All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
without specific prior written permission.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
SUCH DAMAGE.
Performance Effects of Disk Subsystem Choices for VAX\(dg Systems Running 4.2BSD UNIX* Revised July 27, 1983 .AU Bob Kridle .AI mt Xinu 2560 9th Street Suite #312 Berkeley, California 94710 .AU Marshall Kirk McKusick\(dd .AI Computer Systems Research Group Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 .AB .FS \(dgVAX, UNIBUS, and MASSBUS are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation. .FE .FS * UNIX is a trademark of Bell Laboratories. .FE .FS \(ddThis work was supported under grants from the National Science Foundation under grant MCS80-05144, and the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency (DoD) under Arpa Order No. 4031 monitored by Naval Electronic System Command under Contract No. N00039-82-C-0235. .FE Measurements were made of the UNIX file system throughput for various I/O operations using the most attractive currently available Winchester disks and controllers attached to both the native busses (SBI/CMI) and the UNIBUS on both VAX 11/780s and VAX 11/750s. The tests were designed to highlight the performance of single and dual drive subsystems operating in the 4.2BSD fast file system .R environment. Many of the results of the tests were initially counter-intuitive and revealed several important aspects of the VAX implementations which were surprising to us.
The hardware used included two Fujitsu 2351A ``Eagle'' disk drives on each of two foreign-vendor disk controllers and two DEC RA-81 disk drives on a DEC UDA-50 disk controller. The foreign-vendor controllers were Emulex SC750, SC780 and Systems Industries 9900 native bus interfaced controllers. The DEC UDA-50 controller is a UNIBUS interfaced, heavily buffered controller which is the first implementation of a new DEC storage system architecture, DSA.
One of the most important results of our testing was the correction of several timing parameters in our device handler for devices with an RH750/RH780 type interface and having high burst transfer rates. The correction of these parameters resulted in an increase in performance of over twenty percent in some cases. In addition, one of the controller manufacturers altered their bus arbitration scheme to produce another increase in throughput. .AE
.lt \\n(LLu
.pc %
.nr PN \\n%
.tl '\\*(LH'\\*(CH'\\*(RH'
.lt \\n(.lu
..
.af PN i
.bp 1
.if t .ds CF July 27, 1983
.if t .ds LF CSRG TR/8
.if t .ds RF Kridle, et. al.
"TABLE OF CONTENTS"
"1. Motivation"
"2. Equipment 2.1. DEC UDA50 disk controller 2.2. Emulex SC750/SC780 disk controllers 2.3. Systems Industries 9900 disk controller 2.4. DEC RA81 disk drives 2.5. Fujitsu 2351A disk drives
"3. Methodology
"4. Tests
"5. Results
"6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
"Appendix A A.1. read_8192 A.2. write_4096 A.3. write_8192 A.4. rewrite_8192 .af PN 1 .bp 1 2.94 went to 2.6, 3.64 to 3.30
.. 3.5i went to 3.8i
..