History log of /freebsd/sys/kern/subr_epoch.c (Results 1 – 25 of 79)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# fdafd315 24-Nov-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

sys: Automated cleanup of cdefs and other formatting

Apply the following automated changes to try to eliminate
no-longer-needed sys/cdefs.h includes as well as now-empty
blank lines in a row.

Remov

sys: Automated cleanup of cdefs and other formatting

Apply the following automated changes to try to eliminate
no-longer-needed sys/cdefs.h includes as well as now-empty
blank lines in a row.

Remove /^#if.*\n#endif.*\n#include\s+<sys/cdefs.h>.*\n/
Remove /\n+#include\s+<sys/cdefs.h>.*\n+#if.*\n#endif.*\n+/
Remove /\n+#if.*\n#endif.*\n+/
Remove /^#if.*\n#endif.*\n/
Remove /\n+#include\s+<sys/cdefs.h>\n#include\s+<sys/types.h>/
Remove /\n+#include\s+<sys/cdefs.h>\n#include\s+<sys/param.h>/
Remove /\n+#include\s+<sys/cdefs.h>\n#include\s+<sys/capsicum.h>/

Sponsored by: Netflix

show more ...


Revision tags: release/14.0.0
# 685dc743 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line .c pattern

Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/


# 4d846d26 10-May-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.

Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix

show more ...


Revision tags: release/13.2.0
# 2555f175 31-Jan-2023 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>

Move kstack_contains() and GET_STACK_USAGE() to MD machine/stack.h

Reviewed by: jhb
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38320


# fa1d803c 20-Jan-2023 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>

epoch: replace hand coded assertion

The assertion is equivalent to kstack_contains() so use that rather
than spelling it out.

Suggested by: jhb
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: DARP

epoch: replace hand coded assertion

The assertion is equivalent to kstack_contains() so use that rather
than spelling it out.

Suggested by: jhb
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38107

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0
# aca2a7fa 07-Mar-2022 Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@FreeBSD.org>

stack_zero is not needed before stack_save

The man page was recently clarified to commit to this contract.

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon


# db0ac6de 02-Dec-2021 Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>

Revert "wpa: Import wpa_supplicant/hostapd commit 14ab4a816"

This reverts commit 266f97b5e9a7958e365e78288616a459b40d924a, reversing
changes made to a10253cffea84c0c980a36ba6776b00ed96c3e3b.

A mism

Revert "wpa: Import wpa_supplicant/hostapd commit 14ab4a816"

This reverts commit 266f97b5e9a7958e365e78288616a459b40d924a, reversing
changes made to a10253cffea84c0c980a36ba6776b00ed96c3e3b.

A mismerge of a merge to catch up to main resulted in files being
committed which should not have been.

show more ...


# 266f97b5 02-Dec-2021 Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>

wpa: Import wpa_supplicant/hostapd commit 14ab4a816

This is the November update to vendor/wpa committed upstream 2021-11-26.

MFC after: 1 month


# d96fccc5 02-Dec-2021 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

epoch: with EPOCH_TRACE add epoch_where_report()
which will report where the epoch was entered and also
mark the tracker, so that exit will also be reported.

Helps to understand epoch entrance/exit

epoch: with EPOCH_TRACE add epoch_where_report()
which will report where the epoch was entered and also
mark the tracker, so that exit will also be reported.

Helps to understand epoch entrance/exit scenarios in
complex cases, like network stack. As everything else
under EPOCH_TRACE it is a developer only tool.

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.3.0
# ef0f7ae9 21-May-2021 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

The old thread priority must be stored as part of the EPOCH(9) tracker.

Else recursive use of EPOCH(9) may cause the wrong priority to be restored.

Bump the __FreeBSD_version due to changing the th

The old thread priority must be stored as part of the EPOCH(9) tracker.

Else recursive use of EPOCH(9) may cause the wrong priority to be restored.

Bump the __FreeBSD_version due to changing the thread and epoch tracker
structure.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30375
Reviewed by: markj@
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies // NVIDIA Networking

show more ...


# c82c2006 21-May-2021 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

Accessing the epoch structure should happen after the INIT_CHECK().
Else the epoch pointer may be NULL.

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies // NVIDIA Networking


# f3316835 21-May-2021 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

Properly define EPOCH(9) function macro.

No functional change intended.

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies // NVIDIA Networking


# cc9bb7a9 21-May-2021 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

Rework for-loop in EPOCH(9) to reduce indentation level.

No functional change intended.

