xref: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_scalar_ids.c (revision 9e4e86a604dfd06402933467578c4b79f5412b2c)
1 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2 
3 #include <linux/bpf.h>
4 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
5 #include "bpf_misc.h"
6 
7 /* Check that precision marks propagate through scalar IDs.
8  * Registers r{0,1,2} have the same scalar ID.
9  * Range information is propagated for scalars sharing same ID.
10  * Check that precision mark for r0 causes precision marks for r{1,2}
11  * when range information is propagated for 'if <reg> <op> <const>' insn.
12  */
13 SEC("socket")
14 __success __log_level(2)
15 /* first 'if' branch */
16 __msg("6: (0f) r3 += r0")
17 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 4: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
18 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r1,r2 stack=:")
19 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r2 = r0")
20 /* second 'if' branch */
21 __msg("from 4 to 5: ")
22 __msg("6: (0f) r3 += r0")
23 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (bf) r3 = r10")
24 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 4: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
25 /* parent state already has r{0,1,2} as precise */
26 __msg("frame0: parent state regs= stack=:")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)27 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
28 __naked void linked_regs_bpf_k(void)
29 {
30 	asm volatile (
31 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
32 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
33 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
34 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */
35 	"r1 = r0;"
36 	"r2 = r0;"
37 	"if r1 > 7 goto +0;"
38 	/* force r0 to be precise, this eventually marks r1 and r2 as
39 	 * precise as well because of shared IDs
40 	 */
41 	"r3 = r10;"
42 	"r3 += r0;"
43 	/* Mark r1 and r2 as alive. */
44 	"r1 = r1;"
45 	"r2 = r2;"
46 	"r0 = 0;"
47 	"exit;"
48 	:
49 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
50 	: __clobber_all);
51 }
52 
53 /* Registers r{0,1,2} share same ID when 'if r1 > ...' insn is processed,
54  * check that verifier marks r{1,2} as precise while backtracking
55  * 'if r1 > ...' with r0 already marked.
56  */
57 SEC("socket")
58 __success __log_level(2)
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)59 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
60 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (2d) if r1 > r3 goto pc+0")
61 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r1,r2,r3 stack=:")
62 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2,r3 stack= before 4: (b7) r3 = 7")
63 __naked void linked_regs_bpf_x_src(void)
64 {
65 	asm volatile (
66 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
67 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
68 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
69 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */
70 	"r1 = r0;"
71 	"r2 = r0;"
72 	"r3 = 7;"
73 	"if r1 > r3 goto +0;"
74 	/* force r0 to be precise, this eventually marks r1 and r2 as
75 	 * precise as well because of shared IDs
76 	 */
77 	"r4 = r10;"
78 	"r4 += r0;"
79 	/* Mark r1 and r2 as alive. */
80 	"r1 = r1;"
81 	"r2 = r2;"
82 	"r0 = 0;"
83 	"exit;"
84 	:
85 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
86 	: __clobber_all);
87 }
88 
89 /* Registers r{0,1,2} share same ID when 'if r1 > r3' insn is processed,
90  * check that verifier marks r{0,1,2} as precise while backtracking
91  * 'if r1 > r3' with r3 already marked.
92  */
93 SEC("socket")
94 __success __log_level(2)
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)95 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
96 __msg("frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 5: (2d) if r1 > r3 goto pc+0")
97 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r1,r2,r3 stack=:")
98 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1,r2,r3 stack= before 4: (b7) r3 = 7")
99 __naked void linked_regs_bpf_x_dst(void)
100 {
101 	asm volatile (
102 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
103 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
104 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
105 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */
106 	"r1 = r0;"
107 	"r2 = r0;"
108 	"r3 = 7;"
109 	"if r1 > r3 goto +0;"
110 	/* force r0 to be precise, this eventually marks r1 and r2 as
111 	 * precise as well because of shared IDs
112 	 */
113 	"r4 = r10;"
114 	"r4 += r3;"
115 	/* Mark r1 and r2 as alive. */
116 	"r0 = r0;"
117 	"r1 = r1;"
118 	"r2 = r2;"
119 	"r0 = 0;"
120 	"exit;"
121 	:
122 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
123 	: __clobber_all);
124 }
125 
126 /* Same as linked_regs_bpf_k, but break one of the
127  * links, note that r1 is absent from regs=... in __msg below.
