1 //====- X86SpeculativeLoadHardening.cpp - A Spectre v1 mitigation ---------===// 2 // 3 // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. 4 // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. 5 // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception 6 // 7 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// 8 /// \file 9 /// 10 /// Provide a pass which mitigates speculative execution attacks which operate 11 /// by speculating incorrectly past some predicate (a type check, bounds check, 12 /// or other condition) to reach a load with invalid inputs and leak the data 13 /// accessed by that load using a side channel out of the speculative domain. 14 /// 15 /// For details on the attacks, see the first variant in both the Project Zero 16 /// writeup and the Spectre paper: 17 /// https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html 18 /// https://spectreattack.com/spectre.pdf 19 /// 20 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// 21 22 #include "X86.h" 23 #include "X86InstrBuilder.h" 24 #include "X86InstrInfo.h" 25 #include "X86Subtarget.h" 26 #include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" 27 #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" 28 #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" 29 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" 30 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h" 31 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" 32 #include "llvm/ADT/SparseBitVector.h" 33 #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" 34 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h" 35 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineConstantPool.h" 36 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h" 37 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h" 38 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h" 39 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h" 40 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h" 41 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h" 42 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h" 43 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineSSAUpdater.h" 44 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h" 45 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetRegisterInfo.h" 46 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSchedule.h" 47 #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSubtargetInfo.h" 48 #include "llvm/IR/DebugLoc.h" 49 #include "llvm/MC/MCSchedule.h" 50 #include "llvm/Pass.h" 51 #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" 52 #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" 53 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" 54 #include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h" 55 #include <algorithm> 56 #include <cassert> 57 #include <iterator> 58 #include <optional> 59 #include <utility> 60 61 using namespace llvm; 62 63 #define PASS_KEY "x86-slh" 64 #define DEBUG_TYPE PASS_KEY 65 66 STATISTIC(NumCondBranchesTraced, "Number of conditional branches traced"); 67 STATISTIC(NumBranchesUntraced, "Number of branches unable to trace"); 68 STATISTIC(NumAddrRegsHardened, 69 "Number of address mode used registers hardaned"); 70 STATISTIC(NumPostLoadRegsHardened, 71 "Number of post-load register values hardened"); 72 STATISTIC(NumCallsOrJumpsHardened, 73 "Number of calls or jumps requiring extra hardening"); 74 STATISTIC(NumInstsInserted, "Number of instructions inserted"); 75 STATISTIC(NumLFENCEsInserted, "Number of lfence instructions inserted"); 76 77 static cl::opt<bool> EnableSpeculativeLoadHardening( 78 "x86-speculative-load-hardening", 79 cl::desc("Force enable speculative load hardening"), cl::init(false), 80 cl::Hidden); 81 82 static cl::opt<bool> HardenEdgesWithLFENCE( 83 PASS_KEY "-lfence", 84 cl::desc( 85 "Use LFENCE along each conditional edge to harden against speculative " 86 "loads rather than conditional movs and poisoned pointers."), 87 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); 88 89 static cl::opt<bool> EnablePostLoadHardening( 90 PASS_KEY "-post-load", 91 cl::desc("Harden the value loaded *after* it is loaded by " 92 "flushing the loaded bits to 1. This is hard to do " 93 "in general but can be done easily for GPRs."), 94 cl::init(true), cl::Hidden); 95 96 static cl::opt<bool> FenceCallAndRet( 97 PASS_KEY "-fence-call-and-ret", 98 cl::desc("Use a full speculation fence to harden both call and ret edges " 99 "rather than a lighter weight mitigation."), 100 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); 101 102 static cl::opt<bool> HardenInterprocedurally( 103 PASS_KEY "-ip", 104 cl::desc("Harden interprocedurally by passing our state in and out of " 105 "functions in the high bits of the stack pointer."), 106 cl::init(true), cl::Hidden); 107 108 static cl::opt<bool> 109 HardenLoads(PASS_KEY "-loads", 110 cl::desc("Sanitize loads from memory. When disable, no " 111 "significant security is provided."), 112 cl::init(true), cl::Hidden); 113 114 static cl::opt<bool> HardenIndirectCallsAndJumps( 115 PASS_KEY "-indirect", 116 cl::desc("Harden indirect calls and jumps against using speculatively " 117 "stored attacker controlled addresses. This is designed to " 118 "mitigate Spectre v1.2 style attacks."), 119 cl::init(true), cl::Hidden); 120 121 namespace { 122 123 class X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass : public MachineFunctionPass { 124 public: 125 X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) { } 126 127 StringRef getPassName() const override { 128 return "X86 speculative load hardening"; 129 } 130 bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override; 131 void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override; 132 133 /// Pass identification, replacement for typeid. 134 static char ID; 135 136 private: 137 /// The information about a block's conditional terminators needed to trace 138 /// our predicate state through the exiting edges. 139 struct BlockCondInfo { 140 MachineBasicBlock *MBB; 141 142 // We mostly have one conditional branch, and in extremely rare cases have 143 // two. Three and more are so rare as to be unimportant for compile time. 144 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 2> CondBrs; 145 146 MachineInstr *UncondBr; 147 }; 148 149 /// Manages the predicate state traced through the program. 150 struct PredState { 151 unsigned InitialReg = 0; 152 unsigned PoisonReg = 0; 153 154 const TargetRegisterClass *RC; 155 MachineSSAUpdater SSA; 156 157 PredState(MachineFunction &MF, const TargetRegisterClass *RC) 158 : RC(RC), SSA(MF) {} 159 }; 160 161 const X86Subtarget *Subtarget = nullptr; 162 MachineRegisterInfo *MRI = nullptr; 163 const X86InstrInfo *TII = nullptr; 164 const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = nullptr; 165 166 std::optional<PredState> PS; 167 168 void hardenEdgesWithLFENCE(MachineFunction &MF); 169 170 SmallVector<BlockCondInfo, 16> collectBlockCondInfo(MachineFunction &MF); 171 172 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> 173 tracePredStateThroughCFG(MachineFunction &MF, ArrayRef<BlockCondInfo> Infos); 174 175 void unfoldCallAndJumpLoads(MachineFunction &MF); 176 177 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> 178 tracePredStateThroughIndirectBranches(MachineFunction &MF); 179 180 void tracePredStateThroughBlocksAndHarden(MachineFunction &MF); 181 182 unsigned saveEFLAGS(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 183 MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 184 const DebugLoc &Loc); 185 void restoreEFLAGS(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 186 MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, const DebugLoc &Loc, 187 Register Reg); 188 189 void mergePredStateIntoSP(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 190 MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 191 const DebugLoc &Loc, unsigned PredStateReg); 192 unsigned extractPredStateFromSP(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 193 MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 194 const DebugLoc &Loc); 195 196 void 197 hardenLoadAddr(MachineInstr &MI, MachineOperand &BaseMO, 198 MachineOperand &IndexMO, 199 SmallDenseMap<unsigned, unsigned, 32> &AddrRegToHardenedReg); 200 MachineInstr * 201 sinkPostLoadHardenedInst(MachineInstr &MI, 202 SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &HardenedInstrs); 203 bool canHardenRegister(Register Reg); 204 unsigned hardenValueInRegister(Register Reg, MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 205 MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 206 const DebugLoc &Loc); 207 unsigned hardenPostLoad(MachineInstr &MI); 208 void hardenReturnInstr(MachineInstr &MI); 209 void tracePredStateThroughCall(MachineInstr &MI); 210 void hardenIndirectCallOrJumpInstr( 211 MachineInstr &MI, 212 SmallDenseMap<unsigned, unsigned, 32> &AddrRegToHardenedReg); 213 }; 214 215 } // end anonymous namespace 216 217 char X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::ID = 0; 218 219 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::getAnalysisUsage( 220 AnalysisUsage &AU) const { 221 MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU); 222 } 223 224 static MachineBasicBlock &splitEdge(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, 225 MachineBasicBlock &Succ, int SuccCount, 226 MachineInstr *Br, MachineInstr *&UncondBr, 227 const X86InstrInfo &TII) { 228 assert(!Succ.isEHPad() && "Shouldn't get edges to EH pads!"); 229 230 MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent(); 231 232 MachineBasicBlock &NewMBB = *MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock(); 233 234 // We have to insert the new block immediately after the current one as we 235 // don't know what layout-successor relationships the successor has and we 236 // may not be able to (and generally don't want to) try to fix those up. 237 MF.insert(std::next(MachineFunction::iterator(&MBB)), &NewMBB); 238 239 // Update the branch instruction if necessary. 240 if (Br) { 241 assert(Br->getOperand(0).getMBB() == &Succ && 242 "Didn't start with the right target!"); 243 Br->getOperand(0).setMBB(&NewMBB); 244 245 // If this successor was reached through a branch rather than fallthrough, 246 // we might have *broken* fallthrough and so need to inject a new 247 // unconditional branch. 248 if (!UncondBr) { 249 MachineBasicBlock &OldLayoutSucc = 250 *std::next(MachineFunction::iterator(&NewMBB)); 251 assert(MBB.isSuccessor(&OldLayoutSucc) && 252 "Without an unconditional branch, the old layout successor should " 253 "be an actual successor!"); 254 auto BrBuilder = 255 BuildMI(&MBB, DebugLoc(), TII.get(X86::JMP_1)).addMBB(&OldLayoutSucc); 256 // Update the unconditional branch now that we've added one. 257 UncondBr = &*BrBuilder; 258 } 259 260 // Insert unconditional "jump Succ" instruction in the new block if 261 // necessary. 262 if (!NewMBB.isLayoutSuccessor(&Succ)) { 263 SmallVector<MachineOperand, 4> Cond; 264 TII.insertBranch(NewMBB, &Succ, nullptr, Cond, Br->getDebugLoc()); 265 } 266 } else { 267 assert(!UncondBr && 268 "Cannot have a branchless successor and an unconditional branch!"); 269 assert(NewMBB.isLayoutSuccessor(&Succ) && 270 "A non-branch successor must have been a layout successor before " 271 "and now is a layout successor of the new block."); 272 } 273 274 // If this is the only edge to the successor, we can just replace it in the 275 // CFG. Otherwise we need to add a new entry in the CFG for the new 276 // successor. 277 if (SuccCount == 1) { 278 MBB.replaceSuccessor(&Succ, &NewMBB); 279 } else { 280 MBB.splitSuccessor(&Succ, &NewMBB); 281 } 282 283 // Hook up the edge from the new basic block to the old successor in the CFG. 284 NewMBB.addSuccessor(&Succ); 285 286 // Fix PHI nodes in Succ so they refer to NewMBB instead of MBB. 287 for (MachineInstr &MI : Succ) { 288 if (!MI.isPHI()) 289 break; 290 for (int OpIdx = 1, NumOps = MI.getNumOperands(); OpIdx < NumOps; 291 OpIdx += 2) { 292 MachineOperand &OpV = MI.getOperand(OpIdx); 293 MachineOperand &OpMBB = MI.getOperand(OpIdx + 1); 294 assert(OpMBB.isMBB() && "Block operand to a PHI is not a block!"); 295 if (OpMBB.getMBB() != &MBB) 296 continue; 297 298 // If this is the last edge to the succesor, just replace MBB in the PHI 299 if (SuccCount == 1) { 300 OpMBB.setMBB(&NewMBB); 301 break; 302 } 303 304 // Otherwise, append a new pair of operands for the new incoming edge. 305 MI.addOperand(MF, OpV); 306 MI.addOperand(MF, MachineOperand::CreateMBB(&NewMBB)); 307 break; 308 } 309 } 310 311 // Inherit live-ins from the successor 312 for (auto &LI : Succ.liveins()) 313 NewMBB.addLiveIn(LI); 314 315 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Split edge from '" << MBB.getName() << "' to '" 316 << Succ.getName() << "'.