xref: /freebsd/share/man/man7/sdoc.7 (revision 6be3386466ab79a84b48429ae66244f21526d3df)
1.\" Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
2.\" All rights reserved.
3.\"
4.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
6.\" are met:
7.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
8.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
9.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
10.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
11.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
12.\" 3. The names of the authors may not be used to endorse or promote
13.\"    products derived from this software without specific prior written
14.\"    permission.
15.\"
16.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
17.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
18.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
19.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
20.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
21.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
22.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
23.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
24.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
25.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
26.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
27.\"
28.\" $Id: sec-doc.7,v 1.7 2001/12/22 00:14:12 rwatson Exp$
29.\" $FreeBSD$
30.\"
31.Dd September 5, 2005
32.Dt SDOC 7
33.Os
34.Sh NAME
35.Nm sdoc
36.Nd guide to adding security considerations sections to manual pages
37.Sh DESCRIPTION
38This document presents guidelines for
39adding security considerations sections to manual pages.
40It provides two typical examples.
41.Pp
42The guidelines for writing
43.Fx
44manual pages in
45.Xr groff_mdoc 7
46mandate that each manual page describing a feature of the
47.Fx
48system should contain a security considerations section
49describing what security requirements can be broken
50through the misuse of that feature.
51When writing these sections, authors should attempt to
52achieve a happy medium between two conflicting goals:
53brevity and completeness.
54On one hand, security consideration sections must not be too verbose,
55or busy readers might be dissuaded from reading them.
56On the other hand, security consideration sections must not be incomplete,
57or they will fail in their purpose of
58instructing the reader on how to avoid all insecure uses.
59This document provides guidelines for balancing brevity and completeness
60in the security consideration section for a given feature of the
61.Fx
62system.
63.Ss Where to Start
64Begin by listing
65those general security requirements that can be violated
66through the misuse of the feature.
67There are four classes of security requirements:
68.Bl -hang -offset indent
69.It Em integrity
70(example: non-administrators should not modify system binaries),
71.It Em confidentiality
72(example: non-administrators should not view the shadow password file),
73.It Em availability
74(example: the web server should respond to client requests in a timely
75fashion), and
76.It Em correctness
77(example: the ps program should provide exactly the process table
78information listing functionality described in its documentation - no more,
79no less.)
80.El
81.Pp
82A good security considerations section
83should explain how the feature can be misused
84to violate each general security requirement in the list.
85Each explanation should be accompanied by instructions
86the reader should follow in order to avoid a violation.
87When referencing potential vulnerabilities
88described in the Secure Programming Practices manual page,
89.Xr sprog 7 ,
90likewise cross-reference that document
91rather than replicating information.
92Whenever possible, refer to this document
93rather than reproducing the material it contains.
94.Ss Where to Stop
95Security problems are often interrelated;
96individual problems often have far-reaching implications.
97For example, the correctness of virtually any dynamically-linked program
98is dependent on the correct implementation and configuration
99of the run-time linker.
100The correctness of this program, in turn,
101depends on the correctness of its libraries,
102the compiler used to build it,
103the correctness of the preceding compiler that was used to build that compiler,
104and so on,
105as described by Thompson (see
106.Sx SEE ALSO ,
107below).
108.Pp
109Due to the need for brevity, security consideration sections
110should describe only those issues directly related to the feature
111that is the subject of the manual page.
112Refer to other manual pages
113rather than duplicating the material found there.
114.Sh EXAMPLES
115Security considerations sections for most individual functions can follow
116this simple formula:
117.Pp
118.Bl -enum -offset indent -compact
119.It
120Provide one or two sentences describing each potential security
121problem.
122.It
123Provide one or two sentences describing how to avoid each potential
124security problem.
125.It
126Provide a short example in code.
127.El
128.Pp
129This is an example security considerations section for the
130.Xr strcpy 3
131manual page:
132.Pp
133The
134.Fn strcpy
135function is easily misused in a manner which enables malicious users
136to arbitrarily change a running program's functionality
137through a buffer overflow attack.
138.Pp
139Avoid using
140.Fn strcpy .
141Instead, use
142.Fn strncpy
143and ensure that no more characters are copied to the destination buffer
144than it can hold.
145Do not forget to NUL-terminate the destination buffer,
146as
147.Fn strncpy
148will not terminate the destination string if it is truncated.
149.Pp
150Note that
151.Fn strncpy
152can also be problematic.
153It may be a security concern for a string to be truncated at all.
154Since the truncated string will not be as long as the original,
155it may refer to a completely different resource
156and usage of the truncated resource
157could result in very incorrect behavior.
158Example:
159.Bd -literal
160void
161foo(const char *arbitrary_string)
162{
163	char onstack[8];
164
165#if defined(BAD)
166	/*
167	 * This first strcpy is bad behavior.  Do not use strcpy()!
168	 */
169	(void)strcpy(onstack, arbitrary_string);     /* BAD! */
170#elif defined(BETTER)
171	/*
172	 * The following two lines demonstrate better use of
173	 * strncpy().
174	 */
175	(void)strncpy(onstack, arbitrary_string, sizeof(onstack) - 1);
176	onstack[sizeof(onstack - 1)] = '\\0';
177#elif defined(BEST)
178	/*
179	 * These lines are even more robust due to testing for
180	 * truncation.
181	 */
182	if (strlen(arbitrary_string) + 1 > sizeof(onstack))
183		err(1, "onstack would be truncated");
184	(void)strncpy(onstack, arbitrary_string, sizeof(onstack));
185#endif
186}
187.Ed
188.Pp
189Security considerations sections for tools and commands
190are apt to be less formulaic.
191Let your list of potentially-violated security requirements
192be your guide;
193explain each one and list a solution in as concise a manner as possible.
194.Pp
195This is an example security considerations section for the
196.Xr rtld 1
197manual page:
198.Pp
199Using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD environment variables,
200malicious users can cause the dynamic linker
201to link shared libraries of their own devising
202into the address space of processes running non-set-user-ID/group-ID programs.
203These shared libraries can arbitrarily change the functionality
204of the program by replacing calls to standard library functions
205with calls to their own.
206Although this feature is disabled for set-user-ID and set-group-ID programs,
207it can still be used to create Trojan horses in other programs.
208.Pp
209All users should be aware that the correct operation of non
210set-user-ID/group-ID dynamically-linked programs depends on the proper
211configuration of these environment variables,
212and take care to avoid actions that might set them to values
213which would cause the run-time linker
214to link in shared libraries of unknown pedigree.
215.Sh SEE ALSO
216.Xr groff_mdoc 7 ,
217.Xr security 7 ,
218.Xr sprog 7
219.Rs
220.%A "Edward Amoroso, AT&T Bell Laboratories"
221.%B "Fundamentals of Computer Security Technology"
222.%I "P T R Prentice Hall"
223.%D "1994"
224.Re
225.Rs
226.%A "Ken Thompson"
227.%T "Reflections on Trusting Trust"
228.%J "Communications of the ACM"
229.%I "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc."
230.%P "761-763"
231.%N "Vol. 27, No. 8"
232.%D "August, 1984"
233.Re
234.Sh HISTORY
235The
236.Nm
237manual page first appeared in
238.Fx 5.0 .
239.Sh AUTHORS
240.An Tim Fraser Aq Mt tfraser@tislabs.com ,
241NAI Labs CBOSS project
242.An Brian Feldman Aq Mt bfeldman@tislabs.com ,
243NAI Labs CBOSS project
244