| /linux/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/ |
| H A D | memcg_protection.m | 6 % hierarchy to illustrate how overcommitted protection spreads among siblings 9 % Simulation assumes siblings consumed the initial amount of memory (w/out 16 % n vector nominal protection of siblings set at the given level (memory.low) 48 siblings = sum(u); variable 52 e = protected * min(1, E / siblings); % normalize overcommit 55 unclaimed = max(0, E - siblings); 56 parent_overuse = sum(c) - siblings; 79 % XXX here I do parallel reclaim of all siblings
|
| /linux/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ |
| H A D | ws.c | 133 list_for_each_entry(node, &parent->child_list_head, siblings) { in ws_find_node() 139 list_for_each_entry(node, &parent->child_list_head, siblings) { in ws_find_node() 214 list_del(&tc_node->siblings); in irdma_remove_leaf() 219 list_del(&vsi_node->siblings); in irdma_remove_leaf() 295 list_add(&vsi_node->siblings, &ws_tree_root->child_list_head); in irdma_ws_add() 322 list_add(&tc_node->siblings, &vsi_node->child_list_head); in irdma_ws_add() 356 list_del(&tc_node->siblings); in irdma_ws_add() 362 list_del(&vsi_node->siblings); in irdma_ws_add()
|
| H A D | ws.h | 19 struct list_head siblings; member
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/ |
| H A D | selftest_guc_multi_lrc.c | 34 struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE + 1]; in multi_lrc_create_parent() local 43 siblings[i++] = engine; in multi_lrc_create_parent() 49 logical_sort(siblings, i); in multi_lrc_create_parent() 51 return intel_engine_create_parallel(siblings, 1, i); in multi_lrc_create_parent()
|
| /linux/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/ |
| H A D | core-scheduling.rst | 100 siblings of a core such that all the selected tasks running on a core are 107 the sibling has the task enqueued. For rest of the siblings in the core, 112 Once a task has been selected for all the siblings in the core, an IPI is sent to 113 siblings for whom a new task was selected. Siblings on receiving the IPI will 125 siblings could be forced to select a lower priority task if the highest 157 and are considered system-wide trusted. The forced-idling of siblings running 174 the siblings to switch to the new task. But there could be hardware delays in 176 cause an attacker task to start running on a CPU before its siblings receive the 177 IPI. Even though cache is flushed on entry to user mode, victim tasks on siblings 185 Core scheduling cannot protect against MDS attacks between the siblings [all …]
|
| H A D | attack_vector_controls.rst | 125 techniques are used to prevent untrusted workloads from running on SMT siblings.
|
| /linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/ |
| H A D | core.c | 582 unsigned int cpu, updated = 0, failed = 0, timedout = 0, siblings = 0; in load_late_stop_cpus() local 626 case UCODE_OK: siblings++; break; in load_late_stop_cpus() 654 pr_info("load: updated on %u primary CPUs with %u siblings\n", updated, siblings); in load_late_stop_cpus() 657 num_online_cpus() - (updated + siblings)); in load_late_stop_cpus() 662 return updated + siblings == num_online_cpus() ? 0 : -EIO; in load_late_stop_cpus()
|
| /linux/drivers/nvme/host/ |
| H A D | multipath.c | 282 list_for_each_entry_srcu(ns, &head->list, siblings, in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths() 316 list_for_each_entry_srcu(ns, &head->list, siblings, in __nvme_find_path() 355 ns = list_next_or_null_rcu(&head->list, &ns->siblings, struct nvme_ns, in nvme_next_ns() 356 siblings); in nvme_next_ns() 359 return list_first_or_null_rcu(&head->list, struct nvme_ns, siblings); in nvme_next_ns() 416 list_for_each_entry_srcu(ns, &head->list, siblings, in nvme_queue_depth_path() 485 list_for_each_entry_srcu(ns, &head->list, siblings, in nvme_available_path() 1205 list_for_each_entry_srcu(ns, &head->list, siblings, in nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link()
|
| /linux/include/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi_device.h | 108 struct list_head siblings; /* list of all devices on this host */ member 351 struct list_head siblings; member 459 list_for_each_entry((sdev), &((shost)->__devices), siblings)
|
| /linux/drivers/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi_scan.c | 305 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sdev->siblings); in scsi_alloc_sdev() 406 list_del_init(&starget->siblings); in scsi_target_destroy() 439 list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) { in __scsi_find_target() 524 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&starget->siblings); in scsi_alloc_target() 536 list_add_tail(&starget->siblings, &shost->__targets); in scsi_alloc_target() 2098 list_for_each_entry(sdev, &shost->__devices, siblings) { in scsi_forget_host()
|
| H A D | scsi.c | 827 struct list_head *list = (prev ? &prev->siblings : &shost->__devices); in __scsi_iterate_devices() 833 next = list_entry(list->next, struct scsi_device, siblings); in __scsi_iterate_devices() 981 list_for_each_entry(sdev, &shost->__devices, siblings) { in __scsi_device_lookup()
|
| H A D | scsi_sysfs.c | 462 list_del(&sdev->siblings); in scsi_device_dev_release() 1497 list_for_each_entry(sdev, &shost->__devices, siblings) { in __scsi_remove_target() 1536 list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) { in scsi_remove_target() 1627 list_add_tail(&sdev->siblings, &shost->__devices); in scsi_sysfs_device_initialize()
|
| /linux/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/ |
| H A D | intel_epb.rst | 40 example, SMT siblings or cores in one package). For this reason, updating the
|
| /linux/kernel/ |
| H A D | Kconfig.preempt | 153 selection across SMT siblings. When enabled -- see 154 prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE) -- task selection ensures that all SMT siblings
|
| /linux/Documentation/networking/devlink/ |
| H A D | devlink-port.rst | 402 Allows for usage of strict priority arbiter among siblings. This 410 siblings. This arbitration scheme can be used simultaneously with the 412 BW relative to its siblings. Values are relative like a percentage 414 its siblings.
|
| H A D | ice.rst | 421 - allows for usage of strict priority arbiter among siblings. This 429 siblings. This arbitration scheme can be used simultaneously with
|
| /linux/net/sched/ |
| H A D | sch_hfsc.c | 123 struct list_head siblings; /* sibling classes */ member 846 list_for_each_entry(p, &cl->children, siblings) { in hfsc_adjust_levels() 1078 list_add_tail(&cl->siblings, &parent->children); in hfsc_change_class() 1117 list_del(&cl->siblings); in hfsc_delete_class()
|
| /linux/Documentation/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi-generic.rst | 13 is more generalized (but lower level) than its siblings and tends to be
|
| /linux/drivers/scsi/libsas/ |
| H A D | sas_internal.h | 198 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->siblings); in sas_alloc_device()
|
| H A D | sas_discover.c | 321 list_del_init(&dev->siblings); in sas_unregister_common_dev()
|
| /linux/Documentation/virt/ |
| H A D | ne_overview.rst | 52 An enclave runs on dedicated cores. CPU 0 and its CPU siblings need to remain
|
| /linux/Documentation/power/powercap/ |
| H A D | dtpm.rst | 76 …e have a weight on a 2^10 basis reflecting the percentage of power consumption along the siblings::
|
| /linux/Documentation/i2c/ |
| H A D | i2c-topology.rst | 100 mux-locked muxes that are not siblings, when there are address
|
| /linux/Documentation/arch/x86/ |
| H A D | topology.rst | 118 The number of online threads is also printed in /proc/cpuinfo "siblings."
|
| /linux/Documentation/driver-api/ |
| H A D | device_link.rst | 14 mere parent/child relationship, e.g. between siblings, and have the
|