#
0dd5a560 |
| 28-Jan-2024 |
Steve Kargl <kargl@FreeBSD.org> |
lib/msun: Cleanup after $FreeBSD$ removal
Remove no longer needed explicit inclusion of sys/cdefs.h.
PR: 276669 MFC after: 1 week
|
Revision tags: release/14.0.0 |
|
#
1d386b48 |
| 16-Aug-2023 |
Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> |
Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line .c pattern
Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/
|
Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0, release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0, release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0, release/11.0.1, release/11.0.0, release/10.3.0, release/10.2.0, release/10.1.0, release/9.3.0, release/10.0.0, release/9.2.0, release/8.4.0, release/9.1.0, release/8.3.0_cvs, release/8.3.0, release/9.0.0, release/7.4.0_cvs, release/8.2.0_cvs, release/7.4.0, release/8.2.0, release/8.1.0_cvs, release/8.1.0, release/7.3.0_cvs, release/7.3.0, release/8.0.0_cvs, release/8.0.0, release/7.2.0_cvs, release/7.2.0, release/7.1.0_cvs, release/7.1.0, release/6.4.0_cvs, release/6.4.0, release/7.0.0_cvs, release/7.0.0 |
|
#
5aa554c7 |
| 22-Feb-2008 |
David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> |
s/rcsid/__FBSDID/
|
#
6a876b92 |
| 19-Jan-2008 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Use STRICT_ASSIGN() instead of assorted direct volatile hacks to work around assignments not working for gcc on i386. Now volatile hacks for rint() and rintf() don't needlessly pessimize so many arc
Use STRICT_ASSIGN() instead of assorted direct volatile hacks to work around assignments not working for gcc on i386. Now volatile hacks for rint() and rintf() don't needlessly pessimize so many arches and the remaining pessimizations (for arm and powerpc) can be avoided centrally.
This cleans up after s_rint.c 1.3 and 1.13 and s_rintf.c 1.3 and 1.9: - s_rint.c 1.13 broke 1.3 by only using a volatile cast hack in 1 place when it was needed in 2 places, and the volatile cast hack stopped working with gcc-4. These bugs only affected correctness tests on i386 since i386 normally uses asm rint() and doesn't support the extra precision mode that would break assignments of doubles. - s_rintf.c 1.9 improved(?) on 1.3 by using a volatile variable hack instead of an extra-precision variable hack, but it declared 2 variables as volatile when only 1 variable needed to be volatile. This only affected speed tests on i386 since i386 uses asm rintf().
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/6.3.0_cvs, release/6.3.0, release/6.2.0_cvs, release/6.2.0, release/5.5.0_cvs, release/5.5.0, release/6.1.0_cvs, release/6.1.0 |
|
#
11860542 |
| 03-Dec-2005 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Restored removal of the special handling needed for a result of +-0. It was lost in rev.1.9. The log message for rev.1.9 says that the special case of +-0 is handled twice, but it was only handled o
Restored removal of the special handling needed for a result of +-0. It was lost in rev.1.9. The log message for rev.1.9 says that the special case of +-0 is handled twice, but it was only handled once, so it became unhandled, and this happened to break half of the cases that return +-0: - round-towards-minus-infinity: 0 < x < 1: result was -0 not 0 - round-to-nearest: -0.5 <= x < 0: result was 0 not -0 - round-towards-plus-infinity: -1 < x < 0: result was 0 not -0 - round-towards-zero: -1 < x < 0: result was 0 not -0
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/6.0.0_cvs, release/6.0.0, release/5.4.0_cvs, release/5.4.0, release/4.11.0_cvs, release/4.11.0, release/5.3.0_cvs, release/5.3.0 |
|
#
c4da2324 |
| 09-Jun-2004 |
David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> |
Fix a bug where rintf() rounded the wrong way in round-to-nearest mode on all inputs of the form x.75, where x is an even integer and log2(x) = 21. A similar problem occurred when rounding upward. T
Fix a bug where rintf() rounded the wrong way in round-to-nearest mode on all inputs of the form x.75, where x is an even integer and log2(x) = 21. A similar problem occurred when rounding upward. The bug involves the following snippet copied from rint():
i>>=1; if((i0&i)!=0) i0 = (i0&(~i))|((0x100000)>>j0);
The constant 0x100000 should be 0x200000. Apparently this case was never tested.
