1 Implementation Note 2 3 KAME Project 4 http://www.kame.net/ 5 $KAME: IMPLEMENTATION,v 1.216 2001/05/25 07:43:01 jinmei Exp $ 6 $FreeBSD$ 7 8NOTE: The document tries to describe behaviors/implementation choices 9of the latest KAME/*BSD stack (like KAME/NetBSD 1.5.1). The description 10here may not be applicable to KAME-integrated *BSD releases (like stock 11NetBSD 1.5.1), as we have certain amount of changes between them. Still, 12some of the content can be useful for KAME-integrated *BSD releases. 13 14Table of Contents 15 16 1. IPv6 17 1.1 Conformance 18 1.2 Neighbor Discovery 19 1.3 Scope Zone Index 20 1.3.1 Kernel internal 21 1.3.2 Interaction with API 22 1.3.3 Interaction with users (command line) 23 1.4 Plug and Play 24 1.4.1 Assignment of link-local, and special addresses 25 1.4.2 Stateless address autoconfiguration on hosts 26 1.4.3 DHCPv6 27 1.5 Generic tunnel interface 28 1.6 Address Selection 29 1.6.1 Source Address Selection 30 1.6.2 Destination Address Ordering 31 1.7 Jumbo Payload 32 1.8 Loop prevention in header processing 33 1.9 ICMPv6 34 1.10 Applications 35 1.11 Kernel Internals 36 1.12 IPv4 mapped address and IPv6 wildcard socket 37 1.12.1 KAME/BSDI3 and KAME/FreeBSD228 38 1.12.2 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x 39 1.12.2.1 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x, listening side 40 1.12.2.2 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x, initiating side 41 1.12.3 KAME/NetBSD 42 1.12.3.1 KAME/NetBSD, listening side 43 1.12.3.2 KAME/NetBSD, initiating side 44 1.12.4 KAME/BSDI4 45 1.12.4.1 KAME/BSDI4, listening side 46 1.12.4.2 KAME/BSDI4, initiating side 47 1.12.5 KAME/OpenBSD 48 1.12.5.1 KAME/OpenBSD, listening side 49 1.12.5.2 KAME/OpenBSD, initiating side 50 1.12.6 More issues 51 1.12.7 Interaction with SIIT translator 52 1.13 sockaddr_storage 53 1.14 Invalid addresses on the wire 54 1.15 Node's required addresses 55 1.15.1 Host case 56 1.15.2 Router case 57 1.16 Advanced API 58 1.17 DNS resolver 59 2. Network Drivers 60 2.1 FreeBSD 2.2.x-RELEASE 61 2.2 BSD/OS 3.x 62 2.3 NetBSD 63 2.4 FreeBSD 3.x-RELEASE 64 2.5 FreeBSD 4.x-RELEASE 65 2.6 OpenBSD 2.x 66 2.7 BSD/OS 4.x 67 3. Translator 68 3.1 FAITH TCP relay translator 69 3.2 IPv6-to-IPv4 header translator 70 4. IPsec 71 4.1 Policy Management 72 4.2 Key Management 73 4.3 AH and ESP handling 74 4.4 IPComp handling 75 4.5 Conformance to RFCs and IDs 76 4.6 ECN consideration on IPsec tunnels 77 4.7 Interoperability 78 4.8 Operations with IPsec tunnel mode 79 4.8.1 RFC2401 IPsec tunnel mode approach 80 4.8.2 draft-touch-ipsec-vpn approach 81 5. ALTQ 82 6. Mobile IPv6 83 6.1 KAME node as correspondent node 84 6.2 KAME node as home agent/mobile node 85 6.3 Old Mobile IPv6 code 86 7. Routing table extensions 87 7.1 ART routing table lookup algorithm 88 7.2 Multipath routing support 89 8. Coding style 90 9. Policy on technology with intellectual property right restriction 91 921. IPv6 93 941.1 Conformance 95 96The KAME kit conforms, or tries to conform, to the latest set of IPv6 97specifications. For future reference we list some of the relevant documents 98below (NOTE: this is not a complete list - this is too hard to maintain...). 99For details please refer to specific chapter in the document, RFCs, manpages 100come with KAME, or comments in the source code. 101 102Conformance tests have been performed on past and latest KAME STABLE kit, 103at TAHI project. Results can be viewed at http://www.tahi.org/report/KAME/. 104We also attended Univ. of New Hampshire IOL tests (http://www.iol.unh.edu/) 105in the past, with our past snapshots. 106 107RFC1639: FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR) 108 * RFC2428 is preferred over RFC1639. ftp clients will first try RFC2428, 109 then RFC1639 if failed. 110RFC1886: DNS Extensions to support IPv6 111RFC1933: (see RFC2893) 112RFC1981: Path MTU Discovery for IPv6 113RFC2080: RIPng for IPv6 114 * KAME-supplied route6d, bgpd and hroute6d support this. 115RFC2283: Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 116 * so-called "BGP4+". 117 * KAME-supplied bgpd supports this. 118RFC2292: Advanced Sockets API for IPv6 119 * see RFC3542 120RFC2362: Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) 121 * RFC2362 defines the packet formats and the protcol of PIM-SM. 122RFC2373: IPv6 Addressing Architecture 123 * KAME supports node required addresses, and conforms to the scope 124 requirement. 125RFC2374: An IPv6 Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format 126 * KAME supports 64-bit length of Interface ID. 127RFC2375: IPv6 Multicast Address Assignments 128 * Userland applications use the well-known addresses assigned in the RFC. 129RFC2428: FTP Extensions for IPv6 and NATs 130 * RFC2428 is preferred over RFC1639. ftp clients will first try RFC2428, 131 then RFC1639 if failed. 132RFC2460: IPv6 specification 133RFC2461: Neighbor discovery for IPv6 134 * See 1.2 in this document for details. 135RFC2462: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration 136 * See 1.4 in this document for details. 137RFC2463: ICMPv6 for IPv6 specification 138 * See 1.9 in this document for details. 139RFC2464: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks 140RFC2465: MIB for IPv6: Textual Conventions and General Group 141 * Necessary statistics are gathered by the kernel. Actual IPv6 MIB 142 support is provided as patchkit for ucd-snmp. 143RFC2466: MIB for IPv6: ICMPv6 group 144 * Necessary statistics are gathered by the kernel. Actual IPv6 MIB 145 support is provided as patchkit for ucd-snmp. 146RFC2467: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over FDDI Networks 147RFC2472: IPv6 over PPP 148RFC2492: IPv6 over ATM Networks 149 * only PVC is supported. 150RFC2497: Transmission of IPv6 packet over ARCnet Networks 151RFC2545: Use of BGP-4 Multiprotocol Extensions for IPv6 Inter-Domain Routing 152RFC2553: (see RFC3493) 153RFC2671: Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) 154 * see USAGE for how to use it. 155 * not supported on kame/freebsd4 and kame/bsdi4. 156RFC2673: Binary Labels in the Domain Name System 157 * KAME/bsdi4 supports A6, DNAME and binary label to some extent. 158 * KAME apps/bind8 repository has resolver library with partial A6, DNAME 159 and binary label support. 160RFC2675: IPv6 Jumbograms 161 * See 1.7 in this document for details. 162RFC2710: Multicast Listener Discovery for IPv6 163RFC2711: IPv6 router alert option 164RFC2732: Format for Literal IPv6 Addresses in URL's 165 * The spec is implemented in programs that handle URLs 166 (like freebsd ftpio(3) and fetch(1), or netbsd ftp(1)) 167RFC2766: Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT) 168 * Section 4.2 is implemented by totd (see ports/totd, or pkgsrc/net/totd). 169RFC2874: DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation and Renumbering 170 * KAME/bsdi4 supports A6, DNAME and binary label to some extent. 171 * KAME apps/bind8 repository has resolver library with partial A6, DNAME 172 and binary label support. 173RFC2893: Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers 174 * IPv4 compatible address is not supported. 175 * automatic tunneling (4.3) is not supported. 176 * "gif" interface implements IPv[46]-over-IPv[46] tunnel in a generic way, 177 and it covers "configured tunnel" described in the spec. 178 See 1.5 in this document for details. 179RFC2894: Router renumbering for IPv6 180RFC3041: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6 181RFC3056: Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds 182 * So-called "6to4". 183 * "stf" interface implements it. Be sure to read 184 draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse-01.txt 185 below before configuring it, there can be security issues. 186RFC3152: Delegation of IP6.ARPA 187 * libinet6 resolvers contained in the KAME snaps support to use 188 the ip6.arpa domain (with the nibble format) for IPv6 reverse 189 lookups. 190RFC3484: Default Address Selection for IPv6 191 * the selection algorithm for both source and destination addresses 192 is implemented based on the RFC, though some rules are still omitted. 193RFC3493: Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6 194 * IPv4 mapped address (3.7) and special behavior of IPv6 wildcard bind 195 socket (3.8) are, 196 - supported and turned on by default on KAME/FreeBSD[34] 197 and KAME/BSDI4, 198 - supported but turned off by default on KAME/NetBSD and KAME/FreeBSD5, 199 - not supported on KAME/FreeBSD228, KAME/OpenBSD and KAME/BSDI3. 200 see 1.12 in this document for details. 201RFC3542: Advanced Sockets API for IPv6 (revised) 202 * For supported library functions/kernel APIs, see sys/netinet6/ADVAPI. 203 * Some of the updates in the draft are not implemented yet. See 204 TODO.2292bis for more details. 205draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-09: IPv6 Name Lookups Through ICMP 206draft-ietf-ngtrans-tcpudp-relay-04.txt: 207 An IPv6-to-IPv4 transport relay translator 208 * FAITH tcp relay translator (faithd) implements this. See 3.1 for more 209 details. 210draft-ietf-ipngwg-router-selection-01.txt: 211 Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes 212 * router-side only. 213draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-02.txt: 214 The architecture, text representation, and usage of IPv6 215 scoped addresses. 216 * some part of the documentation (especially about the routing 217 model) is not supported yet. 218draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-02.txt 219 A revised version of RFC2362, which includes the IPv6 specific 220 packet format and protocol descriptions. 221draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-00.txt: Multicast DNS 222 * kame/mdnsd has test implementation, which will not be built in 223 default compilation. The draft will experience a major change in the 224 near future, so don't rely upon it. 225draft-itojun-ipv6-tcp-to-anycast-01.txt: 226 Disconnecting TCP connection toward IPv6 anycast address 227draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse-01.txt: 228 Possible abuse against IPv6 transition technologies (expired) 229 * KAME does not implement RFC1933/2893 automatic tunnel. 230 * "stf" interface implements some address filters. Refer to stf(4) 231 for details. Since there's no way to make 6to4 interface 100% secure, 232 we do not include "stf" interface into GENERIC.v6 compilation. 233 * kame/openbsd completely disables IPv4 mapped address support. 234 * kame/netbsd makes IPv4 mapped address support off by default. 235 * See section 1.12.6 and 1.14 for more details. 236draft-itojun-ipv6-flowlabel-api-01.txt: Socket API for IPv6 flow label field 237 * no consideration is made against the use of routing headers and such. 238 2391.2 Neighbor Discovery 240 241Neighbor Discovery is fairly stable. Currently Address Resolution, 242Duplicated Address Detection, and Neighbor Unreachability Detection 243are supported. In the near future we will be adding Unsolicited Neighbor 244Advertisement transmission command as admin tool. 245 246Duplicated Address Detection (DAD) will be performed when an IPv6 address 247is assigned to a network interface, or the network interface is enabled 248(ifconfig up). It is documented in RFC2462 5.4. 249If DAD fails, the address will be marked "duplicated" and message will be 250generated to syslog (and usually to console). The "duplicated" mark 251can be checked with ifconfig. It is administrators' responsibility to check 252for and recover from DAD failures. We may try to improve failure recovery 253in future KAME code. 254DAD procedure may not be effective on certain network interfaces/drivers. 255If a network driver needs long initialization time (with wireless network 256interfaces this situation is popular), and the driver mistakingly raises 257IFF_RUNNING before the driver becomes ready, DAD code will try to transmit 258DAD probes to not-really-ready network driver and the packet will not go out 259from the interface. In such cases, network drivers should be corrected. 260 261Some of network drivers loop multicast packets back to themselves, 262even if instructed not to do so (especially in promiscuous mode). 263In such cases DAD may fail, because DAD engine sees inbound NS packet 264(actually from the node itself) and considers it as a sign of duplicate. 265In this case, drivers should be corrected to honor IFF_SIMPLEX behavior. 266For example, you may need to check source MAC address on an inbound packet, 267and reject it if it is from the node itself. 268You may also want to look at #if condition marked "heuristics" in 269sys/netinet6/nd6_nbr.c:nd6_dad_timer() as workaround (note that the code 270fragment in "heuristics" section is not spec conformant). 271 272Neighbor Discovery specification (RFC2461) does not talk about neighbor 273cache handling in the following cases: 274(1) when there was no neighbor cache entry, node received unsolicited 275 RS/NS/NA/redirect packet without link-layer address 276(2) neighbor cache handling on medium without link-layer address 277 (we need a neighbor cache entry for IsRouter bit) 278For (1), we implemented workaround based on discussions on IETF ipngwg mailing 279list. For more details, see the comments in the source code and email 280thread started from (IPng 7155), dated Feb 6 1999. 