1.\" 2.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994 3.\" The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. 4.\" 5.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by 6.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project. 7.\" 8.\" 9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 11.\" are met: 12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 13.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 15.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the 16.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. 17.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors 18.\" may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software 19.\" without specific prior written permission. 20.\" 21.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND 22.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE 23.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 24.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE 25.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 26.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS 27.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) 28.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT 29.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY 30.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF 31.\" SUCH DAMAGE. 32.\" 33.\" @(#)mount_null.8 8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95 34.\" $FreeBSD$ 35.\" 36.Dd April 22, 2022 37.Dt MOUNT_NULLFS 8 38.Os 39.Sh NAME 40.Nm mount_nullfs 41.Nd "mount a loopback file system sub-tree; demonstrate the use of a null file system layer" 42.Sh SYNOPSIS 43.Nm 44.Op Fl o Ar options 45.Ar target 46.Ar mount-point 47.Sh DESCRIPTION 48The 49.Nm 50utility creates a 51null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system 52name space under another part of the global file system namespace. 53This allows existing files and directories to be accessed 54using a different pathname. 55.Pp 56The primary differences between a virtual copy of the file system 57and a symbolic link are that the 58.Xr getcwd 3 59functions work correctly in the virtual copy, and that other file systems 60may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original. 61A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by 62.Xr stat 2 , 63but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original. 64.Pp 65The 66.Nm 67file system differs from a traditional 68loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using 69a stackable layers techniques, and its 70.Do null-node Dc Ns s 71stack above 72all lower-layer vnodes, not just over directory vnodes. 73.Pp 74The options are as follows: 75.Bl -tag -width indent 76.It Fl o 77Options are specified with a 78.Fl o 79flag followed by a comma separated string of options. 80See the 81.Xr mount 8 82man page for possible options and their meanings. 83Additionally the following option is supported: 84.Bl -tag -width indent 85.It Cm nocache 86Disable caching in the null layer. 87Some lower-layer file systems may force this option. 88.El 89.El 90.Pp 91The null layer has two purposes. 92First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer 93which does nothing. 94(It actually does everything the loopback file system does, 95which is slightly more than nothing.) 96Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer. 97Since it provides all necessary layer framework, 98new file system layers can be created very easily by starting 99with a null layer. 100.Pp 101The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis 102for constructing new layers. 103.\" 104.\" 105.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS 106New null layers are created with 107.Nm . 108The 109.Nm 110utility takes two arguments, the pathname 111of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null 112layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn). 113After 114the null layer is put into place, the contents 115of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn. 116.\" 117.\" 118.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER 119The null layer is the minimum file system layer, 120simply bypassing all possible operations to the lower layer 121for processing there. 122The majority of its activity centers 123on the bypass routine, through which nearly all vnode operations 124pass. 125.Pp 126The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for 127handling by the lower layer. 128It begins by examining vnode 129operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their 130lower-layer equivalents. 131It then invokes the operation 132on the lower layer. 133Finally, it replaces the null-nodes 134in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation, 135stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode. 136.Pp 137Although bypass handles most operations, 138.Em vop_getattr , 139.Em vop_inactive , 140.Em vop_reclaim , 141and 142.Em vop_print 143are not bypassed. 144.Em Vop_getattr 145must change the fsid being returned. 146.Em Vop_inactive 147and 148.Em vop_reclaim 149are not bypassed so that 150they can handle freeing null-layer specific data. 151.Em Vop_print 152is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging 153information. 154.\" 155.\" 156.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS 157Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer, 158in effect stacking two VFSes. 159Vnode stacks are instead 160created on demand as files are accessed. 161.Pp 162The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the 163root of the new null layer. 164All other vnode stacks 165are created as a result of vnode operations on 166this or other null vnode stacks. 167.Pp 168New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of 169an operation which returns a vnode. 170The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new 171vnode before returning it to the caller. 172.Pp 173For example, imagine mounting a null layer with 174.Bd -literal -offset indent 175mount_nullfs /usr/include /dev/layer/null 176.Ed 177.Pp 178Changing directory to 179.Pa /dev/layer/null 180will assign 181the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted). 182Now consider opening 183.Pa sys . 184A vop_lookup would be 185done on the root null-node. 186This operation would bypass through 187to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing 188the UFS 189.Pa sys . 190Null_bypass then builds a null-node 191aliasing the UFS 192.Pa sys 193and returns this to the caller. 194Later operations on the null-node 195.Pa sys 196will repeat this 197process when constructing other vnode stacks. 198.\" 199.\" 200.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS 201One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make 202a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and 203then begin modifying the copy. 204The 205.Xr sed 1 206utility can be used to easily rename 207all variables. 208.Pp 209The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the 210null layer. 211.\" 212.\" 213.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS 214There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer 215when the operation cannot be completely bypassed. 216Each method 217is appropriate in different situations. 218In both cases, 219it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make 220the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer 221by mapping a vnode argument to the lower layer. 222.Pp 223The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine. 224This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation 225currently being handled on the lower layer. 226It has the advantage that 227the bypass routine already must do argument mapping. 228An example of this is 229.Em null_getattrs 230in the null layer. 231.Pp 232A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on 233the lower layer with the 234.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME 235interface. 236The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke 237arbitrary operations on the lower layer. 238The disadvantage 239is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped. 240.\" 241.\" 242.Sh SEE ALSO 243.Xr mount 8 244.Pp 245UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056, 246.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" . 247.Sh HISTORY 248The 249.Nm mount_null 250utility first appeared in 251.Bx 4.4 . 252It was renamed to 253.Nm 254in 255.Fx 5.0 . 256