Searched refs:util_sum (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
141 u32 util_sum = rq->cfs.avg.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt() local142 util_sum += rq->avg_rt.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()143 util_sum += rq->avg_dl.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()154 if (util_sum >= divider) in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()
119 sa->util_sum = decay_load((u64)(sa->util_sum), periods); in accumulate_sum()147 sa->util_sum += contrib << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; in accumulate_sum()267 WRITE_ONCE(sa->util_avg, sa->util_sum / divider); in ___update_load_avg()
3903 * Because of rounding, se->util_sum might ends up being +1 more than3904 * cfs->util_sum. Although this is not a problem by itself, detaching3906 * util_avg (~1ms) can make cfs->util_sum becoming null whereas3909 * Check that util_sum is still above its lower bound for the new3911 * sync, we are only sure that util_sum must be above or equal to4265 if (sa->util_sum) in load_avg_is_decayed() 4539 delta_sum = (long)new_sum - (long)se->avg.util_sum; in update_tg_cfs_util() 4540 se->avg.util_sum = new_sum; in update_tg_cfs_util() 4619 running_sum = se->avg.util_sum >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; in update_tg_cfs_load() 4889 se->avg.util_sum in attach_entity_load_avg() [all...]
1348 P(se.avg.util_sum); in proc_sched_show_task()
514 u32 util_sum; member