281 282IPv6 on-link determination rule (RFC2461) is quite different from assumptions 283in BSD IPv4 network code. To implement behavior in RFC2461 section 5.2 284(when default router list is empty), the kernel needs to know the default 285outgoing interface. To configure the default outgoing interface, use 286commands like "ndp -I de0" as root. Note that the spec misuse the word 287"host" and "node" in several places in the section. 288 289To avoid possible DoS attacks and infinite loops, KAME stack will accept 290only 10 options on ND packet. Therefore, if you have 20 prefix options 291attached to RA, only the first 10 prefixes will be recognized. 292If this troubles you, please contact KAME team and/or modify 293nd6_maxndopt in sys/netinet6/nd6.c. If there are high demands we may 294provide sysctl knob for the variable. 295 296Proxy Neighbor Advertisement support is implemented in the kernel. 297For instance, you can configure it by using the following command: 298 # ndp -s fe80::1234%ne0 0:1:2:3:4:5 proxy 299where ne0 is the interface which attaches to the same link as the 300proxy target. 301There are certain limitations, though: 302- It does not send unsolicited multicast NA on configuration. This is MAY 303 behavior in RFC2461. 304- It does not add random delay before transmission of solicited NA. This is 305 SHOULD behavior in RFC2461. 306- We cannot configure proxy NDP for off-link address. The target address for 307 proxying must be link-local address, or must be in prefixes configured to 308 node which does proxy NDP. 309- RFC2461 is unclear about if it is legal for a host to perform proxy ND. 310 We do not prohibit hosts from doing proxy ND, but there will be very limited 311 use in it. 312 313Starting mid March 2000, we support Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) 314on p2p interfaces, including tunnel interfaces (gif). NUD is turned on by 315default. Before March 2000 KAME stack did not perform NUD on p2p interfaces. 316If the change raises any interoperability issues, you can turn off/on NUD 317by per-interface basis. Use "ndp -i interface -nud" to turn it off. 318Consult ndp(8) for details. 319 320RFC2461 specifies upper-layer reachability confirmation hint. Whenever 321upper-layer reachability confirmation hint comes, ND process can use it 322to optimize neighbor discovery process - ND process can omit real ND exchange 323and keep the neighbor cache state in REACHABLE. 324We currently have two sources for hints: (1) setsockopt(IPV6_REACHCONF) 325defined by 2292bis API, and (2) hints from tcp_input. 326It is questionable if they are really trustworthy. For example, a rogue 327userland program can use IPV6_REACHCONF to confuse ND process. Neighbor 328cache is a system-wide information pool, and it is bad to allow single process 329to affect others. Also, tcp_input can be hosed by hijack attempts. It is 330wrong to allow hijack attempts to affect ND process. 331Starting June 2000, ND code has a protection mechanism against incorrect 332upper-layer reachability confirmation. ND code counts subsequent upper-layer 333hints. If the number of hints reaches maximum, ND code will ignore further 334upper-layer hints and run real ND process to confirm reachability to the peer. 335sysctl net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_maxnudhint defines maximum # of subsequent 336upper-layer hints to be accepted. 337(from April 2000 to June 2000, we rejected setsockopt(IPV6_REACHCONF) from 338non-root process - after local discussion, it looks that hints are not 339that trustworthy even if they are from privileged processes) 340 341If inbound ND packets carry invalid values, the KAME kernel will 342drop these packet and increment statistics variable. See 343"netstat -sn", icmp6 section. For detailed debugging session, you can 344turn on syslog output from the kernel on errors, by turning on sysctl MIB 345net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_debug. nd6_debug can be turned on at bootstrap 346time, by defining ND6_DEBUG kernel compilation option (so you can 347debug behavior during bootstrap). nd6_debug configuration should 348only be used for test/debug purposes - for production environment, 349nd6_debug must be set to 0. If you leave it to 1, malicious parties 350can inject broken packet and fill up /var/log partition. 351 3521.3 Scope Zone Index 353 354IPv6 uses scoped addresses. It is therefore very important to 355specify the scope zone index (link index for a link-local address, or 356site index for a site-local address) with an IPv6 address. Without a 357zone index, a scoped IPv6 address is ambiguous to the kernel, and 358the kernel would not be able to determine the outbound link for a 359packet to the scoped address. KAME code tries to address the issue in 360several ways. 361 362The entire architecture of scoped addresses is documented in 363draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-xx.txt. One non-trivial point of the 364architecture is that the link scope is (theoretically) larger than the 365interface scope. That is, two different interfaces can belong to a 366same single link. However, in a normal operation, we can assume that 367there is 1-to-1 relationship between links and interfaces. In 368other words, we can usually put links and interfaces in the same scope 369type. The current KAME implementation assumes the 1-to-1 370relationship. In particular, we use interface names such as "ne1" as 371unique link identifiers. This would be much more human-readable and 372intuitive than numeric identifiers, but please keep your mind on the 373theoretical difference between links and interfaces. 374 375Site-local addresses are very vaguely defined in the specs, and both 376the specification and the KAME code need tons of improvements to 377enable its actual use. For example, it is still very unclear how we 378define a site, or how we resolve host names in a site. There is work 379underway to define behavior of routers at site border, but, we have 380almost no code for site boundary node support (both forwarding nor 381routing) and we bet almost noone has. We recommend, at this moment, 382you to use global addresses for experiments - there are way too many 383pitfalls if you use site-local addresses. 384 3851.3.1 Kernel internal 386 387In the kernel, the link index for a link-local scope address is 388embedded into the 2nd 16bit-word (the 3rd and 4th bytes) in the IPv6 389address. 390For example, you may see something like: 391 fe80:1::200:f8ff:fe01:6317 392in the routing table and the interface address structure (struct 393in6_ifaddr). The address above is a link-local unicast address which 394belongs to a network link whose link identifier is 1 (note that it 395eqauls to the interface index by the assumption of our 396implementation). The embedded index enables us to identify IPv6 397link-local addresses over multiple links effectively and with only a 398little code change. 399 4001.3.2 Interaction with API 401 402There are several candidates of API to deal with scoped addresses 403without ambiguity. 404 405The IPV6_PKTINFO ancillary data type or socket option defined in the 406advanced API (RFC2292 or RFC3542) can specify 407the outgoing interface of a packet. Similarly, the IPV6_PKTINFO or 408IPV6_RECVPKTINFO socket options tell kernel to pass the incoming 409interface to user applications. 410 411These options are enough to disambiguate scoped addresses of an 412incoming packet, because we can uniquely identify the corresponding 413zone of the scoped address(es) by the incoming interface. However, 414they are too strong for outgoing packets. For example, consider a 415multi-sited node and suppose that more than one interface of the node 416belongs to a same site. When we want to send a packet to the site, 417we can only specify one of the interfaces for the outgoing packet with 418these options; we cannot just say "send the packet to (one of the 419interfaces of) the site." 420 421Another kind of candidates is to use the sin6_scope_id member in the 422sockaddr_in6 structure, defined in RFC2553. The KAME kernel 423interprets the sin6_scope_id field properly in order to disambiguate scoped 424addresses. For example, if an application passes a sockaddr_in6 425structure that has a non-zero sin6_scope_id value to the sendto(2) 426system call, the kernel should send the packet to the appropriate zone 427according to the sin6_scope_id field. Similarly, when the source or 428the destination address of an incoming packet is a scoped one, the 429kernel should detect the correct zone identifier based on the address 430and the receiving interface, fill the identifier in the sin6_scope_id 431field of a sockaddr_in6 structure, and then pass the packet to an 432application via the recvfrom(2) system call, etc. 433 434However, the semantics of the sin6_scope_id is still vague and on the 435way to standardization. Additionally, not so many operating systems 436support the behavior above at this moment. 437 438In summary, 439- If your target system is limited to KAME based ones (i.e. BSD 440 variants and KAME snaps), use the sin6_scope_id field assuming the 441 kernel behavior described above. 442- Otherwise, (i.e. if your program should be portable on other systems 443 than BSDs) 444 + Use the advanced API to disambiguate scoped addresses of incoming 445 packets. 446 + To disambiguate scoped addresses of outgoing packets, 447 * if it is okay to just specify the outgoing interface, use the 448 advanced API. This would be the case, for example, when you 449 should only consider link-local addresses and your system 450 assumes 1-to-1 relationship between links and interfaces. 451 * otherwise, sorry but you lose. Please rush the IETF IPv6 452 community into standardizing the semantics of the sin6_scope_id 453 field. 454 455Routing daemons and configuration programs, like route6d and ifconfig, 456will need to manipulate the "embedded" zone index. These programs use 457routing sockets and ioctls (like SIOCGIFADDR_IN6) and the kernel API 458will return IPv6 addresses with the 2nd 16bit-word filled in. The 459APIs are for manipulating kernel internal structure. Programs that 460use these APIs have to be prepared about differences in kernels 461anyway. 462 463getaddrinfo(3) and getnameinfo(3) support an extended numeric IPv6 464syntax, as documented in draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-xx.txt. You can 465specify the outgoing link, by using the name of the outgoing interface 466as the link, like "fe80::1%ne0" (again, note that we assume there is 4671-to-1 relationship between links and interfaces.) This way you will 468be able to specify a link-local scoped address without much trouble. 469 470Other APIs like inet_pton(3) and inet_ntop(3) are inherently 471unfriendly with scoped addresses, since they are unable to annotate 472addresses with zone identifier. 473 4741.3.3 Interaction with users (command line) 475 476Most of user applications now support the extended numeric IPv6 477syntax. In this case, you can specify outgoing link, by using the name 478of the outgoing interface like "fe80::1%ne0" (sorry for the duplicated 479notice, but please recall again that we assume 1-to-1 relationship 480between links and interfaces). This is even the case for some 481management tools such as route(8) or ndp(8). For example, to install 482the IPv6 default route by hand, you can type like 483 # route add -inet6 default fe80::9876:5432:1234:abcd%ne0 484(Although we suggest you to run dynamic routing instead of static 485routes, in order to avoid configuration mistakes.) 486 487Some applications have command line options for specifying an 488appropriate zone of a scoped address (like "ping6 -I ne0 ff02::1" to 489specify the outgoing interface). However, you can't always expect such 490options. Additionally, specifying the outgoing "interface" is in 491theory an overspecification as a way to specify the outgoing "link" 492(see above). Thus, we recommend you to use the extended format 493described above. This should apply to the case where the outgoing 494interface is specified. 495 496In any case, when you specify a scoped address to the command line, 497NEVER write the embedded form (such as ff02:1::1 or fe80:2::fedc), 498which should only be used inside the kernel (see Section 1.3.1), and 499is not supposed to work. 500 5011.4 Plug and Play 502 503The KAME kit implements most of the IPv6 stateless address 504autoconfiguration in the kernel. 505Neighbor Discovery functions are implemented in the kernel as a whole. 506Router Advertisement (RA) input for hosts is implemented in the 507kernel. Router Solicitation (RS) output for endhosts, RS input 508for routers, and RA output for routers are implemented in the 509userland. 510 5111.4.1 Assignment of link-local, and special addresses 512 513IPv6 link-local address is generated from IEEE802 address (ethernet MAC 514address). Each of interface is assigned an IPv6 link-local address 515automatically, when the interface becomes up (IFF_UP). Also, direct route 516for the link-local address is added to routing table. 