1.\" 2.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994 3.\" The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. 4.\" 5.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by 6.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project. 7.\" 8.\" 9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 11.\" are met: 12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 13.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 15.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the 16.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. 17.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors 18.\" may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software 19.\" without specific prior written permission. 20.\" 21.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND 22.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE 23.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 24.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE 25.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 26.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS 27.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) 28.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT 29.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY 30.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF 31.\" SUCH DAMAGE. 32.\" 33.\" @(#)mount_null.8 8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95 34.\" $FreeBSD$ 35.\" 36.Dd May 6, 2022 37.Dt MOUNT_NULLFS 8 38.Os 39.Sh NAME 40.Nm mount_nullfs 41.Nd "mount a loopback file system sub-tree; demonstrate the use of a null file system layer" 42.Sh SYNOPSIS 43.Nm 44.Op Fl o Ar options 45.Ar target 46.Ar mount-point 47.Sh DESCRIPTION 48The 49.Nm 50utility creates a 51null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system 52name space under another part of the global file system namespace. 53This allows existing files and directories to be accessed 54using a different pathname. 55.Pp 56The primary differences between a virtual copy of the file system 57and a symbolic link are that the 58.Xr getcwd 3 59functions work correctly in the virtual copy, and that other file systems 60may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original. 61A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by 62.Xr stat 2 , 63but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original. 64.Pp 65The 66.Nm 67file system differs from a traditional 68loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using 69a stackable layers techniques, and its 70.Do null-node Dc Ns s 71stack above 72all lower-layer vnodes, not just over directory vnodes. 73.Pp 74The options are as follows: 75.Bl -tag -width indent 76.It Fl o 77Options are specified with a 78.Fl o 79flag followed by a comma separated string of options. 80See the 81.Xr mount 8 82man page for possible options and their meanings. 83Additionally the following option is supported: 84.Bl -tag -width indent 85.It Cm nocache 86Disable metadata caching in the null layer. 87Some lower-layer file systems may force this option. 88Depending on the access pattern, 89this may result in increased lock contention. 90.El 91.El 92.Pp 93The null layer has two purposes. 94First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer 95which does nothing. 96(It actually does everything the loopback file system does, 97which is slightly more than nothing.) 98Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer. 99Since it provides all necessary layer framework, 100new file system layers can be created very easily by starting 101with a null layer. 102.Pp 103The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis 104for constructing new layers. 105.\" 106.\" 107.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS 108New null layers are created with 109.Nm . 110The 111.Nm 112utility takes two arguments, the pathname 113of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null 114layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn). 115After 116the null layer is put into place, the contents 117of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn. 118.\" 119.\" 120.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER 121The null layer is the minimum file system layer, 122simply bypassing all possible operations to the lower layer 123for processing there. 124The majority of its activity centers 125on the bypass routine, through which nearly all vnode operations 126pass. 127.Pp 128The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for 129handling by the lower layer. 130It begins by examining vnode 131operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their 132lower-layer equivalents. 133It then invokes the operation 134on the lower layer. 135Finally, it replaces the null-nodes 136in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation, 137stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode. 138.Pp 139Although bypass handles most operations, 140.Em vop_getattr , 141.Em vop_inactive , 142.Em vop_reclaim , 143and 144.Em vop_print 145are not bypassed. 146.Em Vop_getattr 147must change the fsid being returned. 148.Em Vop_inactive 149and 150.Em vop_reclaim 151are not bypassed so that 152they can handle freeing null-layer specific data. 153.Em Vop_print 154is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging 155information. 156.\" 157.\" 158.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS 159Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer, 160in effect stacking two VFSes. 161Vnode stacks are instead 162created on demand as files are accessed. 163.Pp 164The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the 165root of the new null layer. 166All other vnode stacks 167are created as a result of vnode operations on 168this or other null vnode stacks. 169.Pp 170New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of 171an operation which returns a vnode. 172The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new 173vnode before returning it to the caller. 174.Pp 175For example, imagine mounting a null layer with 176.Bd -literal -offset indent 177mount_nullfs /usr/include /dev/layer/null 178.Ed 179.Pp 180Changing directory to 181.Pa /dev/layer/null 182will assign 183the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted). 184Now consider opening 185.Pa sys . 186A vop_lookup would be 187done on the root null-node. 188This operation would bypass through 189to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing 190the UFS 191.Pa sys . 192Null_bypass then builds a null-node 193aliasing the UFS 194.Pa sys 195and returns this to the caller. 196Later operations on the null-node 197.Pa sys 198will repeat this 199process when constructing other vnode stacks. 200.\" 201.\" 202.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS 203One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make 204a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and 205then begin modifying the copy. 206The 207.Xr sed 1 208utility can be used to easily rename 209all variables. 210.Pp 211The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the 212null layer. 213.\" 214.\" 215.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS 216There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer 217when the operation cannot be completely bypassed. 218Each method 219is appropriate in different situations. 220In both cases, 221it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make 222the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer 223by mapping a vnode argument to the lower layer. 224.Pp 225The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine. 226This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation 227currently being handled on the lower layer. 228It has the advantage that 229the bypass routine already must do argument mapping. 230An example of this is 231.Em null_getattrs 232in the null layer. 233.Pp 234A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on 235the lower layer with the 236.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME 237interface. 238The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke 239arbitrary operations on the lower layer. 240The disadvantage 241is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped. 242.\" 243.\" 244.Sh SEE ALSO 245.Xr mount 8 246.Pp 247UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056, 248.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" . 249.Sh HISTORY 250The 251.Nm mount_null 252utility first appeared in 253.Bx 4.4 . 254It was renamed to 255.Nm 256in 257.Fx 5.0 . 258