\n"); 317 return NewMBB; 318 } 319 320 /// Removing duplicate PHI operands to leave the PHI in a canonical and 321 /// predictable form. 322 /// 323 /// FIXME: It's really frustrating that we have to do this, but SSA-form in MIR 324 /// isn't what you might expect. We may have multiple entries in PHI nodes for 325 /// a single predecessor. This makes CFG-updating extremely complex, so here we 326 /// simplify all PHI nodes to a model even simpler than the IR's model: exactly 327 /// one entry per predecessor, regardless of how many edges there are. 328 static void canonicalizePHIOperands(MachineFunction &MF) { 329 SmallPtrSet<MachineBasicBlock *, 4> Preds; 330 SmallVector<int, 4> DupIndices; 331 for (auto &MBB : MF) 332 for (auto &MI : MBB) { 333 if (!MI.isPHI()) 334 break; 335 336 // First we scan the operands of the PHI looking for duplicate entries 337 // a particular predecessor. We retain the operand index of each duplicate 338 // entry found. 339 for (int OpIdx = 1, NumOps = MI.getNumOperands(); OpIdx < NumOps; 340 OpIdx += 2) 341 if (!Preds.insert(MI.getOperand(OpIdx + 1).getMBB()).second) 342 DupIndices.push_back(OpIdx); 343 344 // Now walk the duplicate indices, removing both the block and value. Note 345 // that these are stored as a vector making this element-wise removal 346 // :w 347 // potentially quadratic. 348 // 349 // FIXME: It is really frustrating that we have to use a quadratic 350 // removal algorithm here. There should be a better way, but the use-def 351 // updates required make that impossible using the public API. 352 // 353 // Note that we have to process these backwards so that we don't 354 // invalidate other indices with each removal. 355 while (!DupIndices.empty()) { 356 int OpIdx = DupIndices.pop_back_val(); 357 // Remove both the block and value operand, again in reverse order to 358 // preserve indices. 359 MI.removeOperand(OpIdx + 1); 360 MI.removeOperand(OpIdx); 361 } 362 363 Preds.clear(); 364 } 365 } 366 367 /// Helper to scan a function for loads vulnerable to misspeculation that we 368 /// want to harden. 369 /// 370 /// We use this to avoid making changes to functions where there is nothing we 371 /// need to do to harden against misspeculation. 372 static bool hasVulnerableLoad(MachineFunction &MF) { 373 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 374 for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { 375 // Loads within this basic block after an LFENCE are not at risk of 376 // speculatively executing with invalid predicates from prior control 377 // flow. So break out of this block but continue scanning the function. 378 if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LFENCE) 379 break; 380 381 // Looking for loads only. 382 if (!MI.mayLoad()) 383 continue; 384 385 // An MFENCE is modeled as a load but isn't vulnerable to misspeculation. 386 if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::MFENCE) 387 continue; 388 389 // We found a load. 390 return true; 391 } 392 } 393 394 // No loads found. 395 return false; 396 } 397 398 bool X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::runOnMachineFunction( 399 MachineFunction &MF) { 400 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** " << getPassName() << " : " << MF.getName() 401 << " **********\n"); 402 403 // Only run if this pass is forced enabled or we detect the relevant function 404 // attribute requesting SLH. 405 if (!EnableSpeculativeLoadHardening && 406 !MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SpeculativeLoadHardening)) 407 return false; 408 409 Subtarget = &MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>(); 410 MRI = &MF.getRegInfo(); 411 TII = Subtarget->getInstrInfo(); 412 TRI = Subtarget->getRegisterInfo(); 413 414 // FIXME: Support for 32-bit. 415 PS.emplace(MF, &X86::GR64_NOSPRegClass); 416 417 if (MF.begin() == MF.end()) 418 // Nothing to do for a degenerate empty function... 419 return false; 420 421 // We support an alternative hardening technique based on a debug flag. 422 if (HardenEdgesWithLFENCE) { 423 hardenEdgesWithLFENCE(MF); 424 return true; 425 } 426 427 // Create a dummy debug loc to use for all the generated code here. 428 DebugLoc Loc; 429 430 MachineBasicBlock &Entry = *MF.begin(); 431 auto EntryInsertPt = Entry.SkipPHIsLabelsAndDebug(Entry.begin()); 432 433 // Do a quick scan to see if we have any checkable loads. 434 bool HasVulnerableLoad = hasVulnerableLoad(MF); 435 436 // See if we have any conditional branching blocks that we will need to trace 437 // predicate state through. 438 SmallVector<BlockCondInfo, 16> Infos = collectBlockCondInfo(MF); 439 440 // If we have no interesting conditions or loads, nothing to do here. 441 if (!HasVulnerableLoad && Infos.empty()) 442 return true; 443 444 // The poison value is required to be an all-ones value for many aspects of 445 // this mitigation. 446 const int PoisonVal = -1; 447 PS->PoisonReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 448 BuildMI(Entry, EntryInsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::MOV64ri32), PS->PoisonReg) 449 .addImm(PoisonVal); 450 ++NumInstsInserted; 451 452 // If we have loads being hardened and we've asked for call and ret edges to 453 // get a full fence-based mitigation, inject that fence. 454 if (HasVulnerableLoad && FenceCallAndRet) { 455 // We need to insert an LFENCE at the start of the function to suspend any 456 // incoming misspeculation from the caller. This helps two-fold: the caller 457 // may not have been protected as this code has been, and this code gets to 458 // not take any specific action to protect across calls. 459 // FIXME: We could skip this for functions which unconditionally return 460 // a constant. 461 BuildMI(Entry, EntryInsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::LFENCE)); 462 ++NumInstsInserted; 463 ++NumLFENCEsInserted; 464 } 465 466 // If we guarded the entry with an LFENCE and have no conditionals to protect 467 // in blocks, then we're done. 468 if (FenceCallAndRet && Infos.empty()) 469 // We may have changed the function's code at this point to insert fences. 470 return true; 471 472 // For every basic block in the function which can b 473 if (HardenInterprocedurally && !FenceCallAndRet) { 474 // Set up the predicate state by extracting it from the incoming stack 475 // pointer so we pick up any misspeculation in our caller. 476 PS->InitialReg = extractPredStateFromSP(Entry, EntryInsertPt, Loc); 477 } else { 478 // Otherwise, just build the predicate state itself by zeroing a register 479 // as we don't need any initial state. 480 PS->InitialReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 481 Register PredStateSubReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR32RegClass); 482 auto ZeroI = BuildMI(Entry, EntryInsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::MOV32r0), 483 PredStateSubReg); 484 ++NumInstsInserted; 485 MachineOperand *ZeroEFLAGSDefOp = 486 ZeroI->findRegisterDefOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr); 487 assert(ZeroEFLAGSDefOp && ZeroEFLAGSDefOp->isImplicit() && 488 "Must have an implicit def of EFLAGS!"); 489 ZeroEFLAGSDefOp->setIsDead(true); 490 BuildMI(Entry, EntryInsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::SUBREG_TO_REG), 491 PS->InitialReg) 492 .addImm(0) 493 .addReg(PredStateSubReg) 494 .addImm(X86::sub_32bit); 495 } 496 497 // We're going to need to trace predicate state throughout the function's 498 // CFG. Prepare for this by setting up our initial state of PHIs with unique 499 // predecessor entries and all the initial predicate state. 500 canonicalizePHIOperands(MF); 501 502 // Track the updated values in an SSA updater to rewrite into SSA form at the 503 // end. 504 PS->SSA.Initialize(PS->InitialReg); 505 PS->SSA.AddAvailableValue(&Entry, PS->InitialReg); 506 507 // Trace through the CFG. 508 auto CMovs = tracePredStateThroughCFG(MF, Infos); 509 510 // We may also enter basic blocks in this function via exception handling 511 // control flow. Here, if we are hardening interprocedurally, we need to 512 // re-capture the predicate state from the throwing code. In the Itanium ABI, 513 // the throw will always look like a call to __cxa_throw and will have the 514 // predicate state in the stack pointer, so extract fresh predicate state from 515 // the stack pointer and make it available in SSA. 516 // FIXME: Handle non-itanium ABI EH models. 517 if (HardenInterprocedurally) { 518 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 519 assert(!MBB.isEHScopeEntry() && "Only Itanium ABI EH supported!"); 520 assert(!MBB.isEHFuncletEntry() && "Only Itanium ABI EH supported!"); 521 assert(!MBB.isCleanupFuncletEntry() && "Only Itanium ABI EH supported!"); 522 if (!MBB.isEHPad()) 523 continue; 524 PS->SSA.AddAvailableValue( 525 &MBB, 526 extractPredStateFromSP(MBB, MBB.SkipPHIsAndLabels(MBB.begin()), Loc)); 527 } 528 } 529 530 if (HardenIndirectCallsAndJumps) { 531 // If we are going to harden calls and jumps we need to unfold their memory 532 // operands. 533 unfoldCallAndJumpLoads(MF); 534 535 // Then we trace predicate state through the indirect branches. 536 auto IndirectBrCMovs = tracePredStateThroughIndirectBranches(MF); 537 CMovs.append(IndirectBrCMovs.begin(), IndirectBrCMovs.end()); 538 } 539 540 // Now that we have the predicate state available at the start of each block 541 // in the CFG, trace it through each block, hardening vulnerable instructions 542 // as we go. 543 tracePredStateThroughBlocksAndHarden(MF); 544 545 // Now rewrite all the uses of the pred state using the SSA updater to insert 546 // PHIs connecting the state between blocks along the CFG edges. 547 for (MachineInstr *CMovI : CMovs) 548 for (MachineOperand &Op : CMovI->operands()) { 549 if (!Op.isReg() || Op.getReg() != PS->InitialReg) 550 continue; 551 552 PS->SSA.RewriteUse(Op); 553 } 554 555 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Final speculative load hardened function:\n"; MF.dump(); 556 dbgs() << "\n"; MF.verify(this)); 557 return true; 558 } 559 560 /// Implements the naive hardening approach of putting an LFENCE after every 561 /// potentially mis-predicted control flow construct. 562 /// 563 /// We include this as an alternative mostly for the purpose of comparison. The 564 /// performance impact of this is expected to be extremely severe and not 565 /// practical for any real-world users. 566 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenEdgesWithLFENCE( 567 MachineFunction &MF) { 568 // First, we scan the function looking for blocks that are reached along edges 569 // that we might want to harden. 570 SmallSetVector<MachineBasicBlock *, 8> Blocks; 571 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 572 // If there are no or only one successor, nothing to do here. 573 if (MBB.succ_size() <= 1) 574 continue; 575 576 // Skip blocks unless their terminators start with a branch. Other 577 // terminators don't seem interesting for guarding against misspeculation. 578 auto TermIt = MBB.getFirstTerminator(); 579 if (TermIt == MBB.end() || !TermIt->isBranch()) 580 continue; 581 582 // Add all the non-EH-pad succossors to the blocks we want to harden. We 583 // skip EH pads because there isn't really a condition of interest on 584 // entering. 585 for (MachineBasicBlock *SuccMBB : MBB.successors()) 586 if (!SuccMBB->isEHPad()) 587 Blocks.insert(SuccMBB); 588 } 589 590 for (MachineBasicBlock *MBB : Blocks) { 591 auto InsertPt = MBB->SkipPHIsAndLabels(MBB->begin()); 592 BuildMI(*MBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::LFENCE)); 593 ++NumInstsInserted; 594 ++NumLFENCEsInserted; 595 } 596 } 597 598 SmallVector<X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::BlockCondInfo, 16> 599 X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::collectBlockCondInfo(MachineFunction &MF) { 600 SmallVector<BlockCondInfo, 16> Infos; 601 602 // Walk the function and build up a summary for each block's conditions that 603 // we need to trace through. 