Searched refs:subtrees (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
654 cache_subtree = &cache->req_key_tree.subtrees[i]; in clean_fn()840 cache_tree->subtrees = kvzalloc_objs(struct pcache_cache_subtree, in cache_tree_init()842 if (!cache_tree->subtrees) { in cache_tree_init()848 struct pcache_cache_subtree *cache_subtree = &cache_tree->subtrees[i]; in cache_tree_init()870 cache_subtree = &cache_tree->subtrees[i]; in cache_tree_clear()887 kvfree(cache_tree->subtrees); in cache_tree_exit()
105 struct pcache_cache_subtree *subtrees; member358 return &cache_tree->subtrees[0]; in get_subtree()360 return &cache_tree->subtrees[off >> PCACHE_CACHE_SUBTREE_SIZE_SHIFT]; in get_subtree()
76 is a bunch of subtrees visible in dcache and locking happens on those.80 several scenarios, starting from "somebody mounted two nested subtrees
204 and not any subtrees. This is legacy behaviour, the default212 entire subtrees, without requiring explicit downward214 subtrees from one another, while retaining free competition215 within those subtrees. This should have been the default3392 effective low, which makes delegation of subtrees possible. It also