xref: /freebsd/sys/fs/cd9660/TODO.hibler (revision b7a1a0a5ff8895e6a5c9404d02357ac9e2eb8091)
11. Investiate making ISOFS another UFS shared filesystem (ala FFS/MFS/LFS).
2   Since it was modelled after the inode code, we might be able to merge
3   them back.  It looks like a seperate (but very similar) lookup routine
4   will be needed due to the associated file stuff.
5
62. Make filesystem exportable.  This comes for free if stacked with UFS.
7   Otherwise, the ufs_export routines need to be elevated to vfs_* routines.
8	[ DONE - hibler ]
9
103. If it can't be merged with UFS, at least get them in sync.  For example,
11   it could use the same style hashing routines as in ufs/ufs_ihash.c
12
134. It would be nice to be able to use the vfs_cluster code.
14   Unfortunately, if the logical block size is smaller than the page size,
15   it won't work.  Also, if throughtput is relatively constant for any
16   block size (as it is for the HP drive--150kbs) then clustering may not
17   buy much (or may even hurt when vfs_cluster comes up with a large sync
18   cluster).
19
205. Seems like there should be a "notrans" or some such mount option to show
21   filenames as they really are without lower-casing, stripping of version
22   numbers, etc.  Does this make sense?
23