drivers using the netdev instance lock may need to use the ``_locked()`` 56variants of the control APIs when that lock is already held. 57 58Datapath API 59------------ 60 61napi_schedule() is the basic method of scheduling a NAPI poll. 62Drivers should call this function in their interrupt handler 63(see :ref:`drv_sched` for more info). A successful call to napi_schedule() 64will take ownership of the NAPI instance. 65 66Later, after NAPI is scheduled, the driver's poll method will be 67called to process the events/packets. The method takes a ``budget`` 68argument - drivers can process completions for any number of Tx 69packets but should only process up to ``budget`` number of 70Rx packets. Rx processing is usually much more expensive. 71 72In other words for Rx processing the ``budget`` argument limits how many 73packets driver can process in a single poll. Rx specific APIs like page 74pool or XDP cannot be used at all when ``budget`` is 0. 75skb Tx processing should happen regardless of the ``budget``, but if 76the argument is 0 driver cannot call any XDP (or page pool) APIs. 77 78.. warning:: 79 80 The ``budget`` argument may be 0 if core tries to only process 81 skb Tx completions and no Rx or XDP packets. 82 83The poll method returns the amount of work done. If the driver still 84has outstanding work to do (e.g. ``budget`` was exhausted) 85the poll method should return exactly ``budget``. In that case, 86the NAPI instance will be serviced/polled again (without the 87need to be scheduled). 88 89If event processing has been completed (all outstanding packets 90processed) the poll method should call napi_complete_done() 91before returning. napi_complete_done() releases the ownership 92of the instance. 93 94.. warning:: 95 96 The case of finishing all events and using exactly ``budget`` 97 must be handled carefully. There is no way to report this 98 (rare) condition to the stack, so the driver must either 99 not call napi_complete_done() and wait to be called again, 100 or return ``budget - 1``. 101 102 If the ``budget`` is 0 napi_complete_done() should never be called. 103 104Call sequence 105------------- 106 107Drivers should not make assumptions about the exact sequencing 108of calls. The poll method may be called without the driver scheduling 109the instance (unless the instance is disabled). Similarly, 110it's not guaranteed that the poll method will be called, even 111if napi_schedule() succeeded (e.g. if the instance gets disabled). 112 113As mentioned in the :ref:`drv_ctrl` section - napi_disable() and subsequent 114calls to the poll method only wait for the ownership of the instance 115to be released, not for the poll method to exit. This means that 116drivers should avoid accessing any data structures after calling 117napi_complete_done(). 118 119.. _drv_sched: 120 121Scheduling and IRQ masking 122-------------------------- 123 124Drivers should keep the interrupts masked after scheduling 125the NAPI instance - until NAPI polling finishes any further 126interrupts are unnecessary. 127 128Drivers which have to mask the interrupts explicitly (as opposed 129to IRQ being auto-masked by the device) should use the napi_schedule_prep() 130and __napi_schedule() calls: 131 132.. code-block:: c 133 134 if (napi_schedule_prep(&v->napi)) { 135 mydrv_mask_rxtx_irq(v->idx); 136 /* schedule after masking to avoid races */ 137 __napi_schedule(&v->napi); 138 } 139 140IRQ should only be unmasked after a successful call to napi_complete_done(): 141 142.. code-block:: c 143 144 if (budget && napi_complete_done(&v->napi, work_done)) { 145 mydrv_unmask_rxtx_irq(v->idx); 146 return min(work_done, budget - 1); 147 } 148 149napi_schedule_irqoff() is a variant of napi_schedule() which takes advantage 150of guarantees given by being invoked in IRQ context (no need to 151mask interrupts). napi_schedule_irqoff() will fall back to napi_schedule() if 152IRQs are threaded (such as if ``PREEMPT_RT`` is enabled). 153 154Instance to queue mapping 155------------------------- 156 157Modern devices have multiple NAPI instances (struct napi_struct) per 158interface. There is no strong requirement on how the instances are 159mapped to queues and interrupts. NAPI is primarily a polling/processing 160abstraction without specific user-facing semantics. That said, most networking 161devices end up using NAPI in fairly similar ways. 162 163NAPI instances most often correspond 1:1:1 to interrupts and queue pairs 164(queue pair is a set of a single Rx and single Tx queue). 165 166In less common cases a NAPI instance may be used for multiple queues 167or Rx and Tx queues can be serviced by separate NAPI instances on a single 168core. Regardless of the queue assignment, however, there is usually still 169a 1:1 mapping between NAPI instances and interrupts. 170 171It's worth noting that the ethtool API uses a "channel" terminology where 172each channel can be either ``rx``, ``tx`` or ``combined``. It's not clear 173what constitutes a channel; the recommended interpretation is to understand 174a channel as an IRQ/NAPI which services queues of a given type. For example, 175a configuration of 1 ``rx``, 1 ``tx`` and 1 ``combined`` channel is expected 176to utilize 3 interrupts, 2 Rx and 2 Tx queues. 