Searched refs:util_sum (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
141 u32 util_sum = rq->cfs.avg.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt() local142 util_sum += rq->avg_rt.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()143 util_sum += rq->avg_dl.util_sum; in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()154 if (util_sum >= divider) in update_idle_rq_clock_pelt()
119 sa->util_sum = decay_load((u64)(sa->util_sum), periods); in accumulate_sum()147 sa->util_sum += contrib << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; in accumulate_sum()267 WRITE_ONCE(sa->util_avg, sa->util_sum / divider); in ___update_load_avg()
4530 * Because of rounding, se->util_sum might ends up being +1 more than4531 * cfs->util_sum. Although this is not a problem by itself, detaching4533 * util_avg (~1ms) can make cfs->util_sum becoming null whereas4536 * Check that util_sum is still above its lower bound for the new4538 * sync, we are only sure that util_sum must be above or equal to4892 if (sa->util_sum)5166 delta_sum = (long)new_sum - (long)se->avg.util_sum; in util_est_update() 5167 se->avg.util_sum = new_sum; in util_est_update() 5246 running_sum = se->avg.util_sum >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; in util_fits_cpu() 5516 se->avg.util_sum [all...]
1406 P(se.avg.util_sum);
514 u32 util_sum; member