xref: /freebsd/lib/msun/man/ieee.3 (revision 2e3f49888ec8851bafb22011533217487764fdb0)
1.\" Copyright (c) 1985 Regents of the University of California.
2.\" All rights reserved.
3.\"
4.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
5.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
6.\" are met:
7.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
8.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
9.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
10.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
11.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
12.\" 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
13.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
14.\"    without specific prior written permission.
15.\"
16.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
17.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
18.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
19.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
20.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
21.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
22.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
23.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
24.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
25.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
26.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
27.\"
28.Dd January 26, 2005
29.Dt IEEE 3
30.Os
31.Sh NAME
32.Nm ieee
33.Nd IEEE standard 754 for floating-point arithmetic
34.Sh DESCRIPTION
35The IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic
36defines representations of floating-point numbers and abstract
37properties of arithmetic operations relating to precision,
38rounding, and exceptional cases, as described below.
39.Ss IEEE STANDARD 754 Floating-Point Arithmetic
40Radix: Binary.
41.Pp
42Overflow and underflow:
43.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
44Overflow goes by default to a signed \*(If.
45Underflow is
46.Em gradual .
47.Ed
48.Pp
49Zero is represented ambiguously as +0 or \-0.
50.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
51Its sign transforms correctly through multiplication or
52division, and is preserved by addition of zeros
53with like signs; but x\-x yields +0 for every
54finite x.
55The only operations that reveal zero's
56sign are division by zero and
57.Fn copysign x \(+-0 .
58In particular, comparison (x > y, x \(>= y, etc.)\&
59cannot be affected by the sign of zero; but if
60finite x = y then \*(If = 1/(x\-y) \(!= \-1/(y\-x) = \-\*(If.
61.Ed
62.Pp
63Infinity is signed.
64.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
65It persists when added to itself
66or to any finite number.
67Its sign transforms
68correctly through multiplication and division, and
69(finite)/\(+-\*(If\0=\0\(+-0
70(nonzero)/0 = \(+-\*(If.
71But
72\*(If\-\*(If, \*(If\(**0 and \*(If/\*(If
73are, like 0/0 and sqrt(\-3),
74invalid operations that produce \*(Na. ...
75.Ed
76.Pp
77Reserved operands (\*(Nas):
78.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
79An \*(Na is
80.Em ( N Ns ot Em a N Ns umber ) .
81Some \*(Nas, called Signaling \*(Nas, trap any floating-point operation
82performed upon them; they are used to mark missing
83or uninitialized values, or nonexistent elements
84of arrays.
85The rest are Quiet \*(Nas; they are
86the default results of Invalid Operations, and
87propagate through subsequent arithmetic operations.
88If x \(!= x then x is \*(Na; every other predicate
89(x > y, x = y, x < y, ...) is FALSE if \*(Na is involved.
90.Ed
91.Pp
92Rounding:
93.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
94Every algebraic operation (+, \-, \(**, /,
95\(sr)
96is rounded by default to within half an
97.Em ulp ,
98and when the rounding error is exactly half an
99.Em ulp
100then
101the rounded value's least significant bit is zero.
102(An
103.Em ulp
104is one
105.Em U Ns nit
106in the
107.Em L Ns ast
108.Em P Ns lace . )
109This kind of rounding is usually the best kind,
110sometimes provably so; for instance, for every
111x = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, ..., 2.0**52, we find
112(x/3.0)\(**3.0 == x and (x/10.0)\(**10.0 == x and ...
113despite that both the quotients and the products
114have been rounded.
115Only rounding like IEEE 754 can do that.
116But no single kind of rounding can be
117proved best for every circumstance, so IEEE 754
118provides rounding towards zero or towards
119+\*(If or towards \-\*(If
120at the programmer's option.
121.Ed
122.Pp
123Exceptions:
124.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
125IEEE 754 recognizes five kinds of floating-point exceptions,
126listed below in declining order of probable importance.
127.Bl -column -offset indent "Invalid Operation" "Gradual Underflow"
128.Em "Exception	Default Result"
129Invalid Operation	\*(Na, or FALSE
130Overflow	\(+-\*(If
131Divide by Zero	\(+-\*(If
132Underflow	Gradual Underflow
133Inexact	Rounded value
134.El
135.Pp
136NOTE: An Exception is not an Error unless handled
137badly.
138What makes a class of exceptions exceptional
139is that no single default response can be satisfactory
140in every instance.
141On the other hand, if a default
142response will serve most instances satisfactorily,
143the unsatisfactory instances cannot justify aborting
144computation every time the exception occurs.