604 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 605 // If there are no or only one successor, nothing to do here. 606 if (MBB.succ_size() <= 1) 607 continue; 608 609 // We want to reliably handle any conditional branch terminators in the 610 // MBB, so we manually analyze the branch. We can handle all of the 611 // permutations here, including ones that analyze branch cannot. 612 // 613 // The approach is to walk backwards across the terminators, resetting at 614 // any unconditional non-indirect branch, and track all conditional edges 615 // to basic blocks as well as the fallthrough or unconditional successor 616 // edge. For each conditional edge, we track the target and the opposite 617 // condition code in order to inject a "no-op" cmov into that successor 618 // that will harden the predicate. For the fallthrough/unconditional 619 // edge, we inject a separate cmov for each conditional branch with 620 // matching condition codes. This effectively implements an "and" of the 621 // condition flags, even if there isn't a single condition flag that would 622 // directly implement that. We don't bother trying to optimize either of 623 // these cases because if such an optimization is possible, LLVM should 624 // have optimized the conditional *branches* in that way already to reduce 625 // instruction count. This late, we simply assume the minimal number of 626 // branch instructions is being emitted and use that to guide our cmov 627 // insertion. 628 629 BlockCondInfo Info = {&MBB, {}, nullptr}; 630 631 // Now walk backwards through the terminators and build up successors they 632 // reach and the conditions. 633 for (MachineInstr &MI : llvm::reverse(MBB)) { 634 // Once we've handled all the terminators, we're done. 635 if (!MI.isTerminator()) 636 break; 637 638 // If we see a non-branch terminator, we can't handle anything so bail. 639 if (!MI.isBranch()) { 640 Info.CondBrs.clear(); 641 break; 642 } 643 644 // If we see an unconditional branch, reset our state, clear any 645 // fallthrough, and set this is the "else" successor. 646 if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::JMP_1) { 647 Info.CondBrs.clear(); 648 Info.UncondBr = &MI; 649 continue; 650 } 651 652 // If we get an invalid condition, we have an indirect branch or some 653 // other unanalyzable "fallthrough" case. We model this as a nullptr for 654 // the destination so we can still guard any conditional successors. 655 // Consider code sequences like: 656 // ``` 657 // jCC L1 658 // jmpq *%rax 659 // ``` 660 // We still want to harden the edge to `L1`. 661 if (X86::getCondFromBranch(MI) == X86::COND_INVALID) { 662 Info.CondBrs.clear(); 663 Info.UncondBr = &MI; 664 continue; 665 } 666 667 // We have a vanilla conditional branch, add it to our list. 668 Info.CondBrs.push_back(&MI); 669 } 670 if (Info.CondBrs.empty()) { 671 ++NumBranchesUntraced; 672 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "WARNING: unable to secure successors of block:\n"; 673 MBB.dump()); 674 continue; 675 } 676 677 Infos.push_back(Info); 678 } 679 680 return Infos; 681 } 682 683 /// Trace the predicate state through the CFG, instrumenting each conditional 684 /// branch such that misspeculation through an edge will poison the predicate 685 /// state. 686 /// 687 /// Returns the list of inserted CMov instructions so that they can have their 688 /// uses of the predicate state rewritten into proper SSA form once it is 689 /// complete. 690 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> 691 X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::tracePredStateThroughCFG( 692 MachineFunction &MF, ArrayRef<BlockCondInfo> Infos) { 693 // Collect the inserted cmov instructions so we can rewrite their uses of the 694 // predicate state into SSA form. 695 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> CMovs; 696 697 // Now walk all of the basic blocks looking for ones that end in conditional 698 // jumps where we need to update this register along each edge. 699 for (const BlockCondInfo &Info : Infos) { 700 MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *Info.MBB; 701 const SmallVectorImpl<MachineInstr *> &CondBrs = Info.CondBrs; 702 MachineInstr *UncondBr = Info.UncondBr; 703 704 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Tracing predicate through block: " << MBB.getName() 705 << "\n"); 706 ++NumCondBranchesTraced; 707 708 // Compute the non-conditional successor as either the target of any 709 // unconditional branch or the layout successor. 710 MachineBasicBlock *UncondSucc = 711 UncondBr ? (UncondBr->getOpcode() == X86::JMP_1 712 ? UncondBr->getOperand(0).getMBB() 713 : nullptr) 714 : &*std::next(MachineFunction::iterator(&MBB)); 715 716 // Count how many edges there are to any given successor. 717 SmallDenseMap<MachineBasicBlock *, int> SuccCounts; 718 if (UncondSucc) 719 ++SuccCounts[UncondSucc]; 720 for (auto *CondBr : CondBrs) 721 ++SuccCounts[CondBr->getOperand(0).getMBB()]; 722 723 // A lambda to insert cmov instructions into a block checking all of the 724 // condition codes in a sequence. 725 auto BuildCheckingBlockForSuccAndConds = 726 [&](MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock &Succ, int SuccCount, 727 MachineInstr *Br, MachineInstr *&UncondBr, 728 ArrayRef<X86::CondCode> Conds) { 729 // First, we split the edge to insert the checking block into a safe 730 // location. 731 auto &CheckingMBB = 732 (SuccCount == 1 && Succ.pred_size() == 1) 733 ? Succ 734 : splitEdge(MBB, Succ, SuccCount, Br, UncondBr, *TII); 735 736 bool LiveEFLAGS = Succ.isLiveIn(X86::EFLAGS); 737 if (!LiveEFLAGS) 738 CheckingMBB.addLiveIn(X86::EFLAGS); 739 740 // Now insert the cmovs to implement the checks. 741 auto InsertPt = CheckingMBB.begin(); 742 assert((InsertPt == CheckingMBB.end() || !InsertPt->isPHI()) && 743 "Should never have a PHI in the initial checking block as it " 744 "always has a single predecessor!"); 745 746 // We will wire each cmov to each other, but need to start with the 747 // incoming pred state. 748 unsigned CurStateReg = PS->InitialReg; 749 750 for (X86::CondCode Cond : Conds) { 751 int PredStateSizeInBytes = TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*PS->RC) / 8; 752 auto CMovOp = X86::getCMovOpcode(PredStateSizeInBytes); 753 754 Register UpdatedStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 755 // Note that we intentionally use an empty debug location so that 756 // this picks up the preceding location. 757 auto CMovI = BuildMI(CheckingMBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), 758 TII->get(CMovOp), UpdatedStateReg) 759 .addReg(CurStateReg) 760 .addReg(PS->PoisonReg) 761 .addImm(Cond); 762 // If this is the last cmov and the EFLAGS weren't originally 763 // live-in, mark them as killed. 764 if (!LiveEFLAGS && Cond == Conds.back()) 765 CMovI->findRegisterUseOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr) 766 ->setIsKill(true); 767 768 ++NumInstsInserted; 769 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting cmov: "; CMovI->dump(); 770 dbgs() << "\n"); 771 772 // The first one of the cmovs will be using the top level 773 // `PredStateReg` and need to get rewritten into SSA form. 774 if (CurStateReg == PS->InitialReg) 775 CMovs.push_back(&*CMovI); 776 777 // The next cmov should start from this one's def. 778 CurStateReg = UpdatedStateReg; 779 } 780 781 // And put the last one into the available values for SSA form of our 782 // predicate state. 783 PS->SSA.AddAvailableValue(&CheckingMBB, CurStateReg); 784 }; 785 786 std::vector<X86::CondCode> UncondCodeSeq; 787 for (auto *CondBr : CondBrs) { 788 MachineBasicBlock &Succ = *CondBr->getOperand(0).getMBB(); 789 int &SuccCount = SuccCounts[&Succ]; 790 791 X86::CondCode Cond = X86::getCondFromBranch(*CondBr); 792 X86::CondCode InvCond = X86::GetOppositeBranchCondition(Cond); 793 UncondCodeSeq.push_back(Cond); 794 795 BuildCheckingBlockForSuccAndConds(MBB, Succ, SuccCount, CondBr, UncondBr, 796 {InvCond}); 797 798 // Decrement the successor count now that we've split one of the edges. 799 // We need to keep the count of edges to the successor accurate in order 800 // to know above when to *replace* the successor in the CFG vs. just 801 // adding the new successor. 802 --SuccCount; 803 } 804 805 // Since we may have split edges and changed the number of successors, 806 // normalize the probabilities. This avoids doing it each time we split an 807 // edge. 808 MBB.normalizeSuccProbs(); 809 810 // Finally, we need to insert cmovs into the "fallthrough" edge. Here, we 811 // need to intersect the other condition codes. We can do this by just 812 // doing a cmov for each one. 813 if (!UncondSucc) 814 // If we have no fallthrough to protect (perhaps it is an indirect jump?) 815 // just skip this and continue. 816 continue; 817 818 assert(SuccCounts[UncondSucc] == 1 && 819 "We should never have more than one edge to the unconditional " 820 "successor at this point because every other edge must have been " 821 "split above!"); 822 823 // Sort and unique the codes to minimize them. 824 llvm::sort(UncondCodeSeq); 825 UncondCodeSeq.erase(llvm::unique(UncondCodeSeq), UncondCodeSeq.end()); 826 827 // Build a checking version of the successor. 828 BuildCheckingBlockForSuccAndConds(MBB, *UncondSucc, /*SuccCount*/ 1, 829 UncondBr, UncondBr, UncondCodeSeq); 830 } 831 832 return CMovs; 833 } 834 835 /// Compute the register class for the unfolded load. 836 /// 837 /// FIXME: This should probably live in X86InstrInfo, potentially by adding 838 /// a way to unfold into a newly created vreg rather than requiring a register 839 /// input. 840 static const TargetRegisterClass * 841 getRegClassForUnfoldedLoad(MachineFunction &MF, const X86InstrInfo &TII, 842 unsigned Opcode) { 843 unsigned Index; 844 unsigned UnfoldedOpc = TII.getOpcodeAfterMemoryUnfold( 845 Opcode, /*UnfoldLoad*/ true, /*UnfoldStore*/ false, &Index); 846 const MCInstrDesc &MCID = TII.get(UnfoldedOpc); 847 return TII.getRegClass(MCID, Index, &TII.getRegisterInfo(), MF); 848 } 849 850 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::unfoldCallAndJumpLoads( 851 MachineFunction &MF) { 852 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) 853 // We use make_early_inc_range here so we can remove instructions if needed 854 // without disturbing the iteration. 855 for (MachineInstr &MI : llvm::make_early_inc_range(MBB.instrs())) { 856 // Must either be a call or a branch. 857 if (!MI.isCall() && !MI.isBranch()) 858 continue; 859 // We only care about loading variants of these instructions. 860 if (!MI.mayLoad()) 861 continue; 862 863 switch (MI.getOpcode()) { 864 default: { 865 LLVM_DEBUG( 866 dbgs() << "ERROR: Found an unexpected loading branch or call " 867 "instruction:\n"; 868 MI.dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 869 report_fatal_error("Unexpected loading branch or call!"); 870 } 871 872 case X86::FARCALL16m: 873 case X86::FARCALL32m: 874 case X86::FARCALL64m: 875 case X86::FARJMP16m: 876 case X86::FARJMP32m: 877 case X86::FARJMP64m: 878 // We cannot mitigate far jumps or calls, but we also don't expect them 879 // to be vulnerable to Spectre v1.2 style attacks. 880 continue; 881 882 case X86::CALL16m: 883 case X86::CALL16m_NT: 884 case X86::CALL32m: 885 case X86::CALL32m_NT: 886 case X86::CALL64m: 887 case X86::CALL64m_NT: 888 case X86::JMP16m: 889 case X86::JMP16m_NT: 890 case X86::JMP32m: 891 case X86::JMP32m_NT: 892 case X86::JMP64m: 893 case X86::JMP64m_NT: 894 case X86::TAILJMPm64: 895 case X86::TAILJMPm64_REX: 896 case X86::TAILJMPm: 897 case X86::TCRETURNmi64: 898 case X86::TCRETURNmi: { 899 // Use the generic unfold logic now that we know we're dealing with 900 // expected instructions. 901 // FIXME: We don't have test coverage for all of these! 902 auto *UnfoldedRC = getRegClassForUnfoldedLoad(MF, *TII, MI.getOpcode()); 903 if (!UnfoldedRC) { 904 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() 905 << "ERROR: Unable to unfold load from instruction:\n"; 906 MI.dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 907 report_fatal_error("Unable to unfold load!"); 908 } 909 Register Reg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(UnfoldedRC); 910 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 2> NewMIs; 911 // If we were able to compute an unfolded reg class, any failure here 912 // is just a programming error so just assert. 