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies // NVIDIA Networking


Revision tags: release/13.0.0
# 7667824a 07-Nov-2020 Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>

epoch: support non-preemptible epochs checking in_epoch()

Previously, non-preemptible epochs could not check; in_epoch() would always
fail, usually because non-preemptible epochs don't imply THREAD_

epoch: support non-preemptible epochs checking in_epoch()

Previously, non-preemptible epochs could not check; in_epoch() would always
fail, usually because non-preemptible epochs don't imply THREAD_NO_SLEEPING.

For default epochs, it's easy enough to verify that we're in the given
epoch: if we're in a critical section and our record for the given epoch
is active, then we're in it.

This patch also adds some additional INVARIANTS bookkeeping. Notably, we set
and check the recorded thread in epoch_enter/epoch_exit to try and catch
some edge-cases for the caller. It also checks upon freeing that none of the
records had a thread in the epoch, which may make it a little easier to
diagnose some improper use if epoch_free() took place while some other
thread was inside.

This version differs slightly from what was just previously reviewed by the
below-listed, in that in_epoch() will assert that no CPU has this thread
recorded even if it *is* currently in a critical section. This is intended
to catch cases where the caller might have somehow messed up critical
section nesting, we can catch both if they exited the critical section or if
they exited, migrated, then re-entered (on the wrong CPU).

Reviewed by: kib, markj (both previous version)
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27098

show more ...


Revision tags: release/12.2.0
# 440cec3f 12-Aug-2020 Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>

MFH

Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (netgate.com)


# e53daa1d 07-Aug-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r363989 through r364034.


# 826c0793 07-Aug-2020 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

Add full support support for dynamic allocation and freeing of epoch's.

Make sure to reclaim epoch structures when they are freed to support
dynamic allocation and freeing of epoch structures.

Whil

Add full support support for dynamic allocation and freeing of epoch's.

Make sure to reclaim epoch structures when they are freed to support
dynamic allocation and freeing of epoch structures.

While at it, move the 64 supported epoch control structures to the
static memory domain. This overall simplifies the management and
debugging of system epoch's.

Reviewed by: kib, markj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25960
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies

show more ...


Revision tags: release/11.4.0
# 75dfc66c 27-Feb-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r358269 through r358399.


# 7029da5c 26-Feb-2020 Pawel Biernacki <kaktus@FreeBSD.org>

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (17 of many)

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are
still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly mark

Mark more nodes as CTLFLAG_MPSAFE or CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT (17 of many)

r357614 added CTLFLAG_NEEDGIANT to make it easier to find nodes that are
still not MPSAFE (or already are but aren’t properly marked).
Use it in preparation for a general review of all nodes.

This is non-functional change that adds annotations to SYSCTL_NODE and
SYSCTL_PROC nodes using one of the soon-to-be-required flags.

Mark all obvious cases as MPSAFE. All entries that haven't been marked
as MPSAFE before are by default marked as NEEDGIANT

Approved by: kib (mentor, blanket)
Commented by: kib, gallatin, melifaro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23718

show more ...


# 44e86fbd 13-Feb-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r357662 through r357854.


# 48baf00f 12-Feb-2020 Mateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org>

epoch: convert zpcpu_get_cpua(.., curcpu) to zpcpu_get


# 66c6c556 17-Jan-2020 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

Change argument order of epoch_call() to more natural, first function,
then its argument.

Reviewed by: imp, cem, jhb


# fedab1b4 13-Jan-2020 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>

Code must not unlock a mutex while owning the thread lock.

Reviewed by: hselasky, markj
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
MFC after: 1 week
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23150


# cc79ea3a 18-Dec-2019 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@FreeBSD.org>

Restore important comment in RCU/EPOCH support in FreeBSD after r355784.

Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies


# 686bcb5c 15-Dec-2019 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org>

schedlock 4/4

Don't hold the scheduler lock while doing context switches. Instead we
unlock after selecting the new thread and switch within a spinlock
section leaving interrupts and preemption dis

schedlock 4/4

Don't hold the scheduler lock while doing context switches. Instead we
unlock after selecting the new thread and switch within a spinlock
section leaving interrupts and preemption disabled to prevent local
concurrency. This means that mi_switch() is entered with the thread
locked but returns without. This dramatically simplifies scheduler
locking because we will not hold the schedlock while spinning on
blocked lock in switch.

This change has not been made to 4BSD but in principle it would be
more straightforward.

Discussed with: markj
Reviewed by: kib
Tested by: pho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22778

show more ...


1234