177 178Persistent NAPI config 179---------------------- 180 181Drivers often allocate and free NAPI instances dynamically. This leads to loss 182of NAPI-related user configuration each time NAPI instances are reallocated. 183The netif_napi_add_config() API prevents this loss of configuration by 184associating each NAPI instance with a persistent NAPI configuration based on 185a driver defined index value, like a queue number. 186 187Using this API allows for persistent NAPI IDs (among other settings), which can 188be beneficial to userspace programs using ``SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID``. See the 189sections below for other NAPI configuration settings. 190 191Drivers should try to use netif_napi_add_config() whenever possible. 192 193User API 194======== 195 196User interactions with NAPI depend on NAPI instance ID. The instance IDs 197are visible to the user through the ``SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID`` socket option 198and the netdev Netlink API. 199 200Users can query NAPI IDs for a device or device queue using netlink. This can 201be done programmatically in a user application or by using a script included in 202the kernel source tree: ``tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py``. 203 204For example, using the script to dump all of the queues for a device (which 205will reveal each queue's NAPI ID): 206 207.. code-block:: bash 208 209 $ kernel-source/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py \ 210 --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \ 211 --dump queue-get \ 212 --json='{"ifindex": 2}' 213 214See ``Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml`` for more details on 215available operations and attributes. 216 217Software IRQ coalescing 218----------------------- 219 220NAPI does not perform any explicit event coalescing by default. 221In most scenarios batching happens due to IRQ coalescing which is done 222by the device. There are cases where software coalescing is helpful. 223 224NAPI can be configured to arm a repoll timer instead of unmasking 225the hardware interrupts as soon as all packets are processed. 226The ``gro_flush_timeout`` sysfs configuration of the netdevice 227is reused to control the delay of the timer, while 228``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` controls the number of consecutive empty polls 229before NAPI gives up and goes back to using hardware IRQs. 230 231The above parameters can also be set on a per-NAPI basis using netlink via 232netdev-genl. When used with netlink and configured on a per-NAPI basis, the 233parameters mentioned above use hyphens instead of underscores: 234``gro-flush-timeout`` and ``napi-defer-hard-irqs``. 235 236Per-NAPI configuration can be done programmatically in a user application 237or by using a script included in the kernel source tree: 238``tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py``. 239 240For example, using the script: 241 242.. code-block:: bash 243 244 $ kernel-source/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py \ 245 --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \ 246 --do napi-set \ 247 --json='{"id": 345, 248 "defer-hard-irqs": 111, 249 "gro-flush-timeout": 11111}' 250 251Similarly, the parameter ``irq-suspend-timeout`` can be set using netlink 252via netdev-genl. There is no global sysfs parameter for this value. 253 254``irq-suspend-timeout`` is used to determine how long an application can 255completely suspend IRQs. It is used in combination with SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, 256which can be set on a per-epoll context basis with ``EPIOCSPARAMS`` ioctl. 257 258.. _poll: 259 260Busy polling 261------------ 262 263Busy polling allows a user process to check for incoming packets before 264the device interrupt fires. As is the case with any busy polling it trades 265off CPU cycles for lower latency (production uses of NAPI busy polling 266are not well known). 267 268Busy polling is enabled by either setting ``SO_BUSY_POLL`` on 269selected sockets or using the global ``net.core.busy_poll`` and 270``net.core.busy_read`` sysctls. An io_uring API for NAPI busy polling 271also exists. Threaded polling of NAPI also has a mode to busy poll for 272packets (:ref:`threaded busy polling<threaded_busy_poll>`) using the NAPI 273processing kthread. 