Lines Matching full:raised

71  * weight-raised while it is deemed interactive, this maximum time
318 * weight-raised at the beginning of their I/O. On the opposite end,
319 * while being weight-raised, these applications
353 * have no right to be weight-raised any longer.
905 * This holds even if low_latency is on, because weight-raised queues
921 * non-weight-raised, and hence change its weight, and in bfq_weights_tree_add()
1119 * mplayer took 23 seconds to start, if constantly weight-raised. in bfq_wr_duration()
1730 * raised at startup (as for any newly in bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival()
1744 * weight-raised while they are pending. in bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival()
1851 * bfqq deserves to be weight-raised if: in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch()
1953 * bfqq is at least as weight-raised, i.e., at least as time in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch()
2343 * . if bfqq is not going to be weight-raised, because, for in bfq_add_request()
2344 * non weight-raised queues, last_wr_start_finish stores the in bfq_add_request()
2349 * . if bfqq is not weight-raised, because, if bfqq is now in bfq_add_request()
2350 * switching to weight-raised, then last_wr_start_finish in bfq_add_request()
2354 * bfqq is currently weight-raised, the weight-raising in bfq_add_request()
2357 * conditions, if bfqq is already weight-raised) in bfq_add_request()
2909 * WARNING: queue merging may impair fairness among non-weight raised
3086 * did not make it to be set in a weight-raised state, in bfq_bfqq_save_state()
3182 * If bfqq is weight-raised, then let new_bfqq inherit in bfq_merge_bfqqs()
3185 * to be weight-raised (which may happen because EQM may merge in bfq_merge_bfqqs()
3395 * Unless the queue is being weight-raised or the scenario is in bfq_arm_slice_timer()
3397 * is seeky. A long idling is preserved for a weight-raised in bfq_arm_slice_timer()
3836 * non-weight-raised queues, for efficiency reasons (see comments on
3837 * bfq_weights_tree_add()). Then the fact that bfqq is weight-raised
3840 * weight-raised, the scenario is still symmetric if all queues with
3842 * weight-raised. Actually, we should be even more precise here, and
3872 * this problem for weight-raised queues.
3985 * Use a constant, low budget for weight-raised queues, in __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget()
4547 * weight-raised queues. in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4551 * non-weight-raised queues ask for requests at a lower rate, in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4552 * then processes associated with weight-raised queues have a in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4562 * there are weight-raised busy queues. In this case, and if in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4563 * bfqq is not weight-raised, this guarantees that the device in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4564 * is not idled for bfqq (if, instead, bfqq is weight-raised, in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4568 * sync non-weight-raised queue, to get a lower number of in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4571 * weight-raised queues get served again. This often mitigates in idling_boosts_thr_without_issues()
4674 * - bfqq is not weight-raised and therefore does not carry in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection()
4677 * - regardless of whether bfqq is weight-raised, bfqq has in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection()
5052 if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1) { /* queue is being weight-raised */ in bfq_update_wr_data()
5102 * update weight both if it must be raised and if it must be in bfq_update_wr_data()
5141 * weight-raised during this service slot, even if it has in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq()
5143 * weight-raised queue. This inflates bfqq's timestamps, which in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq()
5145 * device immediately to possible other weight-raised queues. in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq()
6039 * inject limit to be raised again, and so on. The only effect in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
7135 * In-word depths if no bfq_queue is being weight-raised: in bfq_update_depths()
7155 * raised: leaving ~63% of tags for sync reads. This is the in bfq_update_depths()