913 bool Unfolded = 914 TII->unfoldMemoryOperand(MF, MI, Reg, /*UnfoldLoad*/ true, 915 /*UnfoldStore*/ false, NewMIs); 916 (void)Unfolded; 917 assert(Unfolded && 918 "Computed unfolded register class but failed to unfold"); 919 // Now stitch the new instructions into place and erase the old one. 920 for (auto *NewMI : NewMIs) 921 MBB.insert(MI.getIterator(), NewMI); 922 923 // Update the call site info. 924 if (MI.isCandidateForCallSiteEntry()) 925 MF.eraseCallSiteInfo(&MI); 926 927 MI.eraseFromParent(); 928 LLVM_DEBUG({ 929 dbgs() << "Unfolded load successfully into:\n"; 930 for (auto *NewMI : NewMIs) { 931 NewMI->dump(); 932 dbgs() << "\n"; 933 } 934 }); 935 continue; 936 } 937 } 938 llvm_unreachable("Escaped switch with default!"); 939 } 940 } 941 942 /// Trace the predicate state through indirect branches, instrumenting them to 943 /// poison the state if a target is reached that does not match the expected 944 /// target. 945 /// 946 /// This is designed to mitigate Spectre variant 1 attacks where an indirect 947 /// branch is trained to predict a particular target and then mispredicts that 948 /// target in a way that can leak data. Despite using an indirect branch, this 949 /// is really a variant 1 style attack: it does not steer execution to an 950 /// arbitrary or attacker controlled address, and it does not require any 951 /// special code executing next to the victim. This attack can also be mitigated 952 /// through retpolines, but those require either replacing indirect branches 953 /// with conditional direct branches or lowering them through a device that 954 /// blocks speculation. This mitigation can replace these retpoline-style 955 /// mitigations for jump tables and other indirect branches within a function 956 /// when variant 2 isn't a risk while allowing limited speculation. Indirect 957 /// calls, however, cannot be mitigated through this technique without changing 958 /// the ABI in a fundamental way. 959 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> 960 X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::tracePredStateThroughIndirectBranches( 961 MachineFunction &MF) { 962 // We use the SSAUpdater to insert PHI nodes for the target addresses of 963 // indirect branches. We don't actually need the full power of the SSA updater 964 // in this particular case as we always have immediately available values, but 965 // this avoids us having to re-implement the PHI construction logic. 966 MachineSSAUpdater TargetAddrSSA(MF); 967 TargetAddrSSA.Initialize(MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR64RegClass)); 968 969 // Track which blocks were terminated with an indirect branch. 970 SmallPtrSet<MachineBasicBlock *, 4> IndirectTerminatedMBBs; 971 972 // We need to know what blocks end up reached via indirect branches. We 973 // expect this to be a subset of those whose address is taken and so track it 974 // directly via the CFG. 975 SmallPtrSet<MachineBasicBlock *, 4> IndirectTargetMBBs; 976 977 // Walk all the blocks which end in an indirect branch and make the 978 // target address available. 979 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 980 // Find the last terminator. 981 auto MII = MBB.instr_rbegin(); 982 while (MII != MBB.instr_rend() && MII->isDebugInstr()) 983 ++MII; 984 if (MII == MBB.instr_rend()) 985 continue; 986 MachineInstr &TI = *MII; 987 if (!TI.isTerminator() || !TI.isBranch()) 988 // No terminator or non-branch terminator. 989 continue; 990 991 unsigned TargetReg; 992 993 switch (TI.getOpcode()) { 994 default: 995 // Direct branch or conditional branch (leading to fallthrough). 996 continue; 997 998 case X86::FARJMP16m: 999 case X86::FARJMP32m: 1000 case X86::FARJMP64m: 1001 // We cannot mitigate far jumps or calls, but we also don't expect them 1002 // to be vulnerable to Spectre v1.2 or v2 (self trained) style attacks. 1003 continue; 1004 1005 case X86::JMP16m: 1006 case X86::JMP16m_NT: 1007 case X86::JMP32m: 1008 case X86::JMP32m_NT: 1009 case X86::JMP64m: 1010 case X86::JMP64m_NT: 1011 // Mostly as documentation. 1012 report_fatal_error("Memory operand jumps should have been unfolded!"); 1013 1014 case X86::JMP16r: 1015 report_fatal_error( 1016 "Support for 16-bit indirect branches is not implemented."); 1017 case X86::JMP32r: 1018 report_fatal_error( 1019 "Support for 32-bit indirect branches is not implemented."); 1020 1021 case X86::JMP64r: 1022 TargetReg = TI.getOperand(0).getReg(); 1023 } 1024 1025 // We have definitely found an indirect branch. Verify that there are no 1026 // preceding conditional branches as we don't yet support that. 1027 if (llvm::any_of(MBB.terminators(), [&](MachineInstr &OtherTI) { 1028 return !OtherTI.isDebugInstr() && &OtherTI != &TI; 1029 })) { 1030 LLVM_DEBUG({ 1031 dbgs() << "ERROR: Found other terminators in a block with an indirect " 1032 "branch! This is not yet supported! Terminator sequence:\n"; 1033 for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB.terminators()) { 1034 MI.dump(); 1035 dbgs() << '\n'; 1036 } 1037 }); 1038 report_fatal_error("Unimplemented terminator sequence!"); 1039 } 1040 1041 // Make the target register an available value for this block. 1042 TargetAddrSSA.AddAvailableValue(&MBB, TargetReg); 1043 IndirectTerminatedMBBs.insert(&MBB); 1044 1045 // Add all the successors to our target candidates. 1046 for (MachineBasicBlock *Succ : MBB.successors()) 1047 IndirectTargetMBBs.insert(Succ); 1048 } 1049 1050 // Keep track of the cmov instructions we insert so we can return them. 1051 SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 16> CMovs; 1052 1053 // If we didn't find any indirect branches with targets, nothing to do here. 1054 if (IndirectTargetMBBs.empty()) 1055 return CMovs; 1056 1057 // We found indirect branches and targets that need to be instrumented to 1058 // harden loads within them. Walk the blocks of the function (to get a stable 1059 // ordering) and instrument each target of an indirect branch. 1060 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 1061 // Skip the blocks that aren't candidate targets. 1062 if (!IndirectTargetMBBs.count(&MBB)) 1063 continue; 1064 1065 // We don't expect EH pads to ever be reached via an indirect branch. If 1066 // this is desired for some reason, we could simply skip them here rather 1067 // than asserting. 1068 assert(!MBB.isEHPad() && 1069 "Unexpected EH pad as target of an indirect branch!"); 1070 1071 // We should never end up threading EFLAGS into a block to harden 1072 // conditional jumps as there would be an additional successor via the 1073 // indirect branch. As a consequence, all such edges would be split before 1074 // reaching here, and the inserted block will handle the EFLAGS-based 1075 // hardening. 1076 assert(!MBB.isLiveIn(X86::EFLAGS) && 1077 "Cannot check within a block that already has live-in EFLAGS!"); 1078 1079 // We can't handle having non-indirect edges into this block unless this is 1080 // the only successor and we can synthesize the necessary target address. 1081 for (MachineBasicBlock *Pred : MBB.predecessors()) { 1082 // If we've already handled this by extracting the target directly, 1083 // nothing to do. 1084 if (IndirectTerminatedMBBs.count(Pred)) 1085 continue; 1086 1087 // Otherwise, we have to be the only successor. We generally expect this 1088 // to be true as conditional branches should have had a critical edge 1089 // split already. We don't however need to worry about EH pad successors 1090 // as they'll happily ignore the target and their hardening strategy is 1091 // resilient to all ways in which they could be reached speculatively. 1092 if (!llvm::all_of(Pred->successors(), [&](MachineBasicBlock *Succ) { 1093 return Succ->isEHPad() || Succ == &MBB; 1094 })) { 1095 LLVM_DEBUG({ 1096 dbgs() << "ERROR: Found conditional entry to target of indirect " 1097 "branch!\n"; 1098 Pred->dump(); 1099 MBB.dump(); 1100 }); 1101 report_fatal_error("Cannot harden a conditional entry to a target of " 1102 "an indirect branch!"); 1103 } 1104 1105 // Now we need to compute the address of this block and install it as a 1106 // synthetic target in the predecessor. We do this at the bottom of the 1107 // predecessor. 1108 auto InsertPt = Pred->getFirstTerminator(); 1109 Register TargetReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR64RegClass); 1110 if (MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Small && 1111 !Subtarget->isPositionIndependent()) { 1112 // Directly materialize it into an immediate. 1113 auto AddrI = BuildMI(*Pred, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), 1114 TII->get(X86::MOV64ri32), TargetReg) 1115 .addMBB(&MBB); 1116 ++NumInstsInserted; 1117 (void)AddrI; 1118 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting mov: "; AddrI->dump(); 1119 dbgs() << "\n"); 1120 } else { 1121 auto AddrI = BuildMI(*Pred, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::LEA64r), 1122 TargetReg) 1123 .addReg(/*Base*/ X86::RIP) 1124 .addImm(/*Scale*/ 1) 1125 .addReg(/*Index*/ 0) 1126 .addMBB(&MBB) 1127 .addReg(/*Segment*/ 0); 1128 ++NumInstsInserted; 1129 (void)AddrI; 1130 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting lea: "; AddrI->dump(); 1131 dbgs() << "\n"); 1132 } 1133 // And make this available. 1134 TargetAddrSSA.AddAvailableValue(Pred, TargetReg); 1135 } 1136 1137 // Materialize the needed SSA value of the target. Note that we need the 1138 // middle of the block as this block might at the bottom have an indirect 1139 // branch back to itself. We can do this here because at this point, every 1140 // predecessor of this block has an available value. This is basically just 1141 // automating the construction of a PHI node for this target. 1142 Register TargetReg = TargetAddrSSA.GetValueInMiddleOfBlock(&MBB); 1143 1144 // Insert a comparison of the incoming target register with this block's 1145 // address. This also requires us to mark the block as having its address 1146 // taken explicitly. 1147 MBB.setMachineBlockAddressTaken(); 1148 auto InsertPt = MBB.SkipPHIsLabelsAndDebug(MBB.begin()); 1149 if (MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Small && 1150 !Subtarget->isPositionIndependent()) { 1151 // Check directly against a relocated immediate when we can. 1152 auto CheckI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64ri32)) 1153 .addReg(TargetReg, RegState::Kill) 1154 .addMBB(&MBB); 1155 ++NumInstsInserted; 1156 (void)CheckI; 1157 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting cmp: "; CheckI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1158 } else { 1159 // Otherwise compute the address into a register first. 1160 Register AddrReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR64RegClass); 1161 auto AddrI = 1162 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::LEA64r), AddrReg) 1163 .addReg(/*Base*/ X86::RIP) 1164 .addImm(/*Scale*/ 1) 1165 .addReg(/*Index*/ 0) 1166 .addMBB(&MBB) 1167 .addReg(/*Segment*/ 0); 1168 ++NumInstsInserted; 1169 (void)AddrI; 1170 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting lea: "; AddrI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1171 auto CheckI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::CMP64rr)) 1172 .addReg(TargetReg, RegState::Kill) 1173 .addReg(AddrReg, RegState::Kill); 1174 ++NumInstsInserted; 1175 (void)CheckI; 1176 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting cmp: "; CheckI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1177 } 1178 1179 // Now cmov over the predicate if the comparison wasn't equal. 1180 int PredStateSizeInBytes = TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*PS->RC) / 8; 1181 auto CMovOp = X86::getCMovOpcode(PredStateSizeInBytes); 1182 Register UpdatedStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 1183 auto CMovI = 1184 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, DebugLoc(), TII->get(CMovOp), UpdatedStateReg) 1185 .addReg(PS->InitialReg) 1186 .addReg(PS->PoisonReg) 1187 .addImm(X86::COND_NE); 1188 CMovI->findRegisterUseOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr) 1189 ->setIsKill(true); 1190 ++NumInstsInserted; 1191 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting cmov: "; CMovI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1192 CMovs.push_back(&*CMovI); 1193 1194 // And put the new value into the available values for SSA form of our 1195 // predicate state. 