Searched refs:util_sum (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
141 u32 util_sum = rq->cfs.avg.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt() local142 util_sum += rq->avg_rt.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()143 util_sum += rq->avg_dl.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()154 if (util_sum >= divider) in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()
4782 * Because of rounding, se->util_sum might ends up being +1 more than in reweight_entity() 4783 * cfs->util_sum. Although this is not a problem by itself, detaching in reweight_entity() 4785 * util_avg (~1ms) can make cfs->util_sum becoming null whereas in reweight_entity() 4788 * Check that util_sum is still above its lower bound for the new4790 * sync, we are only sure that util_sum must be above or equal to5299 if (sa->util_sum)5580 delta_sum = (long)new_sum - (long)se->avg.util_sum; in migrate_se_pelt_lag() 5581 se->avg.util_sum = new_sum; in migrate_se_pelt_lag() 5661 running_sum = se->avg.util_sum >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; in update_cfs_rq_load_avg() 5931 se->avg.util_sum in remove_entity_load_avg() [all...]
514 u32 util_sum; member