xref: /freebsd/contrib/nvi/vi/v_undo.c (revision 9768746ba83efa02837c5b9c66348db6e900208f)
1 /*-
2  * Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
3  *	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
4  * Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996
5  *	Keith Bostic.  All rights reserved.
6  *
7  * See the LICENSE file for redistribution information.
8  */
9 
10 #include "config.h"
11 
12 #include <sys/types.h>
13 #include <sys/queue.h>
14 #include <sys/time.h>
15 
16 #include <bitstring.h>
17 #include <errno.h>
18 #include <limits.h>
19 #include <stdio.h>
20 #include <stdlib.h>
21 #include <string.h>
22 
23 #include "../common/common.h"
24 #include "vi.h"
25 
26 /*
27  * v_Undo -- U
28  *	Undo changes to this line.
29  *
30  * PUBLIC: int v_Undo(SCR *, VICMD *);
31  */
32 int
33 v_Undo(SCR *sp, VICMD *vp)
34 {
35 	/*
36 	 * Historically, U reset the cursor to the first column in the line
37 	 * (not the first non-blank).  This seems a bit non-intuitive, but,
38 	 * considering that we may have undone multiple changes, anything
39 	 * else (including the cursor position stored in the logging records)
40 	 * is going to appear random.
41 	 */
42 	vp->m_final.cno = 0;
43 
44 	/*
45 	 * !!!
46 	 * Set up the flags so that an immediately subsequent 'u' will roll
47 	 * forward, instead of backward.  In historic vi, a 'u' following a
48 	 * 'U' redid all of the changes to the line.  Given that the user has
49 	 * explicitly discarded those changes by entering 'U', it seems likely
50 	 * that the user wants something between the original and end forms of
51 	 * the line, so starting to replay the changes seems the best way to
52 	 * get to there.
53 	 */
54 	F_SET(sp->ep, F_UNDO);
55 	sp->ep->lundo = BACKWARD;
56 
57 	return (log_setline(sp));
58 }
59 
60 /*
61  * v_undo -- u
62  *	Undo the last change.
63  *
64  * PUBLIC: int v_undo(SCR *, VICMD *);
65  */
66 int
67 v_undo(SCR *sp, VICMD *vp)
68 {
69 	EXF *ep;
70 
71 	/* Set the command count. */
72 	VIP(sp)->u_ccnt = sp->ccnt;
73 
74 	/*
75 	 * !!!
76 	 * In historic vi, 'u' toggled between "undo" and "redo", i.e. 'u'
77 	 * undid the last undo.  However, if there has been a change since
78 	 * the last undo/redo, we always do an undo.  To make this work when
79 	 * the user can undo multiple operations, we leave the old semantic
80 	 * unchanged, but make '.' after a 'u' do another undo/redo operation.
81 	 * This has two problems.
82 	 *
83 	 * The first is that 'u' didn't set '.' in historic vi.  So, if a
84 	 * user made a change, realized it was in the wrong place, does a
85 	 * 'u' to undo it, moves to the right place and then does '.', the
86 	 * change was reapplied.  To make this work, we only apply the '.'
87 	 * to the undo command if it's the command immediately following an
88 	 * undo command.  See vi/vi.c:getcmd() for the details.
89 	 *
90 	 * The second is that the traditional way to view the numbered cut
91 	 * buffers in vi was to enter the commands "1pu.u.u.u. which will
92 	 * no longer work because the '.' immediately follows the 'u' command.
93 	 * Since we provide a much better method of viewing buffers, and
94 	 * nobody can think of a better way of adding in multiple undo, this
95 	 * remains broken.
96 	 *
97 	 * !!!
98 	 * There is change to historic practice for the final cursor position
99 	 * in this implementation.  In historic vi, if an undo was isolated to
100 	 * a single line, the cursor moved to the start of the change, and
101 	 * then, subsequent 'u' commands would not move it again. (It has been
102 	 * pointed out that users used multiple undo commands to get the cursor
103 	 * to the start of the changed text.)  Nvi toggles between the cursor
104 	 * position before and after the change was made.  One final issue is
105 	 * that historic vi only did this if the user had not moved off of the
106 	 * line before entering the undo command; otherwise, vi would move the
107 	 * cursor to the most attractive position on the changed line.
108 	 *
109 	 * It would be difficult to match historic practice in this area. You
110 	 * not only have to know that the changes were isolated to one line,
111 	 * but whether it was the first or second undo command as well.  And,
112 	 * to completely match historic practice, we'd have to track users line
113 	 * changes, too.  This isn't worth the effort.
114 	 */
115 	ep = sp->ep;
116 	if (!F_ISSET(ep, F_UNDO)) {
117 		F_SET(ep, F_UNDO);
118 		ep->lundo = BACKWARD;
119 	} else if (!F_ISSET(vp, VC_ISDOT))
120 		ep->lundo = ep->lundo == BACKWARD ? FORWARD : BACKWARD;
121 
122 	switch (ep->lundo) {
123 	case BACKWARD:
124 		return (log_backward(sp, &vp->m_final));
125 	case FORWARD:
126 		return (log_forward(sp, &vp->m_final));
127 	default:
128 		abort();
129 	}
130 	/* NOTREACHED */
131 }
132