It turns out that the bit manipulation is completely superfluous anyway, so remove it. (It tries to simulate 90% of the rounding process that the FPU does anyway.) Also, the special case of +-0 is handled twice (in different ways), so remove the second instance.
Throw in some related simplifications from bde:
- Work around a bug where gcc fails to clip to float precision by declaring two float variables as volatile. Previously, we tricked gcc into generating correct code by declaring some float constants as doubles.
- Remove additional superfluous bit manipulation.
- Minor reorganization.
- Include <sys/types.h> explicitly.
Note that some of the equivalent lines in rint() also appear to be unnecessary, but I'll defer to the numerical analysts who wrote it, since I can't test all 2^64 cases.
Discussed with: bde
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/4.10.0_cvs, release/4.10.0, release/5.2.1_cvs, release/5.2.1, release/5.2.0_cvs, release/5.2.0, release/4.9.0_cvs, release/4.9.0, release/5.1.0_cvs, release/5.1.0, release/4.8.0_cvs, release/4.8.0, release/5.0.0_cvs, release/5.0.0, release/4.7.0_cvs, release/4.6.2_cvs, release/4.6.2, release/4.6.1, release/4.6.0_cvs |
|
#
59b19ff1 |
| 28-May-2002 |
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> |
Fix formatting, this is hard to explain, so I'll show one example.
- float ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */ +float +ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */
This is because the __S
Fix formatting, this is hard to explain, so I'll show one example.
- float ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */ +float +ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */
This is because the __STDC__ stuff was indented.
Reviewed by: md5
show more ...
|
#
2dcc2286 |
| 28-May-2002 |
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> |
Assume __STDC__, remove non-__STDC__ code.
Reviewed by: md5
|
Revision tags: release/4.5.0_cvs, release/4.4.0_cvs, release/4.3.0_cvs, release/4.3.0, release/4.2.0, release/4.1.1_cvs, release/4.1.0, release/3.5.0_cvs, release/4.0.0_cvs, release/3.4.0_cvs, release/3.3.0_cvs |
|
#
7f3dea24 |
| 28-Aug-1999 |
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> |
$Id$ -> $FreeBSD$
|
Revision tags: release/3.2.0, release/3.1.0, release/3.0.0, release/2.2.8, release/2.2.7, release/2.2.6, release/2.2.5_cvs, release/2.2.2_cvs, release/2.2.1_cvs, release/2.2.0, release/2.1.7_cvs |
|
#
7e546392 |
| 22-Feb-1997 |
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> |
Revert $FreeBSD$ to $Id$
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.6_cvs, release/2.1.6.1 |
|
#
1130b656 |
| 14-Jan-1997 |
Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.org> |
Make the long-awaited change from $Id$ to $FreeBSD$
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!) avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so
Make the long-awaited change from $Id$ to $FreeBSD$
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!) avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been insane otherwise.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.5_cvs |
|
#
2aa9f7ca |
| 28-Aug-1996 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Made rintf() actually work. It was completely broken (when s_rint.c was compiled with -O) by the precision bug in the i386 version of gcc (assignments and casts don't clip the precision). E.g., rin
Made rintf() actually work. It was completely broken (when s_rint.c was compiled with -O) by the precision bug in the i386 version of gcc (assignments and casts don't clip the precision). E.g., rintf(12.3456789) was 12.125.
Avoid the same bug in rint(). It was only broken for the unusual case when the i387 precision is 64 bits. FreeBSD defaults to 53 bit precision to avoid problems like this, but the standard math emulator always uses 64 bit precision.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.0_cvs, release/2.0.5_cvs |
|
#
6c06b4e2 |
| 30-May-1995 |
Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> |
Remove trailing whitespace.
|
Revision tags: release/2.0 |
|
#
3a8617a8 |
| 19-Aug-1994 |
Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.org> |
J.T. Conklin's latest version of the Sun math library.
-- Begin comments from J.T. Conklin: The most significant improvement is the addition of "float" versions of the math functions that take float
J.T. Conklin's latest version of the Sun math library.
