History log of /freebsd/sys/crypto/rijndael/test00.c (Results 1 – 5 of 5)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: release/14.0.0
# 95ee2897 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: two-line .h pattern

Remove /^\s*\*\n \*\s+\$FreeBSD\$$\n/


Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0, release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0, release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0, release/11.0.1, release/11.0.0, release/10.3.0, release/10.2.0, release/10.1.0, release/9.3.0, release/10.0.0, release/9.2.0, release/8.4.0, release/9.1.0, release/8.3.0_cvs, release/8.3.0, release/9.0.0, release/7.4.0_cvs, release/8.2.0_cvs, release/7.4.0, release/8.2.0, release/8.1.0_cvs, release/8.1.0, release/7.3.0_cvs, release/7.3.0, release/8.0.0_cvs, release/8.0.0, release/7.2.0_cvs, release/7.2.0, release/7.1.0_cvs, release/7.1.0, release/6.4.0_cvs, release/6.4.0, release/7.0.0_cvs, release/7.0.0
# dd8c2454 15-Jan-2008 Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>

Make test00 compilable again.


Revision tags: release/6.3.0_cvs, release/6.3.0, release/6.2.0_cvs, release/6.2.0, release/5.5.0_cvs, release/5.5.0, release/6.1.0_cvs, release/6.1.0, release/6.0.0_cvs, release/6.0.0, release/5.4.0_cvs, release/5.4.0, release/4.11.0_cvs, release/4.11.0, release/5.3.0_cvs, release/5.3.0, release/4.10.0_cvs, release/4.10.0, release/5.2.1_cvs, release/5.2.1, release/5.2.0_cvs, release/5.2.0, release/4.9.0_cvs, release/4.9.0
# 0513e13e 20-Oct-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>

Add a testcase which validates that the same buffer can be passed to
rijndael_blockDecrypt() as both input and output.

This property is important because inside rijndael we can get away
with allocat

Add a testcase which validates that the same buffer can be passed to
rijndael_blockDecrypt() as both input and output.

This property is important because inside rijndael we can get away
with allocating just a 16 byte "work" buffer on the stack (which
is very cheap), whereas the calling code would need to allocate the
full sized buffer, and in all likelyhood would have to do so with
an expensive malloc(9).

show more ...


Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0, release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0, release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0, release/11.0.1, release/11.0.0, release/10.3.0, release/10.2.0, release/10.1.0, release/9.3.0, release/10.0.0, release/9.2.0, release/8.4.0, release/9.1.0, release/8.3.0_cvs, release/8.3.0, release/9.0.0, release/7.4.0_cvs, release/8.2.0_cvs, release/7.4.0, release/8.2.0, release/8.1.0_cvs, release/8.1.0, release/7.3.0_cvs, release/7.3.0, release/8.0.0_cvs, release/8.0.0, release/7.2.0_cvs, release/7.2.0, release/7.1.0_cvs, release/7.1.0, release/6.4.0_cvs, release/6.4.0, release/7.0.0_cvs, release/7.0.0
# dd8c2454 15-Jan-2008 Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>

Make test00 compilable again.


Revision tags: release/6.3.0_cvs, release/6.3.0, release/6.2.0_cvs, release/6.2.0, release/5.5.0_cvs, release/5.5.0, release/6.1.0_cvs, release/6.1.0, release/6.0.0_cvs, release/6.0.0, release/5.4.0_cvs, release/5.4.0, release/4.11.0_cvs, release/4.11.0, release/5.3.0_cvs, release/5.3.0, release/4.10.0_cvs, release/4.10.0, release/5.2.1_cvs, release/5.2.1, release/5.2.0_cvs, release/5.2.0, release/4.9.0_cvs, release/4.9.0
# 0513e13e 20-Oct-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>

Add a testcase which validates that the same buffer can be passed to
rijndael_blockDecrypt() as both input and output.

This property is important because inside rijndael we can get away
with allocat

Add a testcase which validates that the same buffer can be passed to
rijndael_blockDecrypt() as both input and output.

This property is important because inside rijndael we can get away
with allocating just a 16 byte "work" buffer on the stack (which
is very cheap), whereas the calling code would need to allocate the
full sized buffer, and in all likelyhood would have to do so with
an expensive malloc(9).

show more ...