History log of /freebsd/lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c (Results 1 – 6 of 6)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 0dd5a560 28-Jan-2024 Steve Kargl <kargl@FreeBSD.org>

lib/msun: Cleanup after $FreeBSD$ removal

Remove no longer needed explicit inclusion of sys/cdefs.h.

PR: 276669
MFC after: 1 week


Revision tags: release/14.0.0
# 1d386b48 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line .c pattern

Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/


Revision tags: release/13.2.0, release/12.4.0, release/13.1.0, release/12.3.0, release/13.0.0, release/12.2.0, release/11.4.0, release/12.1.0, release/11.3.0, release/12.0.0
# 5a4c3b83 20-Jul-2018 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Recommit r336497: Fix powl, cpow, cpowf, and cpowl imports from OpenBSD

This is a follow-up to r336299.

* lib/msun/Makefile:
. Remove polevll.c

* lib/msun/ld80/e_powl.c:
. Copy contents of pol

Recommit r336497: Fix powl, cpow, cpowf, and cpowl imports from OpenBSD

This is a follow-up to r336299.

* lib/msun/Makefile:
. Remove polevll.c

* lib/msun/ld80/e_powl.c:
. Copy contents of polevll.c to here. This is the only consumer of
these functions. Make functions 'static inline'.
. Make reducl a 'static inline' function.

* lib/msun/man/exp.3:
. Remove BUGS section that no longer applies.

* lib/msun/src/math_private.h:
. Remove prototypes of __p1evll() and __polevll()

* lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c:
* lib/msun/src/s_cpowf.c:
* lib/msun/src/s_cpowl.c
. Include math_private.h.
. Use the CMPLX macro from either C99 or math_private.h (depends on
compiler support) instead of the problematic use of complex I.

Submitted by: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
PR: 229876
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...


# c422fbac 19-Jul-2018 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Revert r336497 for now, as it breaks on architectures using gcc, with:

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c: In function 'cpow':
/usr/src/lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c:63: wa

Revert r336497 for now, as it breaks on architectures using gcc, with:

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c: In function 'cpow':
/usr/src/lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c:63: warning: implicit declaration of function 'CMPLX'

show more ...


# 2ae9055f 19-Jul-2018 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Fix powl, cpow, cpowf, and cpowl imports from OpenBSD

This is a follow-up to r336299.

* lib/msun/Makefile:
. Remove polevll.c

* lib/msun/ld80/e_powl.c:
. Copy contents of polevll.c to here. T

Fix powl, cpow, cpowf, and cpowl imports from OpenBSD

This is a follow-up to r336299.

* lib/msun/Makefile:
. Remove polevll.c

* lib/msun/ld80/e_powl.c:
. Copy contents of polevll.c to here. This is the only consumer of
these functions. Make functions 'static inline'.
. Make reducl a 'static inline' function.

* lib/msun/man/exp.3:
. Remove BUGS section that no longer applies.

* lib/msun/src/math_private.h:
. Remove prototypes of __p1evll() and __polevll()

* lib/msun/src/s_cpow.c:
* lib/msun/src/s_cpowf.c:
* lib/msun/src/s_cpowl.c
. Use the CMPLX macro from either C99 or math_private.h (depends of
compiler support) instead of the problematic use of complex I.

Submitted by: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
PR: 229876
MFC after: 1 week

show more ...


# 6813d08f 15-Jul-2018 Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org>

msun: add ld80/ld128 powl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl from openbsd

This corresponds to the latest status (hasn't changed in 9+
years) from openbsd of ld80/ld128 powl, and source cpowf, cpow,
cpowl (the comp

msun: add ld80/ld128 powl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl from openbsd

This corresponds to the latest status (hasn't changed in 9+
years) from openbsd of ld80/ld128 powl, and source cpowf, cpow,
cpowl (the complex power functions for float complex, double
complex, and long double complex) which are required for C99
compliance and were missing from FreeBSD. Also required for
some numerical codes using complex numbered Hamiltonians.

Thanks to jhb for tracking down the issue with making
weak_reference compile on powerpc.

When asked to review, bde said "I don't like it" - but
provided no actionable feedback or superior implementations.

Discussed with: jhb
Submitted by: jmd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15919

show more ...