-- Begin comments from J.T. Conklin: The most significant improvement is the addition of "float" versions of the math functions that take float arguments, return floats, and do all operations in floating point. This doesn't help (performance) much on the i386, but they are still nice to have.
The float versions were orginally done by Cygnus' Ian Taylor when fdlibm was integrated into the libm we support for embedded systems. I gave Ian a copy of my libm as a starting point since I had already fixed a lot of bugs & problems in Sun's original code. After he was done, I cleaned it up a bit and integrated the changes back into my libm. -- End comments
Reviewed by: jkh Submitted by: jtc
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0, release/12.0.0, release/11.2.0, release/10.4.0, release/11.1.0, release/11.0.1, release/11.0.0, release/10.3.0, release/10.2.0, release/10.1.0, release/9.3.0, release/10.0.0, release/9.2.0, release/8.4.0, release/9.1.0, release/8.3.0_cvs, release/8.3.0, release/9.0.0, release/7.4.0_cvs, release/8.2.0_cvs, release/7.4.0, release/8.2.0, release/8.1.0_cvs, release/8.1.0, release/7.3.0_cvs, release/7.3.0, release/8.0.0_cvs, release/8.0.0, release/7.2.0_cvs, release/7.2.0, release/7.1.0_cvs, release/7.1.0, release/6.4.0_cvs, release/6.4.0, release/7.0.0_cvs, release/7.0.0 |
|
#
5aa554c7 |
| 22-Feb-2008 |
David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> |
s/rcsid/__FBSDID/
|
#
6a876b92 |
| 19-Jan-2008 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Use STRICT_ASSIGN() instead of assorted direct volatile hacks to work around assignments not working for gcc on i386. Now volatile hacks for rint() and rintf() don't needlessly pessimize so many arc
Use STRICT_ASSIGN() instead of assorted direct volatile hacks to work around assignments not working for gcc on i386. Now volatile hacks for rint() and rintf() don't needlessly pessimize so many arches and the remaining pessimizations (for arm and powerpc) can be avoided centrally.
This cleans up after s_rint.c 1.3 and 1.13 and s_rintf.c 1.3 and 1.9: - s_rint.c 1.13 broke 1.3 by only using a volatile cast hack in 1 place when it was needed in 2 places, and the volatile cast hack stopped working with gcc-4. These bugs only affected correctness tests on i386 since i386 normally uses asm rint() and doesn't support the extra precision mode that would break assignments of doubles. - s_rintf.c 1.9 improved(?) on 1.3 by using a volatile variable hack instead of an extra-precision variable hack, but it declared 2 variables as volatile when only 1 variable needed to be volatile. This only affected speed tests on i386 since i386 uses asm rintf().
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/6.3.0_cvs, release/6.3.0, release/6.2.0_cvs, release/6.2.0, release/5.5.0_cvs, release/5.5.0, release/6.1.0_cvs, release/6.1.0 |
|
#
11860542 |
| 03-Dec-2005 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Restored removal of the special handling needed for a result of +-0. It was lost in rev.1.9. The log message for rev.1.9 says that the special case of +-0 is handled twice, but it was only handled o
Restored removal of the special handling needed for a result of +-0. It was lost in rev.1.9. The log message for rev.1.9 says that the special case of +-0 is handled twice, but it was only handled once, so it became unhandled, and this happened to break half of the cases that return +-0: - round-towards-minus-infinity: 0 < x < 1: result was -0 not 0 - round-to-nearest: -0.5 <= x < 0: result was 0 not -0 - round-towards-plus-infinity: -1 < x < 0: result was 0 not -0 - round-towards-zero: -1 < x < 0: result was 0 not -0
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/6.0.0_cvs, release/6.0.0, release/5.4.0_cvs, release/5.4.0, release/4.11.0_cvs, release/4.11.0, release/5.3.0_cvs, release/5.3.0 |
|
#
c4da2324 |
| 09-Jun-2004 |
David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> |
Fix a bug where rintf() rounded the wrong way in round-to-nearest mode on all inputs of the form x.75, where x is an even integer and log2(x) = 21. A similar problem occurred when rounding upward. T
Fix a bug where rintf() rounded the wrong way in round-to-nearest mode on all inputs of the form x.75, where x is an even integer and log2(x) = 21. A similar problem occurred when rounding upward. The bug involves the following snippet copied from rint():
i>>=1; if((i0&i)!=0) i0 = (i0&(~i))|((0x100000)>>j0);
The constant 0x100000 should be 0x200000. Apparently this case was never tested.
