Merge 3.16-rc5 into char-misc-next

This resolves a number of merge issues with changes in this tree and
Linus's tree at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Merge branch 'kprobes-test-fixes' of git://git.linaro.org/people/tixy/kernel into fixes

Merge branches 'ib-mfd-extcon-regulator-3.17', 'ib-mfd-gpio-3.17' and 'ib-mfd-mmc-3.17' into ibs-for-mfd-merged

Merge tag 'v3.16-rc3' into spi-sh-msiof

Linux 3.16-rc3

Merge tag 'v3.16-rc4' into drm-intel-next-queued

Due to Dave's vacation drm-next hasn't opened yet for 3.17 so I
couldn't move my drm-intel-next queue forward yet like I usually do.
Just pull in the

Merge tag 'v3.16-rc4' into drm-intel-next-queued

Due to Dave's vacation drm-next hasn't opened yet for 3.17 so I
couldn't move my drm-intel-next queue forward yet like I usually do.
Just pull in the latest upstream -rc to unblock patch merging - I
don't want to needlessly rebase my current patch pile really and void
all the testing we've done already.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

show more ...

Merge branch 'component-for-driver' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm into driver-core-next

Russell writes:

These updates fix one bug in the component helper where the matched
components

Merge branch 'component-for-driver' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm into driver-core-next

Russell writes:

These updates fix one bug in the component helper where the matched
components are not properly cleaned up when the master fails to bind.
I'll provide a version of this for stable trees if it's deemed that
we need to backport it.

The second patch causes the component helper to ignore duplicate
matches when adding components - this is something that was originally
needed for imx-drm, but since that has now been updated, we no longer
need to skip over a component which has already been matched.

The final patch starts the process of updating the component helper
API to achieve two goals: to allow the API to be more efficient when
deferred probing occurs, and to allow for future improvements to the
component helper without having a major impact on the users.

This represents groundwork for some other changes; once this has been
merged, I will then send two further pull requests (one for the staging
tree, and one for the DRM tree) to update the drivers to the new API.
This will result in these three commits being shared with those trees.

show more ...

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

Merge branch 'perf/urgent' into perf/core, to pick up fixes and refresh the branch

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Merge 3.16-rc2 into staging-next

We want the staging fixes here as well.

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next

Pull sparc fixes from David Miller:
"Sparc sparse fixes from Sam Ravnborg"

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dave

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next

Pull sparc fixes from David Miller:
"Sparc sparse fixes from Sam Ravnborg"

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next: (67 commits)
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in int_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in ftrace.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in kprobes.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in kgdb_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in compat_audit.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in init_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in aes_glue.c
sparc: fix sparse warnings in smp_32.c + smp_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in perf_event.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in kprobes.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in tsb.c
sparc64: clean up compat_sigset_t.seta handling
sparc64: fix sparse "Should it be static?" warnings in signal32.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc32.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in pci.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in prom_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in btext.c
sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_64.c + unaligned_64.c
sparc64: fix sparse warning in process_64.c
...

Conflicts:
arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h

show more ...

Merge branch 'sparc_sparse_fixes'

Sam Ravnborg says:

====================
sparc sparse fixes + diverse cleanup

v1 => v2
- audit of all patches. I deliberately waited a while
before doing so - in

Merge branch 'sparc_sparse_fixes'

Sam Ravnborg says:

====================
sparc sparse fixes + diverse cleanup

v1 => v2
- audit of all patches. I deliberately waited a while
before doing so - in order to look at them with fresh eyes.
- Fix bogus sbus() use found by davem in iommu.c
- Split patch touching iommu.c and io-unit.c in two
- Fix bogus sbus use in time_32 (sbus_readw => sbus_readl)
- Dropped patch that touches signal_64.c
__put_user() does many magic things and I could not convince
myself that dropping a cast of a pointer to (u64) was correct.
- Updated a few changelogs to be more precise/descriptive
- In systbls.h rearrange include and move include to the common part
- Updated cover letter (this mail)

Fix build breakage of sparc32 in certain configurations

Fix sparse warnings in sparc32.
What is remaining:
- "shift too big" warnings in the soft floating point code.
This is too complex - so I dropped trying to fix these

Fix sparse warnings in sparc64.
What is remaining:
- "shift too big" warnings in the soft floating point code (like sparc32)
- pcr.c defines arch_irq_work_raise() which is also defined as __weak in common code.
As I recall there are some issues with weak functions with prototypes
so it is left as-is
- signal32.c issue a lot of "cast removes address space of expression"
This actually deserve an extra look - as I think this may be
some code that mixes two sizes to __put_user()
- viohs.c uses a variable length array
- init_64.c reference vmemmap_free which is properly declared in common code
but seems to be guarded by wrong ifdefs
- signal_64.c mix with __user pointers and wrong casts

None of the remaining sparse warnings looks simple to fix - and any
hints how to proceed are appreciated.