517 518Here is an output of netstat command: 519 520Internet6: 521Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire 522fe80::%ed0/64 link#1 UC ed0 523fe80::%ep0/64 link#2 UC ep0 524 525Interfaces that has no IEEE802 address (pseudo interfaces like tunnel 526interfaces, or ppp interfaces) will borrow IEEE802 address from other 527interfaces, such as ethernet interfaces, whenever possible. 528If there is no IEEE802 hardware attached, last-resort pseudorandom value, 529which is from MD5(hostname), will be used as source of link-local address. 530If it is not suitable for your usage, you will need to configure the 531link-local address manually. 532 533If an interface is not capable of handling IPv6 (such as lack of multicast 534support), link-local address will not be assigned to that interface. 535See section 2 for details. 536 537Each interface joins the solicited multicast address and the 538link-local all-nodes multicast addresses (e.g. fe80::1:ff01:6317 539and ff02::1, respectively, on the link the interface is attached). 540In addition to a link-local address, the loopback address (::1) will be 541assigned to the loopback interface. Also, ::1/128 and ff01::/32 are 542automatically added to routing table, and loopback interface joins 543node-local multicast group ff01::1. 544 5451.4.2 Stateless address autoconfiguration on hosts 546 547In IPv6 specification, nodes are separated into two categories: 548routers and hosts. Routers forward packets addressed to others, hosts does 549not forward the packets. net.inet6.ip6.forwarding defines whether this 550node is a router or a host (router if it is 1, host if it is 0). 551 552It is NOT recommended to change net.inet6.ip6.forwarding while the node 553is in operation. IPv6 specification defines behavior for "host" and "router" 554quite differently, and switching from one to another can cause serious 555troubles. It is recommended to configure the variable at bootstrap time only. 556 557The first step in stateless address configuration is Duplicated Address 558Detection (DAD). See 1.2 for more detail on DAD. 559 560When a host hears Router Advertisement from the router, a host may 561autoconfigure itself by stateless address autoconfiguration. 562This behavior can be controlled by net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv 563(host autoconfigures itself if it is set to 1). 564By autoconfiguration, network address prefix for the receiving interface 565(usually global address prefix) is added. The default route is also 566configured. 567 568Routers periodically generate Router Advertisement packets. To 569request an adjacent router to generate RA packet, a host can transmit 570Router Solicitation. To generate an RS packet at any time, use the 571"rtsol" command. The "rtsold" daemon is also available. "rtsold" 572generates Router Solicitation whenever necessary, and it works great 573for nomadic usage (notebooks/laptops). If one wishes to ignore Router 574Advertisements, use sysctl to set net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to 0. 575 576To generate Router Advertisement from a router, use the "rtadvd" daemon. 577 578Note that the IPv6 specification assumes the following items and that 579nonconforming cases are left unspecified: 580- Only hosts will listen to router advertisements 581- Hosts have single network interface (except loopback) 582This is therefore unwise to enable net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv on routers, 583or multi-interface host. A misconfigured node can behave strange 584(KAME code allows nonconforming configuration, for those who would like 585to do some experiments). 586 587To summarize the sysctl knob: 588 accept_rtadv forwarding role of the node 589 --- --- --- 590 0 0 host (to be manually configured) 591 0 1 router 592 1 0 autoconfigured host 593 (spec assumes that host has single 594 interface only, autoconfigred host with 595 multiple interface is out-of-scope) 596 1 1 invalid, or experimental 597 (out-of-scope of spec) 598 599See 1.2 in the document for relationship between DAD and autoconfiguration. 600 6011.4.3 DHCPv6 602 603We supply a tiny DHCPv6 server/client in kame/dhcp6. However, the 604implementation is premature (for example, this does NOT implement 605address lease/release), and it is not in default compilation tree on 606some platforms. If you want to do some experiment, compile it on your 607own. 608 609DHCPv6 and autoconfiguration also needs more work. "Managed" and "Other" 610bits in RA have no special effect to stateful autoconfiguration procedure 611in DHCPv6 client program ("Managed" bit actually prevents stateless 612autoconfiguration, but no special action will be taken for DHCPv6 client). 613 6141.5 Generic tunnel interface 615 616GIF (Generic InterFace) is a pseudo interface for configured tunnel. 617Details are described in gif(4) manpage. 618Currently 619 v6 in v6 620 v6 in v4 621 v4 in v6 622 v4 in v4 623are available. Use "gifconfig" to assign physical (outer) source 624and destination address to gif interfaces. 625Configuration that uses same address family for inner and outer IP 626header (v4 in v4, or v6 in v6) is dangerous. It is very easy to 627configure interfaces and routing tables to perform infinite level 628of tunneling. Please be warned. 629 630gif can be configured to be ECN-friendly. See 4.5 for ECN-friendliness 631of tunnels, and gif(4) manpage for how to configure. 632 633If you would like to configure an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel with gif interface, 634read gif(4) carefully. You may need to remove IPv6 link-local address 635automatically assigned to the gif interface. 636 6371.6 Address Selection 638 6391.6.1 Source Address Selection 640 641The KAME kernel chooses the source address for an outgoing packet 642sent from a user application as follows: 643 6441. if the source address is explicitly specified via an IPV6_PKTINFO 645 ancillary data item or the socket option of that name, just use it. 646 Note that this item/option overrides the bound address of the 647 corresponding (datagram) socket. 648 6492. if the corresponding socket is bound, use the bound address. 650 6513. otherwise, the kernel first tries to find the outgoing interface of 652 the packet. If it fails, the source address selection also fails. 653 If the kernel can find an interface, choose the most appropriate 654 address based on the algorithm described in RFC3484. 655 656 The policy table used in this algorithm is stored in the kernel. 657 To install or view the policy, use the ip6addrctl(8) command. The 658 kernel does not have pre-installed policy. It is expected that the 659 default policy described in the draft should be installed at the 660 bootstrap time using this command. 661 662 This draft allows an implementation to add implementation-specific 663 rules with higher precedence than the rule "Use longest matching 664 prefix." KAME's implementation has the following additional rules 665 (that apply in the appeared order): 666 667 - prefer addresses on alive interfaces, that is, interfaces with 668 the UP flag being on. This rule is particularly useful for 669 routers, since some routing daemons stop advertising prefixes 670 (addresses) on interfaces that have become down. 671 672 In any case, addresses that break the scope zone of the 673 destination, or addresses whose zone do not contain the outgoing 674 interface are never chosen. 675 676When the procedure above fails, the kernel usually returns 677EADDRNOTAVAIL to the application. 678 679In some cases, the specification explicitly requires the 680implementation to choose a particular source address. The source 681address for a Neighbor Advertisement (NA) message is an example. 682Under the spec (RFC2461 7.2.2) NA's source should be the target 683address of the corresponding NS's target. In this case we follow the 684spec rather than the above rule. 685 686If you would like to prohibit the use of deprecated address for some 687reason, configure net.inet6.ip6.use_deprecated to 0. The issue 688related to deprecated address is described in RFC2462 5.5.4 (NOTE: 689there is some debate underway in IETF ipngwg on how to use 690"deprecated" address). 691 692As documented in the source address selection document, temporary 693addresses for privacy extension are less preferred to public addresses 694by default. However, for administrators who are particularly aware of 695the privacy, there is a system-wide sysctl(3) variable 696"net.inet6.ip6.prefer_tempaddr". When the variable is set to 697non-zero, the kernel will rather prefer temporary addresses. The 698default value of this variable is 0. 699 7001.6.2 Destination Address Ordering 701 702KAME's getaddrinfo(3) supports the destination address ordering 703algorithm described in RFC3484. Getaddrinfo(3) needs to know the 704source address for each destination address and policy entries 705(described in the previous section) for the source and destination 706addresses. To get the source address, the library function opens a 707UDP socket and tries to connect(2) for the destination. To get the 708policy entry, the function issues sysctl(3). 709 7101.7 Jumbo Payload 711 712KAME supports the Jumbo Payload hop-by-hop option used to send IPv6 713packets with payloads longer than 65,535 octets. But since currently 714KAME does not support any physical interface whose MTU is more than 71565,535, such payloads can be seen only on the loopback interface(i.e. 716lo0). 717 718If you want to try jumbo payloads, you first have to reconfigure the 719kernel so that the MTU of the loopback interface is more than 65,535 720bytes; add the following to the kernel configuration file: 721 options "LARGE_LOMTU" #To test jumbo payload 722and recompile the new kernel. 723 724Then you can test jumbo payloads by the ping6 command with -b and -s 725options. The -b option must be specified to enlarge the size of the 726socket buffer and the -s option specifies the length of the packet, 727which should be more than 65,535. For example, type as follows; 728 % ping6 -b 70000 -s 68000 ::1 729 730The IPv6 specification requires that the Jumbo Payload option must not 731be used in a packet that carries a fragment header. If this condition 732is broken, an ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message must be sent to the 733sender. KAME kernel follows the specification, but you cannot usually 734see an ICMPv6 error caused by this requirement. 735 736If KAME kernel receives an IPv6 packet, it checks the frame length of 737the packet and compares it to the length specified in the payload 738length field of the IPv6 header or in the value of the Jumbo Payload 739option, if any. If the former is shorter than the latter, KAME kernel 740discards the packet and increments the statistics. You can see the 741statistics as output of netstat command with `-s -p ip6' option: 742 % netstat -s -p ip6 743 ip6: 744 (snip) 745 1 with data size < data length 746 747So, KAME kernel does not send an ICMPv6 error unless the erroneous 748packet is an actual Jumbo Payload, that is, its packet size is more 749than 65,535 bytes. As described above, KAME kernel currently does not 750support physical interface with such a huge MTU, so it rarely returns an 751ICMPv6 error. 752 753TCP/UDP over jumbogram is not supported at this moment. This is because 754we have no medium (other than loopback) to test this. Contact us if you 755need this. 756 757IPsec does not work on jumbograms. This is due to some specification twists 758in supporting AH with jumbograms (AH header size influences payload length, 759and this makes it real hard to authenticate inbound packet with jumbo payload 760option as well as AH). 761 762There are fundamental issues in *BSD support for jumbograms. We would like to 763address those, but we need more time to finalize the task. To name a few: 764- mbuf pkthdr.len field is typed as "int" in 4.4BSD, so it cannot hold 765 jumbogram with len > 2G on 32bit architecture CPUs. If we would like to 766 support jumbogram properly, the field must be expanded to hold 4G + 767 IPv6 header + link-layer header. Therefore, it must be expanded to at least 768 int64_t (u_int32_t is NOT enough). 769- We mistakingly use "int" to hold packet length in many places. We need 770 to convert them into larger numeric type. It needs a great care, as we may 771 experience overflow during packet length computation. 772- We mistakingly check for ip6_plen field of IPv6 header for packet payload 773 length in various places. We should be checking mbuf pkthdr.len instead. 774 ip6_input() will perform sanity check on jumbo payload option on input, 775 and we can safely use mbuf pkthdr.len afterwards. 776- TCP code needs careful updates in bunch of places, of course. 777 7781.8 Loop prevention in header processing 779 780IPv6 specification allows arbitrary number of extension headers to 781be placed onto packets. If we implement IPv6 packet processing 782code in the way BSD IPv4 code is implemented, kernel stack may 783overflow due to long function call chain. KAME sys/netinet6 code 784is carefully designed to avoid kernel stack overflow. Because of 785this, KAME sys/netinet6 code defines its own protocol switch 786structure, as "struct ip6protosw" (see netinet6/ip6protosw.h). 