Searched refs:FUs (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
111 std::vector<const Record *> FUs = Proc->getValueAsListOfDefs("FU"); in collectAllFuncUnits() local114 << " (" << FUs.size() << " FUs) " << Proc->getName()); in collectAllFuncUnits()117 unsigned numFUs = FUs.size(); in collectAllFuncUnits()122 FUNameToBitsMap[FUs[j]->getName().str()] = FuncResources; in collectAllFuncUnits()123 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << FUs[j]->getName() << ":0x" in collectAllFuncUnits()142 std::vector<const Record *> FUs = Func->getValueAsListOfDefs("CFD"); in collectAllComboFuncs() local144 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " CFD:" << I << " (" << FUs.size() << " combo FUs) " in collectAllComboFuncs()148 for (unsigned J = 0, N = FUs.size(); J < N; ++J) { in collectAllComboFuncs()151 const Record *FuncData = FUs[J]; in collectAllComboFuncs()
436 ConstRecVec FUs = ProcModel.ItinsDef->getValueAsListOfDefs("FU"); in emitStageAndOperandCycleData() local437 if (FUs.empty()) in emitStageAndOperandCycleData()444 for (const auto &[Idx, FU] : enumerate(FUs)) in emitStageAndOperandCycleData()
94 InstrStage::FuncUnits FUs = (*this)[i]; in dump() local98 dbgs() << ((FUs & (1ULL << j)) ? '1' : '0'); in dump()
441 // instruction and vice-versa. We model this behavior with two artificial FUs:448 // Every NEON instruction does the same but with FUs swapped.