It turns out that the bit manipulation is completely superfluous anyway, so remove it. (It tries to simulate 90% of the rounding process that the FPU does anyway.) Also, the special case of +-0 is handled twice (in different ways), so remove the second instance.
Throw in some related simplifications from bde:
- Work around a bug where gcc fails to clip to float precision by declaring two float variables as volatile. Previously, we tricked gcc into generating correct code by declaring some float constants as doubles.
- Remove additional superfluous bit manipulation.
- Minor reorganization.
- Include <sys/types.h> explicitly.
Note that some of the equivalent lines in rint() also appear to be unnecessary, but I'll defer to the numerical analysts who wrote it, since I can't test all 2^64 cases.
Discussed with: bde
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/4.10.0_cvs, release/4.10.0, release/5.2.1_cvs, release/5.2.1, release/5.2.0_cvs, release/5.2.0, release/4.9.0_cvs, release/4.9.0, release/5.1.0_cvs, release/5.1.0, release/4.8.0_cvs, release/4.8.0, release/5.0.0_cvs, release/5.0.0, release/4.7.0_cvs, release/4.6.2_cvs, release/4.6.2, release/4.6.1, release/4.6.0_cvs |
|
#
59b19ff1 |
| 28-May-2002 |
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> |
Fix formatting, this is hard to explain, so I'll show one example.
- float ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */ +float +ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */
This is because the __S
Fix formatting, this is hard to explain, so I'll show one example.
- float ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */ +float +ynf(int n, float x) /* wrapper ynf */
This is because the __STDC__ stuff was indented.
Reviewed by: md5
show more ...
|
#
2dcc2286 |
| 28-May-2002 |
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> |
Assume __STDC__, remove non-__STDC__ code.
Reviewed by: md5
|
Revision tags: release/4.5.0_cvs, release/4.4.0_cvs, release/4.3.0_cvs, release/4.3.0, release/4.2.0, release/4.1.1_cvs, release/4.1.0, release/3.5.0_cvs, release/4.0.0_cvs, release/3.4.0_cvs, release/3.3.0_cvs |
|
#
7f3dea24 |
| 28-Aug-1999 |
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> |
$Id$ -> $FreeBSD$
|
Revision tags: release/3.2.0, release/3.1.0, release/3.0.0, release/2.2.8, release/2.2.7, release/2.2.6, release/2.2.5_cvs, release/2.2.2_cvs, release/2.2.1_cvs, release/2.2.0, release/2.1.7_cvs |
|
#
7e546392 |
| 22-Feb-1997 |
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> |
Revert $FreeBSD$ to $Id$
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.6_cvs, release/2.1.6.1 |
|
#
1130b656 |
| 14-Jan-1997 |
Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.org> |
Make the long-awaited change from $Id$ to $FreeBSD$
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!) avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so
Make the long-awaited change from $Id$ to $FreeBSD$
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!) avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been insane otherwise.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.5_cvs |
|
#
2aa9f7ca |
| 28-Aug-1996 |
Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> |
Made rintf() actually work. It was completely broken (when s_rint.c was compiled with -O) by the precision bug in the i386 version of gcc (assignments and casts don't clip the precision). E.g., rin
Made rintf() actually work. It was completely broken (when s_rint.c was compiled with -O) by the precision bug in the i386 version of gcc (assignments and casts don't clip the precision). E.g., rintf(12.3456789) was 12.125.
Avoid the same bug in rint(). It was only broken for the unusual case when the i387 precision is 64 bits. FreeBSD defaults to 53 bit precision to avoid problems like this, but the standard math emulator always uses 64 bit precision.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: release/2.1.0_cvs, release/2.0.5_cvs |
|
#
6c06b4e2 |
| 30-May-1995 |
Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> |
Remove trailing whitespace.
|