xref: /linux/Documentation/arch/x86/microcode.rst (revision 52990390f91c1c39ca742fc8f390b29891d95127)
1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3==========================
4The Linux Microcode Loader
5==========================
6
7:Authors: - Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
8          - Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
9	  - Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
10
11The kernel has a x86 microcode loading facility which is supposed to
12provide microcode loading methods in the OS. Potential use cases are
13updating the microcode on platforms beyond the OEM End-Of-Life support,
14and updating the microcode on long-running systems without rebooting.
15
16The loader supports three loading methods:
17
18Early load microcode
19====================
20
21The kernel can update microcode very early during boot. Loading
22microcode early can fix CPU issues before they are observed during
23kernel boot time.
24
25The microcode is stored in an initrd file. During boot, it is read from
26it and loaded into the CPU cores.
27
28The format of the combined initrd image is microcode in (uncompressed)
29cpio format followed by the (possibly compressed) initrd image. The
30loader parses the combined initrd image during boot.
31
32The microcode files in cpio name space are:
33
34on Intel:
35  kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
36on AMD  :
37  kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
38
39During BSP (BootStrapping Processor) boot (pre-SMP), the kernel
40scans the microcode file in the initrd. If microcode matching the
41CPU is found, it will be applied in the BSP and later on in all APs
42(Application Processors).
43
44The loader also saves the matching microcode for the CPU in memory.
45Thus, the cached microcode patch is applied when CPUs resume from a
46sleep state.
47
48Here's a crude example how to prepare an initrd with microcode (this is
49normally done automatically by the distribution, when recreating the
50initrd, so you don't really have to do it yourself. It is documented
51here for future reference only).
52::
53
54  #!/bin/bash
55
56  if [ -z "$1" ]; then
57      echo "You need to supply an initrd file"
58      exit 1
59  fi
60
61  INITRD="$1"
62
63  DSTDIR=kernel/x86/microcode
64  TMPDIR=/tmp/initrd
65
66  rm -rf $TMPDIR
67
68  mkdir $TMPDIR
69  cd $TMPDIR
70  mkdir -p $DSTDIR
71
72  if [ -d /lib/firmware/amd-ucode ]; then
73          cat /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd*.bin > $DSTDIR/AuthenticAMD.bin
74  fi
75
76  if [ -d /lib/firmware/intel-ucode ]; then
77          cat /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/* > $DSTDIR/GenuineIntel.bin
78  fi
79
80  find . | cpio -o -H newc >../ucode.cpio
81  cd ..
82  mv $INITRD $INITRD.orig
83  cat ucode.cpio $INITRD.orig > $INITRD
84
85  rm -rf $TMPDIR
86
87
88The system needs to have the microcode packages installed into
89/lib/firmware or you need to fixup the paths above if yours are
90somewhere else and/or you've downloaded them directly from the processor
91vendor's site.
92
93Late loading
94============
95
96You simply install the microcode packages your distro supplies and
97run::
98
99  # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload
100
101as root.
102
103The loading mechanism looks for microcode blobs in
104/lib/firmware/{intel-ucode,amd-ucode}. The default distro installation
105packages already put them there.
106
107Since kernel 5.19, late loading is not enabled by default.
108
109The /dev/cpu/microcode method has been removed in 5.19.
110
111Why is late loading dangerous?
112==============================
113
114Synchronizing all CPUs
115----------------------
116
117The microcode engine which receives the microcode update is shared
118between the two logical threads in a SMT system. Therefore, when
119the update is executed on one SMT thread of the core, the sibling
120"automatically" gets the update.
121
122Since the microcode can "simulate" MSRs too, while the microcode update
123is in progress, those simulated MSRs transiently cease to exist. This
124can result in unpredictable results if the SMT sibling thread happens to
125be in the middle of an access to such an MSR. The usual observation is
126that such MSR accesses cause #GPs to be raised to signal that former are
127not present.
128
129The disappearing MSRs are just one common issue which is being observed.