128  */
129 SEC("socket")
130 __success __log_level(2)
131 __msg("7: (0f) r3 += r0")
132 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 6: (bf) r3 = r10")
133 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0 stack=:")
134 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (25) if r0 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
135 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r2 stack=:")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)136 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
137 __naked void linked_regs_broken_link(void)
138 {
139 	asm volatile (
140 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
141 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
142 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
143 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == r2.id */
144 	"r1 = r0;"
145 	"r2 = r0;"
146 	/* break link for r1, this is the only line that differs
147 	 * compared to the previous test
148 	 */
149 	"r1 = 0;"
150 	"if r0 > 7 goto +0;"
151 	/* force r0 to be precise,
152 	 * this eventually marks r2 as precise because of shared IDs
153 	 */
154 	"r3 = r10;"
155 	"r3 += r0;"
156 	/* Mark r1 and r2 as alive. */
157 	"r1 = r1;"
158 	"r2 = r2;"
159 	"r0 = 0;"
160 	"exit;"
161 	:
162 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
163 	: __clobber_all);
164 }
165 
166 /* Check that precision marks propagate through scalar IDs.
167  * Use the same scalar ID in multiple stack frames, check that
168  * precision information is propagated up the call stack.
169  */
170 SEC("socket")
171 __success __log_level(2)
172 __msg("17: (0f) r2 += r1")
173 /* Current state */
174 __msg("frame2: last_idx 17 first_idx 14 subseq_idx -1 ")
175 __msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 16: (bf) r2 = r10")
176 __msg("frame2: parent state regs=r1 stack=")
177 __msg("frame1: parent state regs= stack=")
178 __msg("frame0: parent state regs= stack=")
179 /* Parent state */
180 __msg("frame2: last_idx 13 first_idx 13 subseq_idx 14 ")
181 __msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 13: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
182 __msg("frame2: parent state regs=r1 stack=")
183 /* frame1.r{6,7} are marked because mark_precise_scalar_ids()
184  * looks for all registers with frame2.r1.id in the current state
185  */
186 __msg("frame1: parent state regs=r6,r7 stack=")
187 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r6 stack=")
188 /* Parent state */
189 __msg("frame2: last_idx 9 first_idx 9 subseq_idx 13")
190 __msg("frame2: regs=r1 stack= before 9: (85) call pc+3")
191 /* frame1.r1 is marked because of backtracking of call instruction */
192 __msg("frame1: parent state regs=r1,r6,r7 stack=")
193 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r6 stack=")
194 /* Parent state */
195 __msg("frame1: last_idx 8 first_idx 7 subseq_idx 9")
196 __msg("frame1: regs=r1,r6,r7 stack= before 8: (bf) r7 = r1")
197 __msg("frame1: regs=r1,r6 stack= before 7: (bf) r6 = r1")
198 __msg("frame1: parent state regs=r1 stack=")
199 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r6 stack=")
200 /* Parent state */
201 __msg("frame1: last_idx 4 first_idx 4 subseq_idx 7")
202 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 4: (85) call pc+2")
203 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r1,r6 stack=")
204 /* Parent state */
205 __msg("frame0: last_idx 3 first_idx 1 subseq_idx 4")
206 __msg("frame0: regs=r1,r6 stack= before 3: (bf) r6 = r0")
207 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0")
208 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)209 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
210 __naked void precision_many_frames(void)
211 {
212 	asm volatile (
213 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
214 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