787 788In addition to this, we restrict the number of extension headers 789(including the IPv6 header) in each incoming packet, in order to 790prevent a DoS attack that tries to send packets with a massive number 791of extension headers. The upper limit can be configured by the sysctl 792value net.inet6.ip6.hdrnestlimit. In particular, if the value is 0, 793the node will allow an arbitrary number of headers. As of writing this 794document, the default value is 50. 795 796IPv4 part (sys/netinet) remains untouched for compatibility. 797Because of this, if you receive IPsec-over-IPv4 packet with massive 798number of IPsec headers, kernel stack may blow up. IPsec-over-IPv6 is okay. 799 8001.9 ICMPv6 801 802After RFC2463 was published, IETF ipngwg has decided to disallow ICMPv6 error 803packet against ICMPv6 redirect, to prevent ICMPv6 storm on a network medium. 804KAME already implements this into the kernel. 805 806RFC2463 requires rate limitation for ICMPv6 error packets generated by a 807node, to avoid possible DoS attacks. KAME kernel implements two rate- 808limitation mechanisms, tunable via sysctl: 809- Minimum time interval between ICMPv6 error packets 810 KAME kernel will generate no more than one ICMPv6 error packet, 811 during configured time interval. net.inet6.icmp6.errratelimit 812 controls the interval (default: disabled). 813- Maximum ICMPv6 error packet-per-second 814 KAME kernel will generate no more than the configured number of 815 packets in one second. net.inet6.icmp6.errppslimit controls the 816 maximum packet-per-second value (default: 200pps) 817Basically, we need to pick values that are suitable against the bandwidth 818of link layer devices directly attached to the node. In some cases the 819default values may not fit well. We are still unsure if the default value 820is sane or not. Comments are welcome. 821 8221.10 Applications 823 824For userland programming, we support IPv6 socket API as specified in 825RFC2553, RFC2292 and upcoming internet drafts. 826 827TCP/UDP over IPv6 is available and quite stable. You can enjoy "telnet", 828"ftp", "rlogin", "rsh", "ssh", etc. These applications are protocol 829independent. That is, they automatically chooses IPv4 or IPv6 830according to DNS. 831 8321.11 Kernel Internals 833 834 (*) TCP/UDP part is handled differently between operating system platforms. 835 See 1.12 for details. 836 837The current KAME has escaped from the IPv4 netinet logic. While 838ip_forward() calls ip_output(), ip6_forward() directly calls 839if_output() since routers must not divide IPv6 packets into fragments. 840 841ICMPv6 should contain the original packet as long as possible up to 8421280. UDP6/IP6 port unreach, for instance, should contain all 843extension headers and the *unchanged* UDP6 and IP6 headers. 844So, all IP6 functions except TCP6 never convert network byte 845order into host byte order, to save the original packet. 846 847tcp6_input(), udp6_input() and icmp6_input() can't assume that IP6 848header is preceding the transport headers due to extension 849headers. So, in6_cksum() was implemented to handle packets whose IP6 850header and transport header is not continuous. TCP/IP6 nor UDP/IP6 851header structure don't exist for checksum calculation. 852 853To process IP6 header, extension headers and transport headers easily, 854KAME requires network drivers to store packets in one internal mbuf or 855one or more external mbufs. A typical old driver prepares two 856internal mbufs for 100 - 208 bytes data, however, KAME's reference 857implementation stores it in one external mbuf. 858 859"netstat -s -p ip6" tells you whether or not your driver conforms 860KAME's requirement. In the following example, "cce0" violates the 861requirement. (For more information, refer to Section 2.) 862 863 Mbuf statistics: 864 317 one mbuf 865 two or more mbuf:: 866 lo0 = 8 867 cce0 = 10 868 3282 one ext mbuf 869 0 two or more ext mbuf 870 871Each input function calls IP6_EXTHDR_CHECK in the beginning to check 872if the region between IP6 and its header is 873continuous. IP6_EXTHDR_CHECK calls m_pullup() only if the mbuf has 874M_LOOP flag, that is, the packet comes from the loopback 875interface. m_pullup() is never called for packets coming from physical 876network interfaces. 877 878TCP6 reassembly makes use of IP6 header to store reassemble 879information. IP6 is not supposed to be just before TCP6, so 880ip6tcpreass structure has a pointer to TCP6 header. Of course, it has 881also a pointer back to mbuf to avoid m_pullup(). 882 883Like TCP6, both IP and IP6 reassemble functions never call m_pullup(). 884 885xxx_ctlinput() calls in_mrejoin() on PRC_IFNEWADDR. We think this is 886one of 4.4BSD implementation flaws. Since 4.4BSD keeps ia_multiaddrs 887in in_ifaddr{}, it can't use multicast feature if the interface has no 888unicast address. So, if an application joins to an interface and then 889all unicast addresses are removed from the interface, the application 890can't send/receive any multicast packets. Moreover, if a new unicast 891address is assigned to the interface, in_mrejoin() must be called. 892KAME's interfaces, however, have ALWAYS one link-local unicast 893address. These extensions have thus not been implemented in KAME. 894 8951.12 IPv4 mapped address and IPv6 wildcard socket 896 897RFC2553/3493 describes IPv4 mapped address (3.7) and special behavior 898of IPv6 wildcard bind socket (3.8). The spec allows you to: 899- Accept IPv4 connections by AF_INET6 wildcard bind socket. 900- Transmit IPv4 packet over AF_INET6 socket by using special form of 901 the address like ::ffff:10.1.1.1. 902but the spec itself is very complicated and does not specify how the 903socket layer should behave. 904Here we call the former one "listening side" and the latter one "initiating 905side", for reference purposes. 906 907Almost all KAME implementations treat tcp/udp port number space separately 908between IPv4 and IPv6. You can perform wildcard bind on both of the address 909families, on the same port. 910 911There are some OS-platform differences in KAME code, as we use tcp/udp 912code from different origin. The following table summarizes the behavior. 913 914 listening side initiating side 915 (AF_INET6 wildcard (connection to ::ffff:10.1.1.1) 916 socket gets IPv4 conn.) 917 --- --- 918KAME/BSDI3 not supported not supported 919KAME/FreeBSD228 not supported not supported 920KAME/FreeBSD3x configurable supported 921 default: enabled 922KAME/FreeBSD4x configurable supported 923 default: enabled 924KAME/NetBSD configurable supported 925 default: disabled 926KAME/BSDI4 enabled supported 927KAME/OpenBSD not supported not supported 928 929The following sections will give you more details, and how you can 930configure the behavior. 931 932Comments on listening side: 933 934It looks that RFC2553/3493 talks too little on wildcard bind issue, 935specifically on (1) port space issue, (2) failure mode, (3) relationship 936between AF_INET/INET6 wildcard bind like ordering constraint, and (4) behavior 937when conflicting socket is opened/closed. There can be several separate 938interpretation for this RFC which conform to it but behaves differently. 939So, to implement portable application you should assume nothing 940about the behavior in the kernel. Using getaddrinfo() is the safest way. 941Port number space and wildcard bind issues were discussed in detail 942on ipv6imp mailing list, in mid March 1999 and it looks that there's 943no concrete consensus (means, up to implementers). You may want to 944check the mailing list archives. 945We supply a tool called "bindtest" that explores the behavior of 946kernel bind(2). The tool will not be compiled by default. 947 948If a server application would like to accept IPv4 and IPv6 connections, 949it should use AF_INET and AF_INET6 socket (you'll need two sockets). 950Use getaddrinfo() with AI_PASSIVE into ai_flags, and socket(2) and bind(2) 951to all the addresses returned. 952By opening multiple sockets, you can accept connections onto the socket with 953proper address family. IPv4 connections will be accepted by AF_INET socket, 954and IPv6 connections will be accepted by AF_INET6 socket (NOTE: KAME/BSDI4 955kernel sometimes violate this - we will fix it). 956 957If you try to support IPv6 traffic only and would like to reject IPv4 958traffic, always check the peer address when a connection is made toward 959AF_INET6 listening socket. If the address is IPv4 mapped address, you may 960want to reject the connection. You can check the condition by using 961IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED() macro. This is one of the reasons the author of 962the section (itojun) dislikes special behavior of AF_INET6 wildcard bind. 963 964Comments on initiating side: 965 966Advise to application implementers: to implement a portable IPv6 application 967(which works on multiple IPv6 kernels), we believe that the following 968is the key to the success: 969- NEVER hardcode AF_INET nor AF_INET6. 970- Use getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo() throughout the system. 971 Never use gethostby*(), getaddrby*(), inet_*() or getipnodeby*(). 972- If you would like to connect to destination, use getaddrinfo() and try 973 all the destination returned, like telnet does. 974- Some of the IPv6 stack is shipped with buggy getaddrinfo(). Ship a minimal 975 working version with your application and use that as last resort. 976 977If you would like to use AF_INET6 socket for both IPv4 and IPv6 outgoing 978connection, you will need tweaked implementation in DNS support libraries, 979as documented in RFC2553/3493 6.1. KAME libinet6 includes the tweak in 980getipnodebyname(). Note that getipnodebyname() itself is not recommended as 981it does not handle scoped IPv6 addresses at all. For IPv6 name resolution 982getaddrinfo() is the preferred API. getaddrinfo() does not implement the 983tweak. 984 985When writing applications that make outgoing connections, story goes much 986simpler if you treat AF_INET and AF_INET6 as totally separate address family. 987{set,get}sockopt issue goes simpler, DNS issue will be made simpler. We do 988not recommend you to rely upon IPv4 mapped address. 989 9901.12.1 KAME/BSDI3 and KAME/FreeBSD228 991 992The platforms do not support IPv4 mapped address at all (both listening side 993and initiating side). AF_INET6 and AF_INET sockets are totally separated. 994 995Port number space is totally separate between AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets. 996 997It should be noted that KAME/BSDI3 and KAME/FreeBSD228 are not conformant 998to RFC2553/3493 section 3.7 and 3.8. It is due to code sharing reasons. 999 10001.12.2 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x 1001 1002KAME/FreeBSD3x and KAME/FreeBSD4x use shared tcp4/6 code (from 1003sys/netinet/tcp*) and shared udp4/6 code (from sys/netinet/udp*). 1004They use unified inpcb/in6pcb structure. 1005 10061.12.2.1 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x, listening side 1007 1008The platform can be configured to support IPv4 mapped address/special 1009AF_INET6 wildcard bind (enabled by default). There is no kernel compilation 1010option to disable it. You can enable/disable the behavior with sysctl 1011(per-node), or setsockopt (per-socket). 1012 1013Wildcard AF_INET6 socket grabs IPv4 connection if and only if the following 1014conditions are satisfied: 1015- there's no AF_INET socket that matches the IPv4 connection 1016- the AF_INET6 socket is configured to accept IPv4 traffic, i.e. 1017 getsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY) returns 0. 1018 1019(XXX need checking) 1020 10211.12.2.2 KAME/FreeBSD[34]x, initiating side 1022 1023KAME/FreeBSD3x supports outgoing connection to IPv4 mapped address 1024(::ffff:10.1.1.1), if the node is configured to accept IPv4 connections 1025by AF_INET6 socket. 1026 1027(XXX need checking) 1028 10291.12.3 KAME/NetBSD 1030 1031KAME/NetBSD uses shared tcp4/6 code (from sys/netinet/tcp*) and shared 1032udp4/6 code (from sys/netinet/udp*). The implementation is made differently 1033from KAME/FreeBSD[34]x. KAME/NetBSD uses separate inpcb/in6pcb structures, 1034while KAME/FreeBSD[34]x uses merged inpcb structure. 1035 1036It should be noted that the default configuration of KAME/NetBSD is not 1037conformant to RFC2553/3493 section 3.8. It is intentionally turned off by 1038default for security reasons. 1039 1040The platform can be configured to support IPv4 mapped address/special AF_INET6 1041wildcard bind (disabled by default). Kernel behavior can be summarized as 1042follows: 1043- default: special support code will be compiled in, but is disabled by 1044 default. It can be controlled by sysctl (net.inet6.ip6.v6only), 1045 or setsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY). 1046- add "INET6_BINDV6ONLY": No special support code for AF_INET6 wildcard socket 1047 will be compiled in. AF_INET6 sockets and AF_INET sockets are totally 1048 separate. The behavior is similar to what described in 1.12.1. 