1196 PS->SSA.AddAvailableValue(&MBB, UpdatedStateReg); 1197 } 1198 1199 // Return all the newly inserted cmov instructions of the predicate state. 1200 return CMovs; 1201 } 1202 1203 // Returns true if the MI has EFLAGS as a register def operand and it's live, 1204 // otherwise it returns false 1205 static bool isEFLAGSDefLive(const MachineInstr &MI) { 1206 if (const MachineOperand *DefOp = 1207 MI.findRegisterDefOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr)) { 1208 return !DefOp->isDead(); 1209 } 1210 return false; 1211 } 1212 1213 static bool isEFLAGSLive(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator I, 1214 const TargetRegisterInfo &TRI) { 1215 // Check if EFLAGS are alive by seeing if there is a def of them or they 1216 // live-in, and then seeing if that def is in turn used. 1217 for (MachineInstr &MI : llvm::reverse(llvm::make_range(MBB.begin(), I))) { 1218 if (MachineOperand *DefOp = 1219 MI.findRegisterDefOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr)) { 1220 // If the def is dead, then EFLAGS is not live. 1221 if (DefOp->isDead()) 1222 return false; 1223 1224 // Otherwise we've def'ed it, and it is live. 1225 return true; 1226 } 1227 // While at this instruction, also check if we use and kill EFLAGS 1228 // which means it isn't live. 1229 if (MI.killsRegister(X86::EFLAGS, &TRI)) 1230 return false; 1231 } 1232 1233 // If we didn't find anything conclusive (neither definitely alive or 1234 // definitely dead) return whether it lives into the block. 1235 return MBB.isLiveIn(X86::EFLAGS); 1236 } 1237 1238 /// Trace the predicate state through each of the blocks in the function, 1239 /// hardening everything necessary along the way. 1240 /// 1241 /// We call this routine once the initial predicate state has been established 1242 /// for each basic block in the function in the SSA updater. This routine traces 1243 /// it through the instructions within each basic block, and for non-returning 1244 /// blocks informs the SSA updater about the final state that lives out of the 1245 /// block. Along the way, it hardens any vulnerable instruction using the 1246 /// currently valid predicate state. We have to do these two things together 1247 /// because the SSA updater only works across blocks. Within a block, we track 1248 /// the current predicate state directly and update it as it changes. 1249 /// 1250 /// This operates in two passes over each block. First, we analyze the loads in 1251 /// the block to determine which strategy will be used to harden them: hardening 1252 /// the address or hardening the loaded value when loaded into a register 1253 /// amenable to hardening. We have to process these first because the two 1254 /// strategies may interact -- later hardening may change what strategy we wish 1255 /// to use. We also will analyze data dependencies between loads and avoid 1256 /// hardening those loads that are data dependent on a load with a hardened 1257 /// address. We also skip hardening loads already behind an LFENCE as that is 1258 /// sufficient to harden them against misspeculation. 1259 /// 1260 /// Second, we actively trace the predicate state through the block, applying 1261 /// the hardening steps we determined necessary in the first pass as we go. 1262 /// 1263 /// These two passes are applied to each basic block. We operate one block at a 1264 /// time to simplify reasoning about reachability and sequencing. 1265 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::tracePredStateThroughBlocksAndHarden( 1266 MachineFunction &MF) { 1267 SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr *, 16> HardenPostLoad; 1268 SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr *, 16> HardenLoadAddr; 1269 1270 SmallSet<unsigned, 16> HardenedAddrRegs; 1271 1272 SmallDenseMap<unsigned, unsigned, 32> AddrRegToHardenedReg; 1273 1274 // Track the set of load-dependent registers through the basic block. Because 1275 // the values of these registers have an existing data dependency on a loaded 1276 // value which we would have checked, we can omit any checks on them. 1277 SparseBitVector<> LoadDepRegs; 1278 1279 for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { 1280 // The first pass over the block: collect all the loads which can have their 1281 // loaded value hardened and all the loads that instead need their address 1282 // hardened. During this walk we propagate load dependence for address 1283 // hardened loads and also look for LFENCE to stop hardening wherever 1284 // possible. When deciding whether or not to harden the loaded value or not, 1285 // we check to see if any registers used in the address will have been 1286 // hardened at this point and if so, harden any remaining address registers 1287 // as that often successfully re-uses hardened addresses and minimizes 1288 // instructions. 1289 // 1290 // FIXME: We should consider an aggressive mode where we continue to keep as 1291 // many loads value hardened even when some address register hardening would 1292 // be free (due to reuse). 1293 // 1294 // Note that we only need this pass if we are actually hardening loads. 1295 if (HardenLoads) 1296 for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { 1297 // We naively assume that all def'ed registers of an instruction have 1298 // a data dependency on all of their operands. 1299 // FIXME: Do a more careful analysis of x86 to build a conservative 1300 // model here. 1301 if (llvm::any_of(MI.uses(), [&](MachineOperand &Op) { 1302 return Op.isReg() && LoadDepRegs.test(Op.getReg()); 1303 })) 1304 for (MachineOperand &Def : MI.defs()) 1305 if (Def.isReg()) 1306 LoadDepRegs.set(Def.getReg()); 1307 1308 // Both Intel and AMD are guiding that they will change the semantics of 1309 // LFENCE to be a speculation barrier, so if we see an LFENCE, there is 1310 // no more need to guard things in this block. 1311 if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LFENCE) 1312 break; 1313 1314 // If this instruction cannot load, nothing to do. 1315 if (!MI.mayLoad()) 1316 continue; 1317 1318 // Some instructions which "load" are trivially safe or unimportant. 1319 if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::MFENCE) 1320 continue; 1321 1322 // Extract the memory operand information about this instruction. 1323 const int MemRefBeginIdx = X86::getFirstAddrOperandIdx(MI); 1324 if (MemRefBeginIdx < 0) { 1325 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() 1326 << "WARNING: unable to harden loading instruction: "; 1327 MI.dump()); 1328 continue; 1329 } 1330 1331 MachineOperand &BaseMO = 1332 MI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrBaseReg); 1333 MachineOperand &IndexMO = 1334 MI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrIndexReg); 1335 1336 // If we have at least one (non-frame-index, non-RIP) register operand, 1337 // and neither operand is load-dependent, we need to check the load. 1338 unsigned BaseReg = 0, IndexReg = 0; 1339 if (!BaseMO.isFI() && BaseMO.getReg() != X86::RIP && 1340 BaseMO.getReg() != X86::NoRegister) 1341 BaseReg = BaseMO.getReg(); 1342 if (IndexMO.getReg() != X86::NoRegister) 1343 IndexReg = IndexMO.getReg(); 1344 1345 if (!BaseReg && !IndexReg) 1346 // No register operands! 1347 continue; 1348 1349 // If any register operand is dependent, this load is dependent and we 1350 // needn't check it. 1351 // FIXME: Is this true in the case where we are hardening loads after 1352 // they complete? Unclear, need to investigate. 1353 if ((BaseReg && LoadDepRegs.test(BaseReg)) || 1354 (IndexReg && LoadDepRegs.test(IndexReg))) 1355 continue; 1356 1357 // If post-load hardening is enabled, this load is compatible with 1358 // post-load hardening, and we aren't already going to harden one of the 1359 // address registers, queue it up to be hardened post-load. Notably, 1360 // even once hardened this won't introduce a useful dependency that 1361 // could prune out subsequent loads. 1362 if (EnablePostLoadHardening && X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariantLoad(MI) && 1363 !isEFLAGSDefLive(MI) && MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() == 1 && 1364 MI.getOperand(0).isReg() && 1365 canHardenRegister(MI.getOperand(0).getReg()) && 1366 !HardenedAddrRegs.count(BaseReg) && 1367 !HardenedAddrRegs.count(IndexReg)) { 1368 HardenPostLoad.insert(&MI); 1369 HardenedAddrRegs.insert(MI.getOperand(0).getReg()); 1370 continue; 1371 } 1372 1373 // Record this instruction for address hardening and record its register 1374 // operands as being address-hardened. 1375 HardenLoadAddr.insert(&MI); 1376 if (BaseReg) 1377 HardenedAddrRegs.insert(BaseReg); 1378 if (IndexReg) 1379 HardenedAddrRegs.insert(IndexReg); 1380 1381 for (MachineOperand &Def : MI.defs()) 1382 if (Def.isReg()) 1383 LoadDepRegs.set(Def.getReg()); 1384 } 1385 1386 // Now re-walk the instructions in the basic block, and apply whichever 1387 // hardening strategy we have elected. Note that we do this in a second 1388 // pass specifically so that we have the complete set of instructions for 1389 // which we will do post-load hardening and can defer it in certain 1390 // circumstances. 1391 for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { 1392 if (HardenLoads) { 1393 // We cannot both require hardening the def of a load and its address. 1394 assert(!(HardenLoadAddr.count(&MI) && HardenPostLoad.count(&MI)) && 1395 "Requested to harden both the address and def of a load!"); 1396 1397 // Check if this is a load whose address needs to be hardened. 1398 if (HardenLoadAddr.erase(&MI)) { 1399 const int MemRefBeginIdx = X86::getFirstAddrOperandIdx(MI); 1400 assert(MemRefBeginIdx >= 0 && "Cannot have an invalid index here!"); 1401 1402 MachineOperand &BaseMO = 1403 MI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrBaseReg); 1404 MachineOperand &IndexMO = 1405 MI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrIndexReg); 1406 hardenLoadAddr(MI, BaseMO, IndexMO, AddrRegToHardenedReg); 1407 continue; 1408 } 1409 1410 // Test if this instruction is one of our post load instructions (and 1411 // remove it from the set if so). 1412 if (HardenPostLoad.erase(&MI)) { 1413 assert(!MI.isCall() && "Must not try to post-load harden a call!"); 1414 1415 // If this is a data-invariant load and there is no EFLAGS 1416 // interference, we want to try and sink any hardening as far as 1417 // possible. 1418 if (X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariantLoad(MI) && !isEFLAGSDefLive(MI)) { 1419 // Sink the instruction we'll need to harden as far as we can down 1420 // the graph. 1421 MachineInstr *SunkMI = sinkPostLoadHardenedInst(MI, HardenPostLoad); 1422 1423 // If we managed to sink this instruction, update everything so we 1424 // harden that instruction when we reach it in the instruction 1425 // sequence. 1426 if (SunkMI != &MI) { 1427 // If in sinking there was no instruction needing to be hardened, 1428 // we're done. 1429 if (!SunkMI) 1430 continue; 1431 1432 // Otherwise, add this to the set of defs we harden. 1433 HardenPostLoad.insert(SunkMI); 1434 continue; 1435 } 1436 } 1437 1438 unsigned HardenedReg = hardenPostLoad(MI); 1439 1440 // Mark the resulting hardened register as such so we don't re-harden. 1441 AddrRegToHardenedReg[HardenedReg] = HardenedReg; 1442 1443 continue; 1444 } 1445 1446 // Check for an indirect call or branch that may need its input hardened 1447 // even if we couldn't find the specific load used, or were able to 1448 // avoid hardening it for some reason. Note that here we cannot break 1449 // out afterward as we may still need to handle any call aspect of this 1450 // instruction. 1451 if ((MI.isCall() || MI.isBranch()) && HardenIndirectCallsAndJumps) 1452 hardenIndirectCallOrJumpInstr(MI, AddrRegToHardenedReg); 1453 } 1454 1455 // After we finish hardening loads we handle interprocedural hardening if 1456 // enabled and relevant for this instruction. 1457 if (!HardenInterprocedurally) 1458 continue; 1459 if (!MI.isCall() && !MI.isReturn()) 1460 continue; 1461 1462 // If this is a direct return (IE, not a tail call) just directly harden 1463 // it. 1464 if (MI.isReturn() && !MI.isCall()) { 1465 hardenReturnInstr(MI); 1466 continue; 1467 } 1468 1469 // Otherwise we have a call. We need to handle transferring the predicate 1470 // state into a call and recovering it after the call returns (unless this 1471 // is a tail call). 