145.Ed
146.Ss Data Formats
147Single-precision:
148.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
149Type name:
150.Vt float
151.Pp
152Wordsize: 32 bits.
153.Pp
154Precision: 24 significant bits,
155roughly like 7 significant decimals.
156.Pp
157If x and x' are consecutive positive single-precision
158numbers (they differ by 1
159.Em ulp ) ,
160then
161.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
1625.9e\-08 < 0.5**24 < (x'\-x)/x \(<= 0.5**23 < 1.2e\-07.
163.El
164.Pp
165.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
166Range:	Overflow threshold  = 2.0**128 = 3.4e38
167	Underflow threshold = 0.5**126 = 1.2e\-38
168.El
169.Pp
170Underflowed results round to the nearest
171integer multiple of
172.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
1730.5**149 = 1.4e\-45.
174.El
175.Ed
176.Pp
177Double-precision:
178.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
179Type name:
180.Vt double
181.Po On some architectures,
182.Vt long double
183is the same as
184.Vt double
185.Pc
186.Pp
187Wordsize: 64 bits.
188.Pp
189Precision: 53 significant bits,
190roughly like 16 significant decimals.
191.Pp
192If x and x' are consecutive positive double-precision
193numbers (they differ by 1
194.Em ulp ) ,
195then
196.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
1971.1e\-16 < 0.5**53 < (x'\-x)/x \(<= 0.5**52 < 2.3e\-16.
198.El
199.Pp
200.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
201Range:	Overflow threshold  = 2.0**1024 = 1.8e308
202	Underflow threshold = 0.5**1022 = 2.2e\-308
203.El
204.Pp
205Underflowed results round to the nearest
206integer multiple of
207.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
2080.5**1074 = 4.9e\-324.
209.El
210.Ed
211.Pp
212Extended-precision:
213.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
214Type name:
215.Vt long double
216(when supported by the hardware)
217.Pp
218Wordsize: 96 bits.
219.Pp
220Precision: 64 significant bits,
221roughly like 19 significant decimals.
222.Pp
223If x and x' are consecutive positive extended-precision
224numbers (they differ by 1
225.Em ulp ) ,
226then
227.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
2281.0e\-19 < 0.5**63 < (x'\-x)/x \(<= 0.5**62 < 2.2e\-19.
229.El
230.Pp
231.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
232Range:	Overflow threshold  = 2.0**16384 = 1.2e4932
233	Underflow threshold = 0.5**16382 = 3.4e\-4932
234.El
235.Pp
236Underflowed results round to the nearest
237integer multiple of
238.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
2390.5**16445 = 5.7e\-4953.
240.El
241.Ed
242.Pp
243Quad-extended-precision:
244.Bd -ragged -offset indent -compact
245Type name:
246.Vt long double
247(when supported by the hardware)
248.Pp
249Wordsize: 128 bits.
250.Pp
251Precision: 113 significant bits,
252roughly like 34 significant decimals.
253.Pp
254If x and x' are consecutive positive quad-extended-precision
255numbers (they differ by 1
256.Em ulp ) ,
257then
258.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
2599.6e\-35 < 0.5**113 < (x'\-x)/x \(<= 0.5**112 < 2.0e\-34.
260.El
261.Pp
262.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
263Range:	Overflow threshold  = 2.0**16384 = 1.2e4932
264	Underflow threshold = 0.5**16382 = 3.4e\-4932
265.El
266.Pp
267Underflowed results round to the nearest
268integer multiple of
269.Bl -column "XXX" -compact
2700.5**16494 = 6.5e\-4966.
271.El
272.Ed
273.Ss Additional Information Regarding Exceptions
274For each kind of floating-point exception, IEEE 754
275provides a Flag that is raised each time its exception
276is signaled, and stays raised until the program resets
277it.
278Programs may also test, save and restore a flag.
279Thus, IEEE 754 provides three ways by which programs
280may cope with exceptions for which the default result
281might be unsatisfactory:
282.Bl -enum
283.It
284Test for a condition that might cause an exception
285later, and branch to avoid the exception.
286.It
287Test a flag to see whether an exception has occurred
288since the program last reset its flag.
289.It
290Test a result to see whether it is a value that only
291an exception could have produced.
292.Pp
293CAUTION: The only reliable ways to discover
294whether Underflow has occurred are to test whether
295products or quotients lie closer to zero than the
296underflow threshold, or to test the Underflow
297flag.
298(Sums and differences cannot underflow in
299IEEE 754; if x \(!= y then x\-y is correct to
300full precision and certainly nonzero regardless of
301how tiny it may be.)