1049 1050sysctl setting will affect per-socket configuration at in6pcb creation time 1051only. In other words, per-socket configuration will be copied from sysctl 1052configuration at in6pcb creation time. To change per-socket behavior, you 1053must perform setsockopt or reopen the socket. Change in sysctl configuration 1054will not change the behavior or sockets that are already opened. 1055 10561.12.3.1 KAME/NetBSD, listening side 1057 1058Wildcard AF_INET6 socket grabs IPv4 connection if and only if the following 1059conditions are satisfied: 1060- there's no AF_INET socket that matches the IPv4 connection 1061- the AF_INET6 socket is configured to accept IPv4 traffic, i.e. 1062 getsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY) returns 0. 1063 1064You cannot bind(2) with IPv4 mapped address. This is a workaround for port 1065number duplicate and other twists. 1066 10671.12.3.2 KAME/NetBSD, initiating side 1068 1069When getsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY) is 0 for a socket, you can make an outgoing 1070traffic to IPv4 destination over AF_INET6 socket, using IPv4 mapped 1071address destination (::ffff:10.1.1.1). 1072 1073When getsockopt(IPV6_V6ONLY) is 1 for a socket, you cannot use IPv4 mapped 1074address for outgoing traffic. 1075 10761.12.4 KAME/BSDI4 1077 1078KAME/BSDI4 uses NRL-based TCP/UDP stack and inpcb source code, 1079which was derived from NRL IPv6/IPsec stack. We guess it supports IPv4 mapped 1080address and speical AF_INET6 wildcard bind. The implementation is, again, 1081different from other KAME/*BSDs. 1082 10831.12.4.1 KAME/BSDI4, listening side 1084 1085NRL inpcb layer supports special behavior of AF_INET6 wildcard socket. 1086There is no way to disable the behavior. 1087 1088Wildcard AF_INET6 socket grabs IPv4 connection if and only if the following 1089condition is satisfied: 1090- there's no AF_INET socket that matches the IPv4 connection 1091 10921.12.4.2 KAME/BSDI4, initiating side 1093 1094KAME/BSDi4 supports connection initiation to IPv4 mapped address 1095(like ::ffff:10.1.1.1). 1096 10971.12.5 KAME/OpenBSD 1098 1099KAME/OpenBSD uses NRL-based TCP/UDP stack and inpcb source code, 1100which was derived from NRL IPv6/IPsec stack. 1101 1102It should be noted that KAME/OpenBSD is not conformant to RFC2553/3493 section 11033.7 and 3.8. It is intentionally omitted for security reasons. 1104 11051.12.5.1 KAME/OpenBSD, listening side 1106 1107KAME/OpenBSD disables special behavior on AF_INET6 wildcard bind for 1108security reasons (if IPv4 traffic toward AF_INET6 wildcard bind is allowed, 1109access control will become much harder). KAME/BSDI4 uses NRL-based TCP/UDP 1110stack as well, however, the behavior is different due to OpenBSD's security 1111policy. 1112 1113As a result the behavior of KAME/OpenBSD is similar to KAME/BSDI3 and 1114KAME/FreeBSD228 (see 1.12.1 for more detail). 1115 11161.12.5.2 KAME/OpenBSD, initiating side 1117 1118KAME/OpenBSD does not support connection initiation to IPv4 mapped address 1119(like ::ffff:10.1.1.1). 1120 11211.12.6 More issues 1122 1123IPv4 mapped address support adds a big requirement to EVERY userland codebase. 1124Every userland code should check if an AF_INET6 sockaddr contains IPv4 1125mapped address or not. This adds many twists: 1126 1127- Access controls code becomes harder to write. 1128 For example, if you would like to reject packets from 10.0.0.0/8, 1129 you need to reject packets to AF_INET socket from 10.0.0.0/8, 1130 and to AF_INET6 socket from ::ffff:10.0.0.0/104. 1131- If a protocol on top of IPv4 is defined differently with IPv6, we need to be 1132 really careful when we determine which protocol to use. 1133 For example, with FTP protocol, we can not simply use sa_family to determine 1134 FTP command sets. The following example is incorrect: 1135 if (sa_family == AF_INET) 1136 use EPSV/EPRT or PASV/PORT; /*IPv4*/ 1137 else if (sa_family == AF_INET6) 1138 use EPSV/EPRT or LPSV/LPRT; /*IPv6*/ 1139 else 1140 error; 1141 The correct code, with consideration to IPv4 mapped address, would be: 1142 if (sa_family == AF_INET) 1143 use EPSV/EPRT or PASV/PORT; /*IPv4*/ 1144 else if (sa_family == AF_INET6 && IPv4 mapped address) 1145 use EPSV/EPRT or PASV/PORT; /*IPv4 command set on AF_INET6*/ 1146 else if (sa_family == AF_INET6 && !IPv4 mapped address) 1147 use EPSV/EPRT or LPSV/LPRT; /*IPv6*/ 1148 else 1149 error; 1150 It is too much to ask for every body to be careful like this. 1151 The problem is, we are not sure if the above code fragment is perfect for 1152 all situations. 1153- By enabling kernel support for IPv4 mapped address (outgoing direction), 1154 servers on the kernel can be hosed by IPv6 native packet that has IPv4 1155 mapped address in IPv6 header source, and can generate unwanted IPv4 packets. 1156 draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse-01.txt, draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api- 1157 harmful-00.txt, and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt 1158 has more on this scenario. 1159 1160Due to the above twists, some of KAME userland programs has restrictions on 1161the use of IPv4 mapped addresses: 1162- rshd/rlogind do not accept connections from IPv4 mapped address. 1163 This is to avoid malicious use of IPv4 mapped address in IPv6 native 1164 packet, to bypass source-address based authentication. 1165- ftp/ftpd assume that you are on dual stack network. IPv4 mapped address 1166 will be decoded in userland, and will be passed to AF_INET sockets 1167 (in other words, ftp/ftpd do not support SIIT environment). 1168 11691.12.7 Interaction with SIIT translator 1170 1171SIIT translator is specified in RFC2765. KAME node cannot become a SIIT 1172translator box, nor SIIT end node (a node in SIIT cloud). 1173 1174To become a SIIT translator box, we need to put additional code for that. 1175We do not have the code in our tree at this moment. 1176 1177There are multiple reasons that we are unable to become SIIT end node. 1178(1) SIIT translators require end nodes in the SIIT cloud to be IPv6-only. 1179Since we are unable to compile INET-less kernel, we are unable to become 1180SIIT end node. (2) As presented in 1.12.6, some of our userland code assumes 1181dual stack network. (3) KAME stack filters out IPv6 packets with IPv4 1182mapped address in the header, to secure non-SIIT case (which is much more 1183common). Effectively KAME node will reject any packets via SIIT translator 1184box. See section 1.14 for more detail about the last item. 1185 1186There are documentation issues too - SIIT document requires very strange 1187things. For example, SIIT document asks IPv6-only (meaning no IPv4 code) 1188node to be able to construct IPv4 IPsec headers. If a node knows how to 1189construct IPv4 IPsec headers, that is not an IPv6-only node, it is a dual-stack 1190node. The requirements imposed in SIIT document contradict with the other 1191part of the document itself. 1192 11931.13 sockaddr_storage 1194 1195When RFC2553 was about to be finalized, there was discussion on how struct 1196sockaddr_storage members are named. One proposal is to prepend "__" to the 1197members (like "__ss_len") as they should not be touched. The other proposal 1198was that don't prepend it (like "ss_len") as we need to touch those members 1199directly. There was no clear consensus on it. 1200 1201As a result, RFC2553 defines struct sockaddr_storage as follows: 1202 struct sockaddr_storage { 1203 u_char __ss_len; /* address length */ 1204 u_char __ss_family; /* address family */ 1205 /* and bunch of padding */ 1206 }; 1207On the contrary, XNET draft defines as follows: 1208 struct sockaddr_storage { 1209 u_char ss_len; /* address length */ 1210 u_char ss_family; /* address family */ 1211 /* and bunch of padding */ 1212 }; 1213 1214In December 1999, it was agreed that RFC2553bis (RFC3493) should pick the 1215latter (XNET) definition. 1216 1217KAME kit prior to December 1999 used RFC2553 definition. KAME kit after 1218December 1999 (including December) will conform to XNET definition, 1219based on RFC3493 discussion. 1220 1221If you look at multiple IPv6 implementations, you will be able to see 1222both definitions. As an userland programmer, the most portable way of 1223dealing with it is to: 1224(1) ensure ss_family and/or ss_len are available on the platform, by using 1225 GNU autoconf, 1226(2) have -Dss_family=__ss_family to unify all occurences (including header 1227 file) into __ss_family, or 1228(3) never touch __ss_family. cast to sockaddr * and use sa_family like: 1229 struct sockaddr_storage ss; 1230 family = ((struct sockaddr *)&ss)->sa_family 1231 12321.14 Invalid addresses on the wire 1233 1234Some of IPv6 transition technologies embed IPv4 address into IPv6 address. 1235These specifications themselves are fine, however, there can be certain 1236set of attacks enabled by these specifications. Recent speicifcation 1237documents covers up those issues, however, there are already-published RFCs 1238that does not have protection against those (like using source address of 1239::ffff:127.0.0.1 to bypass "reject packet from remote" filter). 1240 1241To name a few, these address ranges can be used to hose an IPv6 implementation, 1242or bypass security controls: 1243- IPv4 mapped address that embeds unspecified/multicast/loopback/broadcast 1244 IPv4 address (if they are in IPv6 native packet header, they are malicious) 1245 ::ffff:0.0.0.0/104 ::ffff:127.0.0.0/104 1246 ::ffff:224.0.0.0/100 ::ffff:255.0.0.0/104 1247- 6to4 (RFC3056) prefix generated from unspecified/multicast/loopback/ 1248 broadcast/private IPv4 address 1249 2002:0000::/24 2002:7f00::/24 2002:e000::/24 1250 2002:ff00::/24 2002:0a00::/24 2002:ac10::/28 1251 2002:c0a8::/32 1252- IPv4 compatible address that embeds unspecified/multicast/loopback/broadcast 1253 IPv4 address (if they are in IPv6 native packet header, they are malicious). 1254 Note that, since KAME doe snot support RFC1933/2893 auto tunnels, KAME nodes 1255 are not vulnerable to these packets. 1256 ::0.0.0.0/104 ::127.0.0.0/104 ::224.0.0.0/100 ::255.0.0.0/104 1257 1258Also, since KAME does not support RFC1933/2893 auto tunnels, seeing IPv4 1259compatible is very rare. You should take caution if you see those on the wire. 1260 1261If we see IPv6 packets with IPv4 mapped address (::ffff:0.0.0.0/96) in the 1262header in dual-stack environment (not in SIIT environment), they indicate 1263that someone is trying to inpersonate IPv4 peer. The packet should be dropped. 1264 1265IPv6 specifications do not talk very much about IPv6 unspecified address (::) 1266in the IPv6 source address field. Clarification is in progress. 1267Here are couple of comments: 1268- IPv6 unspecified address can be used in IPv6 source address field, if and 1269 only if we have no legal source address for the node. The legal situations 1270 include, but may not be limited to, (1) MLD while no IPv6 address is assigned 1271 to the node and (2) DAD. 1272- If IPv6 TCP packet has IPv6 unspecified address, it is an attack attempt. 1273 The form can be used as a trigger for TCP DoS attack. KAME code already 1274 filters them out. 1275- The following examples are seemingly illegal. It seems that there's general 1276 consensus among ipngwg for those. (1) mobile-ip6 home address option, 1277 (2) offlink packets (so routers should not forward them). 1278 KAME implmements (2) already. 1279 1280KAME code is carefully written to avoid such incidents. More specifically, 1281KAME kernel will reject packets with certain source/dstination address in IPv6 1282base header, or IPv6 routing header. Also, KAME default configuration file 1283is written carefully, to avoid those attacks. 1284 1285draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse-01.txt, draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api- 1286harmful-00.txt and draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-01.txt has more on 1287this issue. 1288 12891.15 Node's required addresses 1290 1291RFC2373 section 2.8 talks about required addresses for an IPv6 1292node. The section talks about how KAME stack manages those required 1293addresses. 1294 12951.15.1 Host case 1296 1297The following items are automatically assigned to the node (or the node will 1298automatically joins the group), at bootstrap time: 1299- Loopback address 1300- All-nodes multicast addresses (ff01::1) 1301 1302The following items will be automatically handled when the interface becomes 1303IFF_UP: 1304- Its link-local address for each interface 1305- Solicited-node multicast address for link-local addresses 1306- Link-local allnodes multicast address (ff02::1) 1307 1308The following items need to be configured manually by ifconfig(8) or prefix(8). 1309Alternatively, these can be autoconfigured by using stateless address 1310autoconfiguration. 1311- Assigned unicast/anycast addresses 1312- Solicited-Node multicast address for assigned unicast address 1313 1314Users can join groups by using appropriate system calls like setsockopt(2). 1315 13161.15.2 Router case 1317 1318In addition to the above, routers needs to handle the following items. 1319 1320The following items need to be configured manually by using ifconfig(8). 