1472 assert(MI.isCall() && "Should only reach here for calls!"); 1473 tracePredStateThroughCall(MI); 1474 } 1475 1476 HardenPostLoad.clear(); 1477 HardenLoadAddr.clear(); 1478 HardenedAddrRegs.clear(); 1479 AddrRegToHardenedReg.clear(); 1480 1481 // Currently, we only track data-dependent loads within a basic block. 1482 // FIXME: We should see if this is necessary or if we could be more 1483 // aggressive here without opening up attack avenues. 1484 LoadDepRegs.clear(); 1485 } 1486 } 1487 1488 /// Save EFLAGS into the returned GPR. This can in turn be restored with 1489 /// `restoreEFLAGS`. 1490 /// 1491 /// Note that LLVM can only lower very simple patterns of saved and restored 1492 /// EFLAGS registers. The restore should always be within the same basic block 1493 /// as the save so that no PHI nodes are inserted. 1494 unsigned X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::saveEFLAGS( 1495 MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 1496 const DebugLoc &Loc) { 1497 // FIXME: Hard coding this to a 32-bit register class seems weird, but matches 1498 // what instruction selection does. 1499 Register Reg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::GR32RegClass); 1500 // We directly copy the FLAGS register and rely on later lowering to clean 1501 // this up into the appropriate setCC instructions. 1502 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::COPY), Reg).addReg(X86::EFLAGS); 1503 ++NumInstsInserted; 1504 return Reg; 1505 } 1506 1507 /// Restore EFLAGS from the provided GPR. This should be produced by 1508 /// `saveEFLAGS`. 1509 /// 1510 /// This must be done within the same basic block as the save in order to 1511 /// reliably lower. 1512 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::restoreEFLAGS( 1513 MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 1514 const DebugLoc &Loc, Register Reg) { 1515 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::COPY), X86::EFLAGS).addReg(Reg); 1516 ++NumInstsInserted; 1517 } 1518 1519 /// Takes the current predicate state (in a register) and merges it into the 1520 /// stack pointer. The state is essentially a single bit, but we merge this in 1521 /// a way that won't form non-canonical pointers and also will be preserved 1522 /// across normal stack adjustments. 1523 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::mergePredStateIntoSP( 1524 MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 1525 const DebugLoc &Loc, unsigned PredStateReg) { 1526 Register TmpReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 1527 // FIXME: This hard codes a shift distance based on the number of bits needed 1528 // to stay canonical on 64-bit. We should compute this somehow and support 1529 // 32-bit as part of that. 1530 auto ShiftI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::SHL64ri), TmpReg) 1531 .addReg(PredStateReg, RegState::Kill) 1532 .addImm(47); 1533 ShiftI->addRegisterDead(X86::EFLAGS, TRI); 1534 ++NumInstsInserted; 1535 auto OrI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::OR64rr), X86::RSP) 1536 .addReg(X86::RSP) 1537 .addReg(TmpReg, RegState::Kill); 1538 OrI->addRegisterDead(X86::EFLAGS, TRI); 1539 ++NumInstsInserted; 1540 } 1541 1542 /// Extracts the predicate state stored in the high bits of the stack pointer. 1543 unsigned X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::extractPredStateFromSP( 1544 MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 1545 const DebugLoc &Loc) { 1546 Register PredStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 1547 Register TmpReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 1548 1549 // We know that the stack pointer will have any preserved predicate state in 1550 // its high bit. We just want to smear this across the other bits. Turns out, 1551 // this is exactly what an arithmetic right shift does. 1552 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), TmpReg) 1553 .addReg(X86::RSP); 1554 auto ShiftI = 1555 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::SAR64ri), PredStateReg) 1556 .addReg(TmpReg, RegState::Kill) 1557 .addImm(TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*PS->RC) - 1); 1558 ShiftI->addRegisterDead(X86::EFLAGS, TRI); 1559 ++NumInstsInserted; 1560 1561 return PredStateReg; 1562 } 1563 1564 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenLoadAddr( 1565 MachineInstr &MI, MachineOperand &BaseMO, MachineOperand &IndexMO, 1566 SmallDenseMap<unsigned, unsigned, 32> &AddrRegToHardenedReg) { 1567 MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent(); 1568 const DebugLoc &Loc = MI.getDebugLoc(); 1569 1570 // Check if EFLAGS are alive by seeing if there is a def of them or they 1571 // live-in, and then seeing if that def is in turn used. 1572 bool EFLAGSLive = isEFLAGSLive(MBB, MI.getIterator(), *TRI); 1573 1574 SmallVector<MachineOperand *, 2> HardenOpRegs; 1575 1576 if (BaseMO.isFI()) { 1577 // A frame index is never a dynamically controllable load, so only 1578 // harden it if we're covering fixed address loads as well. 1579 LLVM_DEBUG( 1580 dbgs() << " Skipping hardening base of explicit stack frame load: "; 1581 MI.dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1582 } else if (BaseMO.getReg() == X86::RSP) { 1583 // Some idempotent atomic operations are lowered directly to a locked 1584 // OR with 0 to the top of stack(or slightly offset from top) which uses an 1585 // explicit RSP register as the base. 1586 assert(IndexMO.getReg() == X86::NoRegister && 1587 "Explicit RSP access with dynamic index!"); 1588 LLVM_DEBUG( 1589 dbgs() << " Cannot harden base of explicit RSP offset in a load!"); 1590 } else if (BaseMO.getReg() == X86::RIP || 1591 BaseMO.getReg() == X86::NoRegister) { 1592 // For both RIP-relative addressed loads or absolute loads, we cannot 1593 // meaningfully harden them because the address being loaded has no 1594 // dynamic component. 1595 // 1596 // FIXME: When using a segment base (like TLS does) we end up with the 1597 // dynamic address being the base plus -1 because we can't mutate the 1598 // segment register here. This allows the signed 32-bit offset to point at 1599 // valid segment-relative addresses and load them successfully. 1600 LLVM_DEBUG( 1601 dbgs() << " Cannot harden base of " 1602 << (BaseMO.getReg() == X86::RIP ? "RIP-relative" : "no-base") 1603 << " address in a load!"); 1604 } else { 1605 assert(BaseMO.isReg() && 1606 "Only allowed to have a frame index or register base."); 1607 HardenOpRegs.push_back(&BaseMO); 1608 } 1609 1610 if (IndexMO.getReg() != X86::NoRegister && 1611 (HardenOpRegs.empty() || 1612 HardenOpRegs.front()->getReg() != IndexMO.getReg())) 1613 HardenOpRegs.push_back(&IndexMO); 1614 1615 assert((HardenOpRegs.size() == 1 || HardenOpRegs.size() == 2) && 1616 "Should have exactly one or two registers to harden!"); 1617 assert((HardenOpRegs.size() == 1 || 1618 HardenOpRegs[0]->getReg() != HardenOpRegs[1]->getReg()) && 1619 "Should not have two of the same registers!"); 1620 1621 // Remove any registers that have alreaded been checked. 1622 llvm::erase_if(HardenOpRegs, [&](MachineOperand *Op) { 1623 // See if this operand's register has already been checked. 1624 auto It = AddrRegToHardenedReg.find(Op->getReg()); 1625 if (It == AddrRegToHardenedReg.end()) 1626 // Not checked, so retain this one. 1627 return false; 1628 1629 // Otherwise, we can directly update this operand and remove it. 1630 Op->setReg(It->second); 1631 return true; 1632 }); 1633 // If there are none left, we're done. 1634 if (HardenOpRegs.empty()) 1635 return; 1636 1637 // Compute the current predicate state. 1638 Register StateReg = PS->SSA.GetValueAtEndOfBlock(&MBB); 1639 1640 auto InsertPt = MI.getIterator(); 1641 1642 // If EFLAGS are live and we don't have access to instructions that avoid 1643 // clobbering EFLAGS we need to save and restore them. This in turn makes 1644 // the EFLAGS no longer live. 1645 unsigned FlagsReg = 0; 1646 if (EFLAGSLive && !Subtarget->hasBMI2()) { 1647 EFLAGSLive = false; 1648 FlagsReg = saveEFLAGS(MBB, InsertPt, Loc); 1649 } 1650 1651 for (MachineOperand *Op : HardenOpRegs) { 1652 Register OpReg = Op->getReg(); 1653 auto *OpRC = MRI->getRegClass(OpReg); 1654 Register TmpReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(OpRC); 1655 1656 // If this is a vector register, we'll need somewhat custom logic to handle 1657 // hardening it. 1658 if (!Subtarget->hasVLX() && (OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR128RegClass) || 1659 OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR256RegClass))) { 1660 assert(Subtarget->hasAVX2() && "AVX2-specific register classes!"); 1661 bool Is128Bit = OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR128RegClass); 1662 1663 // Move our state into a vector register. 1664 // FIXME: We could skip this at the cost of longer encodings with AVX-512 1665 // but that doesn't seem likely worth it. 1666 Register VStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(&X86::VR128RegClass); 1667 auto MovI = 1668 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::VMOV64toPQIrr), VStateReg) 1669 .addReg(StateReg); 1670 (void)MovI; 1671 ++NumInstsInserted; 1672 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting mov: "; MovI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1673 1674 // Broadcast it across the vector register. 1675 Register VBStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(OpRC); 1676 auto BroadcastI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, 1677 TII->get(Is128Bit ? X86::VPBROADCASTQrr 1678 : X86::VPBROADCASTQYrr), 1679 VBStateReg) 1680 .addReg(VStateReg); 1681 (void)BroadcastI; 1682 ++NumInstsInserted; 1683 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting broadcast: "; BroadcastI->dump(); 1684 dbgs() << "\n"); 1685 1686 // Merge our potential poison state into the value with a vector or. 1687 auto OrI = 1688 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, 1689 TII->get(Is128Bit ? X86::VPORrr : X86::VPORYrr), TmpReg) 1690 .addReg(VBStateReg) 1691 .addReg(OpReg); 1692 (void)OrI; 1693 ++NumInstsInserted; 1694 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting or: "; OrI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1695 } else if (OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR128XRegClass) || 1696 OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR256XRegClass) || 1697 OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR512RegClass)) { 1698 assert(Subtarget->hasAVX512() && "AVX512-specific register classes!"); 1699 bool Is128Bit = OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR128XRegClass); 1700 bool Is256Bit = OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::VR256XRegClass); 1701 if (Is128Bit || Is256Bit) 1702 assert(Subtarget->hasVLX() && "AVX512VL-specific register classes!"); 1703 1704 // Broadcast our state into a vector register. 1705 Register VStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(OpRC); 1706 unsigned BroadcastOp = Is128Bit ? X86::VPBROADCASTQrZ128rr 1707 : Is256Bit ? X86::VPBROADCASTQrZ256rr 1708 : X86::VPBROADCASTQrZrr; 1709 auto BroadcastI = 1710 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(BroadcastOp), VStateReg) 1711 .addReg(StateReg); 1712 (void)BroadcastI; 1713 ++NumInstsInserted; 1714 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting broadcast: "; BroadcastI->dump(); 1715 dbgs() << "\n"); 1716 1717 // Merge our potential poison state into the value with a vector or. 1718 unsigned OrOp = Is128Bit ? X86::VPORQZ128rr 1719 : Is256Bit ? X86::VPORQZ256rr : X86::VPORQZrr; 1720 auto OrI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(OrOp), TmpReg) 1721 .addReg(VStateReg) 1722 .addReg(OpReg); 1723 (void)OrI; 1724 ++NumInstsInserted; 1725 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting or: "; OrI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1726 } else { 1727 // FIXME: Need to support GR32 here for 32-bit code. 1728 assert(OpRC->hasSuperClassEq(&X86::GR64RegClass) && 1729 "Not a supported register class for address hardening!"); 1730 1731 if (!EFLAGSLive) { 1732 // Merge our potential poison state into the value with an or. 1733 auto OrI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::OR64rr), TmpReg) 1734 .addReg(StateReg) 1735 .addReg(OpReg); 1736 OrI->addRegisterDead(X86::EFLAGS, TRI); 1737 ++NumInstsInserted; 1738 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting or: "; OrI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1739 } else { 1740 // We need to avoid touching EFLAGS so shift out all but the least 1741 // significant bit using the instruction that doesn't update flags. 