302Products and quotients that
303underflow gradually can lose accuracy gradually
304without vanishing, so comparing them with zero
305(as one might on a VAX) will not reveal the loss.
306Fortunately, if a gradually underflowed value is
307destined to be added to something bigger than the
308underflow threshold, as is almost always the case,
309digits lost to gradual underflow will not be missed
310because they would have been rounded off anyway.
311So gradual underflows are usually
312.Em provably
313ignorable.
314The same cannot be said of underflows flushed to 0.
315.El
316.Pp
317At the option of an implementor conforming to IEEE 754,
318other ways to cope with exceptions may be provided:
319.Bl -enum
320.It
321ABORT.
322This mechanism classifies an exception in
323advance as an incident to be handled by means
324traditionally associated with error-handling
325statements like "ON ERROR GO TO ...".
326Different
327languages offer different forms of this statement,
328but most share the following characteristics:
329.Bl -dash
330.It
331No means is provided to substitute a value for
332the offending operation's result and resume
333computation from what may be the middle of an
334expression.
335An exceptional result is abandoned.
336.It
337In a subprogram that lacks an error-handling
338statement, an exception causes the subprogram to
339abort within whatever program called it, and so
340on back up the chain of calling subprograms until
341an error-handling statement is encountered or the
342whole task is aborted and memory is dumped.
343.El
344.It
345STOP.
346This mechanism, requiring an interactive
347debugging environment, is more for the programmer
348than the program.
349It classifies an exception in
350advance as a symptom of a programmer's error; the
351exception suspends execution as near as it can to
352the offending operation so that the programmer can
353look around to see how it happened.
354Quite often
355the first several exceptions turn out to be quite
356unexceptionable, so the programmer ought ideally
357to be able to resume execution after each one as if
358execution had not been stopped.
359.It
360\&... Other ways lie beyond the scope of this document.
361.El
362.Pp
363Ideally, each
364elementary function should act as if it were indivisible, or
365atomic, in the sense that ...
366.Bl -enum
367.It
368No exception should be signaled that is not deserved by
369the data supplied to that function.
370.It
371Any exception signaled should be identified with that
372function rather than with one of its subroutines.
373.It
374The internal behavior of an atomic function should not
375be disrupted when a calling program changes from
376one to another of the five or so ways of handling
377exceptions listed above, although the definition
378of the function may be correlated intentionally
379with exception handling.
380.El
381.Pp
382The functions in
383.Nm libm
384are only approximately atomic.
385They signal no inappropriate exception except possibly ...
386.Bl -tag -width indent -offset indent -compact
387.It Xo
388Over/Underflow
389.Xc
390when a result, if properly computed, might have lain barely within range, and
391.It Xo
392Inexact in
393.Fn cabs ,
394.Fn cbrt ,
395.Fn hypot ,
396.Fn log10
397and
398.Fn pow
399.Xc
400when it happens to be exact, thanks to fortuitous cancellation of errors.
401.El
402Otherwise, ...
403.Bl -tag -width indent -offset indent -compact
404.It Xo
405Invalid Operation is signaled only when
406.Xc
407any result but \*(Na would probably be misleading.
408.It Xo
409Overflow is signaled only when
410.Xc
411the exact result would be finite but beyond the overflow threshold.
412.It Xo
413Divide-by-Zero is signaled only when
414.Xc
415a function takes exactly infinite values at finite operands.
416.It Xo
417Underflow is signaled only when
418.Xc
419the exact result would be nonzero but tinier than the underflow threshold.
420.It Xo
421Inexact is signaled only when
422.Xc
423greater range or precision would be needed to represent the exact result.
424.El
425.Sh SEE ALSO
426.Xr fenv 3 ,
427.Xr ieee_test 3 ,
428.Xr math 3
429.Pp
430An explanation of IEEE 754 and its proposed extension p854
431was published in the IEEE magazine MICRO in August 1984 under
432the title "A Proposed Radix- and Word-length-independent
433Standard for Floating-point Arithmetic" by
434.An "W. J. Cody"
435et al.
436The manuals for Pascal, C and BASIC on the Apple Macintosh
437document the features of IEEE 754 pretty well.
438Articles in the IEEE magazine COMPUTER vol.\& 14 no.\& 3 (Mar.\&
4391981), and in the ACM SIGNUM Newsletter Special Issue of
440Oct.\& 1979, may be helpful although they pertain to
441superseded drafts of the standard.
442.Sh STANDARDS
443.St -ieee754
444