215 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
216 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == r6.id */
217 	"r1 = r0;"
218 	"r6 = r0;"
219 	"call precision_many_frames__foo;"
220 	"r6 = r6;" /* mark r6 as live */
221 	"exit;"
222 	:
223 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
224 	: __clobber_all);
225 }
226 
227 static __naked __noinline __used
precision_many_frames__foo(void)228 void precision_many_frames__foo(void)
229 {
230 	asm volatile (
231 	/* conflate one of the register numbers (r6) with outer frame,
232 	 * to verify that those are tracked independently
233 	 */
234 	"r6 = r1;"
235 	"r7 = r1;"
236 	"call precision_many_frames__bar;"
237 	"r6 = r6;" /* mark r6 as live */
238 	"r7 = r7;" /* mark r7 as live */
239 	"exit"
240 	::: __clobber_all);
241 }
242 
243 static __naked __noinline __used
precision_many_frames__bar(void)244 void precision_many_frames__bar(void)
245 {
246 	asm volatile (
247 	"if r1 > 7 goto +0;"
248 	"r6 = 0;" /* mark r6 as live */
249 	"r7 = 0;" /* mark r7 as live */
250 	/* force r1 to be precise, this eventually marks:
251 	 * - bar frame r1
252 	 * - foo frame r{1,6,7}
253 	 * - main frame r{1,6}
254 	 */
255 	"r2 = r10;"
256 	"r2 += r1;"
257 	"r0 = 0;"
258 	"exit;"
259 	::: __clobber_all);
260 }
261 
262 /* Check that scalars with the same IDs are marked precise on stack as
263  * well as in registers.
264  */
265 SEC("socket")
266 __success __log_level(2)
267 __msg("12: (0f) r2 += r1")
268 /* foo frame */
269 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 11: (bf) r2 = r10")
270 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 10: (25) if r1 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
271 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack=-8,-16 before 9: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
272 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack=-8 before 8: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
273 __msg("frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 4: (85) call pc+3")
274 /* main frame */
275 __msg("frame0: regs=r1 stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
276 __msg("frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0")
277 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (57) r0 &= 255")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)278 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
279 __naked void precision_stack(void)
280 {
281 	asm volatile (
282 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
283 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
284 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
285 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id == fp[-8].id */
286 	"r1 = r0;"
287 	"*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
288 	"call precision_stack__foo;"
289 	"r0 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);"
290 	"r0 = 0;"
291 	"exit;"
292 	:
293 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
294 	: __clobber_all);
295 }
296 
297 static __naked __noinline __used
precision_stack__foo(void)298 void precision_stack__foo(void)
299 {
300 	asm volatile (
301 	/* conflate one of the register numbers (r6) with outer frame,
302 	 * to verify that those are tracked independently
303 	 */
304 	"*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
305 	"*(u64*)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
306 	"if r1 > 7 goto +0;"
307 	/* force r1 to be precise, this eventually marks:
308 	 * - foo frame r1,fp{-8,-16}
309 	 * - main frame r1,fp{-8}
310 	 */
311 	"r2 = r10;"
312 	"r2 += r1;"
313 	"r0 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);"
314 	"r0 = *(u64*)(r10 - 16);"
315 	"exit"
316 	::: __clobber_all);
317 }
318 
319 /* Use two separate scalar IDs to check that these are propagated
320  * independently.