1742 auto ShiftI = 1743 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::SHRX64rr), TmpReg) 1744 .addReg(OpReg) 1745 .addReg(StateReg); 1746 (void)ShiftI; 1747 ++NumInstsInserted; 1748 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting shrx: "; ShiftI->dump(); 1749 dbgs() << "\n"); 1750 } 1751 } 1752 1753 // Record this register as checked and update the operand. 1754 assert(!AddrRegToHardenedReg.count(Op->getReg()) && 1755 "Should not have checked this register yet!"); 1756 AddrRegToHardenedReg[Op->getReg()] = TmpReg; 1757 Op->setReg(TmpReg); 1758 ++NumAddrRegsHardened; 1759 } 1760 1761 // And restore the flags if needed. 1762 if (FlagsReg) 1763 restoreEFLAGS(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, FlagsReg); 1764 } 1765 1766 MachineInstr *X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::sinkPostLoadHardenedInst( 1767 MachineInstr &InitialMI, SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &HardenedInstrs) { 1768 assert(X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariantLoad(InitialMI) && 1769 "Cannot get here with a non-invariant load!"); 1770 assert(!isEFLAGSDefLive(InitialMI) && 1771 "Cannot get here with a data invariant load " 1772 "that interferes with EFLAGS!"); 1773 1774 // See if we can sink hardening the loaded value. 1775 auto SinkCheckToSingleUse = 1776 [&](MachineInstr &MI) -> std::optional<MachineInstr *> { 1777 Register DefReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg(); 1778 1779 // We need to find a single use which we can sink the check. We can 1780 // primarily do this because many uses may already end up checked on their 1781 // own. 1782 MachineInstr *SingleUseMI = nullptr; 1783 for (MachineInstr &UseMI : MRI->use_instructions(DefReg)) { 1784 // If we're already going to harden this use, it is data invariant, it 1785 // does not interfere with EFLAGS, and within our block. 1786 if (HardenedInstrs.count(&UseMI)) { 1787 if (!X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariantLoad(UseMI) || isEFLAGSDefLive(UseMI)) { 1788 // If we've already decided to harden a non-load, we must have sunk 1789 // some other post-load hardened instruction to it and it must itself 1790 // be data-invariant. 1791 assert(X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariant(UseMI) && 1792 "Data variant instruction being hardened!"); 1793 continue; 1794 } 1795 1796 // Otherwise, this is a load and the load component can't be data 1797 // invariant so check how this register is being used. 1798 const int MemRefBeginIdx = X86::getFirstAddrOperandIdx(UseMI); 1799 assert(MemRefBeginIdx >= 0 && 1800 "Should always have mem references here!"); 1801 1802 MachineOperand &BaseMO = 1803 UseMI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrBaseReg); 1804 MachineOperand &IndexMO = 1805 UseMI.getOperand(MemRefBeginIdx + X86::AddrIndexReg); 1806 if ((BaseMO.isReg() && BaseMO.getReg() == DefReg) || 1807 (IndexMO.isReg() && IndexMO.getReg() == DefReg)) 1808 // The load uses the register as part of its address making it not 1809 // invariant. 1810 return {}; 1811 1812 continue; 1813 } 1814 1815 if (SingleUseMI) 1816 // We already have a single use, this would make two. Bail. 1817 return {}; 1818 1819 // If this single use isn't data invariant, isn't in this block, or has 1820 // interfering EFLAGS, we can't sink the hardening to it. 1821 if (!X86InstrInfo::isDataInvariant(UseMI) || UseMI.getParent() != MI.getParent() || 1822 isEFLAGSDefLive(UseMI)) 1823 return {}; 1824 1825 // If this instruction defines multiple registers bail as we won't harden 1826 // all of them. 1827 if (UseMI.getDesc().getNumDefs() > 1) 1828 return {}; 1829 1830 // If this register isn't a virtual register we can't walk uses of sanely, 1831 // just bail. Also check that its register class is one of the ones we 1832 // can harden. 1833 Register UseDefReg = UseMI.getOperand(0).getReg(); 1834 if (!canHardenRegister(UseDefReg)) 1835 return {}; 1836 1837 SingleUseMI = &UseMI; 1838 } 1839 1840 // If SingleUseMI is still null, there is no use that needs its own 1841 // checking. Otherwise, it is the single use that needs checking. 1842 return {SingleUseMI}; 1843 }; 1844 1845 MachineInstr *MI = &InitialMI; 1846 while (std::optional<MachineInstr *> SingleUse = SinkCheckToSingleUse(*MI)) { 1847 // Update which MI we're checking now. 1848 MI = *SingleUse; 1849 if (!MI) 1850 break; 1851 } 1852 1853 return MI; 1854 } 1855 1856 bool X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::canHardenRegister(Register Reg) { 1857 // We only support hardening virtual registers. 1858 if (!Reg.isVirtual()) 1859 return false; 1860 1861 auto *RC = MRI->getRegClass(Reg); 1862 int RegBytes = TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*RC) / 8; 1863 if (RegBytes > 8) 1864 // We don't support post-load hardening of vectors. 1865 return false; 1866 1867 unsigned RegIdx = Log2_32(RegBytes); 1868 assert(RegIdx < 4 && "Unsupported register size"); 1869 1870 // If this register class is explicitly constrained to a class that doesn't 1871 // require REX prefix, we may not be able to satisfy that constraint when 1872 // emitting the hardening instructions, so bail out here. 1873 // FIXME: This seems like a pretty lame hack. The way this comes up is when we 1874 // end up both with a NOREX and REX-only register as operands to the hardening 1875 // instructions. It would be better to fix that code to handle this situation 1876 // rather than hack around it in this way. 1877 const TargetRegisterClass *NOREXRegClasses[] = { 1878 &X86::GR8_NOREXRegClass, &X86::GR16_NOREXRegClass, 1879 &X86::GR32_NOREXRegClass, &X86::GR64_NOREXRegClass}; 1880 if (RC == NOREXRegClasses[RegIdx]) 1881 return false; 1882 1883 const TargetRegisterClass *GPRRegClasses[] = { 1884 &X86::GR8RegClass, &X86::GR16RegClass, &X86::GR32RegClass, 1885 &X86::GR64RegClass}; 1886 return RC->hasSuperClassEq(GPRRegClasses[RegIdx]); 1887 } 1888 1889 /// Harden a value in a register. 1890 /// 1891 /// This is the low-level logic to fully harden a value sitting in a register 1892 /// against leaking during speculative execution. 1893 /// 1894 /// Unlike hardening an address that is used by a load, this routine is required 1895 /// to hide *all* incoming bits in the register. 1896 /// 1897 /// `Reg` must be a virtual register. Currently, it is required to be a GPR no 1898 /// larger than the predicate state register. FIXME: We should support vector 1899 /// registers here by broadcasting the predicate state. 1900 /// 1901 /// The new, hardened virtual register is returned. It will have the same 1902 /// register class as `Reg`. 1903 unsigned X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenValueInRegister( 1904 Register Reg, MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator InsertPt, 1905 const DebugLoc &Loc) { 1906 assert(canHardenRegister(Reg) && "Cannot harden this register!"); 1907 1908 auto *RC = MRI->getRegClass(Reg); 1909 int Bytes = TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*RC) / 8; 1910 Register StateReg = PS->SSA.GetValueAtEndOfBlock(&MBB); 1911 assert((Bytes == 1 || Bytes == 2 || Bytes == 4 || Bytes == 8) && 1912 "Unknown register size"); 1913 1914 // FIXME: Need to teach this about 32-bit mode. 1915 if (Bytes != 8) { 1916 unsigned SubRegImms[] = {X86::sub_8bit, X86::sub_16bit, X86::sub_32bit}; 1917 unsigned SubRegImm = SubRegImms[Log2_32(Bytes)]; 1918 Register NarrowStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(RC); 1919 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NarrowStateReg) 1920 .addReg(StateReg, 0, SubRegImm); 1921 StateReg = NarrowStateReg; 1922 } 1923 1924 unsigned FlagsReg = 0; 1925 if (isEFLAGSLive(MBB, InsertPt, *TRI)) 1926 FlagsReg = saveEFLAGS(MBB, InsertPt, Loc); 1927 1928 Register NewReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(RC); 1929 unsigned OrOpCodes[] = {X86::OR8rr, X86::OR16rr, X86::OR32rr, X86::OR64rr}; 1930 unsigned OrOpCode = OrOpCodes[Log2_32(Bytes)]; 1931 auto OrI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(OrOpCode), NewReg) 1932 .addReg(StateReg) 1933 .addReg(Reg); 1934 OrI->addRegisterDead(X86::EFLAGS, TRI); 1935 ++NumInstsInserted; 1936 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting or: "; OrI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 1937 1938 if (FlagsReg) 1939 restoreEFLAGS(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, FlagsReg); 1940 1941 return NewReg; 1942 } 1943 1944 /// Harden a load by hardening the loaded value in the defined register. 1945 /// 1946 /// We can harden a non-leaking load into a register without touching the 1947 /// address by just hiding all of the loaded bits during misspeculation. We use 1948 /// an `or` instruction to do this because we set up our poison value as all 1949 /// ones. And the goal is just for the loaded bits to not be exposed to 1950 /// execution and coercing them to one is sufficient. 1951 /// 1952 /// Returns the newly hardened register. 1953 unsigned X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenPostLoad(MachineInstr &MI) { 1954 MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent(); 1955 const DebugLoc &Loc = MI.getDebugLoc(); 1956 1957 auto &DefOp = MI.getOperand(0); 1958 Register OldDefReg = DefOp.getReg(); 1959 auto *DefRC = MRI->getRegClass(OldDefReg); 1960 1961 // Because we want to completely replace the uses of this def'ed value with 1962 // the hardened value, create a dedicated new register that will only be used 1963 // to communicate the unhardened value to the hardening. 1964 Register UnhardenedReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(DefRC); 1965 DefOp.setReg(UnhardenedReg); 1966 1967 // Now harden this register's value, getting a hardened reg that is safe to 1968 // use. Note that we insert the instructions to compute this *after* the 1969 // defining instruction, not before it. 1970 unsigned HardenedReg = hardenValueInRegister( 1971 UnhardenedReg, MBB, std::next(MI.getIterator()), Loc); 1972 1973 // Finally, replace the old register (which now only has the uses of the 1974 // original def) with the hardened register. 1975 MRI->replaceRegWith(/*FromReg*/ OldDefReg, /*ToReg*/ HardenedReg); 1976 1977 ++NumPostLoadRegsHardened; 1978 return HardenedReg; 1979 } 1980 1981 /// Harden a return instruction. 1982 /// 1983 /// Returns implicitly perform a load which we need to harden. Without hardening 1984 /// this load, an attacker my speculatively write over the return address to 1985 /// steer speculation of the return to an attacker controlled address. This is 1986 /// called Spectre v1.1 or Bounds Check Bypass Store (BCBS) and is described in 1987 /// this paper: 1988 /// https://people.csail.mit.edu/vlk/spectre11.pdf 1989 /// 1990 /// We can harden this by introducing an LFENCE that will delay any load of the 1991 /// return address until prior instructions have retired (and thus are not being 1992 /// speculated), or we can harden the address used by the implicit load: the 1993 /// stack pointer. 1994 /// 1995 /// If we are not using an LFENCE, hardening the stack pointer has an additional 1996 /// benefit: it allows us to pass the predicate state accumulated in this 1997 /// function back to the caller. In the absence of a BCBS attack on the return, 1998 /// the caller will typically be resumed and speculatively executed due to the 1999 /// Return Stack Buffer (RSB) prediction which is very accurate and has a high 2000 /// priority. It is possible that some code from the caller will be executed 2001 /// speculatively even during a BCBS-attacked return until the steering takes 2002 /// effect. Whenever this happens, the caller can recover the (poisoned) 2003 /// predicate state from the stack pointer and continue to harden loads. 2004 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenReturnInstr(MachineInstr &MI) { 2005 MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent(); 2006 const DebugLoc &Loc = MI.getDebugLoc(); 2007 auto InsertPt = MI.getIterator(); 2008 2009 if (FenceCallAndRet) 2010 // No need to fence here as we'll fence at the return site itself. That 2011 // handles more cases than we can handle here. 2012 return; 2013 2014 // Take our predicate state, shift it to the high 17 bits (so that we keep 2015 // pointers canonical) and merge it into RSP. This will allow the caller to 2016 // extract it when we return (speculatively). 