A lot of the sparse warnings are fixed by addding or moving function
prototypes to common files. Many prototypes are for functions
solely called from assembler so they are added only to shut up sparse.
But there is also a lot of prototypes that had local declarations
which are now visible both in the file where the function
is defined and in the file where the function is used.

Change all prototypes in sparc .h files so they do not use extern.
This change touches a lot of files.

Fix so we no longer assumes _NIG_WORDS can have more than one value,
and add a build time check to catch if the value changes anyway.

**The following patches require extra careful review:**

[PATCH 07/34] sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_32.c
The return type of a few syscalls has been changed for sparc32,
to align with sparc64.
I assume this is safe to do.

[PATCH 08/34] sparc32: remove cast from output constraints in math asm statements
[PATCH 09/34] sparc64: remove cast from output constraints in math asm statements
I have not much experience with gcc inline
assembler - so please check that this looks OK.
A cast in the output section of the inline
assembler is dropped - which should be OK.

[PATCH 23/34] sparc64: clean up compat_sigset_t.seta handling
This drops code that assumed _NSIG_WORDS could change.
But as _NIG_WORDS are always constant drop this code.

[PATCH 34/34] sparc64: fix sparse warnings in int_64.c
Introduces some ugly ifdef in the code.
Was not sure if there was a smarter way to do this.
It looked like some code was executed in the
!CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES case which is not required.
For now the simple solution with ifdef was used.

**The following patches touches files outside arch/sparc:**

[PATCH 24/34] sparc64: fix sparse warning in tsb.c
Touches kernel/sysctl.c - removes a few sparc64 specific lines

[PATCH 27/34] sparc: fix sparse warnings in smp_32.c + smp_64.c
Adds prototype for setup_profiling_timer to include/linux/profile.h.
I could not find any obvious candidates to cc: on this patch
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warning in kgdb_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kgdb_64.c:114:18: warning: symbol 'smp_kgdb_capture_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
kgdb_64.c:161:17: warning: symbol

sparc64: fix sparse warning in kgdb_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kgdb_64.c:114:18: warning: symbol 'smp_kgdb_capture_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
kgdb_64.c:161:17: warning: symbol 'kgdb_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototypes

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in compat_audit.c

Fix following warnings:
compat_audit.c:4:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_dir_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:9:10: warning: s

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in compat_audit.c

Fix following warnings:
compat_audit.c:4:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_dir_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:9:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_chattr_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:14:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_write_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:19:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_read_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:24:10: warning: symbol 'sparc32_signal_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
compat_audit.c:29:5: warning: symbol 'sparc32_classify_syscall' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add declarations to kernel.h

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse "Should it be static?" warnings in signal32.c

Fix following warnings:
signal32.c:140:6: warning: symbol 'do_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:230:17:

sparc64: fix sparse "Should it be static?" warnings in signal32.c

Fix following warnings:
signal32.c:140:6: warning: symbol 'do_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:230:17: warning: symbol 'do_rt_sigreturn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:729:6: warning: symbol 'do_signal32' was not declared. Should it be static?
signal32.c:773:16: warning: symbol 'do_sys32_sigstack' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototypes and drop local prototype

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warning in pci.c

Fix following warning:
pci.c:886:5: warning: symbol 'pci64_dma_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototype in kernel.h and delete loc

sparc64: fix sparse warning in pci.c

Fix following warning:
pci.c:886:5: warning: symbol 'pci64_dma_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper prototype in kernel.h and delete local prototype in iommu.c

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.c

Fix following warnings:
smp_64.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'smp_callin' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_panic' was no

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.c

Fix following warnings:
smp_64.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'smp_callin' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_panic' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:187:6: warning: symbol 'smp_synchronize_tick_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:821:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:827:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_single_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:964:18: warning: symbol 'smp_new_mmu_context_version_client' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1149:6: warning: symbol 'smp_capture' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1171:6: warning: symbol 'smp_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1190:18: warning: symbol 'smp_penguin_jailcell' was not declared. Should it be static?
smp_64.c:1410:18: warning: symbol 'smp_receive_signal_client' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add prototypes in kernel.h or asm/smp_64.h as appropriate.
Delete duplicate function kimage_addr_to_ra(), and
adapt parameter to const void * to match the broader use.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_64.c + unaligned_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:643:17: warning: symbol 'sys_kern_features' was not declared. Should it be static?
kerne

sparc64: fix sparse warnings in sys_sparc_64.c + unaligned_64.c

Fix following warnings:
kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:643:17: warning: symbol 'sys_kern_features' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:297:17: warning: symbol 'kernel_unaligned_trap' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:387:5: warning: symbol 'handle_popc' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'handle_ldf_stq' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:553:6: warning: symbol 'handle_ld_nf' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:579:6: warning: symbol 'handle_lddfmna' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/unaligned_64.c:643:6: warning: symbol 'handle_stdfmna' was not declared. Should it be static?

