xref: /freebsd/share/man/man4/route.4 (revision 3e0f6b97b257a96f7275e4442204263e44b16686)
1.\" Copyright (c) 1990, 1991, 1993
2.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
3.\"
4.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
6.\" are met:
7.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
8.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
9.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
10.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
11.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
12.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
13.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
14.\"	This product includes software developed by the University of
15.\"	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
16.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
17.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
18.\"    without specific prior written permission.
19.\"
20.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
21.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
22.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
23.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
24.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
25.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
26.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
27.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
28.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
29.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
30.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
31.\"
32.\"     From: @(#)route.4	8.6 (Berkeley) 4/19/94
33.\"	$FreeBSD$
34.\"
35.Dd October 8, 1996
36.Dt ROUTE 4
37.Os
38.Sh NAME
39.Nm route
40.Nd kernel packet forwarding database
41.Sh SYNOPSIS
42.Fd #include <sys/socket.h>
43.Fd #include <net/if.h>
44.Fd #include <net/route.h>
45.Ft int
46.Fn socket PF_ROUTE SOCK_RAW "int family"
47.Sh DESCRIPTION
48.Tn UNIX
49provides some packet routing facilities.
50The kernel maintains a routing information database, which
51is used in selecting the appropriate network interface when
52transmitting packets.
53.Pp
54A user process (or possibly multiple co-operating processes)
55maintains this database by sending messages over a special kind
56of socket.
57This supplants fixed size
58.Xr ioctl 2 Ns 's
59used in earlier releases.
60Routing table changes may only be carried out by the super user.
61.Pp
62The operating system may spontaneously emit routing messages in response
63to external events, such as receipt of a re-direct, or failure to
64locate a suitable route for a request.
65The message types are described in greater detail below.
66.Pp
67Routing database entries come in two flavors: for a specific
68host, or for all hosts on a generic subnetwork (as specified
69by a bit mask and value under the mask.
70The effect of wildcard or default route may be achieved by using
71a mask of all zeros, and there may be hierarchical routes.
72.Pp
73When the system is booted and addresses are assigned
74to the network interfaces, each protocol family
75installs a routing table entry for each interface when it is ready for traffic.
76Normally the protocol specifies the route
77through each interface as a
78.Dq direct
79connection to the destination host
80or network.  If the route is direct, the transport layer of
81a protocol family usually requests the packet be sent to the
82same host specified in the packet.  Otherwise, the interface
83is requested to address the packet to the gateway listed in the routing entry
84(i.e. the packet is forwarded).
85.Pp
86When routing a packet,
87the kernel will attempt to find
88the most specific route matching the destination.
89(If there are two different mask and value-under-the-mask pairs
90that match, the more specific is the one with more bits in the mask.
91A route to a host is regarded as being supplied with a mask of
92as many ones as there are bits in the destination).
93If no entry is found, the destination is declared to be unreachable,
94and a routing\-miss message is generated if there are any
95listers on the routing control socket described below.
96.Pp
97A wildcard routing entry is specified with a zero
98destination address value, and a mask of all zeroes.
99Wildcard routes will be used
100when the system fails to find other routes matching the
101destination.  The combination of wildcard
102routes and routing redirects can provide an economical
103mechanism for routing traffic.
104.Pp
105One opens the channel for passing routing control messages
106by using the socket call shown in the synopsis above:
107.Pp
108The
109.Fa family
110parameter may be
111.Dv AF_UNSPEC
112which will provide
113routing information for all address families, or can be restricted
114to a specific address family by specifying which one is desired.
115There can be more than one routing socket open per system.
116.Pp
117Messages are formed by a header followed by a small
118number of sockadders (now variable length particularly
119in the
120.Tn ISO
121case), interpreted by position, and delimited
122by the new length entry in the sockaddr.
123An example of a message with four addresses might be an
124.Tn ISO
125redirect:
126Destination, Netmask, Gateway, and Author of the redirect.
127The interpretation of which address are present is given by a
128bit mask within the header, and the sequence is least significant
129to most significant bit within the vector.
130.Pp
131Any messages sent to the kernel are returned, and copies are sent
132to all interested listeners.  The kernel will provide the process
133id. for the sender, and the sender may use an additional sequence
134field to distinguish between outstanding messages.  However,
135message replies may be lost when kernel buffers are exhausted.
136.Pp
137The kernel may reject certain messages, and will indicate this
138by filling in the
139.Ar rtm_errno
140field.