1321o The subnet-router anycast addresses for the interfaces it is configured 1322 to act as a router on (prefix::/64) 1323o All other anycast addresses with which the router has been configured 1324 1325The router will join the following multicast group when rtadvd(8) is available 1326for the interface. 1327o All-Routers Multicast Addresses (ff02::2) 1328 1329Routing daemons will join appropriate multicast groups, as necessary, 1330like ff02::9 for RIPng. 1331 1332Users can join groups by using appropriate system calls like setsockopt(2). 1333 13341.16 Advanced API 1335 1336Current KAME kernel implements RFC3542 API. It also implements RFC2292 API, 1337for backward compatibility purposes with *BSD-integrated codebase. 1338KAME tree ships with RFC3542 headers. 1339*BSD-integrated codebase implements either RFC2292, or RFC3542, API. 1340see "COVERAGE" document for detailed implementation status. 1341 1342Here are couple of issues to mention: 1343- *BSD-integrated binaries, compiled for RFC2292, will work on KAME kernel. 1344 For example, OpenBSD 2.7 /sbin/rtsol will work on KAME/openbsd kernel. 1345- KAME binaries, compiled using RFC3542, will not work on *BSD-integrated 1346 kenrel. For example, KAME /usr/local/v6/sbin/rtsol will not work on 1347 OpenBSD 2.7 kernel. 1348- RFC3542 API is not compatible with RFC2292 API. RFC3542 #define symbols 1349 conflict with RFC2292 symbols. Therefore, if you compile programs that 1350 assume RFC2292 API, the compilation itself goes fine, however, the compiled 1351 binary will not work correctly. The problem is not KAME issue, but API 1352 issue. For example, Solaris 8 implements RFC3542 API. If you compile 1353 RFC2292-based code on Solaris 8, the binary can behave strange. 1354 1355There are few (or couple of) incompatible behavior in RFC2292 binary backward 1356compatibility support in KAME tree. To enumerate: 1357- Type 0 routing header lacks support for strict/loose bitmap. 1358 Even if we see packets with "strict" bit set, those bits will not be made 1359 visible to the userland. 1360 Background: RFC2292 document is based on RFC1883 IPv6, and it uses 1361 strict/loose bitmap. RFC3542 document is based on RFC2460 IPv6, and it has 1362 no strict/loose bitmap (it was removed from RFC2460). KAME tree obeys 1363 RFC2460 IPv6, and lacks support for strict/loose bitmap. 1364 1365The RFC3542 documents leave some particular cases unspecified. The 1366KAME implementation treats them as follows: 1367- The IPV6_DONTFRAG and IPV6_RECVPATHMTU socket options for TCP 1368 sockets are ignored. That is, the setsocktopt() call will succeed 1369 but the specified value will have no effect. 1370 13711.17 DNS resolver 1372 1373KAME ships with modified DNS resolver, in libinet6.a. 1374libinet6.a has a comple of extensions against libc DNS resolver: 1375- Can take "options insecure1" and "options insecure2" in /etc/resolv.conf, 1376 which toggles RES_INSECURE[12] option flag bit. 1377- EDNS0 receive buffer size notification support. It can be enabled by 1378 "options edns0" in /etc/resolv.conf. See USAGE for details. 1379- IPv6 transport support (queries/responses over IPv6). Most of BSD official 1380 releases now has it already. 1381- Partial A6 chain chasing/DNAME/bit string label support (KAME/BSDI4). 1382 1383 13842. Network Drivers 1385 1386KAME requires three items to be added into the standard drivers: 1387 1388(1) (freebsd[234] and bsdi[34] only) mbuf clustering requirement. 1389 In this stable release, we changed MINCLSIZE into MHLEN+1 for all the 1390 operating systems in order to make all the drivers behave as we expect. 1391 1392(2) multicast. If "ifmcstat" yields no multicast group for a 1393 interface, that interface has to be patched. 1394 1395To avoid troubles, we suggest you to comment out the device drivers 1396for unsupported/unnecessary cards, from the kernel configuration file. 1397If you accidentally enable unsupported drivers, some of the userland 1398tools may not work correctly (routing daemons are typical example). 1399 1400In the following sections, "official support" means that KAME developers 1401are using that ethernet card/driver frequently. 1402 1403(NOTE: In the past we required all pcmcia drivers to have a call to 1404in6_ifattach(). We have no such requirement any more) 1405 14062.1 FreeBSD 2.2.x-RELEASE 1407 1408Here is a list of FreeBSD 2.2.x-RELEASE drivers and its conditions: 1409 1410 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1411 --- --- --- --- 1412 (Ethernet) 1413 ar looks ok - - 1414 cnw ok ok yes (*) 1415 ed ok ok yes 1416 ep ok ok yes 1417 fe ok ok yes 1418 sn looks ok - - (*) 1419 vx looks ok - - 1420 wlp ok ok - (*) 1421 xl ok ok yes 1422 zp ok ok - 1423 (FDDI) 1424 fpa looks ok ? - 1425 (ATM) 1426 en ok ok yes 1427 (Serial) 1428 lp ? - not work 1429 sl ? - not work 1430 sr looks ok ok - (**) 1431 1432You may want to add an invocation of "rtsol" in "/etc/pccard_ether", 1433if you are using notebook computers and PCMCIA ethernet card. 1434 1435(*) These drivers are distributed with PAO (http://www.jp.freebsd.org/PAO/). 1436 1437(**) There was some report says that, if you make sr driver up and down and 1438then up, the kernel may hang up. We have disabled frame-relay support from 1439sr driver and after that this looks to be working fine. If you need 1440frame-relay support to come back, please contact KAME developers. 1441 14422.2 BSD/OS 3.x 1443 1444The following lists BSD/OS 3.x device drivers and its conditions: 1445 1446 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1447 --- --- --- --- 1448 (Ethernet) 1449 cnw ok ok yes 1450 de ok ok - 1451 df ok ok - 1452 eb ok ok - 1453 ef ok ok yes 1454 exp ok ok - 1455 mz ok ok yes 1456 ne ok ok yes 1457 we ok ok - 1458 (FDDI) 1459 fpa ok ok - 1460 (ATM) 1461 en maybe ok - 1462 (Serial) 1463 ntwo ok ok yes 1464 sl ? - not work 1465 appp ? - not work 1466 1467You may want to use "@insert" directive in /etc/pccard.conf to invoke 1468"rtsol" command right after dynamic insertion of PCMCIA ethernet cards. 1469 14702.3 NetBSD 1471 1472The following table lists the network drivers we have tried so far. 1473 1474 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1475 --- --- --- --- 1476 (Ethernet) 1477 awi pcmcia/i386 ok ok - 1478 bah zbus/amiga NG(*) 1479 cnw pcmcia/i386 ok ok yes 1480 ep pcmcia/i386 ok ok - 1481 le sbus/sparc ok ok yes 1482 ne pci/i386 ok ok yes 1483 ne pcmcia/i386 ok ok yes 1484 wi pcmcia/i386 ok ok yes 1485 (ATM) 1486 en pci/i386 ok ok - 1487 1488(*) This may need some fix, but I'm not sure what arcnet interfaces assume... 1489 14902.4 FreeBSD 3.x-RELEASE 1491 1492Here is a list of FreeBSD 3.x-RELEASE drivers and its conditions: 1493 1494 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1495 --- --- --- --- 1496 (Ethernet) 1497 cnw ok ok -(*) 1498 ed ? ok - 1499 ep ok ok - 1500 fe ok ok yes 1501 fxp ?(**) 1502 lnc ? ok - 1503 sn ? ? -(*) 1504 wi ok ok yes 1505 xl ? ok - 1506 1507(*) These drivers are distributed with PAO as PAO3 1508 (http://www.jp.freebsd.org/PAO/). 1509(**) there are trouble reports with multicast filter initialization. 1510 1511More drivers will just simply work on KAME FreeBSD 3.x-RELEASE but have not 1512been checked yet. 1513 15142.5 FreeBSD 4.x-RELEASE 1515 1516Here is a list of FreeBSD 4.x-RELEASE drivers and its conditions: 1517 1518 driver multicast 1519 --- --- 1520 (Ethernet) 1521 lnc/vmware ok 1522 15232.6 OpenBSD 2.x 1524 1525Here is a list of OpenBSD 2.x drivers and its conditions: 1526 1527 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1528 --- --- --- --- 1529 (Ethernet) 1530 de pci/i386 ok ok yes 1531 fxp pci/i386 ?(*) 1532 le sbus/sparc ok ok yes 1533 ne pci/i386 ok ok yes 1534 ne pcmcia/i386 ok ok yes 1535 wi pcmcia/i386 ok ok yes 1536 1537(*) There seem to be some problem in driver, with multicast filter 1538configuration. This happens with certain revision of chipset on the card. 1539Should be fixed by now by workaround in sys/net/if.c, but still not sure. 1540 15412.7 BSD/OS 4.x 1542 1543The following lists BSD/OS 4.x device drivers and its conditions: 1544 1545 driver mbuf(1) multicast(2) official support? 1546 --- --- --- --- 1547 (Ethernet) 1548 de ok ok yes 1549 exp (*) 1550 1551You may want to use "@insert" directive in /etc/pccard.conf to invoke 1552"rtsol" command right after dynamic insertion of PCMCIA ethernet cards. 1553 1554(*) exp driver has serious conflict with KAME initialization sequence. 1555A workaround is committed into sys/i386/pci/if_exp.c, and should be okay by now. 1556 15573. Translator 1558 1559We categorize IPv4/IPv6 translator into 4 types. 1560 1561Translator A --- It is used in the early stage of transition to make 1562it possible to establish a connection from an IPv6 host in an IPv6 1563island to an IPv4 host in the IPv4 ocean. 1564 1565Translator B --- It is used in the early stage of transition to make 1566it possible to establish a connection from an IPv4 host in the IPv4 1567ocean to an IPv6 host in an IPv6 island. 1568 1569Translator C --- It is used in the late stage of transition to make it 1570possible to establish a connection from an IPv4 host in an IPv4 island 1571to an IPv6 host in the IPv6 ocean. 1572 1573Translator D --- It is used in the late stage of transition to make it 1574possible to establish a connection from an IPv6 host in the IPv6 ocean 1575to an IPv4 host in an IPv4 island. 1576 1577KAME provides an TCP relay translator for category A. This is called 1578"FAITH". We also provide IP header translator for category A. 1579 15803.1 FAITH TCP relay translator 1581 1582FAITH system uses TCP relay daemon called "faithd" helped by the KAME kernel. 1583FAITH will reserve an IPv6 address prefix, and relay TCP connection 1584toward that prefix to IPv4 destination. 1585 1586For example, if the reserved IPv6 prefix is 3ffe:0501:0200:ffff::, and 1587the IPv6 destination for TCP connection is 3ffe:0501:0200:ffff::163.221.202.12, 1588the connection will be relayed toward IPv4 destination 163.221.202.12. 1589 1590 destination IPv4 node (163.221.202.12) 1591 ^ 1592 | IPv4 tcp toward 163.221.202.12 1593 FAITH-relay dual stack node 1594 ^ 1595 | IPv6 TCP toward 3ffe:0501:0200:ffff::163.221.202.12 1596 source IPv6 node 1597 1598faithd must be invoked on FAITH-relay dual stack node. 1599 1600For more details, consult kame/kame/faithd/README and 1601draft-ietf-ngtrans-tcpudp-relay-04.txt. 1602 16033.2 IPv6-to-IPv4 header translator 1604 1605(to be written) 1606 16074. IPsec 1608 1609IPsec is implemented as the following three components. 1610 1611(1) Policy Management 1612(2) Key Management 1613(3) AH, ESP and IPComp handling in kernel 1614 1615Note that KAME/OpenBSD does NOT include support for KAME IPsec code, 1616as OpenBSD team has their home-brew IPsec stack and they have no plan 1617to replace it. IPv6 support for IPsec is, therefore, lacking on KAME/OpenBSD. 1618 1619http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/network/ipsec/ has more information 1620including usage examples. 1621 16224.1 Policy Management 1623 1624The kernel implements experimental policy management code. There are two ways 1625to manage security policy. One is to configure per-socket policy using 1626setsockopt(3). In this cases, policy configuration is described in 1627ipsec_set_policy(3). The other is to configure kernel packet filter-based 1628policy using PF_KEY interface, via setkey(8). 1629 1630The policy entry will be matched in order. The order of entries makes 1631difference in behavior. 1632 16334.2 Key Management 1634 1635The key management code implemented in this kit (sys/netkey) is a 1636home-brew PFKEY v2 implementation. This conforms to RFC2367. 1637 1638The home-brew IKE daemon, "racoon" is included in the kit (kame/kame/racoon, 1639or usr.sbin/racoon). 1640Basically you'll need to run racoon as daemon, then setup a policy 1641to require keys (like ping -P 'out ipsec esp/transport//use'). 1642The kernel will contact racoon daemon as necessary to exchange keys. 1643 1644In IKE spec, there's ambiguity about interpretation of "tunnel" proposal. 1645For example, if we would like to propose the use of following packet: 1646 IP AH ESP IP payload 1647some implementation proposes it as "AH transport and ESP tunnel", since 1648this is more logical from packet construction point of view. Some 1649implementation proposes it as "AH tunnel and ESP tunnel". 1650Racoon follows the latter route (previously it followed the former, and 1651the latter interpretation seems to be popular/consensus). 1652This raises real interoperability issue. We hope this to be resolved quickly. 1653 1654racoon does not implement byte lifetime for both phase 1 and phase 2 1655(RFC2409 page 35, Life Type = kilobytes). 1656 16574.3 AH and ESP handling 1658 1659IPsec module is implemented as "hooks" to the standard IPv4/IPv6 1660processing. When sending a packet, ip{,6}_output() checks if ESP/AH 1661processing is required by checking if a matching SPD (Security 1662Policy Database) is found. If ESP/AH is needed, 1663{esp,ah}{4,6}_output() will be called and mbuf will be updated 1664accordingly. When a packet is received, {esp,ah}4_input() will be 1665called based on protocol number, i.e. (*inetsw[proto])(). 