Remove $FreeBSD$: two-line .h pattern

Remove /^\s*\*\n \*\s+\$FreeBSD\$$\n/

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.

Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix

show more ...

lib: further adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.

Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using mis-identified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
pr

lib: further adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.

Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using mis-identified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
prone - task.

The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.

show more ...

Merge sync of head

Reintegrate head: r274132-r277384

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

Reintegrate head revisions r273096-r277147

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

MFhead @ r275911 (also, sort out MK_* flags in BMAKE, etc on this branch)

Merge ^/head r275759 through r275911.

Rename cpack*() to CMPLX*().

The C11 standard introduced a set of macros (CMPLX, CMPLXF, CMPLXL) that
can be used to construct complex numbers from a pair of real and
imaginary numbers. Unfortunatel

Rename cpack*() to CMPLX*().

The C11 standard introduced a set of macros (CMPLX, CMPLXF, CMPLXL) that
can be used to construct complex numbers from a pair of real and
imaginary numbers. Unfortunately, they require some compiler support,
which is why we only define them for Clang and GCC>=4.7.

The cpack() function in libm performs the same task as CMPLX(), but
cannot be used to generate compile-time constants. This means that all
invocations of cpack() can safely be replaced by C11's CMPLX(). To keep
the code building with GCC 4.2, provide copies of CMPLX() that can at
least be used to generate run-time complex numbers.

This makes it easier to build some of the functions outside of libm.

show more ...

Use cpack() and the gcc extension __imag__ to implement cimag() and
conj() instead of using expressions like z * I. The latter is bad for
several reasons:

1. It is implemented using arithmetic, whic

Use cpack() and the gcc extension __imag__ to implement cimag() and
conj() instead of using expressions like z * I. The latter is bad for
several reasons:

1. It is implemented using arithmetic, which is unnecessary, and can
generate floating point exceptions, contrary to the requirements on
these functions.

2. gcc implements complex multiplication using a formula that breaks
down for infinities, e.g., it gives INFINITY * I == nan + inf I.

show more ...

Add implementations for cimag{,f,l}, creal{,f,l} and conj{,f,l}. They are
needed for cases where GCC's builtin functions cannot be used and for
compilers that don't know about them.

Approved by: da

Add implementations for cimag{,f,l}, creal{,f,l} and conj{,f,l}. They are
needed for cases where GCC's builtin functions cannot be used and for
compilers that don't know about them.

Approved by: das (mentor)

show more ...

Use cpack() and the gcc extension __imag__ to implement cimag() and
conj() instead of using expressions like z * I. The latter is bad for
several reasons:

1. It is implemented using arithmetic, whic

Use cpack() and the gcc extension __imag__ to implement cimag() and
conj() instead of using expressions like z * I. The latter is bad for
several reasons:

1. It is implemented using arithmetic, which is unnecessary, and can
generate floating point exceptions, contrary to the requirements on
these functions.

2. gcc implements complex multiplication using a formula that breaks
down for infinities, e.g., it gives INFINITY * I == nan + inf I.

show more ...

Add implementations for cimag{,f,l}, creal{,f,l} and conj{,f,l}. They are
needed for cases where GCC's builtin functions cannot be used and for
compilers that don't know about them.

Approved by: da

Add implementations for cimag{,f,l}, creal{,f,l} and conj{,f,l}. They are
needed for cases where GCC's builtin functions cannot be used and for
compilers that don't know about them.

Approved by: das (mentor)

show more ...