| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/ |
| H A D | i915_gem_coherency.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | i915_gem_context.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | huge_pages.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/ |
| H A D | i915_gem_domain.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | i915_gem_object.h | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| H A D | i915_gem_execbuffer.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/ |
| H A D | cmd_parser.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
| H A D | i915_gem.c | diff 1af343cdc1971ff953f08f9dcf0efad464cf057f Wed Aug 19 16:08:46 CEST 2020 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we
cannot rely on the implicit lock there.
This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when
multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance,
fix that up.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-7-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|