2017 mergePredStateIntoSP(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, PS->SSA.GetValueAtEndOfBlock(&MBB)); 2018 } 2019 2020 /// Trace the predicate state through a call. 2021 /// 2022 /// There are several layers of this needed to handle the full complexity of 2023 /// calls. 2024 /// 2025 /// First, we need to send the predicate state into the called function. We do 2026 /// this by merging it into the high bits of the stack pointer. 2027 /// 2028 /// For tail calls, this is all we need to do. 2029 /// 2030 /// For calls where we might return and resume the control flow, we need to 2031 /// extract the predicate state from the high bits of the stack pointer after 2032 /// control returns from the called function. 2033 /// 2034 /// We also need to verify that we intended to return to this location in the 2035 /// code. An attacker might arrange for the processor to mispredict the return 2036 /// to this valid but incorrect return address in the program rather than the 2037 /// correct one. See the paper on this attack, called "ret2spec" by the 2038 /// researchers, here: 2039 /// https://christian-rossow.de/publications/ret2spec-ccs2018.pdf 2040 /// 2041 /// The way we verify that we returned to the correct location is by preserving 2042 /// the expected return address across the call. One technique involves taking 2043 /// advantage of the red-zone to load the return address from `8(%rsp)` where it 2044 /// was left by the RET instruction when it popped `%rsp`. Alternatively, we can 2045 /// directly save the address into a register that will be preserved across the 2046 /// call. We compare this intended return address against the address 2047 /// immediately following the call (the observed return address). If these 2048 /// mismatch, we have detected misspeculation and can poison our predicate 2049 /// state. 2050 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::tracePredStateThroughCall( 2051 MachineInstr &MI) { 2052 MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MI.getParent(); 2053 MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent(); 2054 auto InsertPt = MI.getIterator(); 2055 const DebugLoc &Loc = MI.getDebugLoc(); 2056 2057 if (FenceCallAndRet) { 2058 if (MI.isReturn()) 2059 // Tail call, we don't return to this function. 2060 // FIXME: We should also handle noreturn calls. 2061 return; 2062 2063 // We don't need to fence before the call because the function should fence 2064 // in its entry. However, we do need to fence after the call returns. 2065 // Fencing before the return doesn't correctly handle cases where the return 2066 // itself is mispredicted. 2067 BuildMI(MBB, std::next(InsertPt), Loc, TII->get(X86::LFENCE)); 2068 ++NumInstsInserted; 2069 ++NumLFENCEsInserted; 2070 return; 2071 } 2072 2073 // First, we transfer the predicate state into the called function by merging 2074 // it into the stack pointer. This will kill the current def of the state. 2075 Register StateReg = PS->SSA.GetValueAtEndOfBlock(&MBB); 2076 mergePredStateIntoSP(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, StateReg); 2077 2078 // If this call is also a return, it is a tail call and we don't need anything 2079 // else to handle it so just return. Also, if there are no further 2080 // instructions and no successors, this call does not return so we can also 2081 // bail. 2082 if (MI.isReturn() || (std::next(InsertPt) == MBB.end() && MBB.succ_empty())) 2083 return; 2084 2085 // Create a symbol to track the return address and attach it to the call 2086 // machine instruction. We will lower extra symbols attached to call 2087 // instructions as label immediately following the call. 2088 MCSymbol *RetSymbol = 2089 MF.getContext().createTempSymbol("slh_ret_addr", 2090 /*AlwaysAddSuffix*/ true); 2091 MI.setPostInstrSymbol(MF, RetSymbol); 2092 2093 const TargetRegisterClass *AddrRC = &X86::GR64RegClass; 2094 unsigned ExpectedRetAddrReg = 0; 2095 2096 // If we have no red zones or if the function returns twice (possibly without 2097 // using the `ret` instruction) like setjmp, we need to save the expected 2098 // return address prior to the call. 2099 if (!Subtarget->getFrameLowering()->has128ByteRedZone(MF) || 2100 MF.exposesReturnsTwice()) { 2101 // If we don't have red zones, we need to compute the expected return 2102 // address prior to the call and store it in a register that lives across 2103 // the call. 2104 // 2105 // In some ways, this is doubly satisfying as a mitigation because it will 2106 // also successfully detect stack smashing bugs in some cases (typically, 2107 // when a callee-saved register is used and the callee doesn't push it onto 2108 // the stack). But that isn't our primary goal, so we only use it as 2109 // a fallback. 2110 // 2111 // FIXME: It isn't clear that this is reliable in the face of 2112 // rematerialization in the register allocator. We somehow need to force 2113 // that to not occur for this particular instruction, and instead to spill 2114 // or otherwise preserve the value computed *prior* to the call. 2115 // 2116 // FIXME: It is even less clear why MachineCSE can't just fold this when we 2117 // end up having to use identical instructions both before and after the 2118 // call to feed the comparison. 2119 ExpectedRetAddrReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(AddrRC); 2120 if (MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Small && 2121 !Subtarget->isPositionIndependent()) { 2122 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::MOV64ri32), ExpectedRetAddrReg) 2123 .addSym(RetSymbol); 2124 } else { 2125 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::LEA64r), ExpectedRetAddrReg) 2126 .addReg(/*Base*/ X86::RIP) 2127 .addImm(/*Scale*/ 1) 2128 .addReg(/*Index*/ 0) 2129 .addSym(RetSymbol) 2130 .addReg(/*Segment*/ 0); 2131 } 2132 } 2133 2134 // Step past the call to handle when it returns. 2135 ++InsertPt; 2136 2137 // If we didn't pre-compute the expected return address into a register, then 2138 // red zones are enabled and the return address is still available on the 2139 // stack immediately after the call. As the very first instruction, we load it 2140 // into a register. 2141 if (!ExpectedRetAddrReg) { 2142 ExpectedRetAddrReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(AddrRC); 2143 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::MOV64rm), ExpectedRetAddrReg) 2144 .addReg(/*Base*/ X86::RSP) 2145 .addImm(/*Scale*/ 1) 2146 .addReg(/*Index*/ 0) 2147 .addImm(/*Displacement*/ -8) // The stack pointer has been popped, so 2148 // the return address is 8-bytes past it. 2149 .addReg(/*Segment*/ 0); 2150 } 2151 2152 // Now we extract the callee's predicate state from the stack pointer. 2153 unsigned NewStateReg = extractPredStateFromSP(MBB, InsertPt, Loc); 2154 2155 // Test the expected return address against our actual address. If we can 2156 // form this basic block's address as an immediate, this is easy. Otherwise 2157 // we compute it. 2158 if (MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Small && 2159 !Subtarget->isPositionIndependent()) { 2160 // FIXME: Could we fold this with the load? It would require careful EFLAGS 2161 // management. 2162 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::CMP64ri32)) 2163 .addReg(ExpectedRetAddrReg, RegState::Kill) 2164 .addSym(RetSymbol); 2165 } else { 2166 Register ActualRetAddrReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(AddrRC); 2167 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::LEA64r), ActualRetAddrReg) 2168 .addReg(/*Base*/ X86::RIP) 2169 .addImm(/*Scale*/ 1) 2170 .addReg(/*Index*/ 0) 2171 .addSym(RetSymbol) 2172 .addReg(/*Segment*/ 0); 2173 BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(X86::CMP64rr)) 2174 .addReg(ExpectedRetAddrReg, RegState::Kill) 2175 .addReg(ActualRetAddrReg, RegState::Kill); 2176 } 2177 2178 // Now conditionally update the predicate state we just extracted if we ended 2179 // up at a different return address than expected. 2180 int PredStateSizeInBytes = TRI->getRegSizeInBits(*PS->RC) / 8; 2181 auto CMovOp = X86::getCMovOpcode(PredStateSizeInBytes); 2182 2183 Register UpdatedStateReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(PS->RC); 2184 auto CMovI = BuildMI(MBB, InsertPt, Loc, TII->get(CMovOp), UpdatedStateReg) 2185 .addReg(NewStateReg, RegState::Kill) 2186 .addReg(PS->PoisonReg) 2187 .addImm(X86::COND_NE); 2188 CMovI->findRegisterUseOperand(X86::EFLAGS, /*TRI=*/nullptr)->setIsKill(true); 2189 ++NumInstsInserted; 2190 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inserting cmov: "; CMovI->dump(); dbgs() << "\n"); 2191 2192 PS->SSA.AddAvailableValue(&MBB, UpdatedStateReg); 2193 } 2194 2195 /// An attacker may speculatively store over a value that is then speculatively 2196 /// loaded and used as the target of an indirect call or jump instruction. This 2197 /// is called Spectre v1.2 or Bounds Check Bypass Store (BCBS) and is described 2198 /// in this paper: 2199 /// https://people.csail.mit.edu/vlk/spectre11.pdf 2200 /// 2201 /// When this happens, the speculative execution of the call or jump will end up 2202 /// being steered to this attacker controlled address. While most such loads 2203 /// will be adequately hardened already, we want to ensure that they are 2204 /// definitively treated as needing post-load hardening. While address hardening 2205 /// is sufficient to prevent secret data from leaking to the attacker, it may 2206 /// not be sufficient to prevent an attacker from steering speculative 2207 /// execution. We forcibly unfolded all relevant loads above and so will always 2208 /// have an opportunity to post-load harden here, we just need to scan for cases 2209 /// not already flagged and add them. 2210 void X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::hardenIndirectCallOrJumpInstr( 2211 MachineInstr &MI, 2212 SmallDenseMap<unsigned, unsigned, 32> &AddrRegToHardenedReg) { 2213 switch (MI.getOpcode()) { 2214 case X86::FARCALL16m: 2215 case X86::FARCALL32m: 2216 case X86::FARCALL64m: 2217 case X86::FARJMP16m: 2218 case X86::FARJMP32m: 2219 case X86::FARJMP64m: 2220 // We don't need to harden either far calls or far jumps as they are 2221 // safe from Spectre. 2222 return; 2223 2224 default: 2225 break; 2226 } 2227 2228 // We should never see a loading instruction at this point, as those should 2229 // have been unfolded. 2230 assert(!MI.mayLoad() && "Found a lingering loading instruction!"); 2231 2232 // If the first operand isn't a register, this is a branch or call 2233 // instruction with an immediate operand which doesn't need to be hardened. 2234 if (!MI.getOperand(0).isReg()) 2235 return; 2236 2237 // For all of these, the target register is the first operand of the 2238 // instruction. 2239 auto &TargetOp = MI.getOperand(0); 2240 Register OldTargetReg = TargetOp.getReg(); 2241 2242 // Try to lookup a hardened version of this register. We retain a reference 2243 // here as we want to update the map to track any newly computed hardened 2244 // register. 2245 unsigned &HardenedTargetReg = AddrRegToHardenedReg[OldTargetReg]; 2246 2247 // If we don't have a hardened register yet, compute one. Otherwise, just use 2248 // the already hardened register. 2249 // 2250 // FIXME: It is a little suspect that we use partially hardened registers that 2251 // only feed addresses. The complexity of partial hardening with SHRX 2252 // continues to pile up. Should definitively measure its value and consider 2253 // eliminating it. 2254 if (!HardenedTargetReg) 2255 HardenedTargetReg = hardenValueInRegister( 2256 OldTargetReg, *MI.getParent(), MI.getIterator(), MI.getDebugLoc()); 2257 2258 // Set the target operand to the hardened register. 2259 TargetOp.setReg(HardenedTargetReg); 2260 2261 ++NumCallsOrJumpsHardened; 2262 } 2263 2264 INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass, PASS_KEY, 2265 "X86 speculative load hardener", false, false) 2266 INITIALIZE_PASS_END(X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass, PASS_KEY, 2267 "X86 speculative load hardener", false, false) 2268 2269 FunctionPass *llvm::createX86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass() { 2270 return new X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass(); 2271 } 2272