xref: /linux/Documentation/core-api/entry.rst (revision 55d0969c451159cff86949b38c39171cab962069)
1Entry/exit handling for exceptions, interrupts, syscalls and KVM
2================================================================
3
4All transitions between execution domains require state updates which are
5subject to strict ordering constraints. State updates are required for the
6following:
7
8  * Lockdep
9  * RCU / Context tracking
10  * Preemption counter
11  * Tracing
12  * Time accounting
13
14The update order depends on the transition type and is explained below in
15the transition type sections: `Syscalls`_, `KVM`_, `Interrupts and regular
16exceptions`_, `NMI and NMI-like exceptions`_.
17
18Non-instrumentable code - noinstr
19---------------------------------
20
21Most instrumentation facilities depend on RCU, so instrumentation is prohibited
22for entry code before RCU starts watching and exit code after RCU stops
23watching. In addition, many architectures must save and restore register state,
24which means that (for example) a breakpoint in the breakpoint entry code would
25overwrite the debug registers of the initial breakpoint.
26
27Such code must be marked with the 'noinstr' attribute, placing that code into a
28special section inaccessible to instrumentation and debug facilities. Some
29functions are partially instrumentable, which is handled by marking them
30noinstr and using instrumentation_begin() and instrumentation_end() to flag the
31instrumentable ranges of code:
32
33.. code-block:: c
34
35  noinstr void entry(void)
36  {
37  	handle_entry();     // <-- must be 'noinstr' or '__always_inline'
38	...
39
40	instrumentation_begin();
41	handle_context();   // <-- instrumentable code
42	instrumentation_end();
43
44	...
45	handle_exit();      // <-- must be 'noinstr' or '__always_inline'
46  }
47
48This allows verification of the 'noinstr' restrictions via objtool on
49supported architectures.
50
51Invoking non-instrumentable functions from instrumentable context has no
52restrictions and is useful to protect e.g. state switching which would
53cause malfunction if instrumented.
54
55All non-instrumentable entry/exit code sections before and after the RCU
56state transitions must run with interrupts disabled.
57
58Syscalls
59--------
60
61Syscall-entry code starts in assembly code and calls out into low-level C code
62after establishing low-level architecture-specific state and stack frames. This
63low-level C code must not be instrumented. A typical syscall handling function
64invoked from low-level assembly code looks like this:
65
66.. code-block:: c
67
68  noinstr void syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
69  {
70	arch_syscall_enter(regs);
71	nr = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, nr);
72
73	instrumentation_begin();
74	if (!invoke_syscall(regs, nr) && nr != -1)
75	 	result_reg(regs) = __sys_ni_syscall(regs);
76	instrumentation_end();
77
78	syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
79  }
80
81syscall_enter_from_user_mode() first invokes enter_from_user_mode() which
82establishes state in the following order:
83
84  * Lockdep
85  * RCU / Context tracking
86  * Tracing
87
88and then invokes the various entry work functions like ptrace, seccomp, audit,
89syscall tracing, etc. After all that is done, the instrumentable invoke_syscall
90function can be invoked. The instrumentable code section then ends, after which
91syscall_exit_to_user_mode() is invoked.
92
93syscall_exit_to_user_mode() handles all work which needs to be done before
94returning to user space like tracing, audit, signals, task work etc. After
95that it invokes exit_to_user_mode() which again handles the state
96transition in the reverse order:
97
98  * Tracing
99  * RCU / Context tracking
100  * Lockdep
101
102syscall_enter_from_user_mode() and syscall_exit_to_user_mode() are also
103available as fine grained subfunctions in cases where the architecture code
104has to do extra work between the various steps. In such cases it has to
105ensure that enter_from_user_mode() is called first on entry and
106exit_to_user_mode() is called last on exit.
107
108Do not nest syscalls. Nested systcalls will cause RCU and/or context tracking
109to print a warning.
110
111KVM
112---
113
114Entering or exiting guest mode is very similar to syscalls. From the host
115kernel point of view the CPU goes off into user space when entering the
116guest and returns to the kernel on exit.
117
118kvm_guest_enter_irqoff() is a KVM-specific variant of exit_to_user_mode()
119and kvm_guest_exit_irqoff() is the KVM variant of enter_from_user_mode().
120The state operations have the same ordering.
121
122Task work handling is done separately for guest at the boundary of the
123vcpu_run() loop via xfer_to_guest_mode_handle_work() which is a subset of
124the work handled on return to user space.
125
126Do not nest KVM entry/exit transitions because doing so is nonsensical.
127
128Interrupts and regular exceptions
129---------------------------------
130
131Interrupts entry and exit handling is slightly more complex than syscalls
132and KVM transitions.
133
134If an interrupt is raised while the CPU executes in user space, the entry
135and exit handling is exactly the same as for syscalls.
