Searched hist:"5 c9d9a1b3a540779ba3f2d5e81150b2d92dcb74a" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /linux/arch/arm/mm/ |
| H A D | pmsa-v7.c | diff 5c9d9a1b3a540779ba3f2d5e81150b2d92dcb74a Mon Oct 16 13:59:15 CEST 2017 Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> ARM: 8712/1: NOMMU: Use more MPU regions to cover memory
PMSAv7 defines curious alignment requirements to the regions:
- size must be power of 2, and
- region start must be aligned to the region size
Because of that we currently adjust lowmem bounds plus we assign
only one MPU region to cover memory all these lead to significant amount of
memory could be wasted. As an example, consider 64Mb of memory at
0x70000000 - it fits alignment requirements nicely; now, imagine that
2Mb of memory is reserved for coherent DMA allocation, so now Linux is
expected to see 62Mb of memory... and here annoying thing happens -
memory gets truncated to 32Mb (we've lost 30Mb!), i.e. MPU layout
looks like:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
This patch tries to allocate as much as possible MPU slots to minimise
amount of truncated memory. Moreover, with this patch MPU subregions
starting to get used. MPU subregions allow us reduce the number of MPU
slots used. For example given above, MPU layout looks like:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
1: base 0x72000000, size 0x1000000
2: base 0x73000000, size 0x1000000, disable subreg 7 (0x73e00000 - 0x73ffffff)
Where without subregions we'd get:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
1: base 0x72000000, size 0x1000000
2: base 0x73000000, size 0x800000
3: base 0x73800000, size 0x400000
4: base 0x73c00000, size 0x200000
To achieve better layout we fist try to cover specified memory as is
(maybe with help of subregions) and if we failed, we truncate memory
to fit alignment requirements (so it occupies one MPU slot) and
perform one more attempt with the reminder, and so on till we either
cover all memory or run out of MPU slots.
Tested-by: Szemző András <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
|
| /linux/arch/arm/include/asm/ |
| H A D | mpu.h | diff 5c9d9a1b3a540779ba3f2d5e81150b2d92dcb74a Mon Oct 16 13:59:15 CEST 2017 Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> ARM: 8712/1: NOMMU: Use more MPU regions to cover memory
PMSAv7 defines curious alignment requirements to the regions:
- size must be power of 2, and
- region start must be aligned to the region size
Because of that we currently adjust lowmem bounds plus we assign
only one MPU region to cover memory all these lead to significant amount of
memory could be wasted. As an example, consider 64Mb of memory at
0x70000000 - it fits alignment requirements nicely; now, imagine that
2Mb of memory is reserved for coherent DMA allocation, so now Linux is
expected to see 62Mb of memory... and here annoying thing happens -
memory gets truncated to 32Mb (we've lost 30Mb!), i.e. MPU layout
looks like:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
This patch tries to allocate as much as possible MPU slots to minimise
amount of truncated memory. Moreover, with this patch MPU subregions
starting to get used. MPU subregions allow us reduce the number of MPU
slots used. For example given above, MPU layout looks like:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
1: base 0x72000000, size 0x1000000
2: base 0x73000000, size 0x1000000, disable subreg 7 (0x73e00000 - 0x73ffffff)
Where without subregions we'd get:
0: base 0x70000000, size 0x2000000
1: base 0x72000000, size 0x1000000
2: base 0x73000000, size 0x800000
3: base 0x73800000, size 0x400000
4: base 0x73c00000, size 0x200000
To achieve better layout we fist try to cover specified memory as is
(maybe with help of subregions) and if we failed, we truncate memory
to fit alignment requirements (so it occupies one MPU slot) and
perform one more attempt with the reminder, and so on till we either
cover all memory or run out of MPU slots.
Tested-by: Szemző András <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
|