xref: /linux/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/osi.rst (revision 34dc1baba215b826e454b8d19e4f24adbeb7d00d)
1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3==========================
4ACPI _OSI and _REV methods
5==========================
6
7An ACPI BIOS can use the "Operating System Interfaces" method (_OSI)
8to find out what the operating system supports. Eg. If BIOS
9AML code includes _OSI("XYZ"), the kernel's AML interpreter
10can evaluate that method, look to see if it supports 'XYZ'
11and answer YES or NO to the BIOS.
12
13The ACPI _REV method returns the "Revision of the ACPI specification
14that OSPM supports"
15
16This document explains how and why the BIOS and Linux should use these methods.
17It also explains how and why they are widely misused.
18
19How to use _OSI
20===============
21
22Linux runs on two groups of machines -- those that are tested by the OEM
23to be compatible with Linux, and those that were never tested with Linux,
24but where Linux was installed to replace the original OS (Windows or OSX).
25
26The larger group is the systems tested to run only Windows.  Not only that,
27but many were tested to run with just one specific version of Windows.
28So even though the BIOS may use _OSI to query what version of Windows is running,
29only a single path through the BIOS has actually been tested.
30Experience shows that taking untested paths through the BIOS
31exposes Linux to an entire category of BIOS bugs.
32For this reason, Linux _OSI defaults must continue to claim compatibility
33with all versions of Windows.
34
35But Linux isn't actually compatible with Windows, and the Linux community
36has also been hurt with regressions when Linux adds the latest version of
37Windows to its list of _OSI strings.  So it is possible that additional strings
38will be more thoroughly vetted before shipping upstream in the future.
39But it is likely that they will all eventually be added.
40
41What should an OEM do if they want to support Linux and Windows
42using the same BIOS image?  Often they need to do something different
43for Linux to deal with how Linux is different from Windows.
44
45In this case, the OEM should create custom ASL to be executed by the
46Linux kernel and changes to Linux kernel drivers to execute this custom
47ASL.  The easiest way to accomplish this is to introduce a device specific
48method (_DSM) that is called from the Linux kernel.
49
50In the past the kernel used to support something like:
51_OSI("Linux-OEM-my_interface_name")
52where 'OEM' is needed if this is an OEM-specific hook,
53and 'my_interface_name' describes the hook, which could be a
54quirk, a bug, or a bug-fix.
55
56However this was discovered to be abused by other BIOS vendors to change
57completely unrelated code on completely unrelated systems.  This prompted
58an evaluation of all of its uses. This uncovered that they aren't needed
59for any of the original reasons. As such, the kernel will not respond to
60any custom Linux-* strings by default.
61
62That was easy.  Read on, to find out how to do it wrong.
63
64Before _OSI, there was _OS
65==========================
66
67ACPI 1.0 specified "_OS" as an
68"object that evaluates to a string that identifies the operating system."
69
70The ACPI BIOS flow would include an evaluation of _OS, and the AML
71interpreter in the kernel would return to it a string identifying the OS:
72
73Windows 98, SE: "Microsoft Windows"
74Windows ME: "Microsoft WindowsME:Millennium Edition"
75Windows NT: "Microsoft Windows NT"
76
77The idea was on a platform tasked with running multiple OS's,
78the BIOS could use _OS to enable devices that an OS
79might support, or enable quirks or bug workarounds
80necessary to make the platform compatible with that pre-existing OS.
81
82But _OS had fundamental problems.  First, the BIOS needed to know the name
83of every possible version of the OS that would run on it, and needed to know
84all the quirks of those OS's.  Certainly it would make more sense
85for the BIOS to ask *specific* things of the OS, such
86"do you support a specific interface", and thus in ACPI 3.0,
87_OSI was born to replace _OS.
88
89_OS was abandoned, though even today, many BIOS look for
90_OS "Microsoft Windows NT", though it seems somewhat far-fetched
91that anybody would install those old operating systems
92over what came with the machine.
93
94Linux answers "Microsoft Windows NT" to please that BIOS idiom.
95That is the *only* viable strategy, as that is what modern Windows does,
96and so doing otherwise could steer the BIOS down an untested path.