321  */
322 SEC("socket")
323 __success __log_level(2)
324 /* r{6,7} */
325 __msg("12: (0f) r3 += r7")
326 __msg("frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 11: (bf) r3 = r10")
327 __msg("frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 9: (25) if r7 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
328 /* ... skip some insns ... */
329 __msg("frame0: regs=r6,r7 stack= before 3: (bf) r7 = r0")
330 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r6 stack= before 2: (bf) r6 = r0")
331 /* r{8,9} */
332 __msg("13: (0f) r3 += r9")
333 __msg("frame0: regs=r9 stack= before 12: (0f) r3 += r7")
334 /* ... skip some insns ... */
335 __msg("frame0: regs=r9 stack= before 10: (25) if r9 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
336 __msg("frame0: regs=r8,r9 stack= before 7: (bf) r9 = r0")
337 __msg("frame0: regs=r0,r8 stack= before 6: (bf) r8 = r0")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)338 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
339 __naked void precision_two_ids(void)
340 {
341 	asm volatile (
342 	/* r6 = random number up to 0xff
343 	 * r6.id == r7.id
344 	 */
345 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
346 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
347 	"r6 = r0;"
348 	"r7 = r0;"
349 	/* same, but for r{8,9} */
350 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
351 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
352 	"r8 = r0;"
353 	"r9 = r0;"
354 	/* clear r0 id */
355 	"r0 = 0;"
356 	/* propagate equal scalars precision */
357 	"if r7 > 7 goto +0;"
358 	"if r9 > 7 goto +0;"
359 	"r3 = r10;"
360 	/* force r7 to be precise, this also marks r6 */
361 	"r3 += r7;"
362 	/* force r9 to be precise, this also marks r8 */
363 	"r3 += r9;"
364 	"r6 = r6;" /* mark r6 as live */
365 	"r8 = r8;" /* mark r8 as live */
366 	"exit;"
367 	:
368 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
369 	: __clobber_all);
370 }
371 
372 SEC("socket")
373 __success __log_level(2)
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)374 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
375 /* check that r0 and r6 have different IDs after 'if',
376  * collect_linked_regs() can't tie more than 6 registers for a single insn.
377  */
378 __msg("8: (25) if r0 > 0x7 goto pc+0         ; R0=scalar(id=1")
379 __msg("14: (bf) r6 = r6                      ; R6=scalar(id=2")
380 /* check that r{0-5} are marked precise after 'if' */
381 __msg("frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 8: (25) if r0 > 0x7 goto pc+0")
382 __msg("frame0: parent state regs=r0,r1,r2,r3,r4,r5 stack=:")
383 __naked void linked_regs_too_many_regs(void)
384 {
385 	asm volatile (
386 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
387 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
388 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
389 	/* tie r{0-6} IDs */
390 	"r1 = r0;"
391 	"r2 = r0;"
392 	"r3 = r0;"
393 	"r4 = r0;"
394 	"r5 = r0;"
395 	"r6 = r0;"
396 	/* propagate range for r{0-6} */
397 	"if r0 > 7 goto +0;"
398 	/* keep r{1-5} live */
399 	"r1 = r1;"
400 	"r2 = r2;"
401 	"r3 = r3;"
402 	"r4 = r4;"
403 	"r5 = r5;"
404 	/* make r6 appear in the log */
405 	"r6 = r6;"
406 	/* force r0 to be precise,
407 	 * this would cause r{0-4} to be precise because of shared IDs
408 	 */
409 	"r7 = r10;"
410 	"r7 += r0;"
411 	"r0 = 0;"
412 	"exit;"
413 	:
414 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
415 	: __clobber_all);
416 }
417 
418 SEC("socket")
419 __failure __log_level(2)
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)420 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
421 __msg("regs=r7 stack= before 5: (3d) if r8 >= r0")
422 __msg("parent state regs=r0,r7,r8")
423 __msg("regs=r0,r7,r8 stack= before 4: (25) if r0 > 0x1")
424 __msg("div by zero")
425 __naked void linked_regs_broken_link_2(void)
426 {
427 	asm volatile (
428 	"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
429 	"r7 = r0;"
430 	"r8 = r0;"
431 	"call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
432 	"if r0 > 1 goto +0;"
433 	/* r7.id == r8.id,
434 	 * thus r7 precision implies r8 precision,
435 	 * which implies r0 precision because of the conditional below.
436 	 */
437 	"if r8 >= r0 goto 1f;"
438 	/* break id relation between r7 and r8 */
439 	"r8 += r8;"
440 	/* make r7 precise */
441 	"if r7 == 0 goto 1f;"
442 	"r0 /= 0;"
443 "1:"
444 	"r0 = 42;"
445 	"exit;"
446 	:
447 	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
448 	: __clobber_all);
449 }
450 
451 /* Check that mark_chain_precision() for one of the conditional jump
452  * operands does not trigger equal scalars precision propagation.