1666{esp,ah}4_input() will decrypt/check authenticity of the packet, 1667and strips off daisy-chained header and padding for ESP/AH. It is 1668safe to strip off the ESP/AH header on packet reception, since we 1669will never use the received packet in "as is" form. 1670 1671By using ESP/AH, TCP4/6 effective data segment size will be affected by 1672extra daisy-chained headers inserted by ESP/AH. Our code takes care of 1673the case. 1674 1675Basic crypto functions can be found in directory "sys/crypto". ESP/AH 1676transform are listed in {esp,ah}_core.c with wrapper functions. If you 1677wish to add some algorithm, add wrapper function in {esp,ah}_core.c, and 1678add your crypto algorithm code into sys/crypto. 1679 1680Tunnel mode works basically fine, but comes with the following restrictions: 1681- You cannot run routing daemon across IPsec tunnel, since we do not model 1682 IPsec tunnel as pseudo interfaces. 1683- Authentication model for AH tunnel must be revisited. We'll need to 1684 improve the policy management engine, eventually. 1685- Path MTU discovery does not work across IPv6 IPsec tunnel gateway due to 1686 insufficient code. 1687 1688AH specificaton does not talk much about "multiple AH on a packet" case. 1689We incrementally compute AH checksum, from inside to outside. Also, we 1690treat inner AH to be immutable. 1691For example, if we are to create the following packet: 1692 IP AH1 AH2 AH3 payload 1693we do it incrementally. As a result, we get crypto checksums like below: 1694 AH3 has checksum against "IP AH3' payload". 1695 where AH3' = AH3 with checksum field filled with 0. 1696 AH2 has checksum against "IP AH2' AH3 payload". 1697 AH1 has checksum against "IP AH1' AH2 AH3 payload", 1698Also note that AH3 has the smallest sequence number, and AH1 has the largest 1699sequence number. 1700 1701To avoid traffic analysis on shorter packets, ESP output logic supports 1702random length padding. By setting net.inet.ipsec.esp_randpad (or 1703net.inet6.ipsec6.esp_randpad) to positive value N, you can ask the kernel 1704to randomly pad packets shorter than N bytes, to random length smaller than 1705or equal to N. Note that N does not include ESP authentication data length. 1706Also note that the random padding is not included in TCP segment 1707size computation. Negative value will turn off the functionality. 1708Recommeded value for N is like 128, or 256. If you use a too big number 1709as N, you may experience inefficiency due to fragmented packtes. 1710 17114.4 IPComp handling 1712 1713IPComp stands for IP payload compression protocol. This is aimed for 1714payload compression, not the header compression like PPP VJ compression. 1715This may be useful when you are using slow serial link (say, cell phone) 1716with powerful CPU (well, recent notebook PCs are really powerful...). 1717The protocol design of IPComp is very similar to IPsec, though it was 1718defined separately from IPsec itself. 1719 1720Here are some points to be noted: 1721- IPComp is treated as part of IPsec protocol suite, and SPI and 1722 CPI space is unified. Spec says that there's no relationship 1723 between two so they are assumed to be separate in specs. 1724- IPComp association (IPCA) is kept in SAD. 1725- It is possible to use well-known CPI (CPI=2 for DEFLATE for example), 1726 for outbound/inbound packet, but for indexing purposes one element from 1727 SPI/CPI space will be occupied anyway. 1728- pfkey is modified to support IPComp. However, there's no official 1729 SA type number assignment yet. Portability with other IPComp 1730 stack is questionable (anyway, who else implement IPComp on UN*X?). 1731- Spec says that IPComp output processing must be performed before AH/ESP 1732 output processing, to achieve better compression ratio and "stir" data 1733 stream before encryption. The most meaningful processing order is: 1734 (1) compress payload by IPComp, (2) encrypt payload by ESP, then (3) attach 1735 authentication data by AH. 1736 However, with manual SPD setting, you are able to violate the ordering 1737 (KAME code is too generic, maybe). Also, it is just okay to use IPComp 1738 alone, without AH/ESP. 1739- Though the packet size can be significantly decreased by using IPComp, no 1740 special consideration is made about path MTU (spec talks nothing about MTU 1741 consideration). IPComp is designed for serial links, not ethernet-like 1742 medium, it seems. 1743- You can change compression ratio on outbound packet, by changing 1744 deflate_policy in sys/netinet6/ipcomp_core.c. You can also change outbound 1745 history buffer size by changing deflate_window_out in the same source code. 1746 (should it be sysctl accessible, or per-SAD configurable?) 1747- Tunnel mode IPComp is not working right. KAME box can generate tunnelled 1748 IPComp packet, however, cannot accept tunneled IPComp packet. 1749- You can negotiate IPComp association with racoon IKE daemon. 1750- KAME code does not attach Adler32 checksum to compressed data. 1751 see ipsec wg mailing list discussion in Jan 2000 for details. 1752 17534.5 Conformance to RFCs and IDs 1754 1755The IPsec code in the kernel conforms (or, tries to conform) to the 1756following standards: 1757 "old IPsec" specification documented in rfc182[5-9].txt 1758 "new IPsec" specification documented in: 1759 rfc240[1-6].txt rfc241[01].txt rfc2451.txt rfc3602.txt 1760 IPComp: 1761 RFC2393: IP Payload Compression Protocol (IPComp) 1762IKE specifications (rfc240[7-9].txt) are implemented in userland 1763as "racoon" IKE daemon. 1764 1765Currently supported algorithms are: 1766 old IPsec AH 1767 null crypto checksum (no document, just for debugging) 1768 keyed MD5 with 128bit crypto checksum (rfc1828.txt) 1769 keyed SHA1 with 128bit crypto checksum (no document) 1770 HMAC MD5 with 128bit crypto checksum (rfc2085.txt) 1771 HMAC SHA1 with 128bit crypto checksum (no document) 1772 HMAC RIPEMD160 with 128bit crypto checksum (no document) 1773 old IPsec ESP 1774 null encryption (no document, similar to rfc2410.txt) 1775 DES-CBC mode (rfc1829.txt) 1776 new IPsec AH 1777 null crypto checksum (no document, just for debugging) 1778 keyed MD5 with 96bit crypto checksum (no document) 1779 keyed SHA1 with 96bit crypto checksum (no document) 1780 HMAC MD5 with 96bit crypto checksum (rfc2403.txt 1781 HMAC SHA1 with 96bit crypto checksum (rfc2404.txt) 1782 HMAC SHA2-256 with 96bit crypto checksum (no document) 1783 HMAC SHA2-384 with 96bit crypto checksum (no document) 1784 HMAC SHA2-512 with 96bit crypto checksum (no document) 1785 HMAC RIPEMD160 with 96bit crypto checksum (RFC2857) 1786 AES XCBC MAC with 96bit crypto checksum (RFC3566) 1787 new IPsec ESP 1788 null encryption (rfc2410.txt) 1789 DES-CBC with derived IV 1790 (draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des-derived-01.txt, draft expired) 1791 DES-CBC with explicit IV (rfc2405.txt) 1792 3DES-CBC with explicit IV (rfc2451.txt) 1793 BLOWFISH CBC (rfc2451.txt) 1794 CAST128 CBC (rfc2451.txt) 1795 RIJNDAEL/AES CBC (rfc3602.txt) 1796 AES counter mode (draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ctr-03.txt) 1797 1798 each of the above can be combined with: 1799 ESP authentication with HMAC-MD5(96bit) 1800 ESP authentication with HMAC-SHA1(96bit) 1801 IPComp 1802 RFC2394: IP Payload Compression Using DEFLATE 1803 1804The following algorithms are NOT supported: 1805 old IPsec AH 1806 HMAC MD5 with 128bit crypto checksum + 64bit replay prevention 1807 (rfc2085.txt) 1808 keyed SHA1 with 160bit crypto checksum + 32bit padding (rfc1852.txt) 1809 1810The key/policy management API is based on the following document, with fair 1811amount of extensions: 1812 RFC2367: PF_KEY key management API 1813 18144.6 ECN consideration on IPsec tunnels 1815 1816KAME IPsec implements ECN-friendly IPsec tunnel, described in 1817draft-ietf-ipsec-ecn-02.txt. 1818Normal IPsec tunnel is described in RFC2401. On encapsulation, 1819IPv4 TOS field (or, IPv6 traffic class field) will be copied from inner 1820IP header to outer IP header. On decapsulation outer IP header 1821will be simply dropped. The decapsulation rule is not compatible 1822with ECN, since ECN bit on the outer IP TOS/traffic class field will be 1823lost. 1824To make IPsec tunnel ECN-friendly, we should modify encapsulation 1825and decapsulation procedure. This is described in 1826draft-ietf-ipsec-ecn-02.txt, chapter 3.3. 1827 1828KAME IPsec tunnel implementation can give you three behaviors, by setting 1829net.inet.ipsec.ecn (or net.inet6.ipsec6.ecn) to some value: 1830- RFC2401: no consideration for ECN (sysctl value -1) 1831- ECN forbidden (sysctl value 0) 1832- ECN allowed (sysctl value 1) 1833Note that the behavior is configurable in per-node manner, not per-SA manner 1834(draft-ietf-ipsec-ecn-02 wants per-SA configuration, but it looks too much 1835for me). 1836 1837The behavior is summarized as follows (see source code for more detail): 1838 1839 encapsulate decapsulate 1840 --- --- 1841RFC2401 copy all TOS bits drop TOS bits on outer 1842 from inner to outer. (use inner TOS bits as is) 1843 1844ECN forbidden copy TOS bits except for ECN drop TOS bits on outer 1845 (masked with 0xfc) from inner (use inner TOS bits as is) 1846 to outer. set ECN bits to 0. 1847 1848ECN allowed copy TOS bits except for ECN use inner TOS bits with some 1849 CE (masked with 0xfe) from change. if outer ECN CE bit 1850 inner to outer. is 1, enable ECN CE bit on 1851 set ECN CE bit to 0. the inner. 1852 1853General strategy for configuration is as follows: 1854- if both IPsec tunnel endpoint are capable of ECN-friendly behavior, 1855 you'd better configure both end to "ECN allowed" (sysctl value 1). 1856- if the other end is very strict about TOS bit, use "RFC2401" 1857 (sysctl value -1). 1858- in other cases, use "ECN forbidden" (sysctl value 0). 1859The default behavior is "ECN forbidden" (sysctl value 0). 1860 1861For more information, please refer to: 1862 draft-ietf-ipsec-ecn-02.txt 1863 RFC2481 (Explicit Congestion Notification) 1864 KAME sys/netinet6/{ah,esp}_input.c 1865 1866(Thanks goes to Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> for detailed analysis) 1867 18684.7 Interoperability 1869 1870IPsec, IPComp (in kernel) and IKE (in userland as "racoon") has been tested 1871at several interoperability test events, and it is known to interoperate 1872with many other implementations well. Also, KAME IPsec has quite wide 1873coverage for IPsec crypto algorithms documented in RFC (we do not cover 1874algorithms with intellectual property issues, though). 1875 1876Here are (some of) platforms we have tested IPsec/IKE interoperability 1877in the past, no particular order. Note that both ends (KAME and 1878others) may have modified their implementation, so use the following 1879list just for reference purposes. 1880 ACC, allied-telesis, Altiga, Ashley-laurent (vpcom.com), BlueSteel, 1881 CISCO IOS, Cryptek, Checkpoint FW-1, Data Fellows (F-Secure), 1882 Ericsson, Fitel, FreeS/WAN, HiFn, HITACHI, IBM AIX, IIJ, Intel Canada, 1883 Intel Packet Protect, MEW NetCocoon, MGCS, Microsoft WinNT/2000, 1884 NAI PGPnet, NetLock, NIST (linux IPsec + plutoplus), NEC IX5000, 1885 Netscreen, NxNetworks, OpenBSD isakmpd, Pivotal, Radguard, RapidStream, 1886 RedCreek, Routerware, RSA, SSH (both IPv4/IPv6), Secure Computing, 1887 Soliton, Sun Solaris8, TIS/NAI Gauntret, Toshiba, VPNet, 1888 Yamaha RT series 1889 1890Here are (some of) platforms we have tested IPComp/IKE interoperability 1891in the past, in no particular order. 1892 IRE, SSH (both IPv4/IPv6), NetLock 1893 1894VPNC (vpnc.org) provides IPsec conformance tests, using KAME and OpenBSD 1895IPsec/IKE implementations. Their test results are available at 1896http://www.vpnc.org/conformance.html, and it may give you more idea 1897about which implementation interoperates with KAME IPsec/IKE implementation. 1898 18994.8 Operations with IPsec tunnel mode 1900 1901First of all, IPsec tunnel is a very hairy thing. It seems to do a neat thing 1902like VPN configuration or secure remote accesses, however, it comes with lots 1903of architectural twists. 1904 1905RFC2401 defines IPsec tunnel mode, within the context of IPsec. RFC2401 1906defines tunnel mode packet encapsulation/decapsulation on its own, and 1907does not refer other tunnelling specifications. Since RFC2401 advocates 1908filter-based SPD database matches, it would be natural for us to implement 1909IPsec IPsec tunnel mode as filters - not as pseudo interfaces. 1910 1911There are some people who are trying to separate IPsec "tunnel mode" from 1912the IPsec itself. They would like to implement IPsec transport mode only, 1913and combine it with tunneling pseudo devices. The prime example is found 1914in draft-touch-ipsec-vpn-01.txt. However, if you really define pseudo 1915interfaces separately from IPsec, IKE daemons would need to negotiate 1916transport mode SAs, instead of tunnel mode SAs. Therefore, we cannot 1917really mix RFC2401-based interpretation and draft-touch-ipsec-vpn-01.txt 1918interpretation. 1919 1920The KAME stack implements can be configured in two ways. You may need 1921to recompile your kernel to switch the behavior. 