97
98_OSI is born, and immediately misused
99=====================================
100
101With _OSI, the *BIOS* provides the string describing an interface,
102and asks the OS: "YES/NO, are you compatible with this interface?"
103
104eg. _OSI("3.0 Thermal Model") would return TRUE if the OS knows how
105to deal with the thermal extensions made to the ACPI 3.0 specification.
106An old OS that doesn't know about those extensions would answer FALSE,
107and a new OS may be able to return TRUE.
108
109For an OS-specific interface, the ACPI spec said that the BIOS and the OS
110were to agree on a string of the form such as "Windows-interface_name".
111
112But two bad things happened.  First, the Windows ecosystem used _OSI
113not as designed, but as a direct replacement for _OS -- identifying
114the OS version, rather than an OS supported interface.  Indeed, right
115from the start, the ACPI 3.0 spec itself codified this misuse
116in example code using _OSI("Windows 2001").
117
118This misuse was adopted and continues today.
119
120Linux had no choice but to also return TRUE to _OSI("Windows 2001")
121and its successors.  To do otherwise would virtually guarantee breaking
122a BIOS that has been tested only with that _OSI returning TRUE.
123
124This strategy is problematic, as Linux is never completely compatible with
125the latest version of Windows, and sometimes it takes more than a year
126to iron out incompatibilities.
127
128Not to be out-done, the Linux community made things worse by returning TRUE
129to _OSI("Linux").  Doing so is even worse than the Windows misuse
130of _OSI, as "Linux" does not even contain any version information.
131_OSI("Linux") led to some BIOS' malfunctioning due to BIOS writer's
132using it in untested BIOS flows.  But some OEM's used _OSI("Linux")
133in tested flows to support real Linux features.  In 2009, Linux
134removed _OSI("Linux"), and added a cmdline parameter to restore it
135for legacy systems still needed it.  Further a BIOS_BUG warning prints
136for all BIOS's that invoke it.
137
138No BIOS should use _OSI("Linux").
139
140The result is a strategy for Linux to maximize compatibility with
141ACPI BIOS that are tested on Windows machines.  There is a real risk
142of over-stating that compatibility; but the alternative has often been
143catastrophic failure resulting from the BIOS taking paths that
144were never validated under *any* OS.
145
146Do not use _REV
147===============
148
149Since _OSI("Linux") went away, some BIOS writers used _REV
150to support Linux and Windows differences in the same BIOS.
151
152_REV was defined in ACPI 1.0 to return the version of ACPI
153supported by the OS and the OS AML interpreter.
154
155Modern Windows returns _REV = 2.  Linux used ACPI_CA_SUPPORT_LEVEL,
156which would increment, based on the version of the spec supported.
157
158Unfortunately, _REV was also misused.  eg. some BIOS would check
159for _REV = 3, and do something for Linux, but when Linux returned
160_REV = 4, that support broke.
161
162In response to this problem, Linux returns _REV = 2 always,
163from mid-2015 onward.  The ACPI specification will also be updated
164to reflect that _REV is deprecated, and always returns 2.
165
166Apple Mac and _OSI("Darwin")
167============================
168
169On Apple's Mac platforms, the ACPI BIOS invokes _OSI("Darwin")
170to determine if the machine is running Apple OSX.
171
172Like Linux's _OSI("*Windows*") strategy, Linux defaults to
173answering YES to _OSI("Darwin") to enable full access
174to the hardware and validated BIOS paths seen by OSX.
175Just like on Windows-tested platforms, this strategy has risks.
176
177Starting in Linux-3.18, the kernel answered YES to _OSI("Darwin")
178for the purpose of enabling Mac Thunderbolt support.  Further,
179if the kernel noticed _OSI("Darwin") being invoked, it additionally
180disabled all _OSI("*Windows*") to keep poorly written Mac BIOS
181from going down untested combinations of paths.
182
183The Linux-3.18 change in default caused power regressions on Mac
184laptops, and the 3.18 implementation did not allow changing
185the default via cmdline "acpi_osi=!Darwin".  Linux-4.7 fixed
186the ability to use acpi_osi=!Darwin as a workaround, and
187we hope to see Mac Thunderbolt power management support in Linux-4.11.
188