453  */
454 SEC("socket")
455 __success __log_level(2)
456 __msg("3: (25) if r1 > 0x100 goto pc+0")
457 __msg("frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 2: (bf) r1 = r0")
cjmp_no_linked_regs_trigger(void)458 __naked void cjmp_no_linked_regs_trigger(void)
459 {
460 	asm volatile (
461 	/* r0 = random number up to 0xff */
462 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
463 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
464 	/* tie r0.id == r1.id */
465 	"r1 = r0;"
466 	/* the jump below would be predicted, thus r1 would be marked precise,
467 	 * this should not imply precision mark for r0
468 	 */
469 	"if r1 > 256 goto +0;"
470 	"r0 = 0;"
471 	"exit;"
472 	:
473 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
474 	: __clobber_all);
475 }
476 
477 /* Verify that check_ids() is used by regsafe() for scalars.
478  *
479  * r9 = ... some pointer with range X ...
480  * r6 = ... unbound scalar ID=a ...
481  * r7 = ... unbound scalar ID=b ...
482  * if (r6 > r7) goto +1
483  * r7 = r6
484  * if (r7 > X) goto exit
485  * r9 += r6
486  * ... access memory using r9 ...
487  *
488  * The memory access is safe only if r7 is bounded,
489  * which is true for one branch and not true for another.
490  */
491 SEC("socket")
492 __failure __msg("register with unbounded min value")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)493 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
494 __naked void check_ids_in_regsafe(void)
495 {
496 	asm volatile (
497 	/* Bump allocated stack */
498 	"r1 = 0;"
499 	"*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
500 	/* r9 = pointer to stack */
501 	"r9 = r10;"
502 	"r9 += -8;"
503 	/* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
504 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
505 	"r7 = r0;"
506 	/* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
507 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
508 	"r6 = r0;"
509 	/* if r6 > r7 is an unpredictable jump */
510 	"if r6 > r7 goto l1_%=;"
511 	"r7 = r6;"
512 "l1_%=:"
513 	/* if r7 > 4 ...; transfers range to r6 on one execution path
514 	 * but does not transfer on another
515 	 */
516 	"if r7 > 4 goto l2_%=;"
517 	/* Access memory at r9[r6], r6 is not always bounded */
518 	"r9 += r6;"
519 	"r0 = *(u8*)(r9 + 0);"
520 "l2_%=:"
521 	"r0 = 0;"
522 	"exit;"
523 	:
524 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
525 	: __clobber_all);
526 }
527 
528 /* Similar to check_ids_in_regsafe.
529  * The l0 could be reached in two states:
530  *
531  *   (1) r6{.id=A}, r7{.id=A}, r8{.id=B}
532  *   (2) r6{.id=B}, r7{.id=A}, r8{.id=B}
533  *
534  * Where (2) is not safe, as "r7 > 4" check won't propagate range for it.
535  * This example would be considered safe without changes to
536  * mark_chain_precision() to track scalar values with equal IDs.
537  */
538 SEC("socket")
539 __failure __msg("register with unbounded min value")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)540 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
541 __naked void check_ids_in_regsafe_2(void)
542 {
543 	asm volatile (
544 	/* Bump allocated stack */
545 	"r1 = 0;"
546 	"*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
547 	/* r9 = pointer to stack */
548 	"r9 = r10;"
549 	"r9 += -16;"
550 	/* r8 = ktime_get_ns() */
551 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
552 	"r8 = r0;"
553 	/* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
554 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
555 	"r7 = r0;"
556 	/* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
557 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
558 	"r6 = r0;"
559 	/* scratch .id from r0 */
560 	"r0 = 0;"
561 	/* if r6 > r7 is an unpredictable jump */
562 	"if r6 > r7 goto l1_%=;"
563 	/* tie r6 and r7 .id */
564 	"r6 = r7;"
565 "l0_%=:"
566 	/* if r7 > 4 exit(0) */
567 	"if r7 > 4 goto l2_%=;"
568 	/* Access memory at r9[r6] */
569 	"r9 += r6;"
570 	"r9 += r7;"
571 	"r9 += r8;"
572 	"r0 = *(u8*)(r9 + 0);"
573 "l2_%=:"
574 	"r0 = 0;"
575 	"exit;"
576 "l1_%=:"
577 	/* tie r6 and r8 .id */
578 	"r6 = r8;"
579 	"goto l0_%=;"
580 	:
581 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
582 	: __clobber_all);
583 }
584 
585 /* Check that scalar IDs *are not* generated on register to register
586  * assignments if source register is a constant.