274 275epoll-based busy polling 276------------------------ 277 278It is possible to trigger packet processing directly from calls to 279``epoll_wait``. In order to use this feature, a user application must ensure 280all file descriptors which are added to an epoll context have the same NAPI ID. 281 282If the application uses a dedicated acceptor thread, the application can obtain 283the NAPI ID of the incoming connection using SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID and then 284distribute that file descriptor to a worker thread. The worker thread would add 285the file descriptor to its epoll context. This would ensure each worker thread 286has an epoll context with FDs that have the same NAPI ID. 287 288Alternatively, if the application uses SO_REUSEPORT, a bpf or ebpf program can 289be inserted to distribute incoming connections to threads such that each thread 290is only given incoming connections with the same NAPI ID. Care must be taken to 291carefully handle cases where a system may have multiple NICs. 292 293In order to enable busy polling, there are two choices: 294 2951. ``/proc/sys/net/core/busy_poll`` can be set with a time in useconds to busy 296 loop waiting for events. This is a system-wide setting and will cause all 297 epoll-based applications to busy poll when they call epoll_wait. This may 298 not be desirable as many applications may not have the need to busy poll. 299 3002. Applications using recent kernels can issue an ioctl on the epoll context 301 file descriptor to set (``EPIOCSPARAMS``) or get (``EPIOCGPARAMS``) ``struct 302 epoll_params``:, which user programs can define as follows: 303 304.. code-block:: c 305 306 struct epoll_params { 307 uint32_t busy_poll_usecs; 308 uint16_t busy_poll_budget; 309 uint8_t prefer_busy_poll; 310 311 /* pad the struct to a multiple of 64bits */ 312 uint8_t __pad; 313 }; 314 315IRQ mitigation 316--------------- 317 318While busy polling is supposed to be used by low latency applications, 319a similar mechanism can be used for IRQ mitigation. 320 321Very high request-per-second applications (especially routing/forwarding 322applications and especially applications using AF_XDP sockets) may not 323want to be interrupted until they finish processing a request or a batch 324of packets. 325 326Such applications can pledge to the kernel that they will perform a busy 327polling operation periodically, and the driver should keep the device IRQs 328permanently masked. This mode is enabled by using the ``SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL`` 329socket option. To avoid system misbehavior the pledge is revoked 330if ``gro_flush_timeout`` passes without any busy poll call. For epoll-based 331busy polling applications, the ``prefer_busy_poll`` field of ``struct 332epoll_params`` can be set to 1 and the ``EPIOCSPARAMS`` ioctl can be issued to 333enable this mode. See the above section for more details. 334 335The NAPI budget for busy polling is lower than the default (which makes 336sense given the low latency intention of normal busy polling). This is 337not the case with IRQ mitigation, however, so the budget can be adjusted 338with the ``SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET`` socket option. For epoll-based busy polling 339applications, the ``busy_poll_budget`` field can be adjusted to the desired value 340in ``struct epoll_params`` and set on a specific epoll context using the ``EPIOCSPARAMS`` 341ioctl. See the above section for more details. 342 343It is important to note that choosing a large value for ``gro_flush_timeout`` 344will defer IRQs to allow for better batch processing, but will induce latency 345when the system is not fully loaded. Choosing a small value for 346``gro_flush_timeout`` can cause interference of the user application which is 347attempting to busy poll by device IRQs and softirq processing. This value 348should be chosen carefully with these tradeoffs in mind. epoll-based busy 349polling applications may be able to mitigate how much user processing happens 350by choosing an appropriate value for ``maxevents``. 351 352Users may want to consider an alternate approach, IRQ suspension, to help deal 353with these tradeoffs. 354 355IRQ suspension 356-------------- 357 358IRQ suspension is a mechanism wherein device IRQs are masked while epoll 359triggers NAPI packet processing. 360 361While application calls to epoll_wait successfully retrieve events, the kernel will 362defer the IRQ suspension timer. If the kernel does not retrieve any events 363while busy polling (for example, because network traffic levels subsided), IRQ 364suspension is disabled and the IRQ mitigation strategies described above are 365engaged. 366 367This allows users to balance CPU consumption with network processing 368efficiency. 369 370To use this mechanism: 371 372 1. The per-NAPI config parameter ``irq-suspend-timeout`` should be set to the 373 maximum time (in nanoseconds) the application can have its IRQs 374 suspended. This is done using netlink, as described above. This timeout 375 serves as a safety mechanism to restart IRQ driver interrupt processing if 376 the application has stalled. This value should be chosen so that it covers 377 the amount of time the user application needs to process data from its 378 call to epoll_wait, noting that applications can control how much data 379 they retrieve by setting ``maxevents`` when calling epoll_wait. 380 381 2. The sysfs parameter or per-NAPI config parameters ``gro_flush_timeout`` 382 and ``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` can be set to low values. They will be used 383 to defer IRQs after busy poll has found no data. 384 385 3. The ``prefer_busy_poll`` flag must be set to true. This can be done using 386 the ``EPIOCSPARAMS`` ioctl as described above. 