Functions that are only used in kernel/ - add prototypes in kernel.h
Functions used outside kernel/ - add prototype in asm/setup.h
Removed local prototypes

One of the local prototypes had wrong signature (return void - not int).

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc: drop use of extern for prototypes in arch/sparc/*

Drop the remaining uses of extern for prototypes in .h files
in the sparc specific part of the kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam

sparc: drop use of extern for prototypes in arch/sparc/*

Drop the remaining uses of extern for prototypes in .h files
in the sparc specific part of the kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc32: drop tadpole specific code

tadpole.c assigned cpu_pwr_save based on the current configuration.
The rest of the tadpole.c file was only used if cpu_pwr_save was
dereferenced.
But this variab

sparc32: drop tadpole specific code

tadpole.c assigned cpu_pwr_save based on the current configuration.
The rest of the tadpole.c file was only used if cpu_pwr_save was
dereferenced.
But this variable was never dereferenced - and I went back to a 2.6.12
kernel to check (from June 2005) - and not even then was it used.

Drop this code as it has not been in use for ~10 years.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in time_32.c

Fix following warnings:
time_32.c:63:1: warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:357:13: warning: symbol 'time_init' was

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in time_32.c

Fix following warnings:
time_32.c:63:1: warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:357:13: warning: symbol 'time_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
time_32.c:148:16: warning: dereference of noderef expression

Add extern definition of rtc_lock in mc146818rtc.h.
time_init() is called from init/main.c - add prototype to kernel.h.
Use proper u32 __iomem * for master_l10_counter.
Fix all users.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in pcic.c

Fix following warnings:
pcic.c:164:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:165:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_speculative' was

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in pcic.c

Fix following warnings:
pcic.c:164:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:165:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_speculative' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:166:14: warning: symbol 'pcic_trapped' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:332:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:344:66: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:539:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
pcic.c:677:1: warning: symbol 'pcic_pin_to_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
pcic.c:783:6: warning: symbol 'pcic_nmi' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add extern for pcic_regs.
Define a few variables static.
Replace 0 with NULL.
Delete unused funtion pcic_pin_to_irq().
Include kernel.h so we could drop declaration of
t_nmi and add prototype for pcic_nmi.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc32: fix build breakage

Add forward declaration to kernel.h to fix build breakage
in some configurations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@dav

sparc32: fix build breakage

Add forward declaration to kernel.h to fix build breakage
in some configurations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

Merge branch 'sparc32-sparse'

Sam Ravnborg says:

====================
sparse warning fixes in arch/sparc/

The following patch-set address a lot of sparse warnings
in the sparc32 specific parts of

Merge branch 'sparc32-sparse'

Sam Ravnborg says:

====================
sparse warning fixes in arch/sparc/

The following patch-set address a lot of sparse warnings
in the sparc32 specific parts of arch/sparc/.
A few sparc64 bits are touched too when code are shared.

Within arch/sparc/mm/ only two warnings remains.
These are related to the return value of of_ioremap() which is __iomem.

Within arch/sparc/kernel/ only three files now produces sparse warnings:
sys_sparc_32.c
time_32.c
auxio_32.c

The fixes was not obvious so the warnings was left for now.

When looking at tadpole.c I was left with the impression that most
of the code was actually unused - but for now I added a "TODO".

This is made on top of 3.15-rc2.

This set replaces the two sets sent the last days.
V2:
- Do not add extern in front of prototypes.
- Tidy up a few changelongs

There are still sparse warnings left that are easy to address.
But this fixes the majority.
====================

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in leon_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
leon_smp.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_setbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:151:14: warning: symbol

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in leon_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
leon_smp.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_setbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:151:14: warning: symbol 'leon_smp_getbroadcast' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:269:6: warning: symbol 'leon_irq_rotate' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:355:6: warning: symbol 'leonsmp_ipi_interrupt' was not declared. Should it be static?
leon_smp.c:457:6: warning: symbol 'leon_cross_call_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add static.
Remove unused functions.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4d_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4d_smp.c:113:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:121:5: warning: symbol 's

sparc32: fix sparse warnings in sun4d_smp.c

Fix following warnings:
sun4d_smp.c:113:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:121:5: warning: symbol 'smp4d_boot_one_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:162:13: warning: symbol 'smp4d_smp_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:353:6: warning: symbol 'smp4d_cross_call_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
sun4d_smp.c:363:6: warning: symbol 'smp4d_percpu_timer_interrupt' was not declared. Should it be static?

Add proper declarations

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...