xref: /linux/Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst (revision c532de5a67a70f8533d495f8f2aaa9a0491c3ad0)
1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0)
2.. [see the bottom of this file for redistribution information]
3
4======================
5Bisecting a regression
6======================
7
8This document describes how to use a ``git bisect`` to find the source code
9change that broke something -- for example when some functionality stopped
10working after upgrading from Linux 6.0 to 6.1.
11
12The text focuses on the gist of the process. If you are new to bisecting the
13kernel, better follow Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
14instead: it depicts everything from start to finish while covering multiple
15aspects even kernel developers occasionally forget. This includes detecting
16situations early where a bisection would be a waste of time, as nobody would
17care about the result -- for example, because the problem happens after the
18kernel marked itself as 'tainted', occurs in an abandoned version, was already
19fixed, or is caused by a .config change you or your Linux distributor performed.
20
21Finding the change causing a kernel issue using a bisection
22===========================================================
23
24*Note: the following process assumes you prepared everything for a bisection.
25This includes having a Git clone with the appropriate sources, installing the
26software required to build and install kernels, as well as a .config file stored
27in a safe place (the following example assumes '~/prepared_kernel_.config') to
28use as pristine base at each bisection step; ideally, you have also worked out
29a fully reliable and straight-forward way to reproduce the regression, too.*
30
31* Preparation: start the bisection and tell Git about the points in the history
32  you consider to be working and broken, which Git calls 'good' and 'bad'::
33
34     git bisect start
35     git bisect good v6.0
36     git bisect bad v6.1
37
38  Instead of Git tags like 'v6.0' and 'v6.1' you can specify commit-ids, too.
39
401. Copy your prepared .config into the build directory and adjust it to the
41   needs of the codebase Git checked out for testing::
42
43     cp ~/prepared_kernel_.config .config
44     make olddefconfig
45
462. Now build, install, and boot a kernel. This might fail for unrelated reasons,
47   for example, when a compile error happens at the current stage of the
48   bisection a later change resolves. In such cases run ``git bisect skip`` and
49   go back to step 1.
50
513. Check if the functionality that regressed works in the kernel you just built.
52
53   If it works, execute::
54
55     git bisect good
56
57   If it is broken, run::
58
59     git bisect bad
60
61   Note, getting this wrong just once will send the rest of the bisection
62   totally off course. To prevent having to start anew later you thus want to
63   ensure what you tell Git is correct; it is thus often wise to spend a few
64   minutes more on testing in case your reproducer is unreliable.
65
66   After issuing one of these two commands, Git will usually check out another
67   bisection point and print something like 'Bisecting: 675 revisions left to
68   test after this (roughly 10 steps)'. In that case go back to step 1.
69
70   If Git instead prints something like 'cafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0da
71   is the first bad commit', then you have finished the bisection. In that case
72   move to the next point below. Note, right after displaying that line Git will
73   show some details about the culprit including its patch description; this can
74   easily fill your terminal, so you might need to scroll up to see the message
75   mentioning the culprit's commit-id.
76
77   In case you missed Git's output, you can always run ``git bisect log`` to
78   print the status: it will show how many steps remain or mention the result of
79   the bisection.
80
81* Recommended complementary task: put the bisection log and the current .config
82  file aside for the bug report; furthermore tell Git to reset the sources to
83  the state before the bisection::
84
85     git bisect log > ~/bisection-log
86     cp .config ~/bisection-config-culprit
87     git bisect reset
88
89* Recommended optional task: try reverting the culprit on top of the latest
90  codebase and check if that fixes your bug; if that is the case, it validates
91  the bisection and enables developers to resolve the regression through a
92  revert.
93
94  To try this, update your clone and check out latest mainline. Then tell Git
95  to revert the change by specifying its commit-id::
96
97     git revert --no-edit cafec0cacaca0
98
99  Git might reject this, for example when the bisection landed on a merge
100  commit. In that case, abandon the attempt. Do the same, if Git fails to revert
101  the culprit on its own because later changes depend on it -- at least unless
102  you bisected a stable or longterm kernel series, in which case you want to
103  check out its latest codebase and try a revert there.
104
105  If a revert succeeds, build and test another kernel to check if reverting
106  resolved your regression.
107
108With that the process is complete. Now report the regression as described by
109Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst.
110
111
112Additional reading material
113---------------------------
114
115* The `man page for 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect>`_ and
116  `fighting regressions with 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect-lk2009.html>`_
117  in the Git documentation.
118* `Working with git bisect <https://nathanchance.dev/posts/working-with-git-bisect/>`_
119  from kernel developer Nathan Chancellor.
120* `Using Git bisect to figure out when brokenness was introduced <http://webchick.net/node/99>`_.
121* `Fully automated bisecting with 'git bisect run' <https://lwn.net/Articles/317154>`_.
122
123..
124   end-of-content
125..
126   This document is maintained by Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>. If
127   you spot a typo or small mistake, feel free to let him know directly and
128   he'll fix it. You are free to do the same in a mostly informal way if you
129   want to contribute changes to the text -- but for copyright reasons please CC
130   linux-doc@vger.kernel.org and 'sign-off' your contribution as
131   Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst explains in the section 'Sign
132   your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin'.
133..
134   This text is available under GPL-2.0+ or CC-BY-4.0, as stated at the top
135   of the file. If you want to distribute this text under CC-BY-4.0 only,
136   please use 'The Linux kernel development community' for author attribution
137   and link this as source:
138   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst
139
140..
141   Note: Only the content of this RST file as found in the Linux kernel sources
142   is available under CC-BY-4.0, as versions of this text that were processed
143   (for example by the kernel's build system) might contain content taken from
144   files which use a more restrictive license.
145