xref: /freebsd/sbin/mount_nullfs/mount_nullfs.8 (revision a8445737e740901f5f2c8d24c12ef7fc8b00134e)
1.\"
2.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
3.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
4.\"
5.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by
6.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
7.\"
8.\"
9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
11.\" are met:
12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
13.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
16.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
17.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
18.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
19.\"	This product includes software developed by the University of
20.\"	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
21.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
22.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
23.\"    without specific prior written permission.
24.\"
25.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
26.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
27.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
28.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
29.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
30.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
31.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
32.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
33.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
34.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
35.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
36.\"
37.\"     @(#)mount_null.8	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95
38.\"	$Id: mount_null.8,v 1.8 1997/03/11 12:33:34 peter Exp $
39.\"
40.Dd May 1, 1995
41.Dt MOUNT_NULL 8
42.Os BSD 4.4
43.Sh NAME
44.Nm mount_null
45.Nd mount a loopback filesystem sub-tree;
46demonstrate the use of a null file system layer
47.Sh SYNOPSIS
48.Nm mount_null
49.Op Fl o Ar options
50.Ar target
51.Ar mount-point
52.Sh DESCRIPTION
53The
54.Nm
55command creates a
56null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system
57name space under another part of the global file system namespace.
58This allows existing files and directories to be accessed
59using a different pathname.
60.Pp
61The primary differences between a virtual copy of the filesystem
62and a symbolic link are that
63.Xr getcwd 3
64functions correctly in the virtual copy, and that other filesystems
65may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original.
66A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by
67.Xr stat 2 ,
68but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original.
69.Pp
70The
71.Nm
72filesystem differs from a traditional
73loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using
74a stackable layers techniques, and it's
75.Do
76null-node
77.Dc s
78stack above
79all lower-layer vnodes, not just over directory vnodes.
80.Pp
81The options are as follows:
82.Bl -tag -width indent
83.It Fl o
84Options are specified with a
85.Fl o
86flag followed by a comma separated string of options.
87See the
88.Xr mount 8
89man page for possible options and their meanings.
90.El
91.Pp
92The null layer has two purposes.
93First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer
94which does nothing.
95(It actually does everything the loopback file system does,
96which is slightly more than nothing.)
97Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer.
98Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
99new file system layers can be created very easily be starting
100with a null layer.
101.Pp
102The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis
103for constructing new layers.
104.\"
105.\"
106.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
107New null layers are created with
108.Xr mount_null 8 .
109.Xr Mount_null 8
110takes two arguments, the pathname
111of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
112layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn).  After
113the null layer is put into place, the contents
114of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn.
115.\"
116.\"
117.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
118The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
119simply bypassing all possible operations to the lower layer
120for processing there.  The majority of its activity centers
121on the bypass routine, though which nearly all vnode operations
122pass.
123.Pp
124The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
125handling by the lower layer.  It begins by examining vnode
126operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their
127lower-layer equivalents.  It then invokes the operation
128on the lower layer.  Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
129in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
130stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
131.Pp
132Although bypass handles most operations,
133.Em vop_getattr ,
134.Em vop_inactive ,
135.Em vop_reclaim ,
136and
137.Em vop_print
138are not bypassed.
139.Em Vop_getattr
140must change the fsid being returned.
141.Em Vop_inactive
142and vop_reclaim are not bypassed so that
143they can handle freeing null-layer specific data.
144.Em Vop_print
145is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging
146information.
147.\"
148.\"
149.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
150Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
151in effect stacking two VFSes.  Vnode stacks are instead
152created on demand as files are accessed.
153.Pp
154The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
155root of the new null layer.  All other vnode stacks
156are created as a result of vnode operations on
157this or other null vnode stacks.
158.Pp
159New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
160an operation which returns a vnode.
161The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
162vnode before returning it to the caller.
163.Pp
164For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
165.Bd -literal -offset indent
166mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null
167.Ed
168Changing directory to
169.Pa /dev/layer/null
170will assign
171the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
172Now consider opening
173.Pa sys .
174A vop_lookup would be
175done on the root null-node.  This operation would bypass through
176to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing
177the UFS
178.Pa sys .
179Null_bypass then builds a null-node
180aliasing the UFS
181.Pa sys
182and returns this to the caller.
183Later operations on the null-node
184.Pa sys
185will repeat this
186process when constructing other vnode stacks.
187.\"
188.\"
189.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
190One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
191a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
192then begin modifying the copy.
193.Xr Sed 1
194can be used to easily rename
195all variables.
196.Pp
197The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
198null layer.
199.\"
200.\"
201.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
202There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
203when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.  Each method
204is appropriate in different situations.  In both cases,
205it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
206the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer
207by mapping an vnode arguments to the lower layer.
208.Pp
209The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
210This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
211currently being handled on the lower layer.  It has the advantage
212the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
213An example of this is
214.Em null_getattrs
215in the null layer.
216.Pp
217A second approach is to directly invoked vnode operations on
218the lower layer with the
219.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME
220interface.
221The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
222arbitrary operations on the lower layer.  The disadvantage
223is that vnodes arguments must be manually mapped.
224.\"
225.\"
226.Sh SEE ALSO
227.Xr mount 8
228.sp
229UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056,
230.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" .
231.Sh HISTORY
232The
233.Nm
234utility first appeared in
235.Bx 4.4 .
236