#
9097ca5c |
| 17-Jul-2017 |
Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> |
9107 vi: this statement may fall through Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net> Reviewed by: Andy Fiddaman <af@citrus-it.net> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
|
#
0f1f7826 |
| 13-Mar-2014 |
Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> |
5088 it's probably ok for vi to stop working around pdp-11 bugs now Reviewed by: Andrew Gabriel <illumos@cucumber.demon.co.uk> Reviewed by: Josef Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net> Approved by: Dan McDona
5088 it's probably ok for vi to stop working around pdp-11 bugs now Reviewed by: Andrew Gabriel <illumos@cucumber.demon.co.uk> Reviewed by: Josef Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
show more ...
|
#
68c92b9f |
| 18-Jun-2007 |
cf46844 <none@none> |
6510560 Vulnerabilities in vi(1) and ex(1) may lead to execution of arbitrary code
|
#
f6db9f27 |
| 01-Nov-2005 |
cf46844 <none@none> |
6268958 cmd/vi and gcc don't get along
|
#
a1d23db4 |
| 22-Sep-2005 |
ceastha <none@none> |
6320769 UNIX03 *vsc* modified assertions ex_01.ex 17 and 19 fail 6320774 UNIX03 *vsc* modified assertion ex_08.ex 484 fails
|
#
7c478bd9 |
| 14-Jun-2005 |
stevel@tonic-gate <none@none> |
OpenSolaris Launch
|