130Any other instruction that's being patched and gets concurrently
131executed by the other SMT sibling, can also result in similar,
132unpredictable behavior.
133
134To eliminate this case, a stop_machine()-based CPU synchronization was
135introduced as a way to guarantee that all logical CPUs will not execute
136any code but just wait in a spin loop, polling an atomic variable.
137
138While this took care of device or external interrupts, IPIs including
139LVT ones, such as CMCI etc, it cannot address other special interrupts
140that can't be shut off. Those are Machine Check (#MC), System Management
141(#SMI) and Non-Maskable interrupts (#NMI).
142
143Machine Checks
144--------------
145
146Machine Checks (#MC) are non-maskable. There are two kinds of MCEs.
147Fatal un-recoverable MCEs and recoverable MCEs. While un-recoverable
148errors are fatal, recoverable errors can also happen in kernel context
149are also treated as fatal by the kernel.
150
151On certain Intel machines, MCEs are also broadcast to all threads in a
152system. If one thread is in the middle of executing WRMSR, a MCE will be
153taken at the end of the flow. Either way, they will wait for the thread
154performing the wrmsr(0x79) to rendezvous in the MCE handler and shutdown
155eventually if any of the threads in the system fail to check in to the
156MCE rendezvous.
157
158To be paranoid and get predictable behavior, the OS can choose to set
159MCG_STATUS.MCIP. Since MCEs can be at most one in a system, if an
160MCE was signaled, the above condition will promote to a system reset
161automatically. OS can turn off MCIP at the end of the update for that
162core.
163
164System Management Interrupt
165---------------------------
166
167SMIs are also broadcast to all CPUs in the platform. Microcode update
168requests exclusive access to the core before writing to MSR 0x79. So if
169it does happen such that, one thread is in WRMSR flow, and the 2nd got
170an SMI, that thread will be stopped in the first instruction in the SMI
171handler.
172
173Since the secondary thread is stopped in the first instruction in SMI,
174there is very little chance that it would be in the middle of executing
175an instruction being patched. Plus OS has no way to stop SMIs from
176happening.
177
178Non-Maskable Interrupts
179-----------------------
180
181When thread0 of a core is doing the microcode update, if thread1 is
182pulled into NMI, that can cause unpredictable behavior due to the
183reasons above.
184
185OS can choose a variety of methods to avoid running into this situation.
186
187
188Is the microcode suitable for late loading?
189-------------------------------------------
190
191Late loading is done when the system is fully operational and running
192real workloads. Late loading behavior depends on what the base patch on
193the CPU is before upgrading to the new patch.
194
195This is true for Intel CPUs.
196
197Consider, for example, a CPU has patch level 1 and the update is to
198patch level 3.
199
200Between patch1 and patch3, patch2 might have deprecated a software-visible
201feature.
202
203This is unacceptable if software is even potentially using that feature.
204For instance, say MSR_X is no longer available after an update,
205accessing that MSR will cause a #GP fault.
206
207Basically there is no way to declare a new microcode update suitable
208for late-loading. This is another one of the problems that caused late
209loading to be not enabled by default.
210
211Builtin microcode
212=================
213
214The loader supports also loading of a builtin microcode supplied through
215the regular builtin firmware method CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE. Only 64-bit is
216currently supported.
217
218Here's an example::
219
220  CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="intel-ucode/06-3a-09 amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin"
221  CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR="/lib/firmware"
222
223This basically means, you have the following tree structure locally::
224
225  /lib/firmware/
226  |-- amd-ucode
227  ...
228  |   |-- microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
229  ...
230  |-- intel-ucode
231  ...
232  |   |-- 06-3a-09
233  ...
234
235so that the build system can find those files and integrate them into
236the final kernel image. The early loader finds them and applies them.
237
238Needless to say, this method is not the most flexible one because it
239requires rebuilding the kernel each time updated microcode from the CPU
240vendor is available.
241