Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched full:armv5 (Results 1 – 13 of 13) sorted by relevance

/freebsd/lib/libc/arm/gen/
H A Darm_drain_writebuf.245 On ARMv5 systems, this executes a cp15 coprocessor
/freebsd/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/TextAPI/
H A DArchitecture.def26 ARCHINFO(armv5, MachO::CPU_TYPE_ARM, MachO::CPU_SUBTYPE_ARM_V5TEJ, 32)
/freebsd/sys/contrib/device-tree/Bindings/arm/
H A Darm,integrator.yaml14 They are ARMv4, ARMv5 and ARMv6-capable using different core tiles,
/freebsd/contrib/tcpdump/
H A Dutil-print.c951 * XXX - do we need to worry about ARMv1 through ARMv5, which didn't
953 * of them, or just some of them, e.g. ARMv5?
H A Dnetdissect.h466 * XXX - do we need to worry about ARMv1 through ARMv5, which didn't
468 * of them, or just some of them, e.g. ARMv5?
H A Dextract.h264 * XXX - ARM is a special case. ARMv1 through ARMv5 didn't support
/freebsd/contrib/llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/
H A DDarwin.cpp61 .Cases("arm", "armv4t", "armv5", "armv6", "armv6m", llvm::Triple::arm) in getArchTypeForMachOArchName()
1001 .Case("armv5tej", "armv5") in ArmMachOArchName()
1021 // ARMv5* normalises to ARMv5. in ArmMachOArchNameCPU()
1022 if (Arch.starts_with("armv5")) in ArmMachOArchNameCPU()
2860 else if (Name == "armv5") in TranslateArgs()
/freebsd/contrib/libpcap/
H A Dextract.h232 * XXX - ARM is a special case. ARMv1 through ARMv5 didn't support
/freebsd/contrib/llvm-project/lld/ELF/
H A DThunks.cpp1304 // Creates a thunk for Thumb-ARM interworking compatible with Armv5 and Armv6.
1321 " not supported for Armv5 or Armv6 targets"); in addThunkArmv5v6()
/freebsd/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Utility/
H A DArchSpec.cpp51 "armv5"},
/freebsd/contrib/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Arch/
H A DARM.cpp456 // range. On earlier Architectures such as ARMv4, ARMv5 and ARMv6 (except in getThunkSectionSpacing()
/freebsd/
H A DUPDATING862 Support for armv5 has been disconnected and is being removed. The
/freebsd/crypto/openssl/
H A DCHANGES.md6498 ARMv5 through ARMv8, as opposite to "locking" it to single one.
6500 and argue that binary targeting say ARMv5 would still execute on