xref: /freebsd/share/man/man4/route.4 (revision 17ee9d00bc1ae1e598c38f25826f861e4bc6c3ce)
1.\" Copyright (c) 1990, 1991, 1993
2.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
3.\"
4.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
6.\" are met:
7.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
8.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
9.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
10.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
11.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
12.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
13.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
14.\"	This product includes software developed by the University of
15.\"	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
16.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
17.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
18.\"    without specific prior written permission.
19.\"
20.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
21.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
22.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
23.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
24.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
25.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
26.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
27.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
28.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
29.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
30.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
31.\"
32.\"     @(#)route.4	8.6 (Berkeley) 4/19/94
33.\"
34.Dd April 19, 1994
35.Dt ROUTE 4
36.Os
37.Sh NAME
38.Nm route
39.Nd kernel packet forwarding database
40.Sh SYNOPSIS
41.Fd #include <sys/socket.h>
42.Fd #include <net/if.h>
43.Fd #include <net/route.h>
44.Ft int
45.Fn socket PF_ROUTE SOCK_RAW "int family"
46.Sh DESCRIPTION
47.Tn UNIX
48provides some packet routing facilities.
49The kernel maintains a routing information database, which
50is used in selecting the appropriate network interface when
51transmitting packets.
52.Pp
53A user process (or possibly multiple co-operating processes)
54maintains this database by sending messages over a special kind
55of socket.
56This supplants fixed size
57.Xr ioctl 2 Ns 's
58used in earlier releases.
59Routing table changes may only be carried out by the super user.
60.Pp
61The operating system may spontaneously emit routing messages in response
62to external events, such as receipt of a re-direct, or failure to
63locate a suitable route for a request.
64The message types are described in greater detail below.
65.Pp
66Routing database entries come in two flavors: for a specific
67host, or for all hosts on a generic subnetwork (as specified
68by a bit mask and value under the mask.
69The effect of wildcard or default route may be achieved by using
70a mask of all zeros, and there may be hierarchical routes.
71.Pp
72When the system is booted and addresses are assigned
73to the network interfaces, each protocol family
74installs a routing table entry for each interface when it is ready for traffic.
75Normally the protocol specifies the route
76through each interface as a
77.Dq direct
78connection to the destination host
79or network.  If the route is direct, the transport layer of
80a protocol family usually requests the packet be sent to the
81same host specified in the packet.  Otherwise, the interface
82is requested to address the packet to the gateway listed in the routing entry
83(i.e. the packet is forwarded).
84.Pp
85When routing a packet,
86the kernel will attempt to find
87the most specific route matching the destination.
88(If there are two different mask and value-under-the-mask pairs
89that match, the more specific is the one with more bits in the mask.
90A route to a host is regarded as being supplied with a mask of
91as many ones as there are bits in the destination).
92If no entry is found, the destination is declared to be unreachable,
93and a routing\-miss message is generated if there are any
94listers on the routing control socket described below.
95.Pp
96A wildcard routing entry is specified with a zero
97destination address value, and a mask of all zeroes.
98Wildcard routes will be used
99when the system fails to find other routes matching the
100destination.  The combination of wildcard
101routes and routing redirects can provide an economical
102mechanism for routing traffic.
103.Pp
104One opens the channel for passing routing control messages
105by using the socket call shown in the synopsis above:
106.Pp
107The
108.Fa family
109parameter may be
110.Dv AF_UNSPEC
111which will provide
112routing information for all address families, or can be restricted
113to a specific address family by specifying which one is desired.
114There can be more than one routing socket open per system.
115.Pp
116Messages are formed by a header followed by a small
117number of sockadders (now variable length particularly
118in the
119.Tn ISO
120case), interpreted by position, and delimited
121by the new length entry in the sockaddr.
122An example of a message with four addresses might be an
123.Tn ISO
124redirect:
125Destination, Netmask, Gateway, and Author of the redirect.
126The interpretation of which address are present is given by a
127bit mask within the header, and the sequence is least significant
128to most significant bit within the vector.
129.Pp
130Any messages sent to the kernel are returned, and copies are sent
131to all interested listeners.  The kernel will provide the process
132id. for the sender, and the sender may use an additional sequence
133field to distinguish between outstanding messages.  However,
134message replies may be lost when kernel buffers are exhausted.
135.Pp
136The kernel may reject certain messages, and will indicate this
137by filling in the
138.Ar rtm_errno
139field.
140The routing code returns
141.Dv EEXIST
142if
143requested to duplicate an existing entry,
144.Dv ESRCH
145if
146requested to delete a non-existent entry,
147or
148.Dv ENOBUFS
149if insufficient resources were available
150to install a new route.
151In the current implementation, all routing process run locally,
152and the values for
153.Ar rtm_errno
154are available through the normal
155.Em errno
156mechanism, even if the routing reply message is lost.
157.Pp
158A process may avoid the expense of reading replies to
159its own messages by issuing a
160.Xr setsockopt 2
161call indicating that the
162.Dv SO_USELOOPBACK
163option
164at the
165.Dv SOL_SOCKET
166level is to be turned off.
167A process may ignore all messages from the routing socket
168by doing a
169.Xr shutdown 2
170system call for further input.
