| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/ |
| H A D | intel_display_trace.c | fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_display_trace.h | fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_fifo_underrun.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | g4x_hdmi.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_fdi.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_frontbuffer.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | g4x_dp.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_crtc.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_tv.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_atomic_plane.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_vdsc.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_audio.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_sprite.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_cdclk.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_fbc.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_dp.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
| H A D | i915_driver.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_trace.h | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | Makefile | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_debugfs.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_irq.c | diff fd2b94a5cb0ff4bb163cdc4afaede6527eec5f7e Wed Dec 08 12:05:17 CET 2021 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> drm/i915/trace: split out display trace to a separate file
Add display/intel_display_trace.[ch] for defining display
tracepoints. The main goal is to reduce cross-includes between gem and
display. It would be possible split up tracing even further, but that
would lead to more boilerplate.
We end up having to include intel_crtc.h in a few places because it was
pulled in implicitly via intel_de.h -> i915_trace.h -> intel_crtc.h, and
that's no longer the case.
There should be no changes to tracepoints.
v3:
- Rebase
v2:
- Define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH relative to define_trace.h (Chris)
- Remove useless comments (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7862ad764fbd0748d903c76bc632d3d277874e5b.1638961423.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|