141The routing code returns
142.Dv EEXIST
143if
144requested to duplicate an existing entry,
145.Dv ESRCH
146if
147requested to delete a non-existent entry,
148or
149.Dv ENOBUFS
150if insufficient resources were available
151to install a new route.
152In the current implementation, all routing process run locally,
153and the values for
154.Ar rtm_errno
155are available through the normal
156.Em errno
157mechanism, even if the routing reply message is lost.
158.Pp
159A process may avoid the expense of reading replies to
160its own messages by issuing a
161.Xr setsockopt 2
162call indicating that the
163.Dv SO_USELOOPBACK
164option
165at the
166.Dv SOL_SOCKET
167level is to be turned off.
168A process may ignore all messages from the routing socket
169by doing a
170.Xr shutdown 2
171system call for further input.
172.Pp
173If a route is in use when it is deleted,
174the routing entry will be marked down and removed from the routing table,
175but the resources associated with it will not
176be reclaimed until all references to it are released.
177User processes can obtain information about the routing
178entry to a specific destination by using a
179.Dv RTM_GET
180message,
181or by reading the
182.Pa /dev/kmem
183device, or by issuing a
184.Xr getkerninfo 2
185system call.
186.Pp
187Messages include:
188.Bd -literal
189#define	RTM_ADD		0x1    /* Add Route */
190#define	RTM_DELETE	0x2    /* Delete Route */
191#define	RTM_CHANGE	0x3    /* Change Metrics, Flags, or Gateway */
192#define	RTM_GET		0x4    /* Report Information */
193#define	RTM_LOOSING	0x5    /* Kernel Suspects Partitioning */
194#define	RTM_REDIRECT	0x6    /* Told to use different route */
195#define	RTM_MISS	0x7    /* Lookup failed on this address */
196#define	RTM_RESOLVE	0xb    /* request to resolve dst to LL addr */
197.Ed
198.Pp
199A message header consists of:
200.Bd -literal
201struct rt_msghdr {
202    u_short rmt_msglen;  /* to skip over non-understood messages */
203    u_char  rtm_version; /* future binary compatibility */
204    u_char  rtm_type;    /* message type */
205    u_short rmt_index;   /* index for associated ifp */
206    int     rtm_flags;   /* flags, incl kern & message, e.g. DONE */
207    int     rtm_addrs;   /* bitmask identifying sockaddrs in msg */
208    pid_t   rmt_pid;     /* identify sender */
209    int     rtm_seq;     /* for sender to identify action */
210    int     rtm_errno;   /* why failed */
211    int     rtm_use;     /* from rtentry */
212    u_long  rtm_inits;   /* which values we are initializing */
213    struct  rt_metrics rtm_rmx;	/* metrics themselves */
214};
215.Ed
216.Pp
217where
218.Dq Li "struct rt_metrics"
219and the flag bits are as defined in
220.Xr rtentry 9 .
221.Pp
222Specifiers for metric values in rmx_locks and rtm_inits are:
223.Bd -literal
224#define	RTV_SSTHRESH  0x1    /* init or lock _ssthresh */
225#define	RTV_RPIPE     0x2    /* init or lock _recvpipe */
226#define	RTV_SPIPE     0x4    /* init or lock _sendpipe */
227#define	RTV_HOPCOUNT  0x8    /* init or lock _hopcount */
228#define	RTV_RTT       0x10   /* init or lock _rtt */
229#define	RTV_RTTVAR    0x20   /* init or lock _rttvar */
230#define	RTV_MTU       0x40   /* init or lock _mtu */
231.Ed
232.Pp
233Specifiers for which addresses are present in the messages are:
234.Bd -literal
235#define RTA_DST       0x1    /* destination sockaddr present */
236#define RTA_GATEWAY   0x2    /* gateway sockaddr present */
237#define RTA_NETMASK   0x4    /* netmask sockaddr present */
238#define RTA_GENMASK   0x8    /* cloning mask sockaddr present */
239#define RTA_IFP       0x10   /* interface name sockaddr present */
240#define RTA_IFA       0x20   /* interface addr sockaddr present */
241#define RTA_AUTHOR    0x40   /* sockaddr for author of redirect */
242.Ed
243.Sh SEE ALSO
244.Xr route 8 ,
245.Xr rtentry 9
246.Sh HISTORY
247A
248.Dv PF_ROUTE
249protocol family first appeared in
250.Bx 4.3 reno .
251