171.Pp
172If a route is in use when it is deleted,
173the routing entry will be marked down and removed from the routing table,
174but the resources associated with it will not
175be reclaimed until all references to it are released.
176User processes can obtain information about the routing
177entry to a specific destination by using a
178.Dv RTM_GET
179message,
180or by reading the
181.Pa /dev/kmem
182device, or by issuing a
183.Xr getkerninfo 2
184system call.
185.Pp
186Messages include:
187.Bd -literal
188#define	RTM_ADD		0x1    /* Add Route */
189#define	RTM_DELETE	0x2    /* Delete Route */
190#define	RTM_CHANGE	0x3    /* Change Metrics, Flags, or Gateway */
191#define	RTM_GET		0x4    /* Report Information */
192#define	RTM_LOOSING	0x5    /* Kernel Suspects Partitioning */
193#define	RTM_REDIRECT	0x6    /* Told to use different route */
194#define	RTM_MISS	0x7    /* Lookup failed on this address */
195#define	RTM_RESOLVE	0xb    /* request to resolve dst to LL addr */
196.Ed
197.Pp
198A message header consists of:
199.Bd -literal
200struct rt_msghdr {
201    u_short rmt_msglen;  /* to skip over non-understood messages */
202    u_char  rtm_version; /* future binary compatibility */
203    u_char  rtm_type;    /* message type */
204    u_short rmt_index;   /* index for associated ifp */
205    pid_t   rmt_pid;     /* identify sender */
206    int     rtm_addrs;   /* bitmask identifying sockaddrs in msg */
207    int     rtm_seq;     /* for sender to identify action */
208    int     rtm_errno;   /* why failed */
209    int     rtm_flags;   /* flags, incl kern & message, e.g. DONE */
210    int     rtm_use;     /* from rtentry */
211    u_long  rtm_inits;   /* which values we are initializing */
212    struct  rt_metrics rtm_rmx;	/* metrics themselves */
213};
214.Ed
215.Pp
216where
217.Bd -literal
218struct rt_metrics {
219    u_long rmx_locks;     /* Kernel must leave these values alone */
220    u_long rmx_mtu;       /* MTU for this path */
221    u_long rmx_hopcount;  /* max hops expected */
222    u_long rmx_expire;    /* lifetime for route, e.g. redirect */
223    u_long rmx_recvpipe;  /* inbound delay-bandwith product */
224    u_long rmx_sendpipe;  /* outbound delay-bandwith product */
225    u_long rmx_ssthresh;  /* outbound gateway buffer limit */
226    u_long rmx_rtt;       /* estimated round trip time */
227    u_long rmx_rttvar;    /* estimated rtt variance */
228};
229.Ed
230.Pp
231Flags include the values:
232.Bd -literal
233#define	RTF_UP        0x1       /* route usable */
234#define	RTF_GATEWAY   0x2       /* destination is a gateway */
235#define	RTF_HOST      0x4       /* host entry (net otherwise) */
236#define	RTF_REJECT    0x8       /* host or net unreachable */
237#define	RTF_DYNAMIC   0x10      /* created dynamically (by redirect) */
238#define	RTF_MODIFIED  0x20      /* modified dynamically (by redirect) */
239#define	RTF_DONE      0x40      /* message confirmed */
240#define	RTF_MASK      0x80      /* subnet mask present */
241#define	RTF_CLONING   0x100     /* generate new routes on use */
242#define	RTF_XRESOLVE  0x200     /* external daemon resolves name */
243#define	RTF_LLINFO    0x400     /* generated by ARP or ESIS */
244#define	RTF_STATIC    0x800     /* manually added */
245#define	RTF_BLACKHOLE 0x1000    /* just discard pkts (during updates) */
246#define	RTF_PROTO2    0x4000    /* protocol specific routing flag #1 */
247#define	RTF_PROTO1    0x8000    /* protocol specific routing flag #2 */
248.Ed
249.Pp
250Specifiers for metric values in rmx_locks and rtm_inits are:
251.Bd -literal
252#define	RTV_SSTHRESH  0x1    /* init or lock _ssthresh */
253#define	RTV_RPIPE     0x2    /* init or lock _recvpipe */
254#define	RTV_SPIPE     0x4    /* init or lock _sendpipe */
255#define	RTV_HOPCOUNT  0x8    /* init or lock _hopcount */
256#define	RTV_RTT       0x10   /* init or lock _rtt */
257#define	RTV_RTTVAR    0x20   /* init or lock _rttvar */
258#define	RTV_MTU       0x40   /* init or lock _mtu */
259.Ed
260.Pp
261Specifiers for which addresses are present in the messages are:
262.Bd -literal
263#define RTA_DST       0x1    /* destination sockaddr present */
264#define RTA_GATEWAY   0x2    /* gateway sockaddr present */
265#define RTA_NETMASK   0x4    /* netmask sockaddr present */
266#define RTA_GENMASK   0x8    /* cloning mask sockaddr present */
267#define RTA_IFP       0x10   /* interface name sockaddr present */
268#define RTA_IFA       0x20   /* interface addr sockaddr present */
269#define RTA_AUTHOR    0x40   /* sockaddr for author of redirect */
270.Ed
271