136
137If the interrupt is raised while the CPU executes in kernel space the entry and
138exit handling is slightly different. RCU state is only updated when the
139interrupt is raised in the context of the CPU's idle task. Otherwise, RCU will
140already be watching. Lockdep and tracing have to be updated unconditionally.
141
142irqentry_enter() and irqentry_exit() provide the implementation for this.
143
144The architecture-specific part looks similar to syscall handling:
145
146.. code-block:: c
147
148  noinstr void interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
149  {
150	arch_interrupt_enter(regs);
151	state = irqentry_enter(regs);
152
153	instrumentation_begin();
154
155	irq_enter_rcu();
156	invoke_irq_handler(regs, nr);
157	irq_exit_rcu();
158
159	instrumentation_end();
160
161	irqentry_exit(regs, state);
162  }
163
164Note that the invocation of the actual interrupt handler is within a
165irq_enter_rcu() and irq_exit_rcu() pair.
166
167irq_enter_rcu() updates the preemption count which makes in_hardirq()
168return true, handles NOHZ tick state and interrupt time accounting. This
169means that up to the point where irq_enter_rcu() is invoked in_hardirq()
170returns false.
171
172irq_exit_rcu() handles interrupt time accounting, undoes the preemption
173count update and eventually handles soft interrupts and NOHZ tick state.
174
175In theory, the preemption count could be updated in irqentry_enter(). In
176practice, deferring this update to irq_enter_rcu() allows the preemption-count
177code to be traced, while also maintaining symmetry with irq_exit_rcu() and
178irqentry_exit(), which are described in the next paragraph. The only downside
179is that the early entry code up to irq_enter_rcu() must be aware that the
180preemption count has not yet been updated with the HARDIRQ_OFFSET state.
181
182Note that irq_exit_rcu() must remove HARDIRQ_OFFSET from the preemption count
183before it handles soft interrupts, whose handlers must run in BH context rather
184than irq-disabled context. In addition, irqentry_exit() might schedule, which
185also requires that HARDIRQ_OFFSET has been removed from the preemption count.
186
187Even though interrupt handlers are expected to run with local interrupts
188disabled, interrupt nesting is common from an entry/exit perspective. For
189example, softirq handling happens within an irqentry_{enter,exit}() block with
190local interrupts enabled. Also, although uncommon, nothing prevents an
191interrupt handler from re-enabling interrupts.
192
193Interrupt entry/exit code doesn't strictly need to handle reentrancy, since it
194runs with local interrupts disabled. But NMIs can happen anytime, and a lot of
195the entry code is shared between the two.
196
197NMI and NMI-like exceptions
198---------------------------
199
200NMIs and NMI-like exceptions (machine checks, double faults, debug
201interrupts, etc.) can hit any context and must be extra careful with
202the state.
203
204State changes for debug exceptions and machine-check exceptions depend on
205whether these exceptions happened in user-space (breakpoints or watchpoints) or
206in kernel mode (code patching). From user-space, they are treated like
207interrupts, while from kernel mode they are treated like NMIs.
208
209NMIs and other NMI-like exceptions handle state transitions without
210distinguishing between user-mode and kernel-mode origin.
211
212The state update on entry is handled in irqentry_nmi_enter() which updates
213state in the following order:
214
215  * Preemption counter
216  * Lockdep
217  * RCU / Context tracking
218  * Tracing
219
220The exit counterpart irqentry_nmi_exit() does the reverse operation in the
221reverse order.
222
223Note that the update of the preemption counter has to be the first
224operation on enter and the last operation on exit. The reason is that both
225lockdep and RCU rely on in_nmi() returning true in this case. The
226preemption count modification in the NMI entry/exit case must not be
227traced.
228
229Architecture-specific code looks like this:
230
231.. code-block:: c
232
233  noinstr void nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
234  {
235	arch_nmi_enter(regs);
236	state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
237
238	instrumentation_begin();
239	nmi_handler(regs);
240	instrumentation_end();
241
242	irqentry_nmi_exit(regs);
243  }
244
245and for e.g. a debug exception it can look like this:
246
247.. code-block:: c
248
249  noinstr void debug(struct pt_regs *regs)
250  {
251	arch_nmi_enter(regs);
252
253	debug_regs = save_debug_regs();
254
255	if (user_mode(regs)) {
256		state = irqentry_enter(regs);
257
258		instrumentation_begin();
259		user_mode_debug_handler(regs, debug_regs);
260		instrumentation_end();
261
262		irqentry_exit(regs, state);
263  	} else {
264  		state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
265
266		instrumentation_begin();
267		kernel_mode_debug_handler(regs, debug_regs);
268		instrumentation_end();
269
270		irqentry_nmi_exit(regs, state);
271	}
272  }
273
274There is no combined irqentry_nmi_if_kernel() function available as the
275above cannot be handled in an exception-agnostic way.
276
277NMIs can happen in any context. For example, an NMI-like exception triggered
278while handling an NMI. So NMI entry code has to be reentrant and state updates
279need to handle nesting.
280