1922- RFC2401 IPsec tunnel mode appraoch (4.8.1) 1923- draft-touch-ipsec-vpn approach (4.8.2) 1924 Works in all kernel configuration, but racoon(8) may not interoperate. 1925 1926There are pros and cons on these approaches: 1927 1928RFC2401 IPsec tunnel mode (filter-like) approach 1929 PRO: SPD lookup fits nicely with packet filters (if you integrate them) 1930 CON: cannot run routing daemons across IPsec tunnels 1931 CON: it is very hard to control source address selection on originating 1932 cases 1933 ???: IPv6 scope zone is kept the same 1934draft-touch-ipsec-vpn (transportmode + Pseudo-interface) approach 1935 PRO: run routing daemons across IPsec tunnels 1936 PRO: source address selection can be done normally, by looking at 1937 IPsec tunnel pseudo devices 1938 CON: on outbound, possibility of infinite loops if routing setup 1939 is wrong 1940 CON: due to differences in encap/decap logic from RFC2401, it may not 1941 interoperate with very picky RFC2401 implementations 1942 (those who check TOS bits, for example) 1943 CON: cannot negotiate IKE with other IPsec tunnel-mode devices 1944 (the other end has to implement 1945 ???: IPv6 scope zone is likely to be different from the real ethernet 1946 interface 1947 1948The recommendation is different depending on the situation you have: 1949- use draft-touch-ipsec-vpn if you have the control over the other end. 1950 this one is the best in terms of simplicity. 1951- if the other end is normal IPsec device with RFC2401 implementation, 1952 you need to use RFC2401, otherwise you won't be able to run IKE. 1953- use RFC2401 approach if you just want to forward packets back and forth 1954 and there's no plan to use IPsec gateway itself as an originating device. 1955 19564.8.1 RFC2401 IPsec tunnel mode approach 1957 1958To configure your device as RFC2401 IPsec tunnel mode endpoint, you will 1959use "tunnel" keyword in setkey(8) "spdadd" directives. Let us assume the 1960following topology (A and B could be a network, like prefix/length): 1961 1962 ((((((((((((The internet)))))))))))) 1963 | | 1964 |C (global) |D 1965 your device peer's device 1966 |A (private) |B 1967 ==+===== VPN net ==+===== VPN net 1968 1969The policy configuration directive is like this. You will need manual 1970SAs, or IKE daemon, for actual encryption: 1971 1972 # setkey -c <<EOF 1973 spdadd A B any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/C-D/use; 1974 spdadd B A any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/D-C/use; 1975 ^D 1976 1977The inbound/outbound traffic is monitored/captured by SPD engine, which works 1978just like packet filters. 1979 1980With this, forwarding case should work flawlessly. However, troubles arise 1981when you have one of the following requirements: 1982- When you originate traffic from your VPN gateway device to VPN net on the 1983 other end (like B), you want your source address to be A (private side) 1984 so that the traffic would be protected by the policy. 1985 With this approach, however, the source address selection logic follows 1986 normal routing table, and C (global side) will be picked for any outgoing 1987 traffic, even if the destination is B. The resulting packet will be like 1988 this: 1989 IP[C -> B] payload 1990 and will not match the policy (= sent in clear). 1991- When you want to run routing protocols on top of the IPsec tunnel, it is 1992 not possible. As there is no pseudo device that identifies the IPsec tunnel, 1993 you cannot identify where the routing information came from. As a result, 1994 you can't run routing daemons. 1995 19964.8.2 draft-touch-ipsec-vpn approach 1997 1998With this approach, you will configure gif(4) tunnel interfaces, as well as 1999IPsec transport mode SAs. 2000 2001 # gifconfig gif0 C D 2002 # ifconfig gif0 A B 2003 # setkey -c <<EOF 2004 spdadd C D any -P out ipsec esp/transport//use; 2005 spdadd D C any -P in ipsec esp/transport//use; 2006 ^D 2007 2008Since we have a pseudo-interface "gif0", and it affects the routes and 2009the source address selection logic, we can have source address A, for 2010packets originated by the VPN gateway to B (and the VPN cloud). 2011We can also exchange routing information over the tunnel (gif0), as the tunnel 2012is represented as a pseudo interface (dynamic routes points to the 2013pseudo interface). 2014 2015There is a big drawbacks, however; with this, you can use IKE if and only if 2016the other end is using draft-touch-ipsec-vpn approach too. Since racoon(8) 2017grabs phase 2 IKE proposals from the kernel SPD database, you will be 2018negotiating IPsec transport-mode SAs with the other end, not tunnel-mode SAs. 2019Also, since the encapsulation mechanism is different from RFC2401, you may not 2020be able to interoperate with a picky RFC2401 implementations - if the other 2021end checks certain outer IP header fields (like TOS), you will not be able to 2022interoperate. 2023 2024 20255. ALTQ 2026 2027KAME kit includes ALTQ 2.1 code, which supports FreeBSD2, FreeBSD3, 2028NetBSD and OpenBSD. For BSD/OS, ALTQ does not work. 2029ALTQ in KAME supports (or tries to support) IPv6. 2030(actually, ALTQ is developed on KAME repository since ALTQ 2.1 - Jan 2000) 2031 2032ALTQ occupies single character device number. For FreeBSD, it is officially 2033allocated. For OpenBSD and NetBSD, we use the number which is not 2034currently allocated (will eventually get an official number). 2035The character device is enabled for i386 architecture only. To enable and 2036compile ALTQ-ready kernel for other archititectures, take the following steps: 2037- assume that your architecture is FOOBAA. 2038- modify sys/arch/FOOBAA/FOOBAA/conf.c (or somewhere that defines cdevsw), 2039 to include a line for ALTQ. look at sys/arch/i386/i386/conf.c for 2040 example. The major number must be same as i386 case. 2041- copy kernel configuration file (like ALTQ.v6 or GENERIC.v6) from i386, 2042 and modify accordingly. 2043- build a kernel. 2044- before building userland, change netbsd/{lib,usr.sbin,usr.bin}/Makefile 2045 (or openbsd/foobaa) so that it will visit altq-related sub directories. 2046 20476. mobile-ip6 2048 20496.1 KAME node as correspondent node 2050 2051Default installation recognizes home address option (in destination 2052options header). No sub-options are supported. interaction with 2053IPsec, and/or 2292bis API, needs further study. 2054 20556.2 KAME node as home agent/mobile node 2056 2057KAME kit includes Ericsson mobile-ip6 code. The integration is just started 2058(in Feb 2000), and we will need some more time to integrate it better. 2059 2060See kame/mip6config/{QUICKSTART,README_MIP6.txt} for more details. 2061 2062The Ericsson code implements revision 09 of the mobile-ip6 draft. There 2063are other implementations available: 2064 NEC: http://www.6bone.nec.co.jp/mipv6/internal-dist/ (-13 draft) 2065 SFC: http://neo.sfc.wide.ad.jp/~mip6/ (-13 draft) 2066 20677. Coding style 2068 2069The KAME developers basically do not make a bother about coding 2070style. However, there is still some agreement on the style, in order 2071to make the distributed develoment smooth. 2072 2073- follow *BSD KNF where possible. note: there are multiple KNF standards. 2074- the tab character should be 8 columns wide (tabstops are at 8, 16, 24, ... 2075 column). With vi, use ":set ts=8 sw=8". 2076 With GNU Emacs 20 and later, the easiest way is to use the "bsd" style of 2077 cc-mode with the variable "c-basic-offset" being 8; 2078 (add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook 2079 (function 2080 (lambda () 2081 (c-set-style "bsd") 2082 (setq c-basic-offset 8) ; XXX for Emacs 20 only 2083 ))) 2084 The "bsd" style in GNU Emacs 21 sets the variable to 8 by default, 2085 so the line marked by "XXX" is not necessary if you only use GNU 2086 Emacs 21. 2087- each line should be within 80 characters. 2088- keep a single open/close bracket in a comment such as in the following 2089 line: 2090 putchar('('); /* ) */ 2091 without this, some vi users would have a hard time to match a pair of 2092 brackets. Although this type of bracket seems clumsy and is even 2093 harmful for some other type of vi users and Emacs users, the 2094 agreement in the KAME developers is to allow it. 2095- add the following line to the head of every KAME-derived file: 2096 /* (dollar)KAME(dollar) */ 2097 where "(dollar)" is the dollar character ($), and around "$" are tabs. 2098 (this is for C. For other language, you should use its own comment 2099 line.) 2100 Once commited to the CVS repository, this line will contain its 2101 version number (see, for example, at the top of this file). This 2102 would make it easy to report a bug. 2103- when creating a new file with the WIDE copyright, tap "make copyright.c" at 2104 the top-level, and use copyright.c as a template. KAME RCS tag will be 2105 included automatically. 2106- when editting a third-party package, keep its own coding style as 2107 much as possible, even if the style does not follow the items above. 2108- it is recommended to always wrap an expression containing 2109 bitwise operators by parentheses, especially when the expression is 2110 combined with relational operators, in order to avoid unintentional 2111 mismatch of operators. Thus, we should write 2112 if ((a & b) == 0) /* (A) */ 2113 or 2114 if (a & (b == 0)) /* (B) */ 2115 instead of 2116 if (a & b == 0) /* (C) */ 2117 even if the programmer's intention was (C), which is equivalent to 2118 (B) according to the grammar of the language C. 2119 Thus, we should write a code to test if a bit-flag is set for a 2120 given variable as follows: 2121 if ((flag & FLAG_A) == 0) /* (D) the FLAG_A is NOT set */ 2122 if ((flag & FLAG_A) != 0) /* (E) the FLAG_A is set */ 2123 Some developers in the KAME project rather prefer the following style: 2124 if (!(flag & FLAG_A)) /* (F) the FLAG_A is NOT set */ 2125 if ((flag & FLAG_A)) /* (G) the FLAG_A is set */ 2126 because it would be more intuitive in terms of the relationship 2127 between the negation operator (!) and the semantics of the 2128 condition. The KAME developers have discussed the style, and have 2129 agreed that all the styles from (D) to (G) are valid. So, when you 2130 see styles like (D) and (E) in the KAME code and feel a bit strange, 2131 please just keep them. They are intentional. 2132- When inserting a separate block just to define some intra-block 2133 variables, add the level of indentation as if the block was in a 2134 control statement such as if-else, for, or while. For example, 2135 foo () 2136 { 2137 int a; 2138 2139 { 2140 int internal_a; 2141 ... 2142 } 2143 } 2144 should be used, instead of 2145 foo () 2146 { 2147 int a; 2148 2149 { 2150 int internal_a; 2151 ... 2152 } 2153 } 2154- Do not use printf() or log() in the packet input path of the kernel code. 2155 They can make the system vulnerable to packet flooding attacks (results in 2156 /var overflow). 2157- (not a style issue) 2158 To disable a module that is mistakenly imported (by CVS), just 2159 remove the source tree in the repository. Note, however, that the 2160 removal might annoy other developers who have already checked the 2161 module out, so you should announce the removal as soon as possible. 2162 Also, be 100% sure not to remove other modules. 2163 2164When you want to contribute something to the KAME project, and if *you 2165do not mind* the agreement, it would be helpful for the project to 2166keep these rules. Note, however, that we would never intend to force 2167you to adopt our rules. We would rather regard your own style, 2168especially when you have a policy about the style. 2169 2170 21719. Policy on technology with intellectual property right restriction 2172 2173There are quite a few IETF documents/whatever which has intellectual property 2174right (IPR) restriction. KAME's stance is stated below. 2175 2176 The goal of KAME is to provide freely redistributable, BSD-licensed, 2177 implementation of Internet protocol technologies. 2178 For this purpose, we implement protocols that (1) do not need license 2179 contract with IPR holder, and (2) are royalty-free. 2180 The reason for (1) is, even if KAME contracts with the IPR holder in 2181 question, the users of KAME stack (usually implementers of some other 2182 codebase) would need to make a license contract with the IPR holder. 2183 It would damage the "freely redistributable" status of KAME codebase. 2184 2185 By doing so KAME is (implicitly) trying to advocate no-license-contract, 2186 royalty-free, release of IPRs. 2187 2188Note however, as documented in README, we do not guarantee that KAME code 2189is free of IPR infringement, you MUST check it if you are to integrate 2190KAME into your product (or whatever): 2191 READ CAREFULLY: Several countries have legal enforcement for 2192 export/import/use of cryptographic software. Check it before playing 2193 with the kit. We do not intend to be your legalease clearing house 2194 (NO WARRANTY). If you intend to include KAME stack into your product, 2195 you'll need to check if the licenses on each file fit your situations, 2196 and/or possible intellectual property right issues. 2197 2198 <end of IMPLEMENTATION> 2199