387 388 4. The application uses epoll as described above to trigger NAPI packet 389 processing. 390 391As mentioned above, as long as subsequent calls to epoll_wait return events to 392userland, the ``irq-suspend-timeout`` is deferred and IRQs are disabled. This 393allows the application to process data without interference. 394 395Once a call to epoll_wait results in no events being found, IRQ suspension is 396automatically disabled and the ``gro_flush_timeout`` and 397``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` mitigation mechanisms take over. 398 399It is expected that ``irq-suspend-timeout`` will be set to a value much larger 400than ``gro_flush_timeout`` as ``irq-suspend-timeout`` should suspend IRQs for 401the duration of one userland processing cycle. 402 403While it is not strictly necessary to use ``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` and 404``gro_flush_timeout`` to use IRQ suspension, their use is strongly 405recommended. 406 407IRQ suspension causes the system to alternate between polling mode and 408irq-driven packet delivery. During busy periods, ``irq-suspend-timeout`` 409overrides ``gro_flush_timeout`` and keeps the system busy polling, but when 410epoll finds no events, the setting of ``gro_flush_timeout`` and 411``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` determine the next step. 412 413There are essentially three possible loops for network processing and 414packet delivery: 415 4161) hardirq -> softirq -> napi poll; basic interrupt delivery 4172) timer -> softirq -> napi poll; deferred irq processing 4183) epoll -> busy-poll -> napi poll; busy looping 419 420Loop 2 can take control from Loop 1, if ``gro_flush_timeout`` and 421``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` are set. 422 423If ``gro_flush_timeout`` and ``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` are set, Loops 2 424and 3 "wrestle" with each other for control. 425 426During busy periods, ``irq-suspend-timeout`` is used as timer in Loop 2, 427which essentially tilts network processing in favour of Loop 3. 428 429If ``gro_flush_timeout`` and ``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` are not set, Loop 3 430cannot take control from Loop 1. 431 432Therefore, setting ``gro_flush_timeout`` and ``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` is 433the recommended usage, because otherwise setting ``irq-suspend-timeout`` 434might not have any discernible effect. 435 436.. _threaded_busy_poll: 437 438Threaded NAPI busy polling 439-------------------------- 440 441Threaded NAPI busy polling extends threaded NAPI and adds support to do 442continuous busy polling of the NAPI. This can be useful for forwarding or 443AF_XDP applications. 444 445Threaded NAPI busy polling can be enabled on per NIC queue basis using Netlink. 446 447For example, using the following script: 448 449.. code-block:: bash 450 451 $ ynl --family netdev --do napi-set \ 452 --json='{"id": 66, "threaded": "busy-poll"}' 453 454The kernel will create a kthread that busy polls on this NAPI. 455 456The user may elect to set the CPU affinity of this kthread to an unused CPU 457core to improve how often the NAPI is polled at the expense of wasted CPU 458cycles. Note that this will keep the CPU core busy with 100% usage. 459 460Once threaded busy polling is enabled for a NAPI, PID of the kthread can be 461retrieved using Netlink so the affinity of the kthread can be set up. 462 463For example, the following script can be used to fetch the PID: 464 465.. code-block:: bash 466 467 $ ynl --family netdev --do napi-get --json='{"id": 66}' 468 469This will output something like following, the pid `258` is the PID of the 470kthread that is polling this NAPI. 471 472.. code-block:: bash 473 474 $ {'defer-hard-irqs': 0, 475 'gro-flush-timeout': 0, 476 'id': 66, 477 'ifindex': 2, 478 'irq-suspend-timeout': 0, 479 'pid': 258, 480 'threaded': 'busy-poll'} 481 482.. _threaded: 483 484Threaded NAPI 485------------- 486 487Threaded NAPI is an operating mode that uses dedicated kernel 488threads rather than software IRQ context for NAPI processing. 489Each threaded NAPI instance will spawn a separate thread 490(called ``napi/${ifc-name}-${napi-id}``). 491 492It is recommended to pin each kernel thread to a single CPU, the same 493CPU as the CPU which services the interrupt. Note that the mapping 494between IRQs and NAPI instances may not be trivial (and is driver 495dependent). The NAPI instance IDs will be assigned in the opposite 496order than the process IDs of the kernel threads. 497 498Threaded NAPI is controlled by writing 0/1 to the ``threaded`` file in 499netdev's sysfs directory. It can also be enabled for a specific NAPI using 500netlink interface. 501 502For example, using the script: 503 504.. code-block:: bash 505 506 $ ynl --family netdev --do napi-set --json='{"id": 66, "threaded": 1}' 507 508.. rubric:: Footnotes 509 510.. [#] NAPI was originally referred to as New API in 2.4 Linux. 511