587  *
588  * If such IDs *are* generated the 'l1' below would be reached in
589  * two states:
590  *
591  *   (1) r1{.id=A}, r2{.id=A}
592  *   (2) r1{.id=C}, r2{.id=C}
593  *
594  * Thus forcing 'if r1 == r2' verification twice.
595  */
596 SEC("socket")
597 __success __log_level(2)
598 __msg("14: (1d) if r3 == r4 goto pc+0")
599 __msg("frame 0: propagating r3,r4")
600 __msg("14: safe")
601 __msg("processed 18 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)602 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
603 __naked void no_scalar_id_for_const(void)
604 {
605 	asm volatile (
606 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
607 	/* unpredictable jump */
608 	"if r0 > 7 goto l0_%=;"
609 	/* possibly generate same scalar ids for r3 and r4 */
610 	"r1 = 0;"
611 	"r1 ^= r1;" /* prevent bpf_prune_dead_branches from folding the branch */
612 	"r1 = r1;"
613 	"r3 = r1;"
614 	"r4 = r1;"
615 	"goto l1_%=;"
616 "l0_%=:"
617 	/* possibly generate different scalar ids for r3 and r4 */
618 	"r1 = 0;"
619 	"r1 ^= r1;"
620 	"r2 = 0;"
621 	"r2 ^= r2;"
622 	"r3 = r1;"
623 	"r4 = r2;"
624 "l1_%=:"
625 	/* predictable jump, marks r3 and r4 precise */
626 	"if r3 == r4 goto +0;"
627 	"r0 = 0;"
628 	"exit;"
629 	:
630 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
631 	: __clobber_all);
632 }
633 
634 /* Same as no_scalar_id_for_const() but for 32-bit values */
635 SEC("socket")
636 __success __log_level(2)
637 __msg("14: (1e) if w3 == w4 goto pc+0")
638 __msg("frame 0: propagating r3,r4")
639 __msg("14: safe")
640 __msg("processed 18 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)641 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
642 __naked void no_scalar_id_for_const32(void)
643 {
644 	asm volatile (
645 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
646 	/* unpredictable jump */
647 	"if r0 > 7 goto l0_%=;"
648 	/* possibly generate same scalar ids for r3 and r4 */
649 	"w1 = 0;"
650 	"w1 ^= w1;" /* prevent bpf_prune_dead_branches from folding the branch */
651 	"w1 = w1;"
652 	"w3 = w1;"
653 	"w4 = w1;"
654 	"goto l1_%=;"
655 "l0_%=:"
656 	/* possibly generate different scalar ids for r3 and r4 */
657 	"w1 = 0;"
658 	"w1 ^= w1;"
659 	"w2 = 0;"
660 	"w2 ^= w2;"
661 	"w3 = w1;"
662 	"w4 = w2;"
663 "l1_%=:"
664 	/* predictable jump, marks r3 and r4 precise */
665 	"if w3 == w4 goto +0;"
666 	"r0 = 0;"
667 	"exit;"
668 	:
669 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
670 	: __clobber_all);
671 }
672 
673 /* Check that unique scalar IDs are ignored when new verifier state is
674  * compared to cached verifier state. For this test:
675  * - cached state has no id on r1
676  * - new state has a unique id on r1
677  */
678 SEC("socket")
679 __success __log_level(2)
680 __msg("6: (25) if r6 > 0x7 goto pc+1")
681 __msg("7: (57) r1 &= 255")
682 __msg("8: (bf) r2 = r10")
683 __msg("from 6 to 8: safe")
684 __msg("processed 12 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)685 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
686 __naked void ignore_unique_scalar_ids_cur(void)
687 {
688 	asm volatile (
689 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
690 	"r6 = r0;"
691 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
692 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
693 	/* r1.id == r0.id */
694 	"r1 = r0;"
695 	/* make r1.id unique */
696 	"r0 = 0;"
697 	"if r6 > 7 goto l0_%=;"
