xref: /freebsd/sbin/mount_nullfs/mount_nullfs.8 (revision a2464ee12761660f50d0b6f59f233949ebcacc87)
1.\"
2.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
3.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
4.\"
5.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by
6.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
7.\"
8.\"
9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
11.\" are met:
12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
13.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
16.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
17.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
18.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
19.\"    without specific prior written permission.
20.\"
21.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
22.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
23.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
24.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
25.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
26.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
27.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
28.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
29.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
30.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
31.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
32.\"
33.\"     @(#)mount_null.8	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95
34.\" $FreeBSD$
35.\"
36.Dd May 6, 2022
37.Dt MOUNT_NULLFS 8
38.Os
39.Sh NAME
40.Nm mount_nullfs
41.Nd "mount a loopback file system sub-tree; demonstrate the use of a null file system layer"
42.Sh SYNOPSIS
43.Nm
44.Op Fl o Ar options
45.Ar target
46.Ar mount-point
47.Sh DESCRIPTION
48The
49.Nm
50utility creates a
51null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system
52name space under another part of the global file system namespace.
53This allows existing files and directories to be accessed
54using a different pathname.
55.Pp
56The primary differences between a virtual copy of the file system
57and a symbolic link are that the
58.Xr getcwd 3
59functions work correctly in the virtual copy, and that other file systems
60may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original.
61A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by
62.Xr stat 2 ,
63but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original.
64.Pp
65The
66.Nm
67file system differs from a traditional
68loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using
69a stackable layers techniques, and its
70.Do null-node Dc Ns s
71stack above
72all lower-layer vnodes, not just over directory vnodes.
73.Pp
74The options are as follows:
75.Bl -tag -width indent
76.It Fl o
77Options are specified with a
78.Fl o
79flag followed by a comma separated string of options.
80See the
81.Xr mount 8
82man page for possible options and their meanings.
83Additionally the following option is supported:
84.Bl -tag -width indent
85.It Cm nocache
86Disable metadata caching in the null layer.
87Some lower-layer file systems may force this option.
88Depending on the access pattern,
89this may result in increased lock contention.
90.El
91.El
92.Pp
93The null layer has two purposes.
94First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer
95which does nothing.
96(It actually does everything the loopback file system does,
97which is slightly more than nothing.)
98Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer.
99Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
100new file system layers can be created very easily by starting
101with a null layer.
102.Pp
103The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis
104for constructing new layers.
105.\"
106.\"
107.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
108New null layers are created with
109.Nm .
110The
111.Nm
112utility takes two arguments, the pathname
113of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
114layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn).
115After
116the null layer is put into place, the contents
117of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn.
118.\"
119.\"
120.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
121The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
122simply bypassing all possible operations to the lower layer
123for processing there.
124The majority of its activity centers
125on the bypass routine, through which nearly all vnode operations
126pass.
127.Pp
128The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
129handling by the lower layer.
130It begins by examining vnode
131operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their
132lower-layer equivalents.
133It then invokes the operation
134on the lower layer.
135Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
136in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
137stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
138.Pp
139Although bypass handles most operations,
140.Em vop_getattr ,
141.Em vop_inactive ,
142.Em vop_reclaim ,
143and
144.Em vop_print
145are not bypassed.
146.Em Vop_getattr
147must change the fsid being returned.
148.Em Vop_inactive
149and
150.Em vop_reclaim
151are not bypassed so that
152they can handle freeing null-layer specific data.
153.Em Vop_print
154is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging
155information.
156.\"
157.\"
158.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
159Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
160in effect stacking two VFSes.
161Vnode stacks are instead
162created on demand as files are accessed.
163.Pp
164The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
165root of the new null layer.
166All other vnode stacks
167are created as a result of vnode operations on
168this or other null vnode stacks.
169.Pp
170New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
171an operation which returns a vnode.
172The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
173vnode before returning it to the caller.
174.Pp
175For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
176.Bd -literal -offset indent
177mount_nullfs /usr/include /dev/layer/null
178.Ed
179.Pp
180Changing directory to
181.Pa /dev/layer/null
182will assign
183the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
184Now consider opening
185.Pa sys .
186A vop_lookup would be
187done on the root null-node.
188This operation would bypass through
189to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing
190the UFS
191.Pa sys .
192Null_bypass then builds a null-node
193aliasing the UFS
194.Pa sys
195and returns this to the caller.
196Later operations on the null-node
197.Pa sys
198will repeat this
199process when constructing other vnode stacks.
200.\"
201.\"
202.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
203One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
204a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
205then begin modifying the copy.
206The
207.Xr sed 1
208utility can be used to easily rename
209all variables.
210.Pp
211The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
212null layer.
213.\"
214.\"
215.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
216There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
217when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.
218Each method
219is appropriate in different situations.
220In both cases,
221it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
222the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer
223by mapping a vnode argument to the lower layer.
224.Pp
225The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
226This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
227currently being handled on the lower layer.
228It has the advantage that
229the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
230An example of this is
231.Em null_getattrs
232in the null layer.
233.Pp
234A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on
235the lower layer with the
236.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME
237interface.
238The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
239arbitrary operations on the lower layer.
240The disadvantage
241is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped.
242.\"
243.\"
244.Sh SEE ALSO
245.Xr mount 8
246.Pp
247UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056,
248.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" .
249.Sh HISTORY
250The
251.Nm mount_null
252utility first appeared in
253.Bx 4.4 .
254It was renamed to
255.Nm
256in
257.Fx 5.0 .
258