698 	/* clear r1 id, but keep the range compatible */
699 	"r1 &= 0xff;"
700 "l0_%=:"
701 	/* get here in two states:
702 	 * - first: r1 has no id (cached state)
703 	 * - second: r1 has a unique id (should be considered equivalent)
704 	 */
705 	"r2 = r10;"
706 	"r2 += r1;"
707 	"exit;"
708 	:
709 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
710 	: __clobber_all);
711 }
712 
713 /* Check that unique scalar IDs are ignored when new verifier state is
714  * compared to cached verifier state. For this test:
715  * - cached state has a unique id on r1
716  * - new state has no id on r1
717  */
718 SEC("socket")
719 __success __log_level(2)
720 __msg("6: (25) if r6 > 0x7 goto pc+1")
721 __msg("7: (05) goto pc+1")
722 __msg("9: (bf) r2 = r10")
723 __msg("9: safe")
724 __msg("processed 13 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)725 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
726 __naked void ignore_unique_scalar_ids_old(void)
727 {
728 	asm volatile (
729 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
730 	"r6 = r0;"
731 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
732 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
733 	/* r1.id == r0.id */
734 	"r1 = r0;"
735 	/* make r1.id unique */
736 	"r0 = 0;"
737 	"if r6 > 7 goto l1_%=;"
738 	"goto l0_%=;"
739 "l1_%=:"
740 	/* clear r1 id, but keep the range compatible */
741 	"r1 &= 0xff;"
742 "l0_%=:"
743 	/* get here in two states:
744 	 * - first: r1 has a unique id (cached state)
745 	 * - second: r1 has no id (should be considered equivalent)
746 	 */
747 	"r2 = r10;"
748 	"r2 += r1;"
749 	"exit;"
750 	:
751 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
752 	: __clobber_all);
753 }
754 
755 /* Check that two registers with 0 scalar IDs in a verified state can be mapped
756  * to the same scalar ID in current state.
757  */
758 SEC("socket")
759 __success __log_level(2)
760 /* The states should be equivalent on reaching insn 12.
761  */
762 __msg("12: safe")
763 __msg("processed 17 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)764 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
765 __naked void two_nil_old_ids_one_cur_id(void)
766 {
767 	asm volatile (
768 	/* Give unique scalar IDs to r{6,7} */
769 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
770 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
771 	"r6 = r0;"
772 	"r6 *= 1;"
773 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
774 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
775 	"r7 = r0;"
776 	"r7 *= 1;"
777 	"r0 = 0;"
778 	/* Maybe make r{6,7} IDs identical */
779 	"if r6 > r7 goto l0_%=;"
780 	"goto l1_%=;"
781 "l0_%=:"
782 	"r6 = r7;"
783 "l1_%=:"
784 	/* Mark r{6,7} precise.
785 	 * Get here in two states:
786 	 * - first:  r6{.id=0}, r7{.id=0} (cached state)
787 	 * - second: r6{.id=A}, r7{.id=A}
788 	 * Verifier considers such states equivalent.
789 	 * Thus "exit;" would be verified only once.
790 	 */
791 	"r2 = r10;"
792 	"r2 += r6;"
793 	"r2 += r7;"
794 	"exit;"
795 	:
796 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
797 	: __clobber_all);
798 }
799 
800 /* Check that two different scalar IDs in a verified state can't be
801  * mapped to the same scalar ID in current state.
802  */
803 SEC("socket")
804 __success __log_level(2)
805 /* The exit instruction should be reachable from two states,
806  * use two matches and "processed .. insns" to ensure this.
807  */
808 __msg("16: (95) exit")
809 __msg("16: (95) exit")
810 __msg("processed 22 insns")
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)811 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
812 __naked void two_old_ids_one_cur_id(void)
813 {
814 	asm volatile (
815 	/* Give unique scalar IDs to r{6,7} */
816 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
817 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
818 	"r6 = r0;"
819 	"r8 = r0;"
820 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
821 	"r0 &= 0xff;"
822 	"r7 = r0;"
823 	"r9 = r0;"
824 	"r0 = 0;"
825 	/* Maybe make r{6,7} IDs identical */
826 	"if r6 > r7 goto l0_%=;"
827 	"goto l1_%=;"
828 "l0_%=:"
829 	"r6 = r7;"
830 "l1_%=:"
831 	/* Mark r{6,7} precise.
832 	 * Get here in two states:
833 	 * - first:  r6{.id=A}, r7{.id=B} (cached state)
834 	 * - second: r6{.id=A}, r7{.id=A}
835 	 * Currently we don't want to consider such states equivalent.
836 	 * Thus "exit;" would be verified twice.
837 	 */
838 	"r2 = r10;"
839 	"r2 += r6;"
840 	"r2 += r7;"
841 	/*
842 	 * keep r8 and r9 live, otherwise r6->id and r7->id
843 	 * will become singular and reset to zero before if r6 > r7
844 	 */
845 	"r9 += r8;"
846 	"exit;"
847 	:
848 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
849 	: __clobber_all);
850 }
851 
852 SEC("socket")
853 /* Note the flag, see verifier.c:opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32() */
__flag(BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32)854 __flag(BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32)
855 __success
856 /* This test was added because of a bug in verifier.c:sync_linked_regs(),
857  * upon range propagation it destroyed subreg_def marks for registers.
858  * The subreg_def mark is used to decide whether zero extension instructions
859  * are needed when register is read. When BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 is set it
860  * also causes generation of statements to randomize upper halves of
861  * read registers.
862  *
863  * The test is written in a way to return an upper half of a register
864  * that is affected by range propagation and must have it's subreg_def
865  * preserved. This gives a return value of 0 and leads to undefined
866  * return value if subreg_def mark is not preserved.
867  */
868 __retval(0)
869 /* Check that verifier believes r1/r0 are zero at exit */
870 __log_level(2)
871 __msg("4: (77) r1 >>= 32                     ; R1=0")
872 __msg("5: (bf) r0 = r1                       ; R0=0 R1=0")
873 __msg("6: (95) exit")
874 __msg("from 3 to 4")
875 __msg("4: (77) r1 >>= 32                     ; R1=0")
876 __msg("5: (bf) r0 = r1                       ; R0=0 R1=0")
877 __msg("6: (95) exit")
878 /* Verify that statements to randomize upper half of r1 had not been
879  * generated.
880  */
881 __xlated("call unknown")
882 __xlated("r0 &= 2147483647")
883 __xlated("w1 = w0")
884 /* This is how disasm.c prints BPF_ZEXT_REG at the moment, x86 and arm
885  * are the only CI archs that do not need zero extension for subregs.
886  */
887 #if !defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) && !defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
888 __xlated("w1 = w1")
889 #endif
890 __xlated("if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0")
891 __xlated("r1 >>= 32")
892 __xlated("r0 = r1")
893 __xlated("exit")
894 __naked void linked_regs_and_subreg_def(void)
895 {
896 	asm volatile (
897 	"call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];"
898 	/* make sure r0 is in 32-bit range, otherwise w1 = w0 won't
899 	 * assign same IDs to registers.
900 	 */
901 	"r0 &= 0x7fffffff;"
902 	/* link w1 and w0 via ID */
903 	"w1 = w0;"
904 	/* 'if' statement propagates range info from w0 to w1,
905 	 * but should not affect w1->subreg_def property.
906 	 */
907 	"if w0 < 10 goto +0;"
908 	/* r1 is read here, on archs that require subreg zero
909 	 * extension this would cause zext patch generation.
910 	 */
911 	"r1 >>= 32;"
912 	"r0 = r1;"
913 	"exit;"
914 	:
915 	